KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - Yamaha EMX5014C Powered Mixer Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


premium-member

Offsite Links


It is currently Fri Jan 31, 2025 8:49 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 1:54 pm 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 11:43 am
Posts: 224
Location: Florida Panhandle
Been Liked: 0 time
Let`s hear what you guy`s think of this mixer and for the money is there a better way to go?

_________________
Gator


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 2:20 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
Not a bad mixer. I would like to see it have a little more power and a 4 band eq on the stereo channels rather than a 3, other than that it's a good board.
I would probably save up a little more and opt for the new Mackie PPM1012. It has everything the Yamaha has plus an extra eq for use with monitors, a mono output, dual effects processors built in & a dual monitor capability, not that most would need this however.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 2:25 pm 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 11:43 am
Posts: 224
Location: Florida Panhandle
Been Liked: 0 time
Lonman @ Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:20 pm wrote:
Not a bad mixer. I would like to see it have a little more power and a 4 band eq on the stereo channels rather than a 3, other than that it's a good board.
I would probably save up a little more and opt for the new Mackie PPM1012. It has everything the Yamaha has plus an extra eq for use with monitors, a mono output, dual effects processors built in & a dual monitor capability, not that most would need this however.
Does the mackie have the same amount of power 350@8ohms?

_________________
Gator


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 2:41 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
gator @ Thu Mar 26, 2009 3:25 pm wrote:
Lonman @ Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:20 pm wrote:
Not a bad mixer. I would like to see it have a little more power and a 4 band eq on the stereo channels rather than a 3, other than that it's a good board.
I would probably save up a little more and opt for the new Mackie PPM1012. It has everything the Yamaha has plus an extra eq for use with monitors, a mono output, dual effects processors built in & a dual monitor capability, not that most would need this however.
Does the mackie have the same amount of power 350@8ohms?


It pushes about the same power, the Yamaha's 350 watts @ 8 ohms is a 'max' rating, not continuous. The avg rating would be closer to about 250-300 watts at 8 ohms, which the Mackie is as well.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:55 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed May 03, 2006 11:56 pm
Posts: 889
Location: Gainesville Florida
Been Liked: 3 times
We use that mixer & its great ! Of course we were using an AKJ7000 before that so its like night & day But honestly speaking weve had one break on us & had to send it off to get fixed & it took so long that the store finally gave us a new one for all of our trouble which was very nice..it breaking was our fault, we had it in the suv & not in a case so when hubby slammed on breaks to miss a dog something fell on top of it shoving a button in & we couldnt get it out..but as far a how good it works we love it !

EDIT So I hit the topic thanks button whats it for & why do we need it ? Jus' wonderin'

_________________
Kelley
Star Sounds Karaoke & Mobile Recording Studio
Image

[shadow=black][scroll]You have to respect your audience. Without them, you're essentially standing alone, singing to yourself....KD Lang[/scroll][/shadow]


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 7:40 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:24 pm
Posts: 5576
Location: Cocoa Beach
Been Liked: 122 times
gator @ Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:54 pm wrote:
Let`s hear what you guy`s think of this mixer and for the money is there a better way to go?

For the money, in my opinion you can't beat it. It has enough power to drive most low-end PA speakers, decent effects and compression. The sound is good.

Lonnie, where do you see peak output of 350? The manual says MIN of 350, and my understanding was it is 350w/channel by the US and AU continuous output standard (320 by EU specs).

_________________
[color=#ffff55]Mickey J.[/color]
Alas for those who never sing, but die with all their music in them.
-- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Mar 26, 2009 9:43 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
I saw in the manuals specs - MAX power 350 watts into 8 ohms.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:27 am 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 6:07 am
Posts: 789
Location: Michigan
Been Liked: 2 times
your not seeing things mickey, the manual I have states 350 Watts minimum, nothing under typical or maximum. That's pretty much the same amp that they have been using in the EMX5000 series for years. I assure you, it is no weak sister.

_________________
Quickness of mind will deceive the eye


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 12:35 am 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster

Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 6:07 am
Posts: 789
Location: Michigan
Been Liked: 2 times
gator @ Thu Mar 26, 2009 4:54 pm wrote:
Let`s hear what you guy`s think of this mixer and for the money is there a better way to go?

It's a very good powered mixer for the money. If you could find a used EMX5000-12, (the previous generation) you would gain an extra FX engine, (2 total) the ability to have a seperate sub send complete with an adjustable low pass filter and it's own fader. You would also gain the ability to patch in and out of the mains. You would loose the compression feature though.

_________________
Quickness of mind will deceive the eye


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 1:03 am 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
http://www.yamaha.com/yamahavgn/CDA/Con ... =ATTRIBUTE

First thing in the specs itself say MAXIMUM OUTPUT POWER 350 watts into 8 ohms. Sorry I mislead, I saw it in the specs not the manual - so one or the other is wrong.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 5:33 am 
Offline
Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster

Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 4:49 pm
Posts: 259
Location: Raleigh, NC
Been Liked: 7 times
London is right. If you can find a EMX5000-12, that would be the way to go. You can find them regularly on ebay for about $300 to $350. That being said, I bought the EMX 5014, and love it. Plenty of power and compression, but I'm not crazy about the effects.

Before, I was using a Behringer 1832FX with the Yamaha MSR400 which were (for me) back breakers at 52 pounds. I like my EMX5014, but on reflection, I should have bought the EMX5000-12 at half the price. It has everything the 5014 has, and more. A good choice if you can live without the compression.

_________________
My first choice IS Sound Choice.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 27, 2009 2:16 pm 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Jul 04, 2005 11:43 am
Posts: 224
Location: Florida Panhandle
Been Liked: 0 time
Skid Rowe @ Fri Mar 27, 2009 7:33 am wrote:
London is right. If you can find a EMX5000-12, that would be the way to go. You can find them regularly on ebay for about $300 to $350. That being said, I bought the EMX 5014, and love it. Plenty of power and compression, but I'm not crazy about the effects.

Before, I was using a Behringer 1832FX with the Yamaha MSR400 which were (for me) back breakers at 52 pounds. I like my EMX5014, but on reflection, I should have bought the EMX5000-12 at half the price. It has everything the 5014 has, and more. A good choice if you can live without the compression.
Thanks for the valuable info....

_________________
Gator


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 571 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech