|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
Cueball
|
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 12:00 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
darbykplace wrote: To Super Duper Poster, PS my email is darbykproductions@yahoo.com. Thanks again, Darby His name is Chip, not Super Duper Poster (that's his status)... Look 2 lines above what you thought was the name.
|
|
Top |
|
|
leopard lizard
|
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 12:39 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:18 pm Posts: 2593 Been Liked: 294 times
|
cueball wrote: darbykplace wrote: To Super Duper Poster, PS my email is darbykproductions@yahoo.com. Thanks again, Darby His name is Chip, not Super Duper Poster (that's his status)... Look 2 lines above what you thought was the name. I don't know, Cue. In light of Bird proclaiming Chip to be so sexy, maybe "Super Duper" is his nickname.
|
|
Top |
|
|
MtnKaraoke
|
Posted: Mon Dec 19, 2011 1:11 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 05, 2010 1:40 pm Posts: 1052 Images: 1 Been Liked: 204 times
|
I love the play on words Leopard...
What exactly is a duper? I believe that would be one who dupes.
A super duper would be one who dupes exceedingly well.
Understand, I am not referring to a duper that creates duplicates.
No one or nothing has been duped here.
Though, a backup as referred to by the OP could be defined as a dupe.
_________________ Never the same show twice!
|
|
Top |
|
|
darbykplace
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 8:29 am |
|
|
newbie |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 19, 2011 8:49 am Posts: 7 Been Liked: 0 time
|
To C. Staley or Chip, Could you send me a copy of the email thread from 1998? It would be extremely helpful for my research. It could quite possibly help a great many small karaoke operators. darbykproductions@yahoo.comThanks again, Darby ps thanks to all who gave me the correct name
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Tue Dec 20, 2011 11:23 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: chrisavis wrote: Do I need permission from Sound Choice to backup my original discs to CD? (this would not be a media shift)
That is a media shift. And the answer is...maybe. chrisavis wrote: Do I need permission from Sound Choice to backup my original discs to a hard drive? (this would be a media shift for backup purposes only)
Also maybe. /quote] Allow me to help out a bit. The reason for the lack of answers on a public forum, and the "maybes" is actually very simple: If you look on any of the mfrs. sites- including SC- you will find that THEY ARE NOT AUTHORIZED TO GRANT PERMISSION TO THE END USER TO MEDIA SHIFT.. What they WILL do is tell you that if you satisfy their requirements ( maybe pay for an audit, or settle, or buy something- you know, where they can PROFIT), they will look the other way, and may not sue you. The ONLY ones who can give actual permission to media shift is the owner/publisher of the music. Please note that I said MAY not sue. Back in the end of the 90's Kurt stated for publication ( a link that has been posted here several times) that backing up for archive was perfectly fine. Now, however, a different tone has been set, simply due to the realization of possible profit. Since the company has been shown to be prone to a change of heart, the best you might hope for is that MAYBE they won't sue you, even after you meet their requirements. Ya never know...
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 7:26 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
Quote: The reason for the lack of answers on a public forum, and the "maybes" is actually very simple: @JoeChartreuse - It isn't as simple as you may think. In my case I asked about the additional scenario of backing up to a stationary server on my home network for the specific purposes of 1) having an additional backup in the event of a catastrophic failure of all other systems and 2) to easily reproduce a production drive in case of said scenario. If I were on the other side of this, I would immediately be cautious because point #2 is exactly what the hard drive pirates are doing - they have a primary source like a server that they are duplicating drives from. In addition to that, any system that is connected to a network has the potential to serve whatever is on said system to the network it is connected to. Precautions have to be taken to prevent that from taken place. HarringtonLaw and I have been chatting in email and I am satisfied with the responses I have received to my questions. Since it was my original post and my scenario, I consider my questions answered. Unless you plan on doing what I asked about, I would suggest you are just arguing to argue. It certainly does not impact you in the least if you aren't planning to backup the same way I asked about. Finally, I appreciated it being taken offline so I could discuss it directly without all the other crap that inevitably would and did work it's way into the conversation. My questions were answered. I am done with this thread. -Chris
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lone Wolf
|
Posted: Wed Dec 21, 2011 7:33 pm |
|
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 10:11 am Posts: 1832 Location: TX Been Liked: 59 times
|
I'd ask for a show of hands of those that DO NOT have a back up HD of everything they have ripped to a working (as being used) HD, but I don't think I would see any hands.
_________________ I like everyone when I first meet them. If you don't like me that's not my problem it's YOURS! A stranger is a friend you haven't met yet
|
|
Top |
|
|
diafel
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 2:04 am |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:27 am Posts: 2444 Been Liked: 46 times
|
chrisavis wrote: My questions were answered. I am done with this thread.
How very informative for the rest of us!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Workmen
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 7:49 am |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 05, 2007 12:10 pm Posts: 113 Been Liked: 0 time
|
chrisavis wrote: Finally, I appreciated it being taken offline so I could discuss it directly without all the other crap that inevitably would and did work it's way into the conversation.
My questions were answered. I am done with this thread.
-Chris You asked a question in open forum for a reason so why would you be concerned what others say? You could have just ask it in a PM or email. Maybe you should have sent it in an inter-office memo! So now you want to take your football and go home, bye!
