|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
Skid Rowe
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 9:26 am |
|
|
Advanced Poster |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 4:49 pm Posts: 259 Location: Raleigh, NC Been Liked: 7 times
|
Bird, nobody in this world is PERFECT. C'mon, give 'em a break. Even our politicians that we vote for aren't perfect. Besides, the Eagles thing was like 20 years ago. Like you've never made a mistake in your life. Not trying to start an argument with you (or Chip) but c'mon. Give a little.
_________________ My first choice IS Sound Choice.
|
|
Top |
|
|
hiteck
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 10:10 am |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:39 am Posts: 884 Location: Tx Been Liked: 17 times
|
Skid Rowe wrote: Bird, nobody in this world is PERFECT. C'mon, give 'em a break. Even our politicians that we vote for aren't perfect. Besides, the Eagles thing was like 20 years ago. Like you've never made a mistake in your life. Not trying to start an argument with you (or Chip) but c'mon. Give a little. It may have started 20 years ago, but it's still going on now with custom disks. Sure mistakes are made. If a mistake was made 20 years ago and then they pulled the remaining content and did whatever else to satisfy the IP owner that's great, but if that was the case should they still be selling the same content on a custom disk? [url] http://www.mykaraokecdg.com.au/customer ... for=eagles[/url]
_________________ My statements, opinions and conclusions are based on my own personal experiences, observations, research and/or just my own $.02. I'm not a "cheerleader", but that doesn't make me a Pirate.
|
|
Top |
|
|
rickgood
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 10:28 am |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 7:09 pm Posts: 839 Location: Myrtle Beach, SC Been Liked: 224 times
|
Skid Rowe wrote: Sound Choice is STILL my first choice. Skid, My point was not to trash Sound Choice, they certainly do have some of the best tracks available, but the further we get away from them producing music, the less relevant they become. Not trying to start a fight or disagreement. My point was, I can build a decent library without using them or Chartbuster. I'm not going to subject my business to someone who sneaks into my show, sees a logo and files legal action against me (that will never be erased from an Internet search) without any other evidence or cause other than that I have a computer. If others want to use their tracks, it's a free country. If my selection is not good enough to satisfy my customers, they'll go elsewhere, and my show will be terminated by the venue. By the way, don't think I've ever had anybody under 30 ask for a specific brand, they just sing the song on the screen.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 10:31 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
Skid Rowe wrote: From what I understand, SC had an agreement to legaly produce the Eagles disk. The agreement either fell through, or the Eagles changed their mind. Either way SC took the Eagles disk off the market. I still use my 8125 at almost every show. If the Eagles want to come take it away from me, let it be. And BTW, the 8125 issue has been talked to death. Nah even BC stated that they had produced the disc and released (just like they had done with all discs up to that point) while they were waiting for licensing. That was the first disc they were denied licensing & immediately pulled it. After that they changed the way they released discs after license approval. Why 8125 is the one people seem to get hung up on is beyond me. It was made - yes they jumped the gun, it was pulled within the same year. Ooops.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 10:37 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
rickgood wrote: By the way, don't think I've ever had anybody under 30 ask for a specific brand, they just sing the song on the screen. Because they aren't as educated. The ones i've explained the differences to do notice when they bring in a crappy manu, I have show them the musical difference and many didn't even know there were more than the manu they had. But we've also had 21 YO's walk in on the 21st B-day with their own library as well.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
hiteck
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 10:53 am |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:39 am Posts: 884 Location: Tx Been Liked: 17 times
|
Lonman wrote: Why 8125 is the one people seem to get hung up on is beyond me. It was made - yes they jumped the gun, it was pulled within the same year. Ooops. How can you say it was pulled if its currently available from SC as a custom disk?
_________________ My statements, opinions and conclusions are based on my own personal experiences, observations, research and/or just my own $.02. I'm not a "cheerleader", but that doesn't make me a Pirate.
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 11:11 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
Skid Rowe wrote: From what I understand, SC had an agreement to legaly produce the Eagles disk. The agreement either fell through, or the Eagles changed their mind. Either way SC took the Eagles disk off the market. I still use my 8125 at almost every show. If the Eagles want to come take it away from me, let it be. And BTW, the 8125 issue has been talked to death.
I figure if SC put out 1000 disks with 15 songs each, that 15,000 songs. O-K so they jumped the gun on a SMALL HANDFUL. That shouldn't take away from the tens of thousands that they put out.
Sound Choice is STILL my first choice. Skid, Here's something you (and others) fail to take into account: It cost BIG BUCKS to produce a 15 song disc when you include the costs of the studio musicians, engineering, graphics, packaging, pressing, shipping, marketing, building rent, insurance etc..... (I'd love for Kurt to say it doesn't) If YOU were a manufacturer, would you invest the THOUSANDS of dollars it would take to produce these "1,000 discs" WITHOUT a rock-solid contract/license to do it? I don't think so. BTW, the retail price of that disc when it was sold was $39.00 each meaning a gross income of $39,000.00 Most distributors will get a 40% margin so their NET receipt is around $23,400.00 Let's add to that, the TWO HUNDRED AND FIFTY FIVE songs they were sued for not licensing from one publisher alone... So don't try to minimize and sugarcoat their questionable (illegal) business practices by calling it jumping the gun on a "small handful" of anything.... It was never an oversight OR a "mistake" no matter how you try to justify it.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Moonrider
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 11:58 am |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:13 pm Posts: 551 Been Liked: 0 time
|
Chip's pretty much on the money with his last post. SC, Chartbuster, and Stellar didn't "oops," they decided they could get away with just a compulsory mechanical license for the music. Unfortunately, the loophole they thought they found didn't exist. The appellate decision stated: "Tracks' contention that CD+G's are phonorecords” and thus the video aspect is within the grant of its compulsory licenses can be disposed of quickly.
The plain language of the Copyright Act refutes Tracks' view. Phonorecords are defined as objects on which “sounds” are fixed; CDGs however, are objects on which sounds and visual representations of song lyrics are fixed. Moreover, the term phonorecord expressly excludes “audiovisual works,” yet CD+G's constitute “audiovisual works,” since they “consist of a series of related images”-the lyrics-“together with accompanying sounds”-the music. 17 U.S.C. §101."If you'd like to read the whole decision, you can find it at http://caselaw.findlaw.com/us-2nd-circuit/1074380.htmlIt's very clearly and plainly written, and very enlightening.
_________________ Dave's not here.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Moonrider
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 12:23 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:13 pm Posts: 551 Been Liked: 0 time
|
Skid Rowe wrote: Bird, nobody in this world is PERFECT. C'mon, give 'em a break. Even our politicians that we vote for aren't perfect. Besides, the Eagles thing was like 20 years ago. Like you've never made a mistake in your life. Not trying to start an argument with you (or Chip) but c'mon. Give a little. If it were one incident, 20 years ago, I'd tend to agree with you. Unfortunately, there's a whole string of cases across the last 20 years involving all four major US karaoke manufacturers (SC, CB, Stellar, and MMO Group a.k.a. Pocket Songs). Some these cases were initiated as recently as 2009. To ME, that's a pretty conclusive pattern of trying to skirt the rules and rip off the artists. If they were to license one of my songs (LOL dream on!), I'd be watching 'em like a hawk. In contrast, I've been totally unable to find ANY type of infringement action against Tricerasoft, Sunfly or Zoom. Nada. Zip. Zee Row. And THEY offer downloads! That's a comforting thing to know if I ever write a hit song.
_________________ Dave's not here.
|
|
Top |
|
|
hiteck
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 12:27 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:39 am Posts: 884 Location: Tx Been Liked: 17 times
|
Did SC ever get permission to release any Eagles tracks?
_________________ My statements, opinions and conclusions are based on my own personal experiences, observations, research and/or just my own $.02. I'm not a "cheerleader", but that doesn't make me a Pirate.
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 1:09 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
hiteck wrote: Did SC ever get permission to release any Eagles tracks? Not from the Eagles. They did produce a disc named "R.B.T.L." (read between the lines) that was Eagles songs with NO graphics/lyrics....
|
|
Top |
|
|
hiteck
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 1:13 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:39 am Posts: 884 Location: Tx Been Liked: 17 times
|
c. staley wrote: hiteck wrote: Did SC ever get permission to release any Eagles tracks? Not from the Eagles. They did produce a disc named "R.B.T.L." (read between the lines) that was Eagles songs with NO graphics/lyrics.... So this "http://mykaraokecdg.com.au/"website selling SC Eagles songs on a custom disk isn't legal?
_________________ My statements, opinions and conclusions are based on my own personal experiences, observations, research and/or just my own $.02. I'm not a "cheerleader", but that doesn't make me a Pirate.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:16 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
hiteck wrote: Lonman wrote: Why 8125 is the one people seem to get hung up on is beyond me. It was made - yes they jumped the gun, it was pulled within the same year. Ooops. How can you say it was pulled if its currently available from SC as a custom disk? The disc itself was pulled and has not been available since 94 or so. Remember their custom stuff is UK licenses and only was made available since last year.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Wall Of Sound
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 2:55 pm |
|
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:35 am Posts: 691 Location: Carson City, NV Been Liked: 0 time
|
It looks like SC made a lot of the songs on the GEM Series available to mykaraokecdg.com.au for custom disc. ~ The GEM Series have Eagles songs available but only to KJ's.
_________________ "Just Say NO, To Justin Bieber & His Beatle Haircut"
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 3:21 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
Wall Of Sound wrote: It looks like SC made a lot of the songs on the GEM Series available to mykaraokecdg.com.au for custom disc. ~ The GEM Series have Eagles songs available but only to KJ's. Which is another way of SC saying; "We don't care what the artists want, we'll go to another country and sidestep them there to profit off their work." Whatever floats your boat I suppose...
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 4:44 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
....
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
hiteck
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:13 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:39 am Posts: 884 Location: Tx Been Liked: 17 times
|
Lonman wrote: hiteck wrote: Lonman wrote: Why 8125 is the one people seem to get hung up on is beyond me. It was made - yes they jumped the gun, it was pulled within the same year. Ooops. How can you say it was pulled if its currently available from SC as a custom disk? The disc itself was pulled and has not been available since 94 or so. Remember their custom stuff is UK licenses and only was made available since last year. So the SC Eagles stuff is now legal for use provided you bought it with the GEM series or via that site?
_________________ My statements, opinions and conclusions are based on my own personal experiences, observations, research and/or just my own $.02. I'm not a "cheerleader", but that doesn't make me a Pirate.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Wall Of Sound
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:57 pm |
|
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:35 am Posts: 691 Location: Carson City, NV Been Liked: 0 time
|
Lonman wrote: I'm with you Lon!
_________________ "Just Say NO, To Justin Bieber & His Beatle Haircut"
|
|
Top |
|
|
Wall Of Sound
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 6:10 pm |
|
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:35 am Posts: 691 Location: Carson City, NV Been Liked: 0 time
|
hiteck wrote: So the SC Eagles stuff is now legal for use provided you bought it with the GEM series or via that site?
That appears to be the case! So for around $73 + Shipping you could re-create SC8125 that could be sold to anyone, not just KJs which the GEM is designed for & which is in mp3+g format. If you made the custom, the bit rates would be in cdg/bin, obviously. You could pay at least that much for an original 8125 disc on ebaY if available!
_________________ "Just Say NO, To Justin Bieber & His Beatle Haircut"
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Tue Jun 07, 2011 7:26 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
hiteck wrote: Lonman wrote: hiteck wrote: Lonman wrote: Why 8125 is the one people seem to get hung up on is beyond me. It was made - yes they jumped the gun, it was pulled within the same year. Ooops. How can you say it was pulled if its currently available from SC as a custom disk? The disc itself was pulled and has not been available since 94 or so. Remember their custom stuff is UK licenses and only was made available since last year. So the SC Eagles stuff is now legal for use provided you bought it with the GEM series or via that site? I have no idea about the legalities. Nobody here know for sure, they ALL only guess and speculate as to the legalties. I'm sure they will have a more fulfilling answer for you as to the legalities from their expertise.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 253 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|