Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums https://mail.karaokescenemagazine.net/forums/ |
|
Sound Choice lawsuits in N.C. https://mail.karaokescenemagazine.net/forums/viewtopic.php?f=26&t=28799 |
Page 1 of 1 |
Author: | rickgood [ Mon Oct 07, 2013 4:30 am ] |
Post subject: | Sound Choice lawsuits in N.C. |
This legal action was initiated in 2011, the action to separate the defendants was filed and individual suits were filed in December, 2011. Several of the defendants are still running multiple shows each week, some at the very locations they were filled for. How is this such a slam dunk for Sound Choice if these cases have still not been resolved nearly 2 years later? Oh yes, these guys have lawyered up and are fighting back. I have talked to several legitimate KJs in the area who have played by the rules but are watching these guys take new shows because the venues don't believe anything can happen to them due to the piracy, and so far, nothing has happened to anybody. James Harrington is the attorney for Sound Choice. |
Author: | The Lone Ranger [ Mon Oct 07, 2013 6:08 am ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sound Choice lawsuits in N.C. |
rickgood wrote: This legal action was initiated in 2011, the action to separate the defendants was filed and individual suits were filed in December, 2011. Several of the defendants are still running multiple shows each week, some at the very locations they were filled for. How is this such a slam dunk for Sound Choice if these cases have still not been resolved nearly 2 years later? Oh yes, these guys have lawyered up and are fighting back. I have talked to several legitimate KJs in the area who have played by the rules but are watching these guys take new shows because the venues don't believe anything can happen to them due to the piracy, and so far, nothing has happened to anybody. James Harrington is the attorney for Sound Choice. ![]() |
Author: | JoeChartreuse [ Fri Oct 11, 2013 1:13 pm ] |
Post subject: | Re: Sound Choice lawsuits in N.C. |
The Lone Ranger wrote: [ I think the truth is this is not the slam dunk Jim and Kurt have been maintaining it is. That their legal grounds are not as firm as they would like to have others think it is. Jim and SC drag these things out, have them dismissed without prejudice, then refile them at a later date. All of this is designed to wear down the defendants and have them pay the plaintiff off just to make SC go away. Really if the defendants want to make SC and Jim go away all they have to do is license the GEM series and everything will stop. As expensive as this legal process is I'm surprised they haven't already paid up.. First, I would opine that many folks would rather spend a lot of money to take those trying to intimidate out. A matter of both pride and a sense of justice. As for the expense: Yes, these folks have laid out for lawyers. However, depending on the strength of the case ( which doesn't seem like much when actually argued before the courts), the expense can be ZERO or higher, depending on how much work the defendant wishes to do as well. Panama City proved that. SC ( and now PR) loves to talk about the expense of defending oneself in order to convince those sued to simply pay them off. I would also add that it seems that whenever SC actually GOES to court, more and more holes end up on court records that can be used by the NEXT defendant. In other words, all off the past mistakes that they have made now make it easier and easier for any new defendant to win their case, requiring even less money. |
Page 1 of 1 | All times are UTC - 8 hours |
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group https://www.phpbb.com/ |