|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
Bazza
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 1:36 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
jamkaraoke @ Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:23 am wrote: #1) Sometimes it's not what is said it's How it is said. Agreed. jamkaraoke @ Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:23 am wrote: #2) Although the quality of the Karaoke Singer is rising , the majority of singers are still out just to have FUN at their FAVORITE VENUE. Whether the KJ's system is OK or outstanding usually has no bearing on the fun to be had I agree 100% that the KJ's personality is a huge part of the equation and if the guy down the street with the best equipment is a boring "name caller", you will beat him. BUT with KJ's on equal footing I would have to disagree. People DO notice sound quality. jamkaraoke @ Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:23 am wrote: #3) Business is not about doing things cheap ..BUT SMART. Sometimes smart is buying $100 Shures and sometimes it may not be depending on the KJ and THEIR BUSINESS. Maybe buying 2 PG58 is better ?? I suppose. Part of of this pie is that I notice quality and appreciate it. jamkaraoke @ Tue Jul 27, 2010 9:23 am wrote: #4) If a KJ walks in with a FenderPAssport - vocopro mics and SGB discs and works a steady gig without complaints ... Is not that GOOD ?
Hey, the guy I spoke of plays in a little dirt-hole of a bar, and get's no complaints. That may be fine for him, but I set the bar higher. I don't strive for "no complaints". I strive for rave reviews, a packed house and the "place to be". Having quality equipment is a part of making that happen.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Micky
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:53 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 6:13 pm Posts: 1625 Location: Montreal, Canada Been Liked: 34 times
|
Bazza @ Mon Jul 26, 2010 10:03 am wrote: jamkaraoke @ Mon Jul 26, 2010 8:48 am wrote: Next are the people who feel compelled to belittle anyone who uses anything but a Shure SM58.
I'm amazed to see all these great comments about the sm58, I had one of which I sold to a friend and of which he sold it to his friend... because be both think it wasn't a fit for our voices and that for less you can get much better:roll: But, I have to admit it his a good mic for karaoke but man is it easy to find a better one for the same price or less
|
|
Top |
|
|
mckyj57
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 6:34 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:24 pm Posts: 5576 Location: Cocoa Beach Been Liked: 122 times
|
TopherM @ Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:30 pm wrote: I have had my pair for 6 years, and with a new top grill ($8.00), they would still look new and I could probably sell them for $40-50.
That's true -- you pay $40.00 for a mic and you can't get $2.00 for it on EBay. Buy a *real* SM58 for $99.00, and you can get $70.00 for it if you will show its provenance and guarantee it's not fake. It has real value, instantly converted to cash.
There is the one downside of an SM58 -- you have to be real careful, because there are a lot of counterfeits out there.
_________________ [color=#ffff55]Mickey J.[/color] Alas for those who never sing, but die with all their music in them. -- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Karen K
|
Posted: Tue Jul 27, 2010 8:20 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:56 am Posts: 2621 Location: Canuck, eh. Been Liked: 0 time
|
jamkaraoke @ Tue Jul 27, 2010 11:15 am wrote: Dear Karen
Who are you calling STUPID ?
Wasn't it some 'famous' politician who used that phrase a few years ago?
|
|
Top |
|
|
jeffsw6
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:06 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:19 pm Posts: 793 Location: New Albany, IN Been Liked: 0 time
|
TopherM @ Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:30 pm wrote: I don't know if this is off topic slightly, but if you plan on being a LONG TERM karaoke host, like 2+ years of 1-2 gigs a week, you can't do many cost analysis/comparisons where the Shure SM58 doesn't come out ahead in durability, reliability, and overall cost of ownership. It is simply the most practical mic out there.
I think that thinking should apply to everything: new songs, good sound equipment, keeping books in good shape, etc. etc.
To use Lonman as an example, I bet he's been in business for twenty years, and he posts regularly about the latest upgrade he is making to his sound system. If he still had the same gear that he started with twenty years ago, he probably wouldn't be very successful. Well, except SM58s, which never seem to break or become outdated!
_________________ Jeff Wheeler, moonlight DJ/KJ
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:16 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
jeffsw6 @ Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:06 pm wrote: To use Lonman as an example, I bet he's been in business for twenty years, and he posts regularly about the latest upgrade he is making to his sound system. If he still had the same gear that he started with twenty years ago, he probably wouldn't be very successful. Well, except SM58s, which never seem to break or become outdated!
I think the only original piece of gear (besides the mics) I still have and have working in my rig is the Alesis Midiverb 3. Not because it was a killer piece of equipment - although it is not a POS, but I know all the parameters pretty much inside & out and can make it do exactly what I need it to.
Everything else has been replaced or changed out over the years. Speaker replacement & Driverack are next on the list.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
johnny reverb
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:27 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:05 pm Posts: 3376 Been Liked: 172 times
|
Churning my way through my "Midnight Special" collection over the past year or so......It seems like the vast majority of the prefprmers used a sm58.....am I mistaken?