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:10 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
Workmen wrote: You asked a question in open forum for a reason so why would you be concerned what others say? You could have just ask it in a PM or email. Maybe you should have sent it in an inter-office memo!
So now you want to take your football and go home, bye!
1) I asked in an open forum hoping there would be a blanket answer that covers everyone for the questions I asked. It wasn't as simple as that. 2) HarringtonLaw asked to take it offline. I obliged. 3) To quote myself - "Finally, I appreciated it being taken offline so I could discuss it directly without all the other crap that inevitably would and did work it's way into the conversation." -Chris
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:26 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
Why is the answer to your (seemingly innocent) question such a big secret?
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 8:55 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
It isn't a secret. For me it is about trust.
HarringtonLaw asked to take it offline. We did. We opened a dialog. It became a private conversation at that point. For me there was an assumption of trust that was established. I would prefer to maintain that trust.
For me it is as simple as that.
-Chris
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 10:21 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
chrisavis wrote: It isn't a secret. For me it is about trust.
HarringtonLaw asked to take it offline. We did. We opened a dialog. It became a private conversation at that point. For me there was an assumption of trust that was established. I would prefer to maintain that trust.
For me it is as simple as that.
-Chris One would expect that of all people, HarringtonLaw would want everyone on this site to know how to handle backups legally.... The fact that he wanted to take it to privacy specifically to avoid addressing it in public at all seems fishy... wouldn't you agree?
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:20 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
c. staley wrote: One would expect that of all people, HarringtonLaw would want everyone on this site to know how to handle backups legally....
The fact that he wanted to take it to privacy specifically to avoid addressing it in public at all seems fishy... wouldn't you agree?
I asked to take it private because I had some specific questions about his setup that he might not want to discuss on a public forum. But, as a bonus, I get the added benefit of stoking your curiosity and driving your imagination. Since you don't use SC, there is no need for you to know what I told him.
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 11:33 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: I asked to take it private because I had some specific questions about his setup that he might not want to discuss on a public forum. But, as a bonus, I get the added benefit of stoking your curiosity and driving your imagination. Since you don't use SC, there is no need for you to know what I told him. Very snotty response... especially to all the others that do use SC tracks... That's not what I would characterize as a "helpful and informative" ... Makes you being so elusive on the subject even fishier... It's looking more and more like you want people to make these kinds of mistakes making backups so you can sue them later. Why am I not surprised?
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:00 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
c. staley wrote: Very snotty response... especially to all the others that do use SC tracks.
Why would you care about the people you denigrate as inferior because they want to use SC? c. staley wrote: .. That's not what I would characterize as a "helpful and informative" ...
Makes you being so elusive on the subject even fishier...
It's looking more and more like you want people to make these kinds of mistakes making backups so you can sue them later.
Why am I not surprised? Feel that imagination being driven? Anyone who wants to ask me for SC's position on how to manage their SC collection is free to post here or email me.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:24 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: chrisavis wrote: Do I need permission from Sound Choice to backup my original discs to CD? (this would not be a media shift)
That is a media shift. And the answer is...maybe. . Um, the answer is NO. No permission is required to back up from disc to disc, tape, to tape, etc. This applies to karaoke, software, standard CDs, or other products. You are allowed to make media to media ( no alteration) back-ups for single site use. PERIOD. However, this is ONLY for single site use. In other words, you may NOT use the backup at one site while using the original at another. As for chrisavis's decision not to disclose what was said in private conversation, I respect it. I have had many conversations with people holding opposing positions than mine, and am able to do so based on that very same trust. I'm not thrilled that they decided to take it private, but having done so, breaking that privacy would be a violation of trust. I may not like being left in the dark, but I have to agree with with chrisavis's decision.
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
Last edited by JoeChartreuse on Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:37 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 12:33 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: Why would you care about the people you denigrate as inferior because they want to use SC? Nice try at putting words in my mouth, it appears to be a favorite hobby of yours.Please show me where I've EVER "denigrated" ANYONE because they "want to use SC."
They are welcome to use it all they like. I've decided not to specifically to avoid your "legal business model" that sues KJ's and clubs whether or not they have or even use discs as exampled by the current suit you have against disc-based KJ's. HarringtonLaw wrote: Feel that imagination being driven?
Anyone who wants to ask me for SC's position on how to manage their SC collection is free to post here or email me. So answer it now - why is it still a secret and you're being evasive? Still seems fishy.....
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 1:41 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
c. staley wrote: HarringtonLaw wrote: Feel that imagination being driven?
Anyone who wants to ask me for SC's position on how to manage their SC collection is free to post here or email me. So answer it now - why is it still a secret and you're being evasive? Still seems fishy..... It's not a secret. But the only person who's questioning me about it is someone who says he doesn't use SC. You don't need to know about it. I certainly don't need to tell you; you'll just misquote or criticize my answer anyway. And I can secretly delight in how much it kills you not to know what I said. Win/win.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Mon Jan 02, 2012 2:03 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: It's not a secret. But the only person who's questioning me about it is someone who says he doesn't use SC.
Well then, how about if I ask the question? I still use some original SC discs in my show, and have said so in the past. Also, I'm pretty certain that SC has checked me out, and knows this to be true. So, what are your thoughts on ME backing up my original discs onto discs? I would prefer that your answer be posted here, so that other disc based hosts might learn from it. Thanks in advance for your cooperation.
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 228 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|