HAPPY DANCE...SHAKES POM POMS....HAPPY DANCE Blessings
Athena
| Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums https://mail.karaokescenemagazine.net/forums/ |
|
| Chartbuster teams up with Soundchoice in Arizona lawsuit https://mail.karaokescenemagazine.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=23692 |
Page 1 of 1 |
| Author: | earthling12357 [ Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:20 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Chartbuster teams up with Soundchoice in Arizona lawsuit |
This one has it all: Twenty Four plus defendants, all related to the same multi-rig outfit. The usual Unauthorized Trademark display. The usual John Does yet to be determined. The usual Unfair Competition. A new player in the lawsuit game; Piracy Recovery, LLC (formerly Chartbuster) The new Trademark removal with a Trade Dress twist. The bonus Hard Drive purchase by investigator. These defendants are in big, big trouble. http://dockets.justia.com/docket/arizon ... 98/695367/ This one will be very interesting. Having created a whole separate division for lawsuits, Chartbuster may have found a new calling: Quote: 27. Plaintiff PR is an affiliate of, and successor-in-interest to certain rights formerly belonging to, another of the leading U.S. manufacturers of karaoke accompaniment tracks, commonly known as Chartbuster Karaoke (“Chartbuster”). So perhaps it's only just begun... |
|
| Author: | earthling12357 [ Tue Apr 24, 2012 12:57 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chartbuster teams up with Soundchoice in Arizona lawsuit |
Here's a thought.... I wonder what the settlement package will be now that Chartbuster is part of the suit? And now that Chartbuster is out-of-business, do they still have something to sell to keep a pirate in business? |
|
| Author: | c. staley [ Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:00 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chartbuster teams up with Soundchoice in Arizona lawsuit |
For clarification to those that do not know: The term "successor in interest "means a successor to another's interest in property, especially a successor in ownership of a business that is carried on and controlled substantially as it was before the transfer. in Lake Erie the Ohio Supreme Court stated that the term "successor in interest," as used in Ohio workers' compensation statutes and regulations, "is simply a transferee of a business in whole or in part." 578 N.E.2d at 460. Khan v. Douglas Mach. & Tool Co., 661 F. Supp. 2d 437, 445 (S.D.N.Y. 2009) |
|
| Author: | c. staley [ Tue Apr 24, 2012 1:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chartbuster teams up with Soundchoice in Arizona lawsuit |
earthling12357 wrote: Here's a thought.... I wonder what the settlement package will be now that Chartbuster is part of the suit? And now that Chartbuster is out-of-business, do they still have something to sell to keep a pirate in business? I think it will be nothing but money. |
|
| Author: | Paradigm Karaoke [ Tue Apr 24, 2012 2:15 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chartbuster teams up with Soundchoice in Arizona lawsuit |
a massive multi-rig company selling hard drives..... now THAT IS WHO NEEDS TO BE HUNTED!!!!!! Chartbuster jumps in and finally they get it right. |
|
| Author: | leopard lizard [ Tue Apr 24, 2012 2:28 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chartbuster teams up with Soundchoice in Arizona lawsuit |
SC jumped in, took the hits, made the alterations and improvements and set the stage. Notice that it is Mr. Harrington who is the lawyer on this one. I'm glad CB has been able to join but this isn't just their effort. |
|
| Author: | kjathena [ Tue Apr 24, 2012 2:42 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chartbuster teams up with Soundchoice in Arizona lawsuit |
| HAPPY DANCE...SHAKES POM POMS....HAPPY DANCE Blessings Athena |
|
| Author: | Paradigm Karaoke [ Tue Apr 24, 2012 3:50 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chartbuster teams up with Soundchoice in Arizona lawsuit |
wow, it normally costs me $2.99 per minute for women shake their pom poms at me. 
|
|
| Author: | kjathena [ Tue Apr 24, 2012 4:13 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chartbuster teams up with Soundchoice in Arizona lawsuit |
Oh Paradigm...I will shake my virtual Pom Poms for you whenever you want 
|
|
| Author: | timberlea [ Tue Apr 24, 2012 7:27 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chartbuster teams up with Soundchoice in Arizona lawsuit |
Paradigm, here's a pom pom for you: http://ts3.mm.bing.net/images/thumbnail ... o1_400.jpg |
|
| Author: | Paradigm Karaoke [ Wed Apr 25, 2012 12:24 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chartbuster teams up with Soundchoice in Arizona lawsuit |
i appreciate the thought Timberlea....i really do....but....... ok that was funny. wrong, but funny. |
|
| Author: | chrisavis [ Wed Apr 25, 2012 6:06 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chartbuster teams up with Soundchoice in Arizona lawsuit |
I don't appreciate pictures of naked dogs in cars being posted in a public forum.... -Chris |
|
| Author: | c. staley [ Wed Apr 25, 2012 7:34 am ] | ||
| Post subject: | Re: Chartbuster teams up with Soundchoice in Arizona lawsuit | ||
chrisavis wrote: I don't appreciate pictures of naked dogs in cars being posted in a public forum.... -Chris You prefer them dressed?
|
|||
| Author: | chrisavis [ Wed Apr 25, 2012 8:05 am ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chartbuster teams up with Soundchoice in Arizona lawsuit |
All that dog did was "Leave Your Hat On"....  -Chris |
|
| Author: | JoeChartreuse [ Thu Apr 26, 2012 11:44 pm ] |
| Post subject: | Re: Chartbuster teams up with Soundchoice in Arizona lawsuit |
chrisavis wrote: I don't appreciate pictures of naked dogs in cars being posted in a public forum.... -Chris More of a motorcycle guy? |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
| Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |
|
