Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums https://mail.karaokescenemagazine.net/forums/ |
|
Wireless S-Video Signal https://mail.karaokescenemagazine.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=1&t=15852 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | karaoke for food..... [ Mon Feb 09, 2009 10:47 am ] |
Post subject: | Wireless S-Video Signal |
I was wondering if anyone is currently using the MuxLab VideoEase 500016 S Video balun system? I was thinking of purchasing three or four of these little units. Seems like it would be a lot easier then running all those cables. How are these working out for you? Hows the signal quality? George http://www.muxlab.com/products/ve_svd_s-v_balun.html |
Author: | karyoker [ Mon Feb 09, 2009 11:13 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wireless S-Video Signal |
This would only be considered if high bandwidth is required (karaoke graphics do not require a large bandwidth) and you have long runs 100-1000 feet. It would also be used in a high interference area. For 99% of our apps a s-video to RCA adapter would suffice along with the shacks video DA. |
Author: | Lone Wolf [ Mon Feb 09, 2009 1:53 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wireless S-Video Signal |
karaoke for food..... @ Mon Feb 09, 2009 12:47 pm wrote: I was wondering if anyone is currently using the MuxLab VideoEase 500016 S Video balun system? I was thinking of purchasing three or four of these little units. Seems like it would be a lot easier then running all those cables. How are these working out for you? Hows the signal quality? George
http://www.muxlab.com/products/ve_svd_s-v_balun.html OK I'm a little confused You want to do this to keep from running cables yet you have to run cat 5 cables instead of coax so uh whats the difference as per muxlab The VideoEase S-Video Balun allows one (1) S-Video channel to be connected via two (2) unshielded twisted pairs. Used in pairs, the S-Video Balun is used in home or commercial applications as a smart, fast and cost-effective means of connecting S-Video equipment using twisted pair instead of coax cable. Also coax is stronger and if the ends get pulled off much easier to replace than cat 5. I also believe that you would get a better signal quality than cat 5. Lone Wolf |
Author: | BruceFan4Life [ Mon Feb 09, 2009 4:58 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wireless S-Video Signal |
didn't he say it was a wireless system? |
Author: | Lone Wolf [ Wed Feb 11, 2009 9:06 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wireless S-Video Signal |
BruceFan4Life @ Mon Feb 09, 2009 6:58 pm wrote: didn't he say it was a wireless system?
That's my point where does the wireless come in? L.W. |
Author: | karaoke for food..... [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:02 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wireless S-Video Signal |
Sorry guys, i was under the impression these were a wireless transmitter system. I was told later that they're not..my bad. Can anyone suggest a good wireless system? I looked at one of those cheap $19.95 house wireless systems for sattellite, not really interested in a cheap home unit. George |
Author: | RLC [ Sun Feb 15, 2009 10:07 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Wireless S-Video Signal |
This is what I use for wirelss video --> http://www.x10.com/products4/google/wir ... der_v.html Works great for me. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |