KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - How Much Do You Charge... Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Legalities & Piracy, etc... Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


premium-member

Offsite Links


It is currently Wed Jan 22, 2025 12:55 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:47 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
c. staley wrote:
chrisavis wrote:
That is odd because I am using thousands of dollars of SC product and I am not at risk of legal action due to any element. Any mistakes made would be on my own part. I removed the risk by doing an audit. I am in the "karaoke business" too.


You removed much more than what you believed to be your risk - yet you fully admit that even with your "audit and certification" you still have no guarantee of not being sued - and therefore you have really removed no risk. Quite the opposite actually. But if you read your paperwork, you did give away more than just the "fee."


Are you suggesting that when I say I don't have anything to fear that I actually should? I thought you weren't a fear monger?

The covenant not to sue is not a pardon nor is it amnesty, which is what you seem to want from Sound Choice. There are terms. If I violate the terms, they can sue. If I don’t violate the terms, then I am golden.

c. staley wrote:
chrisavis wrote:
You may not be making any money off fear, but you are most assuredly a fear monger. You broadcast far and wide that anyone using Sound Choice products under any circumstances will get sued. That is just plain not the truth.

Your investment is being wasted by you and you alone.

-Chris


Sorry Chris, but it IS "the plain truth" and you've admitted it yourself that even you can get sued and Harrington has confirmed that "mistakes" will obviously be made even with disc-based hosts. Not "can be made" but " will be made" even though SC has full control over whether any mistakes are made.


Confirmed. You don’t sell fear at all, you just give it away for free. How generous of you.

The "plain truth" is you can’t move past the 1%. The “plain truth” is you will grab any snippet you can and twist it to fit your own agenda . As for mistakes that “will be made”, as venerable and life-experienced as you are, Chip, you WILL make mistakes between now and the time you are no longer on this earth. You are no more flawless than anyone or anything else. Why you continue to think that it should not be possible for anyone else to make mistakes when you will most certainly make plenty between now and when you pass is beyond comprehension.

By the way, you give me far too much credit. You seem to think that because I “confirmed” that it is possible to get sued that everyone, including yourself it seems, should uphold that as having some sort of authority. I appreciate the respect and honor you have bestowed upon me with this appreciation, but I don’t believe for a moment that you hold that it for anything other than to satisfy your argument.

The “plain truth” is this – not a single host that has gone through the audit process has later been sued. In that regard I see my odds of being sued as 0%. You on the other hand are much more likely to get sued. I am also using SC product at every single one of my shows while you claim you don’t use it at all. My hard earned and well spent money is being utilized with the products I purchased and yours are not. I would say that I am very much coming out ahead in this game. But what do I know? You have been at this for two decades and I have only been at it for less than two years.

c. staley wrote:
And to correct your intentional mischaracterization above:
I do not "broadcast far and wide that anyone using Sound Choice products under any circumstances will get sued" however, if you use Sound Choice products you are AT RISK of being sued. Confirmed by you and Mr. Harrington. And it doesn't matter what you use; disc or computer. That is a fact you cannot refute no matter how much you jump up and down and throw a tantrum, point fingers or try to backpedal. I'm not in the risk business.


You do broadcast far and wide. I see what you post on the Old Jolters forum, I have seen your posts on the Sound Choice forums, and we have all been bludgeoned senseless by your rants here. I am sure there are other forums but I honestly could not bear to expose myself to any more than I have to.

c. staley wrote:
Just as you can "soften" any characterization that you really "make money off of piracy by helping pirates keep their jobs" by calling it something less truthful like "helping an illegal host become legal." Doesn't that just sound better and make you feel all pink inside? Sorry, but in this case, you are actually part of the problem not the solution.


Chip, I assure you, it is a feeble attempt on your part to make me feel guilty or look bad in the karaoke community for assisting people that ask for help. I sleep well at night knowing that I have helped people do the right thing. You on the other hand, ignore pirates all-together and push a smear and fear campaign.

c. staley wrote:
I'm seriously growing weary of having to explain the same thing over and over again because cheerleaders think if they ask the same question a hundred different ways, they might get a different answer.... (isn't that part of the definition of insanity? Expecting a different outcome from the same action?)


I am glad you are growing weary. Nothing would please me more than for you to just stop.

Your definition of insanity is “Expecting a different outcome from the same action”

YOU “explain the same thing over and over again” (which meets your insanity definition) because…..
the CHEERLEADERS “ask the same question a hundred different ways” (which does not meet your definition because there are a hundred different actions)

Also, insanity is actually quite rare – to the tune of about 1% of the world’s population – which just so happens to be a number you return to over and over and over again as if you are expecting something to change because of it when nothing is.

I am not a doctor, but one could draw an unsavory conclusion from that. And since my word commands such respect, you might be wise to get a check up.

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 1:47 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
chrisavis wrote:
And since my word commands such respect, you might be wise to get a check up.

-Chris

REALLY Chris?? REALLY?? Thinking a bit much of yourself, aren't you??

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 3:28 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
99% of your post is drivel....

chrisavis wrote:
I have seen your posts on the Sound Choice forums......


And exactly what are the dates of those posts?.... was it 7 or perhaps 8 years ago?

chrisavis wrote:
Chip, I assure you, it is a feeble attempt on your part to make me feel guilty or look bad in the karaoke community for assisting people that ask for help. I sleep well at night knowing that I have helped people do the right thing. You on the other hand, ignore pirates all-together and push a smear and fear campaign.


"assisting people that ask for help" is my point exactly. It's nothing more than an excuse to help pirates keep their jobs. And that's all it is. You make money helping them... I get it.

Ignoring (i.e. "NOT helping") pirates is better for this "industry" and the "fight against piracy" than shielding and assisting them maintain their jobs... But you fight to make it sound like you're doing something worthwhile.... because you "make money" on piracy.... These are your admissions... once you strip away the flowery description you spew forth.

chrisavis wrote:

I am glad you are growing weary. Nothing would please me more than for you to just stop.

Your definition of insanity is “Expecting a different outcome from the same action”

YOU “explain the same thing over and over again” (which meets your insanity definition) because…..
the CHEERLEADERS “ask the same question a hundred different ways” (which does not meet your definition because there are a hundred different actions)

You have that backwards.... Asking the same question a hundred different ways IS the "same action" because you're asking THE SAME question....

Providing the same answer is "consistency."

And if you don't like reading the same answer over and over again then by all means.... DON'T. No one here is forcing to read my posts.... click the "ignore button" and make yourself happy.... Remember your avatar: "Feel Good!" So, go for it! Don't let me stop you....

chrisavis wrote:
And since my word commands such respect......


Perhaps only from the pirates you're helping.....


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 6:58 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
c. staley wrote:
99% of your post is drivel....

chrisavis wrote:
I have seen your posts on the Sound Choice forums......


And exactly what are the dates of those posts?.... was it 7 or perhaps 8 years ago?


Which is exactly my point. You have dedicated an amazing amount of time to beating up Sound Choice and what has it gotten you?

c. staley wrote:
chrisavis wrote:
Chip, I assure you, it is a feeble attempt on your part to make me feel guilty or look bad in the karaoke community for assisting people that ask for help. I sleep well at night knowing that I have helped people do the right thing. You on the other hand, ignore pirates all-together and push a smear and fear campaign.


"assisting people that ask for help" is my point exactly. It's nothing more than an excuse to help pirates keep their jobs. And that's all it is. You make money helping them... I get it.

Ignoring (i.e. "NOT helping") pirates is better for this "industry" and the "fight against piracy" than shielding and assisting them maintain their jobs... But you fight to make it sound like you're doing something worthwhile.... because you "make money" on piracy.... These are your admissions... once you strip away the flowery description you spew forth.


So by your own admission, ignoring a crime somehow improves the industry. By your own admission, allowing someone to continue stealing is better than, helping someone stop stealing and in fact, pay for materials they stole. By your own admission, allowing, if not encouraging someone to steal karaoke music is somehow better for the industry than me working with someone to pay for music they stole and pay for new music they acquire.

Okay - lets bury the flowers, I profited by approximately $300 by selling discs that I owned to people that wanted to buy them. You have done exactly the same thing. What exactly have I done that you have not?

You know about criminals commiting a crime. You allow them to continue to commit that crime. You intentionally keep the affected parties in the dark. One can easily conclude that you are actually intentionally inflicting harm on the industry.

c. staley wrote:
chrisavis wrote:

I am glad you are growing weary. Nothing would please me more than for you to just stop.

Your definition of insanity is “Expecting a different outcome from the same action”

YOU “explain the same thing over and over again” (which meets your insanity definition) because…..
the CHEERLEADERS “ask the same question a hundred different ways” (which does not meet your definition because there are a hundred different actions)

You have that backwards.... Asking the same question a hundred different ways IS the "same action" because you're asking THE SAME question....

Providing the same answer is "consistency."


Hold on, don't twist. I quoted on purpose. You aren't "answering", you are "explaining".

c. staley wrote:
And if you don't like reading the same answer over and over again then by all means.... DON'T. No one here is forcing to read my posts.... click the "ignore button" and make yourself happy.... Remember your avatar: "Feel Good!" So, go for it! Don't let me stop you....


Chip - the only reason I continue to engage with you is to help ensure that new people that come to the forums don't succumb to your FUD. I am pretty sure the long time watchers here have you figured out. The new people here should be exposed to more than your incessant vitriol.

chrisavis wrote:
And since my word commands such respect......


c. staley wrote:
Perhaps only from the pirates you're helping.....


Hold on again. You were the one that elevated my words to the point that I have the power to "confirm" things and thus be held up as proof to your own arguments. You can't have it both ways. You just proven beyond a showdow of a doubt that you will take only the piece you need to fit your mission while ignoring the rest.

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:00 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am
Posts: 3011
Been Liked: 1003 times
c. staley wrote:
Sorry, but with all due respect to your position, that's not gonna cut it.... You are not the legal agent for Slep-Tone Entertainment. And you only have legal responsibilities for those areas that have been assigned to you by your client -- to date -- by your own admission, that doesn't include Michigan.


It's a statement of policy, which is within my purview, but I can respect that you don't want to take my word for it.

c. staley wrote:
Your guarantee also doesn't specify whether or not your client wouldn't sue my corporation (a legal entity) or myself personally or both. It would need to include at minimum both. Based the technicalities that your client sues on, I wouldn't put it past them to guarantee not to sue "the person" and turn around and sue "the corporation." Call it the "DSS" or "Deranged Staley Syndrome" if you like. (I'll just slip into my tinfoil hat...)


Did you think I was talking about you personally?

I did not intend for the term "you" to be restricted in any way. In fact, it applies to everyone. So it will apply to you, your corporation, and everyone else.

c. staley wrote:
The only guarantee that might (key word: "might") work is one that is .... signed on paper and notarized.... by the owner/registered agent of the company and you probably wouldn't like it much anyway.


Now we're getting somewhere. You've moved the goalposts a little bit, but that's fine.

But I do want you to be absolutely clear on this point, because I don't want to keep going back to Kurt to ask for things. I'll state it again just so you can verify: In order to be valid, at a minimum, a guarantee like the one I posted (with appropriate modifications to make it clear it's not restricted to you versus your corporation, employees, etc.) would need to be signed on paper, by the owner of the company, with a notarized signature.

If I can get that for you (and I think I can), will that suffice for what you were requesting?


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 7:34 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
chrisavis wrote:
c. staley wrote:
99% of your post is drivel....

chrisavis wrote:
I have seen your posts on the Sound Choice forums......


And exactly what are the dates of those posts?.... was it 7 or perhaps 8 years ago?


