How about when will they finish the cases in North Carolina - dragging on for over 2 years at this point - you either have a case or you don't - what's the holdup?

The holdup is that the Western District judge transferred the case to the Eastern District, then it took over a year for the Eastern District to decide cross-motions on precisely how to proceed with the case after that point.

I can't make the courts move faster.

The holdup is that the Western District judge transferred the case to the Eastern District, then it took over a year for the Eastern District to decide cross-motions on precisely how to proceed with the case after that point.

I can't make the courts move faster.

Why can't a cease and desist order be issued to stop them until the court date?

There is no such thing as a "cease and desist order." The court can theoretically order a preliminary injunction, but in practice the Supreme Court has made that nearly impossible to obtain in IP cases.

I agree with Paradigm and I am of the opinion that SC had to have some growing pains associated with learning how to do things in this legal area first.

People learn by making mistakes and I have mentioned on other sites that for SC to hire APS, was a GIGANTIC mistake.

There is an old saying Insane "fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me". Why did SC continue to use APS and Donna Boris after the Las Vegas mess, and then use them still in California, entering into a recovery agreement with the same dishonest agents? Have an Insane day.

I normally would not respond to you but I want to point out how ignorant your comment is for the benefit of the readership.

The California case you refer to was filed months before the Las Vegas case.

CA: http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/trad ... l/summary/

NV: http://www.rfcexpress.com/lawsuits/trad ... l/summary/

This proves how recklessly you post misinformative propaganda on these forums with absolutely no cognitive reasoning whatsoever. If anyone took you seriously, they would get what they deserve. Have a Lonely day.

There is an old saying Insane "fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me". Why did SC continue to use APS and Donna Boris after the Las Vegas mess, and then use them still in California, entering into a recovery agreement with the same dishonest agents? Have an Insane day.

.....and why is it you feel you have to comment on every single case, and throw in a bunch of mumbo jumbo to sidetrack the thread when you have no first-hand knowledge of the cases?

This thread is about cases filed individually against different alleged infringers, using different attorney's in a different state. It has nothing to do with APS, Donna Boris, Las Vegas, California, or dishonest agents.

I (and I hope others) would appreciate if you would try to stick to the thread instead of trying to re-hash the exact same thing over and over and over and bury the intent of the thread. We all know you don't like what SC is doing. We don't need for you to remind us in every thread.

-Chris

Wow! Condescension and sarcasm in the same post. So unlawyerly! It's no wonder you're having some issues with the judges handling your cases.