KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - Summary of meeting with Kurt Slep.... Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


premium-member

Offsite Links


It is currently Wed Jan 15, 2025 1:24 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 4:56 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
earthling12357 wrote:
Quote:
While it was acknowledged by all in attendance that it would be nice to see more singers and venues involved in reporting piracy, it is the KJ’s that are the most informed and the most qualified to identify and report pirates.


It would seem that KJs typically are not well informed at all. Considering that the area has so many karaoke venues, it's pathetic that only a dozen people would show up for a meeting so directly related to the happenings in their industry on a local level.

I'm pretty sure, with only one day's notice, I could announce a meeting on the ramifications of trimming ear hair without proper licensing and still pull attendence of twenty or more.

I think it proves that the issues behind the music are unimportant to the typical KJ, venue, or singer and that there are very, very few KJs that take the profession seriously.


I think they are informed. I think the matter of a small turn out came down to

1) Pirates aren't going to show up and risk getting a bullseye painted on themselves. They are the largest group of KJ's in the area.
2) Many legal folks simply don't want to be involved and also don't want to cause attention to be drawn to themselves.
3) Some smaller percentage of people that just don't care.

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 5:30 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
Bazza wrote:
c. staley wrote:
The gem series is a rental, your rental fee will reduce in 2 1/2 years.

No. I license the GEM set, I do not rent them.


If you stop paying for your "license" then they will repossess the goods - likewise - if you stop paying for your "rental" they will prepossess the goods.... what's the difference?

The biggest difference is that if you have a "lease" and you continue to make your payments, you have the right to maintain that until the termination of the period of time of the lease. A license however, can be terminated by the owner (SC) at any time at will.

Bazza wrote:
c. staley wrote:
You don't own it, you never will.

Yet, I can use them for the rest of my life without additional cost and I am confident they will never leave my hands. Six of one, half dozen of another.

not true. You will incur a cost – even though it is small – every single year.

Bazza wrote:
c. staley wrote:
And while it is true that your next licensing payment will be in 2 1/2 years, your initial expense was how many thousands?


My initial expense was less than half the cost of "buying" an identical SC base set of obsolete, hard discs. Like you did.

How much did you spend on five sets of SC discs that are collecting dust in your garage?

I disagree. Didn't you trade in some discs you had purchased for credit? So you handed them something that you no longer had to pay for, in trade for something that you now have to pay for every year.

The difference is, my initial expense was a one time "purchase" that I do not have to ever return.

Bazza wrote:
c. staley wrote:
There is also no guarantee that your licensing payment into a half years will remain small.


Of course there is. It is in the agreement. My worst case scenario is $33 a year...forever. I do not believe I will ever see a bill, and if I do? $33. "Big Whoop" as my 12 year old says.

That may be true on your initial rental, but I can imagine if they ever start actually producing music again, that new music will not be covered by the current agreement and I will bet you the price will go up.

Bazza wrote:
c. staley wrote:
Although it appears as though your licensing payment will not increase, please read your contract. It specifically states that terms and conditions can change at any time.


You are confusing terms & your armchair lawyer skills are lacking. Please consult a professional. Besides, Mr. Harrington has debunked this fear-mongering tactic previously on this very forum. Perhaps I should "Pull a Staley" and take lots of screen shots as "Insurance" as I believe you said? :lol: <-It's a joke!


I believe it was also Mr. Harrington that said the Las Vegas attorneys had that matter "well in hand" just a couple of days before sound choice got "the boot."

You are free to believe whatever it is that makes you feel better.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon May 14, 2012 5:41 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
chrisavis wrote:
I think they are informed. I think the matter of a small turn out came down to

1) Pirates aren't going to show up and risk getting a bullseye painted on themselves. They are the largest group of KJ's in the area.
2) Many legal folks simply don't want to be involved and also don't want to cause attention to be drawn to themselves.
3) Some smaller percentage of people that just don't care.

-Chris


You forgot one:

4) Most legal KJ's aren't interested in hearing more whiny propaganda.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 12:47 am 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster

Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:53 pm
Posts: 187
Been Liked: 5 times
I pick number 2 and 4


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 6:05 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am
Posts: 3312
Images: 0
Been Liked: 610 times
c. staley wrote:
If you stop paying for your "license" then they will repossess the goods - likewise - if you stop paying for your "rental" they will prepossess the goods.... what's the difference?


