|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
Lonman
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 12:41 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
Paradigm Karaoke wrote: karaokegod73 wrote: I think without the suits there would just be a continued downward spiral. If you're putting money into karaoke then obviously you want to make money...so why would you want people buying hard drives for a few hundred dollars with 100,000 songs taking shows that you could have gotten? These people would not be going into business at all if it wasn't so cheap.
i agree, however the law suits are doing nothing to stem that tide. the settlements include GEM sets for the money paid. more than you and i could lease them for, but still less than what we have paid for our music. i am also not sure how they got all that information being everything is sealed. I don't even think that is an issue anymore, prices do fall. If someone can get the GEM for less than what we paid, yeah it sucks to be us, but i'd rather play on an even keel with at least the SC tracks than compete against one that has EVERy SC track available.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 12:43 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
Smoothedge69 wrote: Lonman wrote: Smoothedge69 wrote: Yeah, I guess you are right. No wonder they want to sue everyone they can get their greedy little hands on. And they wonder why people do not want to use their product. Amazing. They are suing from those that stole from them in the first place Open your eyes, Bro. They name almost anyone they see displaying a Sound Choice mark, without question. Ok, but as soon as that person shows discs behind their tracks, suit dropped - period - yes i've heard they are going to start charging double (or more) to those who didn't volunteer, but until then, no harm no foul! If that changes, i'm sure we'll hear about it here. Otherwise the way most 'anti' SC policy think, there is no way to determine whether a kj has or doesn't have discs - which I am betting the majority do not. And once again, THAT is their primary concern in this whole thing!
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
hiteck
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 5:08 am |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:39 am Posts: 884 Location: Tx Been Liked: 17 times
|
Lonman wrote: ...the way most 'anti' SC policy think, there is no way to determine whether a kj has or doesn't have discs - which I am betting the majority do not. And once again, THAT is their primary concern in this whole thing! How about I take a photo of every SC disc I have and generate a track list for everyone of those songs and send it to SC. You want me to put a special mark, tag or number on my disks no problem. SC would then know exactly what I have and what I don't. If I get caught playing something I've not reported then my goose is cooked. This method is good enough for the 2% increase in a library for certified hosts why isn't it good enough for permission to play their tracks in media shifted format? How much would that really cost SC if the KJ did all the work. I could care less about being listed on their site, their banner or their CNS. I'd just like to have permission in writing from them to media shift their tracks I have on SC original media for use in a show
_________________ My statements, opinions and conclusions are based on my own personal experiences, observations, research and/or just my own $.02. I'm not a "cheerleader", but that doesn't make me a Pirate.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Bazza
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 7:45 am |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
Smoothedge69 wrote: Lonman wrote: Smoothedge69 wrote: Yeah, I guess you are right. No wonder they want to sue everyone they can get their greedy little hands on. And they wonder why people do not want to use their product. Amazing. They are suing from those that stole from them in the first place Open your eyes, Bro. They name almost anyone they see displaying a Sound Choice mark, without question. You open YOUR eyes "bro". With a very small handful of exceptions, those that settle are pirates. Those with the actual discs are dismissed.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lone Wolf
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 3:43 pm |
|
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 10:11 am Posts: 1832 Location: TX Been Liked: 59 times
|
Lonman wrote: Bazza wrote: Smoothedge69 wrote: someone said there are, possibly, 30,000 active KJs out there That number seems very high. There aren't hundreds of KJ's in every town. Who knows though. It's all speculation. Sure seems like it here. Karaoke on almost every corner! I think there are more than 30,000. If ya do the math that's only 600 KJ's per state. I'm willing to bet that there are alot more than that in Cali, Fla, and TX. I don't know any state that doesn't have Karaoke but then again you might ask Mcky57 seems like he gets to a lot of states and sings Karaoke.
_________________ I like everyone when I first meet them. If you don't like me that's not my problem it's YOURS! A stranger is a friend you haven't met yet
|
|
Top |
|
|
earthling12357
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 4:29 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:21 pm Posts: 1609 Location: Earth Been Liked: 307 times
|
Take that math one step further. With their current method of certification, it has taken 3 years to certify less than 300 KJs. At that rate all 30,000+ KJs will be certified by the year 2312.
_________________ KNOW THYSELF
|
|
Top |
|
|
Smoothedge69
|
Posted: Wed May 09, 2012 4:33 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am Posts: 3885 Images: 0 Been Liked: 397 times
|
earthling12357 wrote: Take that math one step further. With their current method of certification, it has taken 3 years to certify less than 300 KJs. At that rate all 30,000+ KJs will be certified by the year 2312. See?? This proves my point!! SC is involved in a fruitless effort. EVERY KJ alive today will be LONG dead by 2312!!! It is illogical to continue this mindless mission of theirs.