Today top preformers use wireless mics that cost 40K or so.....guess that makes me, spending 4 or 5 hundred bucks on one, still in the Little League....
|
|
Top |
|
|
letitrip
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 3:50 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:53 am Posts: 1462 Location: West Bend, WI Been Liked: 3 times
|
jeffsw6 @ Wed Jul 28, 2010 5:06 pm wrote: TopherM @ Tue Jul 27, 2010 3:30 pm wrote: I don't know if this is off topic slightly, but if you plan on being a LONG TERM karaoke host, like 2+ years of 1-2 gigs a week, you can't do many cost analysis/comparisons where the Shure SM58 doesn't come out ahead in durability, reliability, and overall cost of ownership. It is simply the most practical mic out there. I think that thinking should apply to everything: new songs, good sound equipment, keeping books in good shape, etc. etc. To use Lonman as an example, I bet he's been in business for twenty years, and he posts regularly about the latest upgrade he is making to his sound system. If he still had the same gear that he started with twenty years ago, he probably wouldn't be very successful. Well, except SM58s, which never seem to break or become outdated!
True to some extent but sometimes not (and now I'm speaking about pro-audio gear in general, not just specific to Karaoke). For instance, the Yamaha SPX90 was introduced in 1983. It's still one of the most popular reverb units (for drums in particular) and you'll find it in many racks and even some riders yet today. We've still got plenty of them in service. The SDE-1000 is another unit that's older than the hills and still very popular, I had two of them in a rack I used this past weekend. The PM4000 is almost 20 years old and still an extremely popular and widely used FOH desk.
And that's the way it is with pro-audio. When guys find something that just works and makes their job easier, they continue to use it. When something comes out that is supposed to be better, guys try it. If it proves to sound and work better, then it will replace the older stuff, but many times the preference is to stick with what works.
_________________ DJ Tony
Let It Rip Karaoke
|
|
Top |
|
|
ripman8
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:14 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:34 pm Posts: 3616 Location: Toronto Canada Been Liked: 146 times
|
jeffsw6 @ Fri Jul 23, 2010 4:27 pm wrote: I don't understand why anyone wants to cheap out on microphones to the extent that they are buying $30 mics instead of a $100 mic which is the industry-standard and the most widely-used live vocal microphone. I look at it this way: my songs cost many thousands of dollars, so why would I keep spending money on songs and worry about the cost difference between $30 mics and $100 mics?
Agree!
First of all I(I in caps) KNOW! 2nd, I know they are durable, won't crap out. Easy for me to advertise that I use the BEST equipment to make sure eveyone has a karaoke experience to remember. I have 2 pieces of Behringer equipment. One is used in my ( in caps again) can tell the difference when I'm at other shows singing.
If I owned a restarurant, would I use generic ingredients if I thought most customers wouldn't know?
_________________ KingBing Entertainment C'mon Up! I have a song for you!!! [font=MS Sans Serif][/font]
|
|
Top |
|
|
ripman8
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:45 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:34 pm Posts: 3616 Location: Toronto Canada Been Liked: 146 times
|
Karen K @ Tue Jul 27, 2010 12:51 pm wrote: It's the economy stupid -- right now the people with the most discretionary dollars to spend are the ones steering the karaoke ship, at least in our area. Those with more discretionary funds are a little fussier, again at least in our area. They have a choice as to the shows they will attend. They are not tolerant of krappyoke and a new show that pops up in a nice place will get visited once but if the host, the equipment, and their ability to run it, plus the song selection are lacking in some way, the show may last 3-4 weeks until the venue figures out that it isn't going to fly.
Hence, why go into that battle only partially armed? Spend a little more on mics because it is the 'voice' of your system. Literally. Consider spending money on better quality music; again, SGB will work, no doubt, and some is actually better than others, but the discretionary spender who has their choice will seek out the best shows...at least in our area, where there are DOZENS of shows on any given night within a 25-mile radius or less. If your collection is lacking, beef it up a little at a time by request.
The successful shows, at least in our area, have good equipment with an *effects option and good mics, a host with more than basic knowledge of sound mixing, a decent selection of songs to choose from, a venue that is respectable, and a schedule that is easy to remember.
* Re: Effects. I've had more than one really, really good singer mention to me after they sing on my system that they sound much better than at such-and-such a place. Believe it or not, it is the careful use of effects that is the difference, and the use of 58s. Such a simple concept. ///////////////////
EXACTLY! A talented singer sang at a show of mine a couple months ago and went on and on about how much better my show was then this other KJ'S show that she attends regurly. Two weeks ago I received a call from the owner of the other bar. I am hosting karaoke for their 15th year anniversary party this Saturday. Out of the blue. Hmmm? It wasn't just the mics, but they were mentioned to me twice. Guess what he uses?????
Guess how I got thie gig. Guess what the owner was hinting to while hiring me for this "one time"?
_________________ KingBing Entertainment C'mon Up! I have a song for you!!! [font=MS Sans Serif][/font]
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:49 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
letitrip @ Wed Jul 28, 2010 4:50 pm wrote: True to some extent but sometimes not (and now I'm speaking about pro-audio gear in general, not just specific to Karaoke). For instance, the Yamaha SPX90 was introduced in 1983. It's still one of the most popular reverb units (for drums in particular) and you'll find it in many racks and even some riders yet today. We've still got plenty of them in service. The SDE-1000 is another unit that's older than the hills and still very popular, I had two of them in a rack I used this past weekend. The PM4000 is almost 20 years old and still an extremely popular and widely used FOH desk.
True! One of my 'upgrades' were to 2 Symetrix 501 compressor/limiters that haven't been openly available for probably 15 years. Still one of the best compressors i've used in it's league - and $100 for 2 of them in near mint condition was a steal in itself.
The original Universal Audio 1176 or LA2 (much of their gear for that matter), came out in the late 60's early 70's and the originals are still used in high end studios today even though there are now reproductions of those models made today. Just because it's old doesn't mean it's not good. Much of my personal replacements were from lower grade (IMO) that I wanted a better quality.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
pxranger
|
Posted: Thu Jul 29, 2010 11:41 am |
|
|
Major Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Nov 11, 2003 7:48 pm Posts: 71 Location: U.S.A. Been Liked: 13 times
|
Shure 58's are the only mics I will put on my stands...well, with the exception of audix or heil. You get what you pay for.
|
|
Top |
|
|
jeffsw6
|
Posted: Fri Jul 30, 2010 3:17 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Apr 01, 2009 2:19 pm Posts: 793 Location: New Albany, IN Been Liked: 0 time
|
pxranger @ Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:41 pm wrote: Shure 58's are the only mics I will put on my stands...well, with the exception of audix or heil. You get what you pay for.
There are plenty of great mics out there. The tricky thing with karaoke is whatever we use has to be okay for everyone, and okay when the singers have no clue how to correctly use a microphone.
I use Heil PR20 and PR22s, for example; but these mics do not behave well when singers "cup" the mic. Much worse than an SM58. However, when used correctly, they are significantly better for most singers.
_________________ Jeff Wheeler, moonlight DJ/KJ
|
|
Top |
|
|
rsstoner
|
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 5:05 pm |
|
|
Major Poster |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 1:04 am Posts: 50 Been Liked: 0 time
|
Just to make this all sooooo much more fun..................... I spoke with our previous Karaoke host and last night he loaned me 1 of his sm58's, I used it along with a $9.00 First Act microphone bought at WallyWorld, (both corded btw) as I stated before we have a woman here that can SING!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! asked her to try both, she said personally she could tell a diff, but no one in our crowd noticed............. and even funnier, both mic's being there, our singers grabbed the cheapo $9.00 one time and again, said they liked the way it "felt" in their hands (I know, I know, THATS an entirely new thread subject!!!)............. so again, in my Opinion, It's the Fun you have, not the equipment you're using................ unless you are a Pro that host's major events and have many talented singers.................................... So, to each their own. Peace, S.
|
|
Top |
|
|
BigJer
|
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 8:39 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:42 pm Posts: 1064 Been Liked: 92 times
|
I found this video comparison of the PG 58, SM 58 and Beta-58 online and thought it was very interesting and you can decide for yourselves how much difference there is in the sound, clarity, durability, handling noise, etc.... Enjoy
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5VuADSPDk8
|
|
Top |
|
|
BigJer
|
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 9:42 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:42 pm Posts: 1064 Been Liked: 92 times
|
Hmm must be some distortion that only affects people with British accents
|
|
Top |
|
|
Dr Fred
|
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 10:44 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:22 pm Posts: 1128 Location: Athens, GA Been Liked: 4 times
|
It does not take "abuse" to wear out a cheap mic. Nearly everything has an expected working lifespan. If you only expect to run mics 30-40 hours a year, then a cheap mic may last you years. But if you are running one or more shows a week and hundreds of hours of use a year, the cheap mics will wear out.
Just feel the weight difference between a SM58 and some of the discount mics you can buy. The SM58 can weigh 2 times as much or more, and that is because the parts are more solidly built.
|
|
Top |
|
|
rsstoner
|
Posted: Sat Aug 07, 2010 10:49 pm |
|
|
Major Poster |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 19, 2010 1:04 am Posts: 50 Been Liked: 0 time
|
Oh........... and just too make things clear, if people start to like my karaoke, and I keep having fun, and I decide to Step Up and start making some money from this, I have been making notes and keeping the details available on equipment, manu's, quality, etc....... so pro/con or otherwise, Thank You All for EVERY bit of information you've given!!! Peace, S.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Sun Aug 08, 2010 1:53 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
BigJer @ Sat Aug 07, 2010 9:39 pm wrote: I found this video comparison of the PG 58, SM 58 and Beta-58 online and thought it was very interesting and you can decide for yourselves how much difference there is in the sound, clarity, durability, handling noise, etc.... Enjoy http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=u5VuADSPDk8
Noticeable difference between the PG & SM, between the SM & Beta, noticeable, but not quite as dramatic - provided everything was eq'd the same.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 464 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|