KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - Spokane, WA bar getting sued for copyright infringment Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


premium-member

Offsite Links


It is currently Fri Feb 07, 2025 12:12 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:15 am 
Offline
Novice Poster
Novice Poster

Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:30 pm
Posts: 40
Been Liked: 0 time
You gotta pay ASCAP/BMI their due!  I am a member of ASCAP myself, I don;t think I will ever even get my dues back from the few songs I am likely to write in my lifetime but I do have one that I liked and decided to register the copyright and join ASCAP as sort of a vanity purchase.  Whether you are doing Karoke or singing one cover song during an evening at a totally free event for a charity, if it is open to the general public the venue, not the performer or KJ, the venue, has to have the ASCAP/BMI licens or only allow original non protected music.  ASCAP in particular does hire folks to go around and document abuse of this.  Grocery stores have to pay ASCAP/BMI if they play the radio instead of buying Muzak.  The County Fair has to pay them too so their performers can do shows on stage.

The exceptions are schools doing stuff for educatinal purposes only and Churches during the actual worship service, not the televised or recorded copies of the servece, the actual service.  Home parties where the public at large is not invited are also "Fair Use" situations as are a few other select situations but for the most part if you are in public and there is music playing that you recognize someone should be playing ASCAP/BMI...

We had a coffee shop locally that didn;t pay up, they informed all the performers that they would not pay up and made them sign contracts that said they would play only originals that were not registered with either of the services.  They still got harrased for quite some time I think but they eventually signed up paid up because people just wanted to hear covers, it's what the public demanded.

It's a small expence, less than one months light bill for most places.  They are being hard headed jerks for not paying.  It shows incredible lack of respect for musicians and writers to not pay this tiny stipend, they make money off of the work of these folks and even though the chances of normal folks getