|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
ShyGuy
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:32 am |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:36 pm Posts: 177 Location: Miserable Town Been Liked: 0 time
|
Quote: Steven Kaplan: Yet at .054 can't an atty get him off on not being over the legal limit, and file a counter-suit ? Oh f*ck, another law suit. Anyhow that’s not the point. The limit of 0.08 is just a number. If an officer of the law suspects you being intoxicated, he can take you in, you don’t have to be over the limit. On another note, what would the reason be for a lawsuit? Quote: Isis: Being in a bar does not exempt one from the state laws against public intoxication. That’s the law, drunk in public, and it does not give the cops too much power, they just enforce the law. Why do you have to get drunk in the first place? Can’t you just enjoy a few drinks without getting stupidly drunk? Quote: Keith02: Now you guys understand why I built the disco/bar at home.....Yep, I got a dance pole, lights and sound all at home A Disco? , that is sooooo 80’s! I guess you have a lot of Cleanex tissues and hand lotion as well. Quote: Steven Kaplan: How do they determine "arrest-worthy intoxication" though Rich? There are simple tests like the touch your nose or walk the line. Quote: Steven Kaplan: Assume I go out, have a limp, or perhaps a slight balance problem, have a speech impediment to begin with, yet have a designated driver, meaning I have NO intent on getting behind the wheel of a car? Assumption is the mother of all F*ck-up’s. Most people don’t have all the symptoms you just mentioned. You are just trying to justify 1% of the population. Why ask so many questions? Let the cops pick them up, and apologize later if you made a mistake. Quote: Steven Kaplan: Sobriety checkpoints are the way to go, not to invade the space... It’s normally to late then. Quote: Steven Kaplan: I DO NOT want to blow into the breathalyzer. Assuming I must submit to a test, to me this is a CLEAR violation. If I can save 1 life by “violating” you “rights” then I really don’t give a $hit about your bruised little ego. Quote: Isis: I can certainly see where he would be singled out if they even say hello to him.....And that would be a huge lawsuit waiting to happen.... ANOTHER f*cking lawsuit! What is up with the people just trying to sue someone? What is up with using words like “lawsuit” and “unconstitutional”?
_________________ Money is better than poverty, if only for financial reasons.
|
|
Top |
|
|
EElvis
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 6:39 am |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 9:01 am Posts: 841 Location: New Orleans Been Liked: 0 time
|
Careful now, Next Texas will be the first to have alcohol Free bars........... Imagine that for business.
_________________ ______________________________________
I'm Not Dead yet...... But every day Im getting Closer !
|
|
Top |
|
|
Odie
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:24 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Sat Jul 09, 2005 12:46 pm Posts: 3377 Been Liked: 0 time
|
Quote: ShyGuy @ Fri Mar 24, 2006 5:32 am Quote: Steven Kaplan: I DO NOT want to blow into the breathalyzer. Assuming I must submit to a test, to me this is a CLEAR violation. If I can save 1 life by “violating” you “rights” then I really don’t give a $hit about your bruised little ego. Quote: Isis: I can certainly see where he would be singled out if they even say hello to him.....And that would be a huge lawsuit waiting to happen.... ANOTHER f*cking lawsuit! What is up with the people just trying to sue someone? What is up with using words like “lawsuit” and “unconstitutional”?
ShyGuy ~
When given an issue, what guidelines do you go by when deciding that privacy and constitutional rights can be superseded by other regulations?
|
|
Top |
|
|
Babs
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:41 am |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 06, 2005 11:37 am Posts: 7979 Location: Suburbs Been Liked: 0 time
|
Arresting people in a bar for being drunk is like arresting someone in a mall for shopping. I don't drink I I think this is stupid.
I wish they were in my bar Wed. night. I had a guy knock over a stool 3 times and fall under the bar at least 4 times from being so drunk. He tried to start a fight as soon as he walked in the door already blasted. The owner didn't care because he knows the guy doesn't drive. I asked him twice to kick him out with no luck.
_________________ [shadow=pink][glow=deepskyblue]. . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . .
[updown] ~*~ MONKEY BUSINESS KARAOKE~*~ [/shadow][/updown][/glow]
|
|
Top |
|
|
ShyGuy
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:48 am |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 08, 2006 2:36 pm Posts: 177 Location: Miserable Town Been Liked: 0 time
|
Odie @ Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:24 am wrote: ShyGuy ~ When given an issue, what guidelines do you go by when deciding that privacy and constitutional rights can be superseded by other regulations? My guidelines are very simple actually:
Amendment I - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Amendment IV - Search and seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.
Amendment XVIII - Liquor abolished. Ratified 1/16/1919. Repealed by Amendment XXI, 12/5/1933. History 1. After one year from the ratification of this article the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors within, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the United States and all territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited. 2. The Congress and the several States shall have concurrent power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. 3. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of the several States, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the submission hereof to the States by the Congress.
_________________ Money is better than poverty, if only for financial reasons.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Singing Squid
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:53 am |
|
|
Super Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 12:46 pm Posts: 1564 Songs: 3 Location: Fort Worth, Texas Been Liked: 0 time
|
ShyGuy @ Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:48 am wrote: Odie @ Fri Mar 24, 2006 7:24 am wrote: ShyGuy ~ When given an issue, what guidelines do you go by when deciding that privacy and constitutional rights can be superseded by other regulations? My guidelines are very simple actually: Amendment I - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression. Ratified 12/15/1791. Note Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.Amendment IV - Search and seizure. Ratified 12/15/1791. The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.Amendment XVIII - Liquor abolished. Ratified 1/16/1919. Repealed by Amendment XXI, 12/5/1933. History 1. After one year from the ratification of this article the manufacture, sale, or transportation of intoxicating liquors within, the importation thereof into, or the exportation thereof from the United States and all territory subject to the jurisdiction thereof for beverage purposes is hereby prohibited. 2. The Congress and the several States shall have concurrent power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation. 3. This article shall be inoperative unless it shall have been ratified as an amendment to the Constitution by the legislatures of the several States, as provided in the Constitution, within seven years from the date of the submission hereof to the States by the Congress.
OK, so where are the other 24 Amendements?
Pay PARTICULAR attention to IX, X, and XXI in this situation!!
Edit: I would also add that IMHO, your citing of Amendment I is more than relevant here...the "lawsuits" that you disparage would be an attempt to "petition the government for redress of grievances"...the grievance in this case being an agency of the government (State government, in this case) that has gone a little too far in their zeal.
_________________ [glow=white][scroll]Live, laugh, and love today--just in case tomorrow doesn't make it[/scroll][/glow]
|
|
Top |
|
|
ok What Now
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:08 am |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Sun Feb 22, 2004 4:53 pm Posts: 803 Location: Gulfport Ms Been Liked: 0 time
|
not sure if ALL agree with me but i think we should hang up Shyguy by the B--s...
not sure who u r but man u suck the life out of people.....go get drunk r something, so i can sue ur A--......you take care now ya hear?
|
|
Top |
|
|
Isis
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:21 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 11:11 am Posts: 2641 Location: Seattle, WA Been Liked: 1 time
|
By people filing lawsuits this challenges the legal system and forces laws to be changed...sometimes for the good and sometimes for the bad...There is a process...Precedents need to be set and laws governing this type of activity need to be more defined.....
There has to be a measurement system in place and right now there is not..Applying one set of laws for a different situation is not right IMO....Enforcing vague laws are dangerous to all parties involved...Not just the ones that are directly involved...it affects all of us.....
I don't beleive in frivoulous lawsuits...People that slip on a wet spot in a store...A person that spills hot coffee on themselves etc....but when you have a situation that needs to be clarified and precidence set, YES....By all means use the legal system to accomplish that......
<edit> I feel compelled to remind everyone of a lawsuit that was filed some 30+ years ago that continues to set precidence in all of our states...It is still challenged to this day....Please keep in mind I do not want to discuss this case, nor will I. I just wanted to point out how filing a lawsuit can actually change things...I think a lot of people IMO forget that a lawsuit can be a very powerful tool in our great country....
With all that being said
Roe vs Wade
A challenge can take many forms...whether it be by lawsuit, protest...etc....Can anyone imagine where we would all be now if Rosa Parks had just moved to the back of the bus???
_________________ Will sing or fish for food!!I'm not quite right!!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Charmin_Gibson
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:37 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 10:32 am Posts: 7385 Images: 8 Location: Out West Been Liked: 47 times
|
Isis @ Thu Mar 23, 2006 8:12 pm wrote: Ummm..hey...gosh...I...think....um..I may have forgotten to tell you that I have invited evryone here to crash when we have the KS get together in June...Well not everyone just Lil Mizz, xxxtal, crank, kappy, keith, squid, lonman and I can't remember the rest..I just told them all they have to do is buy you beer....Remember when I told you that??? Right???? Hmm. I may be in the doghouse instead of Dave.... Dave have fun sleeping in my spot tonight... ... LMAO LMAO LMAO LMAO WooHoo..... I'm in on the invite. Move over Rich, cause I'm gonna share the bed too, I don't like sleeping on couches, and I'm sure not bunkin' in the same room as all those unruly men!! I'll make sure and bring lots of beer, so you can sleep where you fall....... Wait, in TEXAS, that MIGHT get me arrested!! And I'd live out the nightmare my dad told me about. And, now that I'm "on topic"....... Quote: SHYGUY: Why do you have to get drunk in the first place? Can’t you just enjoy a few drinks without getting stupidly drunk? Quote: STEVEN KAPLAN: what this means is if you are a smaller framed female, let's say around 105 lbs and 5' 2", you are illegal in a public place, and drunk at .08, and can be hauled out as things currently are stated after 1.5 standard sized glasses of beer..
That is where the real unfairness of it would come in. I could sit beside my husband, he could have 6 to my 1.... and I would be the first hauled off for "public drunk". For me, to drink- anything (literally) over a beer every hour or so.... means to get "drunk". Atleast, what would LEGALLY be considered "drunk" by state law. I may not be "stumbling around"... but it would certainly throw me over the limit. Some men, can hold liquor better, and drink all night and still walk straight- not appearing to be "legally drunk". So under this law, for me to have 4-5 beers during a complete karaoke show could get me thrown in jail. So no, some of us can't "enjoy a few drinks without getting drunk". Atleast a BIT drunk.
Not fair to the little guy at all.
And don't bite my A$$ for that comment, it's NOT like I go out getting drunk all the time, I'm just stating a point.
_________________ ♥ Laugh your heart out, dance in the rain. Cherish the memories, ignore the pain. Love and learn, forget and forgive. Because you only have one life to live. ♥
|
|
Top |
|
|
phatrat
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:46 am |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 01, 2006 8:36 pm Posts: 320 Location: Texas Been Liked: 0 time
|
It just amazes me that some people can get in to conversations, start "quoting" the constitution and still sound like .....
The issue is not getting drunk in a bar or anything about drinking. The issue is the government coming into an establishment and randomly picking people who they believe are violating certain laws.
Drinking is legal. Being in public is legal. Do you have the right to get drunk and act like an a$$. Sure you do as long as you don't "interfere" with other's peoples drunk. Do you have the right to drive in that condition? absolutely not.
I agree with ok what now. Why does shy guy have to be so vicious in his attacks on people's comments, yet when a comment is made about buy a sense of humor, he gets offended.
i smell double standard.
My wife, Isis, is absolutely right in the law suit thing. You don't have to sue for money, you can sue for cause. Which is perfectly acceptable!
_________________ [scroll]we're men, manly men, we're men in tights[/scroll]
|
|
Top |
|
|
Isis
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:50 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 11:11 am Posts: 2641 Location: Seattle, WA Been Liked: 1 time
|
Lil Mizz Attitude @ Fri Mar 24, 2006 11:37 am wrote: [ That is where the real unfairness of it would come in. I could sit beside my husband, he could have 6 to my 1.... and I would be the first hauled off for "public drunk". For me, to drink- anything (literally) over a beer every hour or so.... means to get "drunk". Atleast, what would LEGALLY be considered "drunk" by state law. I may not be "stumbling around"... but it would certainly throw me over the limit. Some men, can hold liquor better, and drink all night and still walk straight- not appearing to be "legally drunk". So under this law, for me to have 4-5 beers during a complete karaoke show could get me thrown in jail. So no, some of us can't "enjoy a few drinks without getting drunk". Atleast a BIT drunk. Not fair to the little guy at all. And don't bite my A$$ for that comment, it's NOT like I go out getting drunk all the time, I'm just stating a point.
I am right there with you Lil Mizz...I don't go out to get drunk but I do have a small frame and I imagine I do go over the legal limit very quickly, just based on my size....It's not like I am doing shots and carrying on all the time...But then I take Rich with me so that I can have a few drinks, have fun and not worry about killing myself or someone else on the way home....If I have felt that I was over the .08 limit I have had people come get me, taken a cab etc....I have also taken my share of people who were over the limit home as well.....
I don't feel that we are all DRUNKS because we like to go out and socialize and have a few adult beverages....But the reality is that we do have to be careful with going over that limit and because people of smaller size have a lower tolerance they have to be especially careful and can go over the limit very quickly even with a beer an hour.....
I don't know about anyone here, but I have left a beer to sit for an hour and it gets even more gross when it it warm (fyi, I don't like beer). But I will have one occasionally...
_________________ Will sing or fish for food!!I'm not quite right!!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Charmin_Gibson
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:02 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 10:32 am Posts: 7385 Images: 8 Location: Out West Been Liked: 47 times
|
phatrat @ Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:46 am wrote: The issue is not getting drunk in a bar or anything about drinking. The issue is the government coming into an establishment and randomly picking people who they believe are violating certain laws.
Well, the issue here is about "getting drunk in a bar, or drinking"..... If you're sitting in a bar, sipping ice water, and listening to the juke box, this "newly twisted law" is not going to apply to you. Though, I do know what you're saying..... you're looking more at the "our god dayum government" side of this. But, I'm not gonna be one of those who point the finger at the white house for every law that goes awry.... I'm sure this new thing happening in Texas is NOT a direct order from Bush. This thing they're doing IS stupid. It doesn't make sense. Police patroling the parking lot to see who wobbles to their car/down the street walking/trying to mount a bicycle seat...... I can see that. But coming INTO the bar to say "Oops, you're getting drunk, you might do something unruly, we best haul you off to jail before you DO..." is unfair and unjust. It totally blows to hail the "innocent until proven guilty" theory. Quote: I agree with ok what now. Why does shy guy have to be so vicious in his attacks on people's comments, yet when a comment is made about buy a sense of humor, he gets offended. To each his own, it's not the first time someone has stated their opinion so baldly, and certainly wont be the last: Quote: Assumption is the mother of all F*ck-up’s.
And I've heard THAT one somewhere before.
_________________ ♥ Laugh your heart out, dance in the rain. Cherish the memories, ignore the pain. Love and learn, forget and forgive. Because you only have one life to live. ♥
|
|
Top |
|
|
Charmin_Gibson
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:06 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 10:32 am Posts: 7385 Images: 8 Location: Out West Been Liked: 47 times
|
Isis @ Fri Mar 24, 2006 9:50 am wrote: I am right there with you Lil Mizz...I don't go out to get drunk but I do have a small frame and I imagine I do go over the legal limit very quickly, just based on my size....It's not like I am doing shots and carrying on all the time...But then I take Rich with me so that I can have a few drinks, have fun and not worry about killing myself or someone else on the way home....If I have felt that I was over the .08 limit I have had people come get me, taken a cab etc....I have also taken my share of people who were over the limit home as well.....
I don't feel that we are all DRUNKS because we like to go out and socialize and have a few adult beverages....But the reality is that we do have to be careful with going over that limit and because people of smaller size have a lower tolerance they have to be especially careful and can go over the limit very quickly even with a beer an hour.....
I don't know about anyone here, but I have left a beer to sit for an hour and it gets even more gross when it it warm (fyi, I don't like beer). But I will have one occasionally...
