KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - Zoom Downloads now prohibited in US and Canada Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Legalities & Piracy, etc... Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


premium-member

Offsite Links


It is currently Sat Jan 04, 2025 2:19 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 114 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 3:02 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
Lonman wrote:
Cool lets get illegal again.... :roll: They put an IP ban on for a reason.

Come down off your horse!! Why should the publishers always have the upper hand?? Why should we, as KJs have to suffer for all this nonsense?? None of this is our fault, or our doing. We are paying for our songs, and need material to buy. Would you rather people pirate their songs, or actually pay for their songs, but go around the damn brick wall to do it??

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 3:16 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm
Posts: 5107
Location: Phoenix Az
Been Liked: 1279 times
Lonman wrote:
Cool lets get illegal again.... :roll: They put an IP ban on for a reason.

i get it, but i see the other side too.
my uncle in Edmonton buys the track and sends it to me, the publisher gets the rate that they agreed to on paper for Zoom to make that song. all rights holders get paid the rate they agreed to on paper, Zoom gets the rate they agreed to on paper, and i play a purchased song.

or

if they go through TOR, the song gets bought. the publisher gets the rate that they agreed to on paper for Zoom to make that song. all rights holders get paid the rate they agreed to on paper, Zoom gets the rate they agreed to on paper, and i play a purchased song.

either way, everyone down the line gets paid what they agreed to on paper.

_________________
Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 3:30 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
Smoothedge69 wrote:
Lonman wrote:
Cool lets get illegal again.... :roll: They put an IP ban on for a reason.

Come down off your horse!! (a) Why should the publishers always have the upper hand?? (b) Why should we, as KJs have to suffer for all this nonsense?? (c) None of this is our fault, or our doing. (d) We are paying for our songs, and need material to buy. Would you rather people pirate their songs, or actually pay for their songs, but go around the damn brick wall to do it??
Here's the problems you've addressed as I see it:
(a) The songs, lyrics and synch rights belong to the publisher(s). It's rooted in their intellectual property.
(b) You're right... he KJ's didn't make the karaoke versions did they?
(c) It's not your doing because you're not the one who's supplying the market. So that means it must be....
(d) "We" might be paying, but it's apparent that the publishers aren't receiving, otherwise if they were, you probably wouldn't even know they exist. Based on the track records of the manufacturers in this business, can you blame them?


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 4:22 am 
Offline
Super Extreme
Super Extreme
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 4:12 pm
Posts: 7702
Songs: 1
Location: Hollyweird, Ca.
Been Liked: 1089 times
I'll be in Australia starting next week, anything you need picked up?


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:28 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 7:24 pm
Posts: 4466
Been Liked: 1052 times
The first time I ever heard of tor is when Chris mentioned it in his post. A google search revealed their website which I happily passed on to Smooth since he was interested in it. However, both Internet Explorer and Google Chrome have similar programs built into their browsers that allow you to surf the web anonymously. Google calls it "Incognito" and IE calls it "In Private". Don't know if it's exactly the same as tor though since I've never tired it.

_________________
Electro-Voice Evolve 50... Taking Sound To The Next Level.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 6:41 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
Alan B wrote:
The first time I ever heard of tor is when Chris mentioned it in his post. A google search revealed their website which I happily passed on to Smooth since he was interested in it. However, both Internet Explorer and Google Chrome have similar programs built into their browsers that allow you to surf the web anonymously. Google calls it "Incognito" and IE calls it "In Private". Don't know if it's exactly the same as tor though since I've never tired it.


Those features are not the same and will not allow you to download from geo-fenced sites.

The Chrome/Firefox/IE "Private" browser option simply turn off some data collection features like cookies that can help a remote site identify you.

TOR uses a modified Firefox browser to do that plus set up proxies to mask your physical location as well. It is a great tool for privacy (even though the FBI and other government agencies run their own TOR proxies).

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 6:55 am 
Offline
Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster

Joined: Thu Oct 01, 2015 6:49 am
Posts: 466
Been Liked: 124 times
chrisavis wrote:
Alan B wrote:
The first time I ever heard of tor is when Chris mentioned it in his post. A google search revealed their website which I happily passed on to Smooth since he was interested in it. However, both Internet Explorer and Google Chrome have similar programs built into their browsers that allow you to surf the web anonymously. Google calls it "Incognito" and IE calls it "In Private". Don't know if it's exactly the same as tor though since I've never tired it.


Those features are not the same and will not allow you to download from geo-fenced sites.

The Chrome/Firefox/IE "Private" browser option simply turn off some data collection features like cookies that can help a remote site identify you.

TOR uses a modified Firefox browser to do that plus set up proxies to mask your physical location as well. It is a great tool for privacy (even though the FBI and other government agencies run their own TOR proxies).


TOR accesses whats called "The Deep Web", and you can find a lot so crazy stuff in there, almost all of it illegal or nasty. It's the digital black market if you will. The prevailing currency is BitCoins, untraceable currency that has no country or origin. I will say, The Deep Web is not for the faint of heart, as most people who deal from there are a tad worse then shady. Dealers on there would probably laugh you off, because, karaoke is not really enough of a hard core illegal item for them. But then again, they do trade heavily with Movies and all, so who knows.

TM


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 7:23 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
All this cloak 'n dagger stuff is just too much work.

Why not use the same business model first unveiled by sound choice in 2009?

All you need is a contact in England....

Send them money, they buy the track(s) you want and they email them to you...

It is then "technically" the same as the Gem series: protected under the "First Sale Doctrine" because the publishers are paid, the "first sale" is made in England, etc....


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 7:49 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am
Posts: 3011
Been Liked: 1003 times
That would work for physical goods. It doesn't work for digital goods because emailing means making a copy, and first sale doesn't apply.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:02 am 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2013 7:05 am
Posts: 241
Been Liked: 197 times
You may not realize it, but the Europeans are blocked from the US sites the same way. Whether it be a simple clip from Jimmy Fallon or any other TV show..."Sorry, this content is unavailable in your country"....Want to buy a song on iTunes? Sorry, this song is only available in the US iTunes store"...

It has always been this way...


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:06 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
attorney Harrington wrote:
That would work for physical goods. It doesn't work for digital goods because emailing means making a copy, and first sale doesn't apply.


And who exactly is going to police this?.....

Not you.

Have a Nice Day. :)


Last edited by c. staley on Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:10 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 8:08 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
KSFGROUP wrote:
You may not realize it, but the Europeans are blocked from the US sites the same way. Whether it be a simple clip from Jimmy Fallon or any other TV show..."Sorry, this content is unavailable in your country"....Want to buy a song on iTunes? Sorry, this song is only available in the US iTunes store"...

It has always been this way...


Commercial sites are, private email is not.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 10:08 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am
Posts: 3011
Been Liked: 1003 times
c. staley wrote:
attorney Harrington wrote:
That would work for physical goods. It doesn't work for digital goods because emailing means making a copy, and first sale doesn't apply.


And who exactly is going to police this?.....


You implied that the procedure you suggested is legal. Whether it's policed or not, it's not legal.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 10:52 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
JimHarrington wrote:
You implied that the procedure you suggested is legal. Whether it's policed or not, it's not legal.

Take a look in a mirror, the issue of "policed" vs "legal" never seemed to stop you...
attorney Harrington wrote:
JoeChartreuse wrote:
1) SO, I ask again: How does a company that is unauthorized to grant either media shifting rights, or even the transfer of SC's shifted product to a PC, have the right to demand that KJ's ask for permission that THEY ARE NOT ALLOWED TO GRANT?


It is true that SC cannot necessarily grant permission
that would cover all of the copyrights encompassed by the product, but it has the right to control the use of its trademarks. SC's permission is NECESSARY to shift content that bears the SC trademarks. It may not be SUFFICIENT to shift that content because of copyright held by other rights holders. If you choose to shift your content from the original media to another medium, even with SC's permission (with respect to the trademark and any copyright that SC may own), you, not SC, bear the risk that another rights holder will demand that you ask permission as well. We think the chances of them asking are small to begin with, and they may not even have the right to stop it anyway. But if they get a mind to litigate, they will be litigating against the media-shifter, not SC.


But then again, your gem license indemnifies you against this "not legal" activity and pushes all the liability directly onto your licensees... while you reassure them that you believe "the chances of them asking are small to begin with."

It's extremely easy to minimize risk - when it's not your risk.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 1:51 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
Paradigm Karaoke wrote:
Lonman wrote:
Cool lets get illegal again.... :roll: They put an IP ban on for a reason.

i get it, but i see the other side too.
my uncle in Edmonton buys the track and sends it to me, the publisher gets the rate that they agreed to on paper for Zoom to make that song. all rights holders get paid the rate they agreed to on paper, Zoom gets the rate they agreed to on paper, and i play a purchased song.
I'd rather do it that way than to try to purposely try to bypass the IP restriction if I were so inclined.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 4:29 pm 
Offline
Major Poster
Major Poster

Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 5:20 pm
Posts: 67
Been Liked: 17 times
Except that, until the digital laws catch up, digital "possessions" can't be sold or transfered. The scheme of getting something outside of a "good-faith" purchase most likely will remain... My concern in this area, is if I pass the biz to the kids... They can only received the disc portion of my show (which means their NEWEST music would be from 2011... Still a pretty good legacy, but seriously lacking!


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 4:50 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
Lonman wrote:
I'd rather do it that way than to try to purposely try to bypass the IP restriction if I were so inclined.

I have a business to run. I need songs when I need them. Sorry, I am not the paragon of virtue that you are. I am paying for the damn things, so everyone who needs to make their money is!! You can have fun limiting yourself.

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 4:59 pm 
Offline
Major Poster
Major Poster

Joined: Tue Feb 10, 2015 5:20 pm
Posts: 67
Been Liked: 17 times
UmmmUmm. So you don't have a "business" to run, you have a "family" to run? The way I look at it, if it is a means of survival it should be above board! Singers wanting songs doesn't constitute an emergency, that requires risking a valid business. Just sayin'...


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:08 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
Sqwigee wrote:
Except that, until the digital laws catch up, digital "possessions" can't be sold or transfered. The scheme of getting something outside of a "good-faith" purchase most likely will remain... My concern in this area, is if I pass the biz to the kids... They can only received the disc portion of my show (which means their NEWEST music would be from 2011... Still a pretty good legacy, but seriously lacking!


I would disagree. I believe that they can be transferred.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Oct 06, 2015 5:25 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
Smoothedge69 wrote:
Lonman wrote:
I'd rather do it that way than to try to purposely try to bypass the IP restriction if I were so inclined.

I have a business to run. I need songs when I need them. Sorry, I am not the paragon of virtue that you are. I am paying for the damn things, so everyone who needs to make their money is!! You can have fun limiting yourself.
Obviously!
Lol, yeah i'm not limiting anything, just don't try to fly in under the radar. I have stuff you WISH you had. :twisted: As far as needing it now - if I can get it now - great. I'm not going to lose a customer if I cannot get it right now - and if I do, chances are they weren't worth having to begin with. If the songs aren't available now, I will purchase other ways rather than manipulating around a blcoked IP.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 114 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 259 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech