|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
vtrod
|
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 12:26 am |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 3:19 pm Posts: 245 Location: Sydney, Australia Been Liked: 1 time
|
Hi All
I am getting REALLY busy lately with my music and am looking to potentially increase the quality off my show by using a software or a plugin or whatever that will give me a good quality transpose option.
I currently use
1. Winamp with pitchshifter plugin
2. Virtual DJ Pro with a pitchwheel
In my opinion neither of these programs offer a good enough quality output when I have transposed between 1 - 4 semitones. Sound geets a little muddy, bass starts to sound weird, etc.
What is everyone else using for pitch changes? What has given you the best results?
I only need to change between 1 - 4 semitones. I am wiilling to invest in new software if it will help resolve these issues.
Thank you for your advice.
Vic in Sydney.
|
|
Top |
|
|
DannyG2006
|
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 1:07 am |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 11:31 am Posts: 5403 Location: Watebrury, CT Been Liked: 407 times
|
Compuhost has a good keychanger as does Karma. I believe Hoster's is good too.
_________________ The Line Array Experiment is over. Nothing to see here. Move along.
|
|
Top |
|
|
BruceFan4Life
|
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 1:59 am |
|
|
Super Duper Poster |
|
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:03 pm Posts: 2674 Location: Jersey Been Liked: 160 times
|
I really like winamps key changer. If you drop the key and then speed up the tempo and the speed controls to compensate, it sounds really good.....to me anyway.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:12 am |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
Siglos has a great one, it surprised me one night somehow it dropped 8 without so much as a gurgle.....the background singer sounded interresting.........it was a shania twain song
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
Jian
|
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:48 am |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 10:18 pm Posts: 4080 Location: Serian Been Liked: 0 time
|
If you need the track to be permanently transposed, use one of those better multitracks recording software. Most of those program can do a better job. .Wav file will give a better result compare to mp3.
_________________ I can neither confirm nor deny ever having or knowing anything about nothing.... mrscott
|
|
Top |
|
|
Micky
|
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 6:09 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 6:13 pm Posts: 1625 Location: Montreal, Canada Been Liked: 34 times
|
Jian @ Sun Aug 15, 2010 5:48 am wrote: If you need the track to be permanently transposed, use one of those better multitracks recording software. Most of those program can do a better job. .Wav file will give a better result compare to mp3.
I agree and the best to do so is EAX Console from Creative but you need to have a Sound Blaster Audigy card I probably tested everything out there and none are doing the job right
I'm not trying to promote myself but this track is down 2 steps, can you tell? I've used the EAX Console to prepare my track in 24 bit/96k
http://www.singersshowcase.com/song.php ... act2=85623
|
|
Top |
|
|
tbreen
|
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 11:19 am |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:43 pm Posts: 230 Been Liked: 0 time
|
Bare in mind that with ANY digital keychanger, the bitrate quality of the audio file in question plays a BIG part in how well the song will sound after a significant keychange. A keychanged file encoded with a bitrate of 320 will sound INCREDIBLE when compared to a file encoded to a bitrate of 120.
So, when doing your comparison, be sure to compare apples for apples.
tbreen
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm
|
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:30 pm |
|
|
Novice Poster |
|
Joined: Sat Apr 24, 2010 3:00 am Posts: 18 Been Liked: 0 time
|
tbreen: good point, i should add to my comment, my library is in .wav format, that probably gives me more room to play without artifacts
|
|
Top |
|
|
tbreen
|
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 4:15 pm |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 01, 2007 12:43 pm Posts: 230 Been Liked: 0 time
|
Paradigm @ Sun Aug 15, 2010 2:30 pm wrote: tbreen: good point, i should add to my comment, my library is in .wav format, that probably gives me more room to play without artifacts
Yep, you're right, as long as the file was ripped directly from the CD to the WAV file. If, in the past it was just converted to WAV from an encoded file like an MP3, your quality will only be as good as the encoded file it was converted from, thus if the file was ever converted from an MP3/120 bitrate, you'll be stuck with the same low quality regardless.
I'm saying this only for the benefit of others that may read this, don't want them to get the idea that simply because it's presently a WAV file that it's near CD quality, only if it was ripped from CD to WAV.
tbreen
|
|
Top |
|
|
vtrod
|
Posted: Sun Aug 15, 2010 4:25 pm |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 3:19 pm Posts: 245 Location: Sydney, Australia Been Liked: 1 time
|
great info.
I use a Creative Live Soundcard all the time, and I have used the EAX console before, just never thought of it for whatever reason.
I will give this a shot.
Thanks all for your feedback.
|
|
Top |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 307 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|