Yeah, they have "light" beer.... but they need to make a "lightweight" beer for us little people, hahaha. Maybe 4 ounce cans or something? (like those tiny half size Pepsi cans you can buy at some stores) :rofl4:
_________________ ♥ Laugh your heart out, dance in the rain. Cherish the memories, ignore the pain. Love and learn, forget and forgive. Because you only have one life to live. ♥
|
|
Top |
|
|
Isis
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:08 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 11:11 am Posts: 2641 Location: Seattle, WA Been Liked: 1 time
|
Excellent idea on the lightweight beer......We should be on American Inventor with that one....... :beermates:
_________________ Will sing or fish for food!!I'm not quite right!!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Singing Squid
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:10 am |
|
|
Super Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 12:46 pm Posts: 1564 Songs: 3 Location: Fort Worth, Texas Been Liked: 0 time
|
They already MAKE flyweight beer...O'Douls, Coors Cutter, Kingsbury, etc...but that's NO fun!! :no: :no: :no:
_________________ [glow=white][scroll]Live, laugh, and love today--just in case tomorrow doesn't make it[/scroll][/glow]
|
|
Top |
|
|
Charmin_Gibson
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:18 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 10:32 am Posts: 7385 Images: 8 Location: Out West Been Liked: 47 times
|
SingingSquid @ Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:10 am wrote: They already MAKE flyweight beer...O'Douls, Coors Cutter, Kingsbury, etc...but that's NO fun!! :no: :no: :no:
Yeah, and why not just go to the bar and sniff empty cans and get the same effect? LOL
I said "lightweight"..... not "flyweight"..... give us a little credit for being SOMEwhat able to handle liquor. :D
_________________ ♥ Laugh your heart out, dance in the rain. Cherish the memories, ignore the pain. Love and learn, forget and forgive. Because you only have one life to live. ♥
|
|
Top |
|
|
Isis
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:18 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 16, 2006 11:11 am Posts: 2641 Location: Seattle, WA Been Liked: 1 time
|
SingingSquid @ Fri Mar 24, 2006 12:10 pm wrote: They already MAKE flyweight beer...O'Douls, Coors Cutter, Kingsbury, etc...but that's NO fun!! :no: :no: :no:
That is non alch beer.....You might as well drink something that taste good like a soft drink or fruit juice.......
_________________ Will sing or fish for food!!I'm not quite right!!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Charmin_Gibson
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:31 am |
|
Joined: Sun May 23, 2004 10:32 am Posts: 7385 Images: 8 Location: Out West Been Liked: 47 times
|
Isis @ Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:18 am wrote: SingingSquid @ Fri Mar 24, 2006 12:10 pm wrote: They already MAKE flyweight beer...O'Douls, Coors Cutter, Kingsbury, etc...but that's NO fun!! :no: :no: :no: That is non alch beer.....You might as well drink something that taste good like a soft drink or fruit juice.......
I know, I remember when my dad was trying to quit drinking..... I would have Coors Cutters in the cupboard, and when he went off the wagon, after he had one or two (he ALWAYS poured it in a glass).... I'd start refilling it with the Cutters. It kept a night of music & beer from turning into a 3 day whirligig.
It does taste real though.
_________________ ♥ Laugh your heart out, dance in the rain. Cherish the memories, ignore the pain. Love and learn, forget and forgive. Because you only have one life to live. ♥
|
|
Top |
|
|
Singing Squid
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:51 am |
|
|
Super Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Jan 17, 2006 12:46 pm Posts: 1564 Songs: 3 Location: Fort Worth, Texas Been Liked: 0 time
|
Lil Mizz Attitude @ Fri Mar 24, 2006 12:18 pm wrote: SingingSquid @ Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:10 am wrote: They already MAKE flyweight beer...O'Douls, Coors Cutter, Kingsbury, etc...but that's NO fun!! :no: :no: :no: Yeah, and why not just go to the bar and sniff empty cans and get the same effect? LOL I said "lightweight"..... not "flyweight"..... give us a little credit for being SOMEwhat able to handle liquor. :D Quote: That is non alch beer.....You might as well drink something that taste good like a soft drink or fruit juice.......
I wasn't recommending it!! Near-beer almost always has a burnt after-taste that ruins the experience anyway, not to mention the buzz-kill.
Is 3.2 beer still around? The "low-alcohol" stuff? Didn't there used to be a brand called "LA", for "Low Alcohol"?
_________________ [glow=white][scroll]Live, laugh, and love today--just in case tomorrow doesn't make it[/scroll][/glow]
|
|
Top |
|
|
Steven Kaplan
|
Posted: Fri Mar 24, 2006 10:55 am |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 03, 2005 6:48 pm Posts: 13645 Been Liked: 11 times
|
Hey BIlly.
<had to edit> . I'm getting like Lil miss attitude now.
_________________ Northeast United States runner up for the "Singing Hall of Shame".
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 557 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|