KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - looks like being a pirate just got more scarey & exspensive Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Legalities & Piracy, etc... Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


wordpress-hosting

Offsite Links


It is currently Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:19 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Mon Sep 03, 2012 10:34 pm 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster

Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:51 pm
Posts: 1636
Been Liked: 73 times
new ruling in a Florida Middle District case. And some real surprises.

http://www.pdf-archive.com/2012/09/04/s ... f-schenck/

discuss

_________________
"Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain."
Unknown
"if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters."
Lee McGuffey


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 2:09 am 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster

Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:53 pm
Posts: 187
Been Liked: 5 times
Did they have any disks?

You didn't spell scary or expensive properly.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 2:30 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm
Posts: 5107
Location: Phoenix Az
Been Liked: 1279 times
doesn't sound like they had any discs. nail 'em to the wall.

_________________
Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 3:38 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
kjathena wrote:
new ruling in a Florida Middle District case. And some real surprises


Sure.... first of all, your desire/desperation to turn nothing into something, is amazing. It is an amended DEFAULT judgement, not a "new ruling." If it was anything worth mentioning at all, HarringtonLaw would have been the first to toot his own horn.

Don't make it sound like some earth-shattering precedent when it's a simply another default judgement. (Whoopie-F/N-do)

You are talking about a company whose sole business model is to sue $100/night (or less) Karaoke Jockeys for "piracy" when they -- themselves -- have a legal history of being sued by publishers for copyright infringement (a.k.a. "piracy").

When that doesn't work, they sue the clubs who really don't know the difference (or even care) because they might happen to have a pocket -- not a deep one -- or an insurance policy. Especially their cronies - Piracy Recovery, LLC - who has never produced a track, never sold a track, never did anything other than sue for many of the tracks that had no business (or license) being made in the first place.

Nothing more than bottom-feeding-trolls.

It's a pretty sad existence if you ask me. I'd be embarrassed as h*ll if that was the only way I could make a living. A meter-maid has a much more honorable profession.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 5:47 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm
Posts: 4094
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
Been Liked: 309 times
Yes Chip it was one of many DEFAULT cases SC has won. Why? Because the DEFENADANTS failed to appear. Why did they fail to appear? I daresay they knew they didn't have a case, otherwise they would have fought.

_________________
You can be strange but not a stranger


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 6:38 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am
Posts: 3011
Been Liked: 1003 times
c. staley wrote:

Don't make it sound like some earth-shattering precedent when it's a simply another default judgement. (Whoopie-F/N-do)


It was amended because the judge held an evidentiary hearing to help him decide what the proper damage award should be.

It's not everything, but it's not nothing, either.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 8:41 am 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster

Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 5:35 pm
Posts: 130
Been Liked: 10 times
Even if that default judgement is meaningless--it is just priceless the look on a pirates face when they see that 44,000 dollar award.
It is fun having copies of that.
Thanks Athena


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:38 am 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster

Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:51 pm
Posts: 1636
Been Liked: 73 times
personally I think the order for the marshals to seize the drives if not turned over (and the pirates being charged for the seizure) is almost better than the amount of the award being increased by more than 4 times the original award.

At least this judge finally gets it and is putting some teeth behind his awards. The reason that MOST of those charged do not answer the court is because they cant prove they own the music they were playing. I suspect MOST have also listened to bottom feeding TROLLS that have advised many to just ignore the lawsuits as "SC will never take a case all the way" and then changed their advise to "just don't use SC"

Double check ANY suggestion listed on any forum of board or be willing to pay the costs.

And yes I am a bad speller

_________________
"Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain."
Unknown
"if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters."
Lee McGuffey


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 9:46 am 
Offline
Super Extreme
Super Extreme
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 4:12 pm
Posts: 7704
Songs: 1
Location: Hollyweird, Ca.
Been Liked: 1089 times
Firefox browser has spell check built in.. :angel:


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 10:02 am 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster

Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:51 pm
Posts: 1636
Been Liked: 73 times
yes JD and I do try and use it for most posts...I was just excited to post this and did not check :D I thought proper spelling was not a requirement of the forum has this changed ?

_________________
"Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain."
Unknown
"if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters."
Lee McGuffey


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 10:10 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
timberlea wrote:
Yes Chip it was one of many DEFAULT cases SC has won. Why? Because the DEFENADANTS failed to appear. Why did they fail to appear? I daresay they knew they didn't have a case, otherwise they would have fought.


Sounds like you're describing the similar DEFAULT case Cavs won against the "pirate manufacturer" Chartbuster Karaoke.... remember them? The same ones that didn't bother to respond.. and why? Because to use your words; "they didn't have a case, otherwise they would have fought." And they suckered how many KJ's into believing they were legitimate? Even going as far as "certifying" them?.....

It is to laugh.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 11:03 am 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:21 pm
Posts: 1609
Location: Earth
Been Liked: 307 times
kjathena wrote:
The reason that MOST of those charged do not answer the court is because they cant prove they own the music they were playing. I suspect MOST have also listened to bottom feeding TROLLS that have advised many to just ignore the lawsuits as "SC will never take a case all the way" and then changed their advise to "just don't use SC"


I have never seen, nor have I been able to locate any instance anywhere of anyone suggesting a lawsuit be ignored.
I don't believe there is any basis in fact for that statement.

_________________
KNOW THYSELF


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 11:07 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am
Posts: 3011
Been Liked: 1003 times
c. staley wrote:
timberlea wrote:
Yes Chip it was one of many DEFAULT cases SC has won. Why? Because the DEFENADANTS failed to appear. Why did they fail to appear? I daresay they knew they didn't have a case, otherwise they would have fought.


Sounds like you're describing the similar DEFAULT case Cavs won against the "pirate manufacturer" Chartbuster Karaoke.... remember them? The same ones that didn't bother to respond.. and why? Because to use your words; "they didn't have a case, otherwise they would have fought." And they suckered how many KJ's into believing they were legitimate? Even going as far as "certifying" them?.....

It is to laugh.


The entity that CAVS sued was defunct at the time the suit was filed. So try again.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 11:14 am 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster

Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:51 pm
Posts: 1636
Been Liked: 73 times
earthling....read back on this forum and you will find those statements...also you can check other websites and forums as well. As it is not polite to post other sites PM me and I can give you sites to look at. If I have time I will go back to posts here when I first joined and point you to posts telling people to ignore the lawsuits and posts advising people to erase HD's if caught. Unfortunately "the other karaoke forum" was "scrubbed" when it changed hands so the screenshots I have from it can not be verified. But there are other websites where you can still see for yourself

_________________
"Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain."
Unknown
"if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters."
Lee McGuffey


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 11:38 am 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:21 pm
Posts: 1609
Location: Earth
Been Liked: 307 times
kjathena wrote:
earthling....read back on this forum and you will find those statements...also you can check other websites and forums as well. As it is not polite to post other sites PM me and I can give you sites to look at. If I have time I will go back to posts here when I first joined and point you to posts telling people to ignore the lawsuits and posts advising people to erase HD's if caught. Unfortunately "the other karaoke forum" was "scrubbed" when it changed hands so the screenshots I have from it can not be verified. But there are other websites where you can still see for yourself


I have been around for some time.
As I said, I have looked and have not found anyone advising anyone else to ignore a lawsuit.
If you have evidence to back up your statement, please post it.
But please, don't ask me to reread the entire internet.
If the suggestions to ignore SC lawsuits are so ubiquitous on the internet that KJs in your little part of the world are finding and falling for it, shouldn't it be easy for anyone else to find?

_________________
KNOW THYSELF


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 11:46 am 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster

Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:51 pm
Posts: 1636
Been Liked: 73 times
you may wish to start reading with "the 411 0n letters of intent" thread and see how many falsehoods have been disproved. I will look deeper as I have time. Off to an appointment right now. You may wish to check the threads I posted on when I first came to this site back in 2009 or 2010....you will find the info. I will not post other sites here as I do not wish to be banned

_________________
"Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain."
Unknown
"if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters."
Lee McGuffey


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:34 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm
Posts: 5107
Location: Phoenix Az
Been Liked: 1279 times
it looks (according to the math) that the defendant was short by about 1500 SC discs, a multirigger? gee....i know one of those in AZ............

_________________
Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 12:46 pm 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 3:00 am
Posts: 192
Location: Illinois
Been Liked: 16 times
kjathena wrote:
you may wish to start reading with "the 411 0n letters of intent" thread and see how many falsehoods have been disproved.


Thanks Athena. Many who posted in that thread, including the OP, has been proven wrong in many of their posts if one looks in hindsight.

viewtopic.php?f=26&t=20238


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 1:01 pm 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:21 pm
Posts: 1609
Location: Earth
Been Liked: 307 times
So, where's the quote in that thread from someone who advocates ignoring a lawsuit?
It does not exist.

_________________
KNOW THYSELF


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 04, 2012 1:37 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
HarringtonLaw wrote:
c. staley wrote:
timberlea wrote:
Yes Chip it was one of many DEFAULT cases SC has won. Why? Because the DEFENADANTS failed to appear. Why did they fail to appear? I daresay they knew they didn't have a case, otherwise they would have fought.


Sounds like you're describing the similar DEFAULT case Cavs won against the "pirate manufacturer" Chartbuster Karaoke.... remember them? The same ones that didn't bother to respond.. and why? Because to use your words; "they didn't have a case, otherwise they would have fought." And they suckered how many KJ's into believing they were legitimate? Even going as far as "certifying" them?.....

It is to laugh.


The entity that CAVS sued was defunct at the time the suit was filed. So try again.


Again a load of pure misinformation from HarringtonLaw.

Tennessee Production Center was sued in October 18, 2011 - case 2:11-cv-08612, still "certifying" KJs, still selling hard drives, announced early this year that there was "big news that would change the way you thought about karaoke".... and didn't even stop distributing until MAY 10, 2012.

And just like the pirates in the default judgment above, Tennessee Production Center hid their assets and disappeared like a cockroach when you turn the light on...

If you expect the readership here to allow you any credibility, you need to stop misleading them.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 70 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 113 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech