Ok, I’ll take the time to make it perfectly clear to you how I came to the conclusion you are trying to give a false impression.
kjflorida wrote:
HUMMM. So Latshaw is saying they can not be sued for linking to sites "since it would link to sites around the world where downloaded content may violate copyright agreements in this country (or others), " Does anyone know if a user could be sued for using the sites ?
You have taken this quote from Latshaw out of context and changed it’s meaning. Here is the full quote:
Quote:
After warnings from multiple colleagues in the karaoke industry that the iCroons.com project would invite lawsuits from music publishers since it would link to sites around the world where downloaded content may violate copyright agreements in this country (or others), we decided to abandon the iCroons project indefinitely as mentioned in a previous post.
HUMMM…. So Latshaw never said that, it was his karaoke industry colleagues that warned a music publisher might try to initiate a lawsuit with such an accusation. There was no statement from Latshaw that icroons would violate any copyrights anywhere. You twisted his words to make it look that way.
Perhaps that was unintentional, but then:
kjathena wrote:
thoose interested may want to look at this thread also.....
viewtopic.php?f=26&t=24388After twisting Latshaw’s words to make it look like his intentions were less than honorable, you posted a link drawing a comparison of his activity to that of someone who is on the wrong side of the law.
kjathena wrote:
I seem to recall a lawsuit brought by SONY against a reseller...sorry I can not locate the link presently ...if they are willing to do this do you really think they (or another artist or publisher) wont to decide to push the matter if the current actions against karaoke theft are not effective ? Karaoke may be a micro market but it does bring cash into those with rights to be preserved (singers/song writers/record labels). Since the karaoke manufactures are not being able to licence the quantity of music (as in the past), they have to make more per licence granted. this is another way thieves are costing ALL Kj's (similar to stores raising priced to make up for shoplifters).
This again implies that icroons will be selling illegal tracks.
earthling12357 wrote:
kjathena wrote:
earthling12357 wrote:
So, are you making a case that it's somehow inappropriate for Soundchoice to post links to Karaoke Channel and Clark Music on their website?
Sound choice links to Karaoke channel and they list "home Use only"
Clark Music created custom discs...perfectly legal to import 1 copy of discs from overseas.
Different animals in each situation.
Please tell me how that is so different from what Latshaw has proposed doing with icroons?
It seems you are still implying that Latshaw is going to do something illegal.
Is that the message you are trying to get across?
kjathena wrote:
Earthling12357,
I asked 9 different people read and critique my post midway tru the last page. Each one fully comprehended the post(even those who may not agree with my veiwpoint). maybe you just read too quickly .......I hope that if you re-read it you will gain understanding.
So rather than answer my question, you choose to insult my ability to comprehend.
Well, your comprehension is clearly questionable, as I have laid out here, beginning with your inability to correctly grasp the context of the first sentence in the original post.
Now let me add some further context for you with a quote from Latshaw’s facebook page explaining this very complicated concept:
Quote:
Ever wish there was a single web site you could go to and search a database of every known karaoke track ever made and instantly find the song you're looking for and where to legally get it?
Well, we're building it now... ...stay tuned
Notice it doesn’t say anything there about selling downloads.
Notice it doesn’t say anything about linking to anything illegal.
Notice it clearly states “where to legally get it”
What is suggested is a search engine where you can search for a karaoke song and find out where to legally aquire it.
So, one more question for you to ignore:
Did you read too quickly and misunderstand, or are you against this idea and suggesting it to be somehow illegal?