KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - SC audits question Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Legalities & Piracy, etc... Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


wordpress-hosting

Offsite Links


It is currently Thu Jan 09, 2025 11:02 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 183 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: SC audits question
PostPosted: Wed May 02, 2012 11:16 pm 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster

Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:53 pm
Posts: 187
Been Liked: 5 times
I believe that part of the audit agreement is agreeing to submit to future audits.

So if you're audited and pass, and are audited again (innocent once not good enough), who pays for the audit? Is it the KJ again? If so, you'd be agreeing to a lifetime of potential continuous probation and extortion.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 12:18 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
karaokegod73 wrote:
I believe that part of the audit agreement is agreeing to submit to future audits.

So if you're audited and pass, and are audited again (innocent once not good enough), who pays for the audit? Is it the KJ again? If so, you'd be agreeing to a lifetime of potential continuous probation and extortion.

As far as I know you have to report to them every time you increase your SC collection by 2%.

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 12:24 am 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster

Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:53 pm
Posts: 187
Been Liked: 5 times
None of this probing should be necessary, if you weren't ever proven to be stealing tracks. This is why I don't believe SC can be successful in the future if they sell new music, with the anti-KJ view they appear to have. They feel we are all criminals (shows in their GEM advertising and their agreements) and if we're not guilty yet we will be eventually. This attitude should keep most away from buying any more SC than they already own.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 12:31 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
karaokegod73 wrote:
None of this probing should be necessary, if you weren't ever proven to be stealing tracks. This is why I don't believe SC can be successful in the future if they sell new music, with the anti-KJ view they appear to have. They feel we are all criminals (shows in their GEM advertising and their agreements) and if we're not guilty yet we will be eventually. This attitude should keep most away from buying any more SC than they already own.

It will keep me away, that's for sure.

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 6:07 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am
Posts: 3312
Images: 0
Been Liked: 610 times
I have had the GEM series for almost two years (Set #1). I have never been audited (paid or otherwise). I have never been called. I have never been visited (and they know where I am, obviously). And I don't expect to be as I am not pirating the music or multi-rigging.

Do not confuse those that are caught, settle and become GEM users with those like me who obtained the GEM set proactively in order to enhance their library. The paranoia around SC is simply amazing to me.


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 6:17 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
Also do not confuse those that were sued, settled, and certified with those of us that pro-actively certify.

I can't say whether SC has sent anyone to follow up or not, but I can say that I would expect them to. I imagine there are many that certify (by either means) and then start to creep back towards their old ways (in the case of pirates) or simply don't take it seriously enough or fall into temptation (in the case of the pro-active types).

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 11:19 am 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:21 pm
Posts: 1609
Location: Earth
Been Liked: 307 times
Bazza wrote:
Do not confuse those that are caught, settle and become GEM users with those like me who obtained the GEM set proactively in order to enhance their library. The paranoia around SC is simply amazing to me.


It would seem that kind of confusion is inevitable since the purpose of the Gem set is to offer a settlement option to pirates. Even Soundchoice's own advertising points out that the only reason to aquire the Gem set is to "keep you from having to walk the plank" because the "dog ate my discs".

You are now part of the small minority of Gem users who purchased without being sued.
As the settlements from lawsuits continue to grow, the distinction between those who purchased without legal pressures and those who purchased because they were busted for piracy will diminish.

In the future, it shall be known far and wide that he who displays the blue Soundchoice logo was once a dishonest pirate and probably still is....

chrisavis wrote:
I imagine there are many that certify (by either means) and then start to creep back towards their old ways (in the case of pirates) or simply don't take it seriously enough or fall into temptation (in the case of the pro-active types).

-Chris


See what I mean?

_________________
KNOW THYSELF


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 12:12 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am
Posts: 3312
Images: 0
Been Liked: 610 times
earthling12357 wrote:
It would seem that kind of confusion is inevitable since the purpose of the Gem set is to offer a settlement option to pirates.


This is like saying safe driver courses are ONLY for those that have been arrested for drunk driving. Forget those who take it proactively to reduce insurance costs.

earthling12357 wrote:
You are now part of the small minority of Gem users who purchased without being sued. As the settlements from lawsuits continue to grow, the distinction between those who purchased without legal pressures and those who purchased because they were busted for piracy will diminish.


A guess on many levels as you have no idea of the numbers. Ass-U-Me, etc.

earthling12357 wrote:
In the future, it shall be known far and wide that he who displays the blue Soundchoice logo was once a dishonest pirate and probably still is....


LOL I can play this game!

"In the future, it shall be known far and wide that all who refuse to play SC songs are pirates attempting to avoid prosecution."

See how that whole "broad brush" thing works? :lol:


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 1:16 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
Bazza wrote:
LOL I can play this game!

"In the future, it shall be known far and wide that all who refuse to play SC songs are pirates attempting to avoid prosecution."

See how that whole "broad brush" thing works? :lol:


The difference is of course, that earthling has showed you a prime example of it in the quote from Chris Avis. Your statement above is nothing more than your game.

Besides, just as you have proactively purchased the gems series, why do you automatically paint those who proactively choose to avoid any prosecution as "Pirates?"

Your broad brush has a slight twist in the handle.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 2:35 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
karaokegod73 wrote:
None of this probing should be necessary, if you weren't ever proven to be stealing tracks. This is why I don't believe SC can be successful in the future if they sell new music, with the anti-KJ view they appear to have. They feel we are all criminals (shows in their GEM advertising and their agreements) and if we're not guilty yet we will be eventually. This attitude should keep most away from buying any more SC than they already own.

Any new music will only be available to GEM owners & certified KJ's from what I understand.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 3:09 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
The sentence that was excluded from my quote is key to the point I was making. Sound Choice's continued monitoring of even those that voluntarily chose an audit should be expected and not be an exception.

People are people and they succumb to temptation.

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 4:05 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:39 am
Posts: 884
Location: Tx
Been Liked: 17 times
Lonman wrote:
Any new music will only be available to GEM owners & certified KJ's from what I understand.


Where'd that come from?

_________________
My statements, opinions and conclusions are based on my own personal experiences, observations, research and/or just my own $.02. I'm not a "cheerleader", but that doesn't make me a Pirate.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 4:08 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
Harrington has alluded to it more than once now.

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 4:10 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:39 am
Posts: 884
Location: Tx
Been Liked: 17 times
chrisavis wrote:
Harrington has alluded to it more than once now.

-Chris


On this board or another?

_________________
My statements, opinions and conclusions are based on my own personal experiences, observations, research and/or just my own $.02. I'm not a "cheerleader", but that doesn't make me a Pirate.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 4:22 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
hiteck wrote:
chrisavis wrote:
Harrington has alluded to it more than once now.

-Chris


On this board or another?

Another.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 8:18 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm
Posts: 4433
Location: New York City
Been Liked: 757 times
Lonman wrote:
Any new music will only be available to GEM owners & certified KJ's from what I understand.

hiteck wrote:
Where'd that come from?

chrisavis wrote:
Harrington has alluded to it more than once now.

hiteck wrote:
On this board or another?

Lonman wrote:
Another.


I was going to ask the same questions. That doesn't sound very fair to someone like me (who is ODB and un-certified).


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 8:22 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am
Posts: 3011
Been Liked: 1003 times
cueball wrote:
I was going to ask the same questions. That doesn't sound very fair to someone like me (who is ODB and un-certified).


By the time the next new release is ready, we will also have the ODB certification program up and running. We're just waiting on the programming on that, by the way.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 10:30 pm 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster

Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:53 pm
Posts: 187
Been Liked: 5 times
chrisavis wrote:
The sentence that was excluded from my quote is key to the point I was making. Sound Choice's continued monitoring of even those that voluntarily chose an audit should be expected and not be an exception.

People are people and they succumb to temptation.

-Chris


If customers should be expected to be monitored like criminals then they shouldn't reasonably expect to have any customers.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 11:01 pm 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster

Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:51 pm
Posts: 1636
Been Liked: 73 times
karaokegod73 wrote:
chrisavis wrote:
The sentence that was excluded from my quote is key to the point I was making. Sound Choice's continued monitoring of even those that voluntarily chose an audit should be expected and not be an exception.

People are people and they succumb to temptation.

-Chris


If customers should be expected to be monitored like criminals then they shouldn't reasonably expect to have any customers.


Funny thing...I worked for GE for a number of years and software vendors monitored them (via on-site audits)as they knew that large companies often "over install" software....GE did not feel like they were being treated as criminals....they understood that the actions of others made it necessary for the vendors to double check. GE was a multi-billion dollar company....here we have single operators and small multi-op companies complaining of the same type of monitoring. Does this seem strange to anyone else here?

Just saying
Athena

_________________
"Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain."
Unknown
"if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters."
Lee McGuffey


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Thu May 03, 2012 11:45 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
kjathena wrote:
karaokegod73 wrote:
chrisavis wrote:
The sentence that was excluded from my quote is key to the point I was making. Sound Choice's continued monitoring of even those that voluntarily chose an audit should be expected and not be an exception.

People are people and they succumb to temptation.

-Chris


If customers should be expected to be monitored like criminals then they shouldn't reasonably expect to have any customers.


Funny thing...I worked for GE for a number of years and software vendors monitored them (via on-site audits)as they knew that large companies often "over install" software....GE did not feel like they were being treated as criminals....they understood that the actions of others made it necessary for the vendors to double check. GE was a multi-billion dollar company....here we have single operators and small multi-op companies complaining of the same type of monitoring. Does this seem strange to anyone else here?

Just saying
Athena

One would think that a huge company NEEDS to be watched, not a one person company. NOTHING excuses the behavior of Sound Choice.

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 183 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 156 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech