|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Kirks Karaoke
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 6:45 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 12:39 pm Posts: 735 Been Liked: 99 times
|
Robin Dean wrote: Phoenix Entertainment Partners Acquires Sound Choice Marks, Other Assets https://pep.rocks/relaunch.phpAll I what to know is how frigen much! Nothing from the web site, I'm done. I don't and never will have SC.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 8:21 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
Ct Kirk Karaoke wrote: Robin Dean wrote: Phoenix Entertainment Partners Acquires Sound Choice Marks, Other Assets https://pep.rocks/relaunch.phpAll I what to know is how frigen much! Nothing from the web site, I'm done. I don't and never will have SC. I didn't look at PEP's website, but, if you go to www.sounndchoice.com, you will find your answer.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Kirks Karaoke
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:21 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 12:39 pm Posts: 735 Been Liked: 99 times
|
cueball wrote: Ct Kirk Karaoke wrote: Robin Dean wrote: Phoenix Entertainment Partners Acquires Sound Choice Marks, Other Assets https://pep.rocks/relaunch.phpAll I what to know is how frigen much! Nothing from the web site, I'm done. I don't and never will have SC. I didn't look at PEP's website, but, if you go to http://www.sounndchoice.com, you will find your answer. http://www.sounndchoice.com for all or any purpose isn't anymore.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Kirks Karaoke
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 9:26 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Sun Feb 03, 2013 12:39 pm Posts: 735 Been Liked: 99 times
|
Just for the record I plan on quitting the Karaoke hosting this year. No one will care but me.
|
|
Top |
|
|
dsm2000
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 10:29 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Sat Nov 01, 2014 8:41 am Posts: 682 Been Liked: 259 times
|
More of the same o same o. Just another nail in the karaoke coffin.
The single most important point that all of these greedy corporations seem to miss completely is that they (the corporations) have killed off middle class and lower middle class America.
Joe six pack can now only afford one six pack a week and that six pack won't pay the overhead for all the mom & pop bar rooms and halls to run Karaoke.
If I could still charge 250-500 a night per gig like in the old days and run 4 or 5 nights a week a subscription rate like this might be doable. At a 100 a night 2 nights a week it's a bit unrealistic.
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Fri Feb 13, 2015 11:48 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
dsm2000 wrote: If I could still charge 250-500 a night per gig like in the old days and run 4 or 5 nights a week a subscription rate like this might be doable. At a 100 a night 2 nights a week it's a bit unrealistic. I believe the Karaoke Cloud and the HELP program are targeted at full time karaoke hosts. Five plus nights a week and at a decent rate. I like the rate this high because it is a barrier to entry to all but the most serious hosts. There certainly won't be a glut of karaoke hosts because of this program.
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 6:04 am |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
|
Top |
|
|
KaraokeIan
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 6:55 am |
|
|
Advanced Poster |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 3:04 pm Posts: 486 Been Liked: 99 times
|
I think anyone who pays Sound Choice or karaoke cloud a monthly fee is crazy. We do still live in a world where the venue's BMI and ASCAP fees do cover ALL live material including karaoke, and where you can still purchase songs you own without any monthly fees.
Sound choice is the only company that is using their copyrights as a means to extract more money than we normally used to pay. They have made great music, but they are completely screwing up with their business model, which, seems to get even worse with each new reincarnation. They are so lost. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that you can get all of your music from sources outside of the U.S. and never pay any monthly fees and completely own all your music. Just because they've fooled a few people into this whole monthly fee thing, doesn't mean they'll ever get enough people to stay afloat. It hasn't worked so far for anyone, and the fact that they can't see that is surely spelling certain doom for both Sound Choice and the Karaoke Cloud.
Both of these companies fall into Einstein's definition of insanity which is "doing the same thing over and over but expecting different results".
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 7:36 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
KaraokeIan wrote: I think anyone who pays Sound Choice or karaoke cloud a monthly fee is crazy. We do still live in a world where the venue's BMI and ASCAP fees do cover ALL live material including karaoke, and where you can still purchase songs you own without any monthly fees.
Sound choice is the only company that is using their copyrights as a means to extract more money than we normally used to pay. They have made great music, but they are completely screwing up with their business model, which, seems to get even worse with each new reincarnation. They are so lost. It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure out that you can get all of your music from sources outside of the U.S. and never pay any monthly fees and completely own all your music. Just because they've fooled a few people into this whole monthly fee thing, doesn't mean they'll ever get enough people to stay afloat. It hasn't worked so far for anyone, and the fact that they can't see that is surely spelling certain doom for both Sound Choice and the Karaoke Cloud.
Both of these companies fall into Einstein's definition of insanity which is "doing the same thing over and over but expecting different results". Karaoke Cloud has at least 178 monthly subscribers. That may not seem like a lot, but 178 @ $99/mo = $17,622 per month = $211,464 per year. That doesn't include the music that people buy outright without a subscription. So even though their service isn't right for me or perhaps you, it seems to be working just fine for others, and they are (presumably) profiting. PEP is still selling GEM's. PEP will get some subscribers and in fact, I am reviewing my numbers to see what impact this would have on me for new systems. Plus, it's easy to say that all the music is available, but actually acquiring it and the costs involved, make services like attractive to some people. Think about it..... Brand new KJ with zero music decides to start up a show and just download on the fly. Let's pretend for a moment that he is also psychic and knows EXACTLY which songs will be performed every night for the first year. From what we have seen from Lonnie's history as well as anecdotal evidence from others, the new KJ will have to buy ~1000 tracks to support his show for the first year. If every one of those tracks are available from Tricerasoft, they can buy them using the 200 unit credit packs. 5 X 280 = $1400 for 1000 tracks. Spread out over a year and that is $116 per month. That is only $13/mo less than the PEP deal (which also gives you access to 16500 tracks - BUT there would be additional costs to fill in songs from 2009 and later). The very next year, the cost of acquiring music SHOULD go down because they already own a bunch of music that will get re-used. BUT, acquiring the music up front means paying $1400 up front. *OR* they could just download on the fly as needed which creates a LOT of extra work, especially during the first few months when they are fulfilling requests every night for music they don't have yet. If they use Karaoke Cloud or PEP, they can get their foot in the door at a much lower up front cost by using a subscription. And lets not beat around the bush here....people that come into this business these days try to do it as cheaply as possible. These services aren't really for the long time karaoke host. These services are much better suited for the new players coming online. But they may actually be viable for long term hosts as well depending on what their business model is. Oh Yeah......(and I have been saying this for a few years now). The world is changing. The new generation cares less about ownership and more about ease of use and access to content anytime, anywhere, from any device. You don't own any of the Spotify or Pandora content you listen to and the moment you stop paying for those, you lose access (or have to tolerate ads). Both services are wildly successful. Time will tell if PEP can keep their head above water.....they just need to get the word out.
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
mckyj57
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 11:15 am |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:24 pm Posts: 5576 Location: Cocoa Beach Been Liked: 122 times
|
Small warning -- there has been some talk of licensing and legalities already. If you want to continue in that vein, create a new topic in Legalities & Piracy (or post in the one that's already there). Otherwise, stick to the plan and its merits.
_________________ [color=#ffff55]Mickey J.[/color] Alas for those who never sing, but die with all their music in them. -- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 12:21 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
chrisavis wrote: PEP is still selling GEM's. PEP will get some subscribers and in fact, I am reviewing my numbers to see what impact this would have on me for new systems.
Plus, it's easy to say that all the music is available, but actually acquiring it and the costs involved, make services like attractive to some people.
Think about it.....
Brand new KJ with zero music decides to start up a show and just download on the fly. Let's pretend for a moment that he is also psychic and knows EXACTLY which songs will be performed every night for the first year. From what we have seen from Lonnie's history as well as anecdotal evidence from others, the new KJ will have to buy ~1000 tracks to support his show for the first year. If every one of those tracks are available from Tricerasoft, they can buy them using the 200 unit credit packs.
5 X 280 = $1400 for 1000 tracks. Spread out over a year and that is $116 per month. That is only $13/mo less than the PEP deal (which also gives you access to 16500 tracks - BUT there would be additional costs to fill in songs from 2009 and later)... Where did it say that PEP gives access to 16,500 tracks? Did I miss something? This is all I saw: PEP Website wrote: What tracks does the HELP Program apply to? Your HELP license covers any of the more than 16,500 "red logo" tracks recorded and published by Sound Choice between 1987 and 2009. You can tell whether the HELP license applies to a track by examining the logo that is displayed when you play it. If the musical staff of that logo is red (in its original form), you're covered. The HELP license does not cover the GEM Series tracks (which have a blue logo and are marked "Pro Series") or any tracks produced as part of our new production series (which will have a green logo). PEP Website wrote: Where do I get the tracks I'm going to use? The tracks you use come from original Sound Choice-branded CD+G discs. The HELP program does not grant you the right to obtain tracks from other than original discs, but our program does not require proof of disc ownership or 1:1 correspondence. Where you source the tracks you use is up to you. Bear in mind obtaining tracks other than from original discs may constitute copyright infringement, which you commit at your own risk.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Bazza
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 12:58 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
cueball wrote: Where did it say that PEP gives access to 16,500 tracks? Did I miss something? Read from other thread: HarringtonLaw wrote: Bazza wrote: Sound Choice Website wrote: Through the HELP program, you get a license that allows you to use the Sound Choice marks on tracks stored on non-original media, no matter how many of the more than 16,500 unique "red logo"* Sound Choice tracks you have, no matter where you got them. So. A KJ could torrent all 16,500 red-label songs, pay you a monthly fee and be legal? Since there is no disc audit, etc, you take their word for it? Am I reading this right? The problem with that scenario is that red-label songs are not widely available at the minimum required bitrate. The KJ does have to meet quality-control provisions in the agreement. But you are right; there's no disc audit.
|
|
Top |
|
|
MadMusicOne
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 1:03 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:41 am Posts: 652 Images: 0 Been Liked: 48 times
|
cueball wrote: chrisavis wrote: PEP is still selling GEM's. PEP will get some subscribers and in fact, I am reviewing my numbers to see what impact this would have on me for new systems.
Plus, it's easy to say that all the music is available, but actually acquiring it and the costs involved, make services like attractive to some people.
Think about it.....
Brand new KJ with zero music decides to start up a show and just download on the fly. Let's pretend for a moment that he is also psychic and knows EXACTLY which songs will be performed every night for the first year. From what we have seen from Lonnie's history as well as anecdotal evidence from others, the new KJ will have to buy ~1000 tracks to support his show for the first year. If every one of those tracks are available from Tricerasoft, they can buy them using the 200 unit credit packs.
5 X 280 = $1400 for 1000 tracks. Spread out over a year and that is $116 per month. That is only $13/mo less than the PEP deal (which also gives you access to 16500 tracks - BUT there would be additional costs to fill in songs from 2009 and later)... Where did it say that PEP gives access to 16,500 tracks? Did I miss something? This is all I saw: PEP Website wrote: What tracks does the HELP Program apply to? Your HELP license covers any of the more than 16,500 "red logo" tracks recorded and published by Sound Choice between 1987 and 2009. You can tell whether the HELP license applies to a track by examining the logo that is displayed when you play it. If the musical staff of that logo is red (in its original form), you're covered. The HELP license does not cover the GEM Series tracks (which have a blue logo and are marked "Pro Series") or any tracks produced as part of our new production series (which will have a green logo). PEP Website wrote: Where do I get the tracks I'm going to use? The tracks you use come from original Sound Choice-branded CD+G discs. The HELP program does not grant you the right to obtain tracks from other than original discs, but our program does not require proof of disc ownership or 1:1 correspondence. Where you source the tracks you use is up to you. Bear in mind obtaining tracks other than from original discs may constitute copyright infringement, which you commit at your own risk. ...Here's another one for ya: "Simply register for HELP, promise to meet a few quality standards, and pay a monthly fee based on the number of karaoke hard drives you use that have Sound Choice-branded tracks on them. No disc audits. No certifications. No hassles."
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 2:08 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
Bazza wrote: cueball wrote: Where did it say that PEP gives access to 16,500 tracks? Did I miss something? Read from other thread: HarringtonLaw wrote: Bazza wrote: Sound Choice Website wrote: Through the HELP program, you get a license that allows you to use the Sound Choice marks on tracks stored on non-original media, no matter how many of the more than 16,500 unique "red logo"* Sound Choice tracks you have, no matter where you got them. So. A KJ could torrent all 16,500 red-label songs, pay you a monthly fee and be legal? Since there is no disc audit, etc, you take their word for it? Am I reading this right? The problem with that scenario is that red-label songs are not widely available at the minimum required bitrate. The KJ does have to meet quality-control provisions in the agreement. But you are right; there's no disc audit. @ Bazza and MadMusicOne...And I will ask again.... WHERE does it say that PEP gives you access to those tracks. All I am reading here is that PEP doesn't care where you obtained the tracks from. They say that if you didn't obtain them from original discs, you are at risk of being sued for copyright infringement. They may be willing to turn a blind eye towards this (as long as you pay them their monthly fee), but I still don't see the words "PEP WILL GIVE YOU access to all of those tracks.
|
|
Top |
|
|
MadMusicOne
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 2:42 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:41 am Posts: 652 Images: 0 Been Liked: 48 times
|
Cueball wrote:
@ Bazza and MadMusicOne...
And I will ask again.... WHERE does it say that PEP gives you access to those tracks. All I am reading here is that PEP doesn't care where you obtained the tracks from. They say that if you didn't obtain them from original discs, you are at risk of being sued for copyright infringement. They may be willing to turn a blind eye towards this (as long as you pay them their monthly fee), but I still don't see the words "PEP WILL GIVE YOU access to all of those tracks.[/quote]
...Cue, I'm not sure where you found the following line, "WHERE does it say that PEP gives you access to those tracks? ...My answer and no disrespect because currently I'm all over the place right now but I can only assume that they mean "See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Say No Evil." I haven't seen anywhere, on their website, that states PEP gives you access to 16,500 tracks... But, I just don't know?
|
|
Top |
|
|
Bazza
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 3:48 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
MadMusicOne wrote: Cueball wrote: And I will ask again.... WHERE does it say that PEP gives you access to those tracks. All I am reading here is that PEP doesn't care where you obtained the tracks from. They say that if you didn't obtain them from original discs, you are at risk of being sued for copyright infringement. They may be willing to turn a blind eye towards this (as long as you pay them their monthly fee), but I still don't see the words "PEP WILL GIVE YOU access to all of those tracks. ...Cue, I'm not sure where you found the following line, " WHERE does it say that PEP gives you access to those tracks? ...My answer and no disrespect because currently I'm all over the place right now but I can only assume that they mean "See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Say No Evil." I haven't seen anywhere, on their website, that states PEP gives you access to 16,500 tracks... But, I just don't know? Yes. It appears to be a "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" type policy. They say with a PEP license, all your red-label tracks are licensed, without an audit or having to show discs, " no matter where you got them". So. Can you seriously not read between the lines here? Geez man. It's no secret whats happening. It's legitimatizing & licensing (and SC finally getting paid) for pirate hard drives.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 4:01 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
MadMusicOne wrote: ...Cue, I'm not sure where you found the following line, "WHERE does it say that PEP gives you access to those tracks? ...My answer and no disrespect because currently I'm all over the place right now but I can only assume that they mean "See No Evil, Hear No Evil, Say No Evil." I haven't seen anywhere, on their website, that states PEP gives you access to 16,500 tracks... But, I just don't know? I haven't seen anything on their website that states such a thing either. I am asking that question based on what I quoted from Chris Avis's post.... chrisavis wrote: ... Spread out over a year and that is $116 per month. That is only $13/mo less than the PEP deal (which also gives you access to 16500 tracks - BUT there would be additional costs to fill in songs from 2009 and later).... Bazza wrote: Yes. It appears to be a "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" type policy. They say with a PEP license, all your red-label tracks are licensed, without an audit or having to show discs, "no matter where you got them".
So. Can you seriously not read between the lines here? Geez man. It's no secret whats happening. It's legitimatizing & licensing (and SC finally getting paid) for pirate hard drives. Yes... I can read between the lines, and that is exactly how I am reading it too. That's just NOT the way Chris put it, and that's why I was calling him out on it.
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Sat Feb 14, 2015 4:11 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
https://pep.rocks/licensing.php"Through the HELP program, you get a license that allows you to use the Sound Choice marks on tracks stored on non-original media, no matter how many of the more than 16,500 unique "red logo"* Sound Choice tracks you have, no matter where you got them."
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 188 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|