I'm not going to have any payments. It's a Peppercorn clause. That's the point.

c. staley wrote:
A license however, can be terminated by the owner (SC) at any time at will.


Your belief that SC can just decide one day to change their mind and demand my discs back is incorrect. Now. If I break the terms by pirating, copying or otherwise stealing the music...that is a different story. I have no plans to do this however.

c. staley wrote:
Not true. You will incur a cost – even though it is small – every single year.


LOL. OK, I will concede that the worst case scenario is $30. I think I can handle that. 20 minutes work at a single gig. :lol:

c. staley wrote:
I disagree. Didn't you trade in some discs you had purchased for credit? So you handed them something that you no longer had to pay for, in trade for something that you now have to pay for every year.


I was offered retail price for discs I bought on eBay. I actually made a profit, further reducing the overall GEM cost. In fact the profit I made on those discs will cover my potential $30 annual fee for over a decade. :wink:

c. staley wrote:
The difference is, my initial expense was a one time "purchase" that I do not have to ever return.


I will never have to return my GEM discs. I could pay $30 a year for thirty more years (LONG after they are obsolete) and still not pay as much as you have for your precious "ownership". I have use of the songs for as long as I like, for half what you paid. "The difference" is that my discs are still making me money while yours are rotting in your basement. And I am the fool? :lol:

Too many people romanticize their discs. These are not antiques, real estate or vintage cars. They are not investments that one day you will sell for big profit. They are not heirlooms that will stay in your family for generations. They are simply karaoke songs to use in my business. I can use them for as long as I like, for half the price of "ownership".

Bazza wrote:
That may be true on your initial rental, but I can imagine if they ever start actually producing music again, that new music will not be covered by the current agreement and I will bet you the price will go up.


Any potential new music SC may or may not produce has ZERO to do with my GEM set and license.

c. staley wrote:
You are free to believe whatever it is that makes you feel better.


I am free to continue to use the best base set in the business, for as long as I like, for half the cost of purchasing obsolete CD+G's. It's a no-brainer.


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 6:13 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:05 pm
Posts: 3376
Been Liked: 172 times
Lonman wrote:
c. staley wrote:
first of all, removing sound choice – and removing chart busters from your library – is not going to put any KJ out of business. Patrons go to the clubs to sing and if they are so concerned about the brand that they sing from, they will purchase their own and bring it with them if that is necessary. Otherwise, the rest of the patrons are there to sing and have fun with their friends – they really don't care about brand of song.

How is that going to help, if the KJ pulls those brands that a customer specifically wants to sing from? You say they can just buy their own and bring it, but what if it is the same tracks the kj pulled - like yourself you wouldn't allow someone to sing from a SC disc they brought? Only solution for those singers is to find another show that WILL allow them to sing from their tracks - or the kj has those tracks.


Didn't a poll on here say about 50% wouldn't come back to a place that didn't have Sound Choice?....... :lol: Chasing away half of your customers doesn't sound like a good business practice..... :)


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 6:50 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm
Posts: 5107
Location: Phoenix Az
Been Liked: 1279 times
not necessarily JR, how many singers come on to this forum?
your average everyday singers do not, those singers that do have their own library of discs anyway and would bring the requested SC disc with them, and if they wont sing because it is not SC, they are not singing for the fun of it, but to come make a one man show of it.

_________________
Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:07 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
I am so tired of seeing this crap that you can't run a gig without SC and CB. I know a few hosts here that have NO SC and only a few CB discs, and use DK, SGB, SPC, Pioneer, MM, All Star, Party Tyme, and other brands, and have perfectly successful shows for YEARS!! SC and CB are not the end all be all of the karaoke world. I don't even think Chartbuster is even that good. Sound Choice isn't perfect, either.

People around here aren't dependent on brands. I have had exactly 1 person ask for Chartbuster. I already told y'all about that. I have to say that CB's version of Gimme Three Steps is terrible.

