Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums
https://mail.karaokescenemagazine.net/forums/

Latest SC Lawsuit Summery On Florida Transfer 7/13/11
https://mail.karaokescenemagazine.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=21942
Page 1 of 1

Author:  Wall Of Sound [ Thu Jul 14, 2011 2:54 pm ]
Post subject:  Latest SC Lawsuit Summery On Florida Transfer 7/13/11

http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/trad ... r/summary/

Author:  jdmeister [ Thu Jul 14, 2011 3:07 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Latest SC Lawsuit Summery On Florida Transfer 7/13/11

Thanks for the link.

:mrgreen:

Author:  Wall Of Sound [ Tue Jul 19, 2011 12:02 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Latest SC Lawsuit Summery On Florida Transfer 7/13/11

Here are the latest district transfer filings in Florida dated 7/18/11 with docket text.

http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/trad ... s/summary/

http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/trad ... e/summary/

Looks like some defendants defaulted:

"6/7/2011 42 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to CURTIS DAVIS, JAIMI PUTZKE, DAN SPRING (djb) [Transferred from flnd on 7/18/2011.] (Entered: 06/07/2011)

6/6/2011 40 APPLICATION for Clerk's Entry of Default as to Curtis Davis, Dan Spring, and Jaimi Putzke. (FLOREN, MARIA) [Transferred from flnd on 7/18/2011.] (Entered: 06/06/2011)"

Author:  rumbolt [ Tue Jul 19, 2011 1:35 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Latest SC Lawsuit Summery On Florida Transfer 7/13/11

Wall Of Sound wrote:
Here are the latest district transfer filings in Florida dated 7/18/11 with docket text.

http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/trad ... s/summary/

http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/trad ... e/summary/

Looks like some defendants defaulted:

"6/7/2011 42 Clerk's ENTRY OF DEFAULT as to CURTIS DAVIS, JAIMI PUTZKE, DAN SPRING (djb) [Transferred from flnd on 7/18/2011.] (Entered: 06/07/2011)

6/6/2011 40 APPLICATION for Clerk's Entry of Default as to Curtis Davis, Dan Spring, and Jaimi Putzke. (FLOREN, MARIA) [Transferred from flnd on 7/18/2011.] (Entered: 06/06/2011)"




If they defaulted and it is upheld in future court dates, does this mean that this a positive outcome for SC?

Author:  Moonrider [ Tue Jul 19, 2011 2:47 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Latest SC Lawsuit Summery On Florida Transfer 7/13/11

rumbolt wrote:
If they defaulted and it is upheld in future court dates, does this mean that this a positive outcome for SC?


it won't mean squat if SC can't show cause why the case shouldn't be severed and filed as separate suits or simply dismissed out of hand for not complying with a court order per this little exchange:

You might note that the Florida judges don't seem to be tolerating any unnecessary delays on the part of Sound Choice. Sounds to me like irritated judge syndrome.

5/5/2011 28 SHOW CAUSE ORDER: Plaintiff shall show cause not later than 5/20/2011 why the claims against the disparate defendants should not be dropped, severed in favor of separate trials, and/or transferred to the appropriate district. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 5/5/2011. (jem) [Transferred from flnd on 7/18/2011.] (Entered: 05/05/2011)

5/20/2011 39 RESPONSE TO ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE by SLEP-TONE ENTERTAINMENT CORPORATION. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Declaration of Kurt J. Slep) (HARRINGTON, JAMES) [Transferred from flnd on 7/18/2011.] (Entered: 05/20/2011)

ACTION REQUIRED BY DISTRICT JUDGE: Chambers of JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK notified that action is needed Re: 39 Response to Order to Show Cause (djb) [Transferred from flnd on 7/18/2011.] (Entered: 05/20/2011)

6/13/2011 44 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE - Within FOURTEEN (14) DAYS from the date of docketing of this order, Plaintiff shall show cause, if any, why this case should not be dismissed for failure to comply with an order of the court. Plaintiff's failure to comply with an order of this court will result in a recommendation of dismissal of this action. Signed by MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY on 6/13/2011. Show Cause Response due by 6/27/2011. (djb) [Transferred from flnd on 7/18/2011.] (Entered: 06/13/2011)

6/28/2011 ACTION REQUIRED BY MAGISTRATE JUDGE: Chambers of MAGISTRATE JUDGE ELIZABETH M TIMOTHY notified that action is needed Re: 46 Response to Order to Show Cause. (tll) [Transferred from flnd on 7/18/2011.] (Entered: 06/28/2011)


7/7/2011 48 ORDER re 28 Order to Show Cause, 39 Response. Plaintiff shall file a particularized report not later than 7/21/2011. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 7/7/2011. (jem) [Transferred from flnd on 7/18/2011.] (Entered: 07/07/2011)

Author:  Wall Of Sound [ Tue Jul 19, 2011 3:14 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Latest SC Lawsuit Summery On Florida Transfer 7/13/11

Another transfer with docket text of defaults but defendants in default were transffered yesterday June 18th 2011:

"7/8/2011 55 ORDER The clerk is directed to transfer these Dfts to the appropriate district. DANIEL BRANCH, BRENDA BREININGER, CHRIS CONRAD, ANDREW COUCHE, PATRICE COUCHE, D & D'S PUB INC, MARK FLEMING, ROBERT GERHART, HI-NOTE ENTERTAINMENT INC, ISLAND ENTERTAINMENT LLC, REUBEN JENKINS, DEANA JENNINGS, FAYE JOHNSON, MICHAEL ANGELO MINCIELI, MOBILE MUSIC EXPRESS LLC, MONA LISA ITALIAN RESTAURANT PIZZA AND LOUNGE, DAVID NOTHSTINE, ELIZABETH NOTHSTINE, OUTLAW KARAOKE, PARADISE MOON ENTERTAINMENT INC, GIUSEPPE PIRRONE, ROSALIA PIRRONE, SEAN COREY ENTERTAINMENT LLC, NICHOLAS SILEO, TOUCAN ENTERTAINMENT, JAMES ALLEN and SUSAN BADGLEY terminated. Signed by JUDGE RICHARD SMOAK on 7/8/2011. (sea) Transferred from flnd on 7/18/2011.] "

So it appears SC is doing what has been ordered.

http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/trad ... d/summary/

"

Author:  Wall Of Sound [ Tue Jul 19, 2011 3:21 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Latest SC Lawsuit Summery On Florida Transfer 7/13/11

Moonrider wrote:
rumbolt wrote:
If they defaulted and it is upheld in future court dates, does this mean that this a positive outcome for SC?


it won't mean squat if SC can't show cause why the case shouldn't be severed and filed as separate suits


Looks like this is being done as we speak.

This one just now popped up which is a single defendant dated today July 19th 2011.

http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/trad ... k/summary/

Author:  Moonrider [ Tue Jul 19, 2011 5:20 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Latest SC Lawsuit Summery On Florida Transfer 7/13/11

Wall Of Sound wrote:

So it appears SC is doing what has been ordered.

http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/trad ... d/summary/



Different case. Please stay on point.
http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/trad ... e/summary/

Author:  Wall Of Sound [ Tue Jul 19, 2011 7:01 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Latest SC Lawsuit Summery On Florida Transfer 7/13/11

Moonrider wrote:
Wall Of Sound wrote:

So it appears SC is doing what has been ordered.

http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/trad ... d/summary/



Different case. Please stay on point.
http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/trad ... e/summary/


Sorry I know it's a different case. The new filings keep popping up almost daily.

I believe part of all this new activity is to do what you suggest.

Author:  The Lone Ranger [ Wed Jul 20, 2011 4:39 am ]
Post subject:  Re: Latest SC Lawsuit Summery On Florida Transfer 7/13/11

Moonrider wrote:
rumbolt wrote:
If they defaulted and it is upheld in future court dates, does this mean that this a positive outcome for SC?


it won't mean squat if SC can't show cause why the case shouldn't be severed and filed as separate suits or simply dismissed out of hand for not complying with a court order per this little exchange:

You might note that the Florida judges don't seem to be tolerating any unnecessary delays on the part of Sound Choice. Sounds to me like irritated judge syndrome.

8) It is a good thing that maybe we will have one of these cases tried finally, get some kind of ruling, and then maybe put of of this speculation, to rest once and for all. Once everyone knows what we are dealing with, the right response can be employed, to the situation of suits from the manus. Then the hosts can focus once more on their business and not what some others have in mind for this industry.

Author:  kjathena [ Sat Jul 23, 2011 4:03 pm ]
Post subject:  Re: Latest SC Lawsuit Summery On Florida Transfer 7/13/11

looks like a number of default judgments have been awarded...hope SC makes examples of them. For Kurt Slep's reply see the More Florida refilling thread

Page 1 of 1 All times are UTC - 8 hours
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group
https://www.phpbb.com/