Which is exactly my point. You have dedicated an amazing amount of time to beating up Sound Choice and what has it gotten you?


Why do you care at all? You spent such an amazing amount of time with your "Schlap Yeti" thread that you even took the time to post it on other forums where it resides today.... for fun? And then immediately turn around and offer to birdofsong to purchase our 8125's? Really?

chrisavis wrote:
So by your own admission, ignoring a crime somehow improves the industry. By your own admission, allowing someone to continue stealing is better than, helping someone stop stealing and in fact, pay for materials they stole.


"helping someone stop stealing?" Is that what you're calling it now? C'mon... be serious because your flip-flopping is creating whiplash..... On one hand, you claim you "report pirates" and on the other you "help someone stop stealing?"

Is this your justification for reporting pirates that won't buy anything from you? You're only "helping the lost souls" that do?

If I ignore a pirate... I'm not "helping them" am I?

Apparently you don't (or refuse) to see a distinction.

chrisavis wrote:
By your own admission, allowing, if not encouraging someone to steal karaoke music is somehow better for the industry than me working with someone to pay for music they stole and pay for new music they acquire.


I'm not encouraging anyone to steal anything... that's the point.. and I'm not re-labeling something it isn't just to make it more palatable to the rest of the world.

If you really wanted to "help fight piracy" you'd only be reporting these same people you are "helping and working with" so that legal KJ's could have some decent work. But you'd rather profit from it while diluting the market with even more competition....

How exactly is that "helping" any legal KJ? It doesn't in my opinion.

chrisavis wrote:
Okay - lets bury the flowers, I profited by approximately $300 by selling discs that I owned to people that wanted to buy them. You have done exactly the same thing. What exactly have I done that you have not?


You have admitted that you help, assist or even "work with" KJ's that you know are pirates to keep their jobs while selling them materials so they can keep their current gigs and continue to compete. At the same time, you claim to "report piracy".....

I think even you are confused on which way you're going.

chrisavis wrote:
You know about criminals commiting a crime. You allow them to continue to commit that crime. You intentionally keep the affected parties in the dark. One can easily conclude that you are actually intentionally inflicting harm on the industry.

Isn't this EXACTLY the same people you are "working with?"

(a) They are not legal, and even you call them "illegal hosts" instead of pirates.

(b) You allow them to continue to commit that crime... while you're "helping and working with them."

(c) You intentionally keep the "affected parties" (i.e. Sound Choice) in the dark (by not reporting them).

(d) One CAN conclude that you are actually inflicting harm on the industry.

Isn't that what is happening with you in a nutshell?

chrisavis wrote:
c. staley wrote:
chrisavis wrote:

I am glad you are growing weary. Nothing would please me more than for you to just stop.

Your definition of insanity is “Expecting a different outcome from the same action”

YOU “explain the same thing over and over again” (which meets your insanity definition) because…..
the CHEERLEADERS “ask the same question a hundred different ways” (which does not meet your definition because there are a hundred different actions)

You have that backwards.... Asking the same question a hundred different ways IS the "same action" because you're asking THE SAME question....

Providing the same answer is "consistency."


Hold on, don't twist. I quoted on purpose. You aren't "answering", you are "explaining".

I'm not twisting anything and I didn't think you were quoting on accident. You just can't have it both ways. You can't insist that I fit the definition of "insane" for answering the same way time after time... I KNOW it's the same way.... every time. I'm not expecting a different answer each time. The cheerleaders are though.. so they simply rephrase the same questions over and over again hoping someday they'll get a different answer....



chrisavis wrote:
c. staley wrote:
And if you don't like reading the same answer over and over again then by all means.... DON'T. No one here is forcing to read my posts.... click the "ignore button" and make yourself happy.... Remember your avatar: "Feel Good!" So, go for it! Don't let me stop you....


Chip - the only reason I continue to engage with you is to help ensure that new people that come to the forums don't succumb to your FUD. I am pretty sure the long time watchers here have you figured out. The new people here should be exposed to more than your incessant vitriol.


Then you must feel you have a worthwhile purpose, great. Explain it to the "new people" you're here to "help." No need to go 'round and 'round with me is there?

chrisavis wrote:
chrisavis wrote:
And since my word commands such respect......


c. staley wrote:
Perhaps only from the pirates you're helping.....


Hold on again. You were the one that elevated my words to the point that I have the power to "confirm" things and thus be held up as proof to your own arguments. You can't have it both ways. You just proven beyond a showdow of a doubt that you will take only the piece you need to fit your mission while ignoring the rest.

-Chris


Where did you get the idea that I've "elevated" anything you say to any level whatsoever? You're a relative newbie.... I know you're all excited about this business and believe you have the solution to everything.....

If you drop your day job(s) and tried to survive only on your karaoke business, I think you'd have a different outlook.

Carry on.....


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 9:59 am 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 3:00 am
Posts: 192
Location: Illinois
Been Liked: 16 times
chrisavis wrote:

Chip - the only reason I continue to engage with you is to help ensure that new people that come to the forums don't succumb to your FUD. I am pretty sure the long time watchers here have you figured out. The new people here should be exposed to more than your incessant vitriol.



This is appreciated Chris in order to keep it fresh. I've been here around 6 months and it didn't take me long to figure him out. Surely anyone new to this forum with common sense will most certainly do the same.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 12:20 pm 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster

Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 4:51 am
Posts: 148
Been Liked: 17 times
Agree with CHIP on everything he states. :angel: of truth.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 1:52 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
c. staley wrote:
chrisavis wrote:
c. staley wrote:
99% of your post is drivel....

chrisavis wrote:
I have seen your posts on the Sound Choice forums......


And exactly what are the dates of those posts?.... was it 7 or perhaps 8 years ago?


Which is exactly my point. You have dedicated an amazing amount of time to beating up Sound Choice and what has it gotten you?


Why do you care at all? You spent such an amazing amount of time with your "Schlap Yeti" thread that you even took the time to post it on other forums where it resides today.... for fun? And then immediately turn around and offer to birdofsong to purchase our 8125's? Really?

chrisavis wrote:
So by your own admission, ignoring a crime somehow improves the industry. By your own admission, allowing someone to continue stealing is better than, helping someone stop stealing and in fact, pay for materials they stole.


"helping someone stop stealing?" Is that what you're calling it now? C'mon... be serious because your flip-flopping is creating whiplash..... On one hand, you claim you "report pirates" and on the other you "help someone stop stealing?"

Is this your justification for reporting pirates that won't buy anything from you? You're only "helping the lost souls" that do?

If I ignore a pirate... I'm not "helping them" am I?

Apparently you don't (or refuse) to see a distinction.

chrisavis wrote:
By your own admission, allowing, if not encouraging someone to steal karaoke music is somehow better for the industry than me working with someone to pay for music they stole and pay for new music they acquire.


I'm not encouraging anyone to steal anything... that's the point.. and I'm not re-labeling something it isn't just to make it more palatable to the rest of the world.

If you really wanted to "help fight piracy" you'd only be reporting these same people you are "helping and working with" so that legal KJ's could have some decent work. But you'd rather profit from it while diluting the market with even more competition....

How exactly is that "helping" any legal KJ? It doesn't in my opinion.

chrisavis wrote:
Okay - lets bury the flowers, I profited by approximately $300 by selling discs that I owned to people that wanted to buy them. You have done exactly the same thing. What exactly have I done that you have not?


You have admitted that you help, assist or even "work with" KJ's that you know are pirates to keep their jobs while selling them materials so they can keep their current gigs and continue to compete. At the same time, you claim to "report piracy".....

I think even you are confused on which way you're going.

chrisavis wrote:
You know about criminals commiting a crime. You allow them to continue to commit that crime. You intentionally keep the affected parties in the dark. One can easily conclude that you are actually intentionally inflicting harm on the industry.

Isn't this EXACTLY the same people you are "working with?"

(a) They are not legal, and even you call them "illegal hosts" instead of pirates.

(b) You allow them to continue to commit that crime... while you're "helping and working with them."

(c) You intentionally keep the "affected parties" (i.e. Sound Choice) in the dark (by not reporting them).

(d) One CAN conclude that you are actually inflicting harm on the industry.

Isn't that what is happening with you in a nutshell?

chrisavis wrote:
c. staley wrote:
chrisavis wrote:

I am glad you are growing weary. Nothing would please me more than for you to just stop.

Your definition of insanity is “Expecting a different outcome from the same action”

YOU “explain the same thing over and over again” (which meets your insanity definition) because…..
the CHEERLEADERS “ask the same question a hundred different ways” (which does not meet your definition because there are a hundred different actions)

You have that backwards.... Asking the same question a hundred different ways IS the "same action" because you're asking THE SAME question....

Providing the same answer is "consistency."


Hold on, don't twist. I quoted on purpose. You aren't "answering", you are "explaining".

I'm not twisting anything and I didn't think you were quoting on accident. You just can't have it both ways. You can't insist that I fit the definition of "insane" for answering the same way time after time... I KNOW it's the same way.... every time. I'm not expecting a different answer each time. The cheerleaders are though.. so they simply rephrase the same questions over and over again hoping someday they'll get a different answer....



chrisavis wrote:
c. staley wrote:
And if you don't like reading the same answer over and over again then by all means.... DON'T. No one here is forcing to read my posts.... click the "ignore button" and make yourself happy.... Remember your avatar: "Feel Good!" So, go for it! Don't let me stop you....


Chip - the only reason I continue to engage with you is to help ensure that new people that come to the forums don't succumb to your FUD. I am pretty sure the long time watchers here have you figured out. The new people here should be exposed to more than your incessant vitriol.


Then you must feel you have a worthwhile purpose, great. Explain it to the "new people" you're here to "help." No need to go 'round and 'round with me is there?

chrisavis wrote:
chrisavis wrote:
And since my word commands such respect......


c. staley wrote:
Perhaps only from the pirates you're helping.....


Hold on again. You were the one that elevated my words to the point that I have the power to "confirm" things and thus be held up as proof to your own arguments. You can't have it both ways. You just proven beyond a showdow of a doubt that you will take only the piece you need to fit your mission while ignoring the rest.

-Chris


Where did you get the idea that I've "elevated" anything you say to any level whatsoever? You're a relative newbie.... I know you're all excited about this business and believe you have the solution to everything.....

If you drop your day job(s) and tried to survive only on your karaoke business, I think you'd have a different outlook.

Carry on.....


I started writing up a point by point response, and then I recalled a certain signature message from another audited/certified member -

"Do not argue with an idiot. He will drag you down to his level and beat you with experience."

I don't believe you to be an idiot by any means. In fact, I think you are quite intelligent. So were some of the most reviled people in history.

When the FUD reaches the appropriate level, I will jump into the fray again.

Carry on.....

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 1:58 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
What is FUD????

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 1:59 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
FUD = Fear Uncertainty and Doubt

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:05 pm 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 10:11 am
Posts: 1832
Location: TX
Been Liked: 59 times
would you guys please learn to edit your posts!

_________________
I like everyone when I first meet them. If you don't like me that's not my problem it's YOURS!
A stranger is a friend you haven't met yet


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 2:14 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
Lone Wolf wrote:
would you guys please learn to edit your posts!


Sorry Folks, I decided to stop editing hoping to keep the debate on point.

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Mar 28, 2012 4:40 pm 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 10:11 am
Posts: 1832
Location: TX
Been Liked: 59 times
Yes I realize that but when you have to scroll through 1/2 a page just to get to the end of the post its getting boring.

_________________
I like everyone when I first meet them. If you don't like me that's not my problem it's YOURS!
A stranger is a friend you haven't met yet


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 54 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 180 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech