Karaoke Forums

Wow RaokeBoy, you are either quite an investigator or a real good cut and paste artist just as fast as I can cut and paste Suite 1300!

_________________
-- Mark

Obfuscation. It's dishonest to say that you "read" it because you are lying by omission.



That's the usual process when a lawyer steals money from her client.



Considering three separate patent attorneys independently agreed with the client's position, the fee award amount to a penalty for guessing wrong about how the district court would decide claim construction. I think I'll wait to see what the Federal Circuit says before deciding where to place blame. Argument in May.



Actually, nobody was on the hook in that case. The client--whose conduct caused the sanction in the first place--settled with the defendant for no money.

I don't see what any of this has to do with karaoke legalities. Seems more like a personal attack on me...which reflects almost as poorly on you as the fact that you're posting here anonymously, considering the circumstances.

I think I will let your particularly arrogant and vindictive statements speak for you: "we are taking steps to ensure that Ms. Boris exits the profession for her misconduct." Again, big of you to brag about reporting her to the state bar and even bigger of you that you threaten to take her license away. Even without your history, it does reflect poorly on you sir.

Have an insane day.

Mr. Harrington - You speak so freely of Ms. Boris' conduct in her absence. Precisely what evidence do you have, Mr. Harrington, to support your claim that Ms. Boris "steals money"? Merely because Slep-tone wasn't provided the settlement funds it thought it should have had?

Raoke, we all know who James is but who are you. Since you are accusing James of something, we should know who you are so we can ascertain as to your credibility. Otherwise you are just another internet troll. Right now James is open with us and you are not.

_________________
You can be strange but not a stranger

I will SECOND that motion!

_________________
Still love to sing!

What exactly have I accused James of?

Just as I thought, no guts, no glory.

_________________
You can be strange but not a stranger

Have to ask. WTF is your problem? As stated this has nothing to do with this thread. You are attacking this person.

_________________
Still love to sing!

He has an agenda, which would be obvious if he were posting with his true identity.

While I cannot respond to all the handles, I do note so many questions I posed have been left unanswered, like where is the proof Ms. Boris stole money from Slep-tone? So sad to see an attack on one's character when she is not on board to defend herself. What can I say other than have an insane day.

...And that would be? The mods have checked It's not Chip, and sure as hell don't need a second account to speak as I please, nor does Lone, or any other poster who disagrees with your point of view. In fact, what would it matter?

Most folks here are intelligent enough to take each post on what they consider merit, or lack thereof. It doesn't matter how they dress, or what hobbies they have, or how tall they are. The only thing that counts in an internet forum is whethor or not a particular post seems intelligent or worthwhile to the reader- period.

What is it that you are inferring?

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."

You are correct, it's not Chip.

Me thinks it's Saul Goodman in Suite 1300!

http://www.bettercallsaul.com/

_________________
-- Mark

Yes, and look what happened to Chip when he posted anything here against Sound Choice. He put his real name and people stalked him on the internet, even creating false Facebook pages in his name with vile lies. The Cheerleaders are still stalking him, even though he's been gone from here for a very long time. After that, can you blame someone who comes here making very strong statements against Sound Choice and their attorney for not posting their real name? I don't.

Of course, if you want to keep things fair and you insist on ragging on RaokeBoy for being anonymous, you might want to also give the same treatment to InsaneKJ, who was been doing that for years. But you wouldn't do that, would you, because....oh, yeah...he's on your side.

_________________
Birdofsong

Why birdofsong your not implying a double standard are you? Have a blessed day.

Yeah, they "courageously" put down those who aren't here to offer a defense, and make insulting statements about them, but do not address the questions presented about the conduct of Slep-tone and its attorney. Seems they just ignore the ugly truth and blindly cheer on.

I was given bad treatment from your husband, diafel, JoeC, and others almost immediately from my first posts regarding the very first SC lawsuit in 2009 and any mention of KIAA. I was the first to report here on KS about that lawsuit which began this entire discussion on SC going after pirates in the courts, so please stop playing the victim. Many members here immediately ganged up on me for posting the anti-piracy efforts of KIAA and the SC lawsuits. No wonder that I went on the defensive because people like you and your husband treated me like sh!t. So again, please stop playing the victim bird. Your husband brought on his woes himself by his "vile" posts causing reactions from others.

BTW, leading up to my banning from KS in January 2010, the thread that I started on that very first lawsuit was deleted because I posted information about Dan Dan's criminal background, which was of public record and had nothing to do with the SC lawsuit he was involved in. Now RoakeBoy has posted about Harrington's dealings in other cases, which are of public record and have nothing to do with the SC lawsuits that he is involved in.

My anonymity has to do with the amount of reporting alleged pirates in our market share, beginning in 2009, and not tipping our hand. We are still waiting for lawsuits in our area. I post on forums as an individual, not representing the company I work for, thus more reason to remain anonymous. My posts are mine alone, not the view of the companies.

So if my anonymity is viewed as being non-credible, so be it. You can say the same of RoakeBoy's credibility in the same vein. Is there really any difference? There may be a difference. Me, I'm just a guy, who by the way is not on the Slep-Tone payroll, who works for a humble karaoke company and has a passion for getting rid of pirates in our area. My opinion is that RoakeBoy seems to appear that he is more involved in these lawsuits, which ARE of public record. As Harrington said, "He has an agenda".

I could really give a fu<k about what you and others think about my credibility in all this, and how it may effect my job ethically, but if my suspicions are correct, RoakeBoy's credibility could have disastrous effects in his field of work, and in the ethics that are required.

Have a chipper day in Suite 1300!

_________________
-- Mark

The proof is a matter of public record.

She filed dismissal papers against two defendants in the case she was handling, based upon settlement agreements that called for dismissal after the payment of money. Those dismissals are a matter of public record. She obviously received the money, and I have seen a copy of the canceled check indicating that she did. Yet she failed to remit the funds to her client and has not responded to telephone calls, emails, or letters since at least October.

These are not attacks on her character. They're statements of fact. That they reflect poorly on her character is her own fault.

The simple fact that Slep-tone has not been paid does not mean that she stole the money. Don't lawyers have trust accounts which hold funds that arrive to them in a case? What if there is a dispute between Slep-tone and APS over who is entitled to the funds that arrived? Based on Slep-tone's lawsuit against APS, there clearly is and she was receiving the funds. Is she supposed to distribute the funds to Slep-tone just because Slep-tone demands them and risk a lawsuit from APS/Brophy for improperly doing so? Are you sure she is not holding the funds in her trust account until your dispute with APS and Brophy is resolved? The fact the you accuse her of stealing money is a very serious accusation against her. Thus far you have presented no proof of it. Without such proof don't you think your accusation is slanderous?

First it would be libel, not slander if not true. I thought you of all people would know that!

If you so desperately want answers to these questions, why not go ask Ms. Boris herself. It's not far to 90210 from Suite 1300 now is it?

_________________
-- Mark