|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
Smoothedge69
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 3:02 am |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am Posts: 3885 Images: 0 Been Liked: 397 times
|
Lonman wrote: Cool lets get illegal again.... They put an IP ban on for a reason. Come down off your horse!! Why should the publishers always have the upper hand?? Why should we, as KJs have to suffer for all this nonsense?? None of this is our fault, or our doing. We are paying for our songs, and need material to buy. Would you rather people pirate their songs, or actually pay for their songs, but go around the damn brick wall to do it??
_________________ I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 3:16 am |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
Lonman wrote: Cool lets get illegal again.... They put an IP ban on for a reason. i get it, but i see the other side too. my uncle in Edmonton buys the track and sends it to me, the publisher gets the rate that they agreed to on paper for Zoom to make that song. all rights holders get paid the rate they agreed to on paper, Zoom gets the rate they agreed to on paper, and i play a purchased song. or if they go through TOR, the song gets bought. the publisher gets the rate that they agreed to on paper for Zoom to make that song. all rights holders get paid the rate they agreed to on paper, Zoom gets the rate they agreed to on paper, and i play a purchased song. either way, everyone down the line gets paid what they agreed to on paper.
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 3:30 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
Smoothedge69 wrote: Lonman wrote: Cool lets get illegal again.... They put an IP ban on for a reason. Come down off your horse!! (a) Why should the publishers always have the upper hand?? (b) Why should we, as KJs have to suffer for all this nonsense?? (c) None of this is our fault, or our doing. (d) We are paying for our songs, and need material to buy. Would you rather people pirate their songs, or actually pay for their songs, but go around the damn brick wall to do it?? Here's the problems you've addressed as I see it: (a) The songs, lyrics and synch rights belong to the publisher(s). It's rooted in their intellectual property. (b) You're right... he KJ's didn't make the karaoke versions did they? (c) It's not your doing because you're not the one who's supplying the market. So that means it must be.... (d) "We" might be paying, but it's apparent that the publishers aren't receiving, otherwise if they were, you probably wouldn't even know they exist. Based on the track records of the manufacturers in this business, can you blame them?
|
|
Top |
|
|
jdmeister
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 4:22 am |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 4:12 pm Posts: 7702 Songs: 1 Location: Hollyweird, Ca. Been Liked: 1089 times
|
I'll be in Australia starting next week, anything you need picked up?
|
|
Top |
|
|
Alan B
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:28 am |
|
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 7:24 pm Posts: 4466 Been Liked: 1052 times
|
The first time I ever heard of tor is when Chris mentioned it in his post. A google search revealed their website which I happily passed on to Smooth since he was interested in it. However, both Internet Explorer and Google Chrome have similar programs built into their browsers that allow you to surf the web anonymously. Google calls it "Incognito" and IE calls it "In Private". Don't know if it's exactly the same as tor though since I've never tired it.
_________________ Electro-Voice Evolve 50... Taking Sound To The Next Level.
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 6:41 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
Alan B wrote: The first time I ever heard of tor is when Chris mentioned it in his post. A google search revealed their website which I happily passed on to Smooth since he was interested in it. However, both Internet Explorer and Google Chrome have similar programs built into their browsers that allow you to surf the web anonymously. Google calls it "Incognito" and IE calls it "In Private". Don't know if it's exactly the same as tor though since I've never tired it. Those features are not the same and will not allow you to download from geo-fenced sites. The Chrome/Firefox/IE "Private" browser option simply turn off some data collection features like cookies that can help a remote site identify you. TOR uses a modified Firefox browser to do that plus set up proxies to mask your physical location as well. It is a great tool for privacy (even though the FBI and other government agencies run their own TOR proxies).
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
Toastedmuffin
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 6:55 am |
|
|
Advanced Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:49 am Posts: 466 Been Liked: 124 times
|
chrisavis wrote: Alan B wrote: The first time I ever heard of tor is when Chris mentioned it in his post. A google search revealed their website which I happily passed on to Smooth since he was interested in it. However, both Internet Explorer and Google Chrome have similar programs built into their browsers that allow you to surf the web anonymously. Google calls it "Incognito" and IE calls it "In Private". Don't know if it's exactly the same as tor though since I've never tired it. Those features are not the same and will not allow you to download from geo-fenced sites. The Chrome/Firefox/IE "Private" browser option simply turn off some data collection features like cookies that can help a remote site identify you. TOR uses a modified Firefox browser to do that plus set up proxies to mask your physical location as well. It is a great tool for privacy (even though the FBI and other government agencies run their own TOR proxies). TOR accesses whats called "The Deep Web", and you can find a lot so crazy stuff in there, almost all of it illegal or nasty. It's the digital black market if you will. The prevailing currency is BitCoins, untraceable currency that has no country or origin. I will say, The Deep Web is not for the faint of heart, as most people who deal from there are a tad worse then shady. Dealers on there would probably laugh you off, because, karaoke is not really enough of a hard core illegal item for them. But then again, they do trade heavily with Movies and all, so who knows. TM
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 7:23 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
All this cloak 'n dagger stuff is just too much work.
Why not use the same business model first unveiled by sound choice in 2009?
All you need is a contact in England....
Send them money, they buy the track(s) you want and they email them to you...
It is then "technically" the same as the Gem series: protected under the "First Sale Doctrine" because the publishers are paid, the "first sale" is made in England, etc....
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 7:49 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
That would work for physical goods. It doesn't work for digital goods because emailing means making a copy, and first sale doesn't apply.
|
|
Top |
|
|
SINGA USA
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:02 am |
|
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 7:05 am Posts: 241 Been Liked: 197 times
|
You may not realize it, but the Europeans are blocked from the US sites the same way. Whether it be a simple clip from Jimmy Fallon or any other TV show..."Sorry, this content is unavailable in your country"....Want to buy a song on iTunes? Sorry, this song is only available in the US iTunes store"...
It has always been this way...
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:06 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
attorney Harrington wrote: That would work for physical goods. It doesn't work for digital goods because emailing means making a copy, and first sale doesn't apply. And who exactly is going to police this?..... Not you. Have a Nice Day.
Last edited by c. staley on Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:08 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
KSFGROUP wrote: You may not realize it, but the Europeans are blocked from the US sites the same way. Whether it be a simple clip from Jimmy Fallon or any other TV show..."Sorry, this content is unavailable in your country"....Want to buy a song on iTunes? Sorry, this song is only available in the US iTunes store"...
It has always been this way... Commercial sites are, private email is not.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 10:08 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
c. staley wrote: attorney Harrington wrote: That would work for physical goods. It doesn't work for digital goods because emailing means making a copy, and first sale doesn't apply. And who exactly is going to police this?..... You implied that the procedure you suggested is legal. Whether it's policed or not, it's not legal.
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 10:52 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
JimHarrington wrote: You implied that the procedure you suggested is legal. Whether it's policed or not, it's not legal. Take a look in a mirror, the issue of "policed" vs "legal" never seemed to stop you... attorney Harrington wrote: JoeChartreuse wrote: 1) SO, I ask again: How does a company that is unauthorized to grant either media shifting rights, or even the transfer of SC's shifted product to a PC, have the right to demand that KJ's ask for permission that THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO GRANT? It is true that SC cannot necessarily grant permission that would cover all of the copyrights encompassed by the product, but it has the right to control the use of its trademarks. SC's permission is NECESSARY to shift content that bears the SC trademarks. It may not be SUFFICIENT to shift that content because of copyright held by other rights holders. If you choose to shift your content from the original media to another medium, even with SC's permission (with respect to the trademark and any copyright that SC may own), you, not SC, bear the risk that another rights holder will demand that you ask permission as well. We think the chances of them asking are small to begin with, and they may not even have the right to stop it anyway. But if they get a mind to litigate, they will be litigating against the media-shifter, not SC. But then again, your gem license indemnifies you against this "not legal" activity and pushes all the liability directly onto your licensees... while you reassure them that you believe "the chances of them asking are small to begin with." It's extremely easy to minimize risk - when it's not your risk.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 1:51 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
Paradigm Karaoke wrote: Lonman wrote: Cool lets get illegal again.... They put an IP ban on for a reason. i get it, but i see the other side too. my uncle in Edmonton buys the track and sends it to me, the publisher gets the rate that they agreed to on paper for Zoom to make that song. all rights holders get paid the rate they agreed to on paper, Zoom gets the rate they agreed to on paper, and i play a purchased song. I'd rather do it that way than to try to purposely try to bypass the IP restriction if I were so inclined.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Sqwigee
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 4:29 pm |
|
|
Major Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 5:20 pm Posts: 67 Been Liked: 17 times
|
Except that, until the digital laws catch up, digital "possessions" can't be sold or transfered. The scheme of getting something outside of a "good-faith" purchase most likely will remain... My concern in this area, is if I pass the biz to the kids... They can only received the disc portion of my show (which means their NEWEST music would be from 2011... Still a pretty good legacy, but seriously lacking!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Smoothedge69
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 4:50 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am Posts: 3885 Images: 0 Been Liked: 397 times
|
Lonman wrote: I'd rather do it that way than to try to purposely try to bypass the IP restriction if I were so inclined. I have a business to run. I need songs when I need them. Sorry, I am not the paragon of virtue that you are. I am paying for the damn things, so everyone who needs to make their money is!! You can have fun limiting yourself.
_________________ I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE
|
|
Top |
|
|
Sqwigee
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 4:59 pm |
|
|
Major Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 5:20 pm Posts: 67 Been Liked: 17 times
|
UmmmUmm. So you don't have a "business" to run, you have a "family" to run? The way I look at it, if it is a means of survival it should be above board! Singers wanting songs doesn't constitute an emergency, that requires risking a valid business. Just sayin'...
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:08 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
Sqwigee wrote: Except that, until the digital laws catch up, digital "possessions" can't be sold or transfered. The scheme of getting something outside of a "good-faith" purchase most likely will remain... My concern in this area, is if I pass the biz to the kids... They can only received the disc portion of my show (which means their NEWEST music would be from 2011... Still a pretty good legacy, but seriously lacking! I would disagree. I believe that they can be transferred.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:25 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
Smoothedge69 wrote: Lonman wrote: I'd rather do it that way than to try to purposely try to bypass the IP restriction if I were so inclined. I have a business to run. I need songs when I need them. Sorry, I am not the paragon of virtue that you are. I am paying for the damn things, so everyone who needs to make their money is!! You can have fun limiting yourself. Obviously! Lol, yeah i'm not limiting anything, just don't try to fly in under the radar. I have stuff you WISH you had. As far as needing it now - if I can get it now - great. I'm not going to lose a customer if I cannot get it right now - and if I do, chances are they weren't worth having to begin with. If the songs aren't available now, I will purchase other ways rather than manipulating around a blcoked IP.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 259 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|