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:16 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
I don't think anyone stated you couldn't run a successful show without certain brands, however good quality music does in fact attract better quality singers. The lesser brands typically resemble the songs but with no real quality usually which attracts the stereotypical 'karaoke' singer that may be no better than avg.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:29 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:10 pm
Posts: 933
Location: Twin Lake, MI
Been Liked: 59 times
c. staley wrote:
chrisavis wrote:
I think they are informed. I think the matter of a small turn out came down to

1) Pirates aren't going to show up and risk getting a bullseye painted on themselves. They are the largest group of KJ's in the area.
2) Many legal folks simply don't want to be involved and also don't want to cause attention to be drawn to themselves.
3) Some smaller percentage of people that just don't care.

-Chris


You forgot one:

4) Most legal KJ's aren't interested in hearing more whiny propaganda.



And 5) KJ's are reluctant to provide any additional information because many provided KAPA and simliar "organizations" (<---- ha ha) information faithfully for many months until it became apparent the organization didn't really seem to exist and that any additional efforts on their parts would be another waste of effort.

_________________
I'm not a cheerleader, but I paid for my pom poms with my own money!


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue May 15, 2012 9:38 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 14, 2010 7:10 pm
Posts: 933
Location: Twin Lake, MI
Been Liked: 59 times
johnny reverb wrote:
Lonman wrote:
c. staley wrote:
first of all, removing sound choice – and removing chart busters from your library – is not going to put any KJ out of business. Patrons go to the clubs to sing and if they are so concerned about the brand that they sing from, they will purchase their own and bring it with them if that is necessary. Otherwise, the rest of the patrons are there to sing and have fun with their friends – they really don't care about brand of song.

How is that going to help, if the KJ pulls those brands that a customer specifically wants to sing from? You say they can just buy their own and bring it, but what if it is the same tracks the kj pulled - like yourself you wouldn't allow someone to sing from a SC disc they brought? Only solution for those singers is to find another show that WILL allow them to sing from their tracks - or the kj has those tracks.


Didn't a poll on here say about 50% wouldn't come back to a place that didn't have Sound Choice?....... :lol: Chasing away half of your customers doesn't sound like a good business practice..... :)


Only a fairly small percentage of singers know the difference between manu's or that the music we play isn't really created by the original artist/s. Trust me, as many years as I have been involved in karaoke, my guess is certainly less than 20% - and that's being generous. Statistically speaking, your 50% statistic - I guarantee that it based on a sample that is not acceptable according to legitimate statistical methods.

What we have learned in this forum is simply that CB, PHM & SC are the most reliable manus - and that's what makes them the "Best". Other manus are just as good (and sometime better) at most of their renditions, it's just that SC/CB/PHM have a better % of their songs that are what we consider to be acceptable.

Using other manu's is perfectly acceptable - as long as you use an acceptable version of the song (and that's the hard part). You just have to have a standard operating procedure for evaluating songs and replacing the ones that aren't good renditions with other versions. There's a lot of songs we all have multiple versions of!

_________________
I'm not a cheerleader, but I paid for my pom poms with my own money!


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 3:23 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
Lonman wrote:
I don't think anyone stated you couldn't run a successful show without certain brands, however good quality music does in fact attract better quality singers. The lesser brands typically resemble the songs but with no real quality usually which attracts the stereotypical 'karaoke' singer that may be no better than avg.

Personally, I like the average singers better than the really good ones. The average singers come out to have fun and drink. The really good singers think they special and should be treated that way.

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 5:44 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm
Posts: 4433
Location: New York City
Been Liked: 757 times
Smoothedge69 wrote:
Personally, I like the average singers better than the really good ones. The average singers come out to have fun and drink. The really good singers think they special and should be treated that way.


Please do not write such GENERALIZED and INSULTING comments like that!!!

I consider myself to be a really good Singer (not an American Idol contender, but nevertheless, really good). I have NEVER thought or acted like I was special, and I have NEVER asked for special treatment!!! Those that know and have met me here on this forum could vouch for that. The most I have ever asked for was to play from my discs, and considering how many other singers (good or bad) do that as well, it's not what I would consider to be anything special.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 10:48 am 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
Smoothedge69 wrote:
Lonman wrote:
I don't think anyone stated you couldn't run a successful show without certain brands, however good quality music does in fact attract better quality singers. The lesser brands typically resemble the songs but with no real quality usually which attracts the stereotypical 'karaoke' singer that may be no better than avg.

Personally, I like the average singers better than the really good ones. The average singers come out to have fun and drink. The really good singers think they special and should be treated that way.

That in itself is stereotypical thinking. Good singers come out and spend just as much and party just as much - however the difference is - they are actually nice to listen to the entire night. As opposed to the screamers & the off key singer on the longest songs they can find.
I also have seen some of the worst singers nurse Cokes or get waters/coffee all night & complain about others singning "their" songs. It goes both ways.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 11:31 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
Smoothedge69 wrote:
I am so tired of seeing this crap that you can't run a gig without SC and CB. I know a few hosts here that have NO SC and only a few CB discs, and use DK, SGB, SPC, Pioneer, MM, All Star, Party Tyme, and other brands, and have perfectly successful shows for YEARS!! SC and CB are not the end all be all of the karaoke world. I don't even think Chartbuster is even that good. Sound Choice isn't perfect, either.

People around here aren't dependent on brands. I have had exactly 1 person ask for Chartbuster. I already told y'all about that. I have to say that CB's version of Gimme Three Steps is terrible.



You've just described me to a tee. I've NEVER had more than a tiny percentage of either label, and have been successful for decades. As a matter of fact, I KNOW that it's the host that creates it's own monster. Those who are brand dependant have TRAINED their singers to be comfortable with just that brand. They stuck themselves, and no longer have enough confidence in their own abilities as hosts to branch out.

If one truly believes losing any particular brand of karaoke will make a serious impact on their show, one might consider re-inspecting their hosting skills, improve where needed, grow a set, and make the show dependent on the HOST, as it is supposed to be. If not, then there is no reason for a venue to hire you over anyone else, or pay you more.

I carry a lot of different mfrs. discs, and the diversity is one of the draws of my show. We have brand dependent KJ's here as well, and the major complaint is that the singers, having tasted diversity, are not thrilled with the 1-2 brand KJs- leaving me with a BIGGER piece of the pie.

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 3:21 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
JoeChartreuse wrote:
Smoothedge69 wrote:
I am so tired of seeing this crap that you can't run a gig without SC and CB. I know a few hosts here that have NO SC and only a few CB discs, and use DK, SGB, SPC, Pioneer, MM, All Star, Party Tyme, and other brands, and have perfectly successful shows for YEARS!! SC and CB are not the end all be all of the karaoke world. I don't even think Chartbuster is even that good. Sound Choice isn't perfect, either.

People around here aren't dependent on brands. I have had exactly 1 person ask for Chartbuster. I already told y'all about that. I have to say that CB's version of Gimme Three Steps is terrible.



You've just described me to a tee. I've NEVER had more than a tiny percentage of either label, and have been successful for decades. As a matter of fact, I KNOW that it's the host that creates it's own monster. Those who are brand dependant have TRAINED their singers to be comfortable with just that brand. They stuck themselves, and no longer have enough confidence in their own abilities as hosts to branch out.

If one truly believes losing any particular brand of karaoke will make a serious impact on their show, one might consider re-inspecting their hosting skills, improve where needed, grow a set, and make the show dependent on the HOST, as it is supposed to be. If not, then there is no reason for a venue to hire you over anyone else, or pay you more.

I carry a lot of different mfrs. discs, and the diversity is one of the draws of my show. We have brand dependent KJ's here as well, and the major complaint is that the singers, having tasted diversity, are not thrilled with the 1-2 brand KJs- leaving me with a BIGGER piece of the pie.



I have seen this Brand vs Host debate many times over. It amazes me how narrow people's view is on this.

It seems to me that many here feel that what applies in their particular 10-20 mile radius around where they live and host is EXACTLY the way the rest of the karaoke universe is like when that could not be further from the truth.

Just like China is different from the US which is different from South America, you will find that karaoke hosts, singers, expectations and tastes will vary widely from geography to geography as well.

Karaoke in the Dallas area is different from SoCal is different from Seattle. There are even big differences in karaoke between Seattle and "The Eastside" which is the area east of Lake Washington.

To say that in ALL areas, that pulling Sound Choice should not have an impact is to ignore that Sound Choice is the predominant manufacturer available in that area.