_________________ I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE
|
|
Top |
|
|
karaokegod73
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 4:21 am |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:53 pm Posts: 187 Been Liked: 5 times
|
We'll probably all be dead by then. In fact, with the world situation I don't see us lasting another 50. Just my opinion though!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Smoothedge69
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 4:26 am |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am Posts: 3885 Images: 0 Been Liked: 397 times
|
Hopefully, by 2312 we will be doing Karaoke on the Holodeck of a star ship going Warp 7. \\//_
_________________ I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 11:48 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
Lonman wrote: Smoothedge69 wrote: Lonman wrote: Smoothedge69 wrote: Yeah, I guess you are right. No wonder they want to sue everyone they can get their greedy little hands on. And they wonder why people do not want to use their product. Amazing. They are suing from those that stole from them in the first place Open your eyes, Bro. They name almost anyone they see displaying a Sound Choice mark, without question. Ok, but as soon as that person shows discs behind their tracks, suit dropped - period - yes i've heard they are going to start charging double (or more) to those who didn't volunteer, but until then, no harm no foul! Sue first, ask questions later- and you claim no harm no foul? I don't normally do the negative personalization/flame bit, but that strikes me as the same lack of ethics that SC displays. If I have misunderstood you, then I offer apologies in advance. If I haven't, then I stand by my statement.
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Fri May 11, 2012 11:52 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
Lonman wrote: 1) . Otherwise the way most 'anti' SC policy think, there is no way to determine whether a kj has or doesn't have discs - which I am betting the majority do not.
2) And once again, THAT is their primary concern in this whole thing!
1) While that may be the case, it is not an excuse to persecute PAYING CUSTOMERS. 2) Please find and re-read Kurt's posts. That has NEVER been the primary concern- per KURT. The PRIMARY concern- again, PER KURT, is to recoup losses. In other words, to gain another income.
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 12:45 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
Right - recoup losses from those that stole from them ie pirates.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
birdofsong
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 6:55 am |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:25 am Posts: 965 Been Liked: 118 times
|
Lonman wrote: Right - recoup losses from those that stole from them ie pirates. If that is the case, then why are they charging paying customers a G...D....thing?
_________________ Birdofsong
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 7:07 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
birdofsong wrote: Lonman wrote: Right - recoup losses from those that stole from them ie pirates. If that is the case, then why are they charging paying customers a G...D....thing? Straight from the Pre-Suit Audit - "The charge for this audit helps offset the significant labor and management expense to provide this service."Clear, concise, and leaves very little room for debate. -Chris
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
birdofsong
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 7:54 am |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:25 am Posts: 965 Been Liked: 118 times
|
chrisavis wrote: birdofsong wrote: Lonman wrote: Right - recoup losses from those that stole from them ie pirates. If that is the case, then why are they charging paying customers a G...D....thing? Straight from the Pre-Suit Audit - "The charge for this audit helps offset the significant labor and management expense to provide this service."Clear, concise, and leaves very little room for debate. -Chris But also shouldn't be my problem. I didn't ask them to impose an audit. It was their decision. If they are going to change their policy to make their job more labor intensive, they should be willing to bear the cost of it. It's not a "service" to ME.
_________________ Birdofsong
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 8:56 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
birdofsong wrote: chrisavis wrote: birdofsong wrote: Lonman wrote: Right - recoup losses from those that stole from them ie pirates. If that is the case, then why are they charging paying customers a G...D....thing? Straight from the Pre-Suit Audit - "The charge for this audit helps offset the significant labor and management expense to provide this service."Clear, concise, and leaves very little room for debate. -Chris But also shouldn't be my problem. I didn't ask them to impose an audit. It was their decision. If they are going to change their policy to make their job more labor intensive, they should be willing to bear the cost of it. It's not a "service" to ME. I don't like the word "service" either btw. I think it is more of a program. Absorbing the cost is something I think they have done quite a bit of already. Cost absorption ALWAYS results in the cost being passed along in some other way. Maybe another dollar or two per disc. Which over time amounts to a lot more than the cost of the audit. You will pay for it some way. I know the return argument will be "They don't make discs any more" and "We don't use/buy their product anymore". They have indicated they will be producing again though and while the rumor is that it will only be for certified hosts, those that are eligible and do buy would have the costs passed on to them. Someone pays for it. -Chris
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
Second City Song
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 9:51 am |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 3:00 am Posts: 192 Location: Illinois Been Liked: 16 times
|
birdofsong wrote: I didn't ask them to impose an audit. I don't think Sound Choice asked people to make copies of their product either.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Smoothedge69
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 10:28 am |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am Posts: 3885 Images: 0 Been Liked: 397 times
|
This argument is NEVER going to end, unless SC finally goes out of business.
_________________ I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 12:35 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
they cant take it as just "a cost of doing business"?
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
timberlea
|
Posted: Sat May 12, 2012 12:38 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm Posts: 4094 Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada Been Liked: 309 times
|
Would you be willing to take the hit?
_________________ You can be strange but not a stranger
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 105 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|