maybe, but i thought he said there was no affiliation between the companies.
either way it is odd to buy Digitrax with a Digitrax opening logo on a Chartbuster track with Chartbuster grapgics and Chartbuster logos throughout the track.

Maybe since James is the only poster in the know about the true relationship between the two companies, he should come on an explain it. If the reason PR is holding off on the legal process, to help out Digitrax, and not have any negative backlash on cloud or other products, then their relationship would have to be pretty close. Almost to where the actions of one effects the profits of the other. Have a blessed day.

I have to hand it to you. You certainly have the market cornered on uninformed speculation.

as we are splitting legal hairs now, i went last night and bought "sugar Daddy" from the Bellamy Brothers and there, plain as day was the CB logo on screen. What does that mean for the liability? Does that mean that DT is infringing on the CB trademark (owned by PRLLC, no affiliation to DTE) for all these songs for commercial purposes (resale)?

Not having all the information like you do at my finger tips James, all I can do is speculate.

Or you could, maybe, not speculate.

DT and PR are affiliated entities. PR owns the Chartbuster Karaoke trademarks and uses them by licensing them to others.

My understanding was that DT would not be selling CB-branded tracks going forward because DT is focused on building its own brand. If that has changed, it was changed without my knowledge. DT is not my client, so I don't have all of the details on what they are doing. I can assure you, however, that if DT is selling CB-branded tracks, it is not an infringement.

At least speculating gets you to provide information once in awhile, without it you wouldn't have the opportunity to show how silly everyone else is and how superior you are. The only reason for your mastery of the subject is your superior information sources. These come from your legal relationship with your clients. Speculation sometimes strikes a nerve and gets a response, just like throwing something on the wall and seeing if it sticks. Sort of like probing an enemy's position, it is what we call in the military gathering intelligence. When you are guessing what a foe might do that is also speculation. So yes speculation does serve a useful purpose. Have a legal day.

What information have you extracted from Harrington's replies that has benefitted anyone?

-Chris

For one he did answer the question about the relationship between DTE and PR, now we have a little bit better understanding of their business arrangements. Have a blessed day.