We all know that a great host can more than make up for a song selection that is lacking, but it also works out that a great song selection can help out an average host. Not to mention, how many "great" karaoke hosts are out there anyway? I only know of a few hosts that I would call great in 20 years of doing karaoke. The vast majority are adequate to pretty good. I consider myself to be nothing more than an adequate host and know that anyone I hire will likely be "better" at hosting than I am. I happen to be perfectly fine with that.

With respect to everyone here, what we do is not rocket science.

For those that run with zero Sound Choice, come do my show, and see how much explaining you have to do. Sure, after a while you can wean the singers off to other brands, but you will shed a lot of singers in the mean time.

For those of you in the southern part of the US, pull all of your Chartbuster tracks and watch the country singers start going elsewhere.

Also, for those of you that have been in business for years and years and have "regulars", try hosting in a downtown metro area where the "regulars" only come in once a month and 90% of the singers you have are brand new people every single week.

There is no one size, fits all model, that works for all hosts in all parts of the US. Otherwise we would all charge the exact same rate, have the exact same songs, and do things the exact same way.

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 5:16 pm 
Offline
Super Duper Poster
Super Duper Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:18 pm
Posts: 2593
Been Liked: 294 times
The mechanics of running a show might not be rocket science but the intangibles like reading and relating to the crowd and keeping up their spirits and the momentum are things that may come naturally to some but have to be studied and learned by others. A person can land in a well populated bar and just ride the crowd momentum and people will tell you how great or fun you are. But it is when you have those discouraging slow nights or when no one wants to sing or your baby boomer crowd just got replaced over night by 21 year old obscenity spewing pukers who just want the juke box on and please leave that you realize your strengths and weaknesses as far as hosting abilitites.

I actually like the adrenaline of the multi-tasking (we are disc so there is alot of it) but I don't think that the people part is easy at all. More power to the hosts who have that party mentality/high emotional IQ thing going for them. We have gotten used to name calling shows with the great influx of hosts the past few years. The entertaining put on a show host is more of a rarity and the host who can entertain without being obtrusive is even more rare and not something that even rocket science could quantify.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 5:46 pm 
Offline
Super Duper Poster
Super Duper Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:18 pm
Posts: 2593
Been Liked: 294 times
Oops--back to SC. Our show has a certain personality. We do strange things for humor sometimes and we like to foster dancing. Our singers may not be brand conscious but they do notice when things "aren't right"--especially the guitars. When you get a really good track that invokes the feeling of the original then the feet hit the dance floor. Now sometimes we get lucky--our $2 close out Legends Billy Idol gets them going--but in general it's the SCs--both the songs that are available and the execution--that have the right feel for dance floor excitement. The show might not live or die by them but they do enhance what we are tyring to do.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed May 16, 2012 9:27 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster

Joined: Thu Mar 13, 2008 5:44 pm
Posts: 949
Been Liked: 11 times
chrisavis wrote:
It is very long so I felt it more appropriate to post as a blog entry.

http://afairrotation.wordpress.com/2012 ... n-seattle/

Feel free to extract out of it pieces you wish to comment on and post here to this thread.

-Chris


Well, Kurt is in the digital music content business/entertainment business. If I were him and I were in Seattle, I would try and hook up with a rather well-known softare company in Redmon that makes things like Xbox and Kinect. He might be able to collaborate with them on secure streaming and content storage techniques, and might also be able to collaborate on new karaoke hardware ideas.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu May 17, 2012 2:47 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm
Posts: 5107
Location: Phoenix Az
Been Liked: 1279 times
chrisavis wrote:
We all know that a great host can more than make up for a song selection that is lacking, but it also works out that a great song selection can help out an average host.
-Chris


but we are not talking about song selection, we are talking about "if you don't have this brand, go f@#k yourself i will go elsewhere."

just as an example, have you heard the 3 Doors Down SC stuff? has that engineer ever used a compressor before? The chorus is literally 4dB quiter than the verses.....the part where you are to sing louder the music gets quieter. I use the PHM, it is actually singable.
And do we really need to discuss the CB Skynyrd disc?
SC is not god, CB is not god, no brand is. how many people would rather sing off of Pioneer laser disc with the horribly cheesy videos (that i kinda dig for their cheesiness) instead of an SC version because it is dead on musically?

_________________
Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 55 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 364 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech