Quote:
That link was from 2001. I think this idea is not worthy exploring. First of all, all of the modern 32 bit Operating system, like XP or even Vista, limits you to 4GB of total sytem memory, which is good but modern OS requires a lot of memory. If you take 1GB of that and make it to a RAM drive, then you are talking away 1GB from system resource, which would slow down lower level daemons, or even the kernel. Think about it, if you limit the system resources to 3GB, then it has to swap it's memory with the disk drive rather than keeping it in memory. Then it will slow down the overall system and whatever you may have gained from the RAMdrive is not that much.
The ram drive comes from a period when DOS was then kernel and and mem was used in a very efficient manner The available ram might only be only be 64MB A ram drive in no way used 25% of ram. An Os could perform tasks that we use as hosts and no way required the computers needed now
Quote:
Besides, if I remember right, the RAMdisk came up as another mounted volume, so you would still have to copy the files/programs/etc to the disk to use it. If you are ripping the CD+G to RAMdisk, you still have to transfer the files back to non volatile memory, like hard drive or FLASH drive, so you are still limited by your slowest transfer speed after you rip them. The waiting is the same whether you do it to the RAMdrive or hard drive, except now you have to do an extra step at the end. Not worth in my opinion.
There is no copying from a real drive to a ram drive The ram drive can be the default drive. It is very efficient to use CD Clone and copy an image to a hard drive. When used with a virtual drive the ripping process is 100 times faster. This was not presented as the final approach but as an alternative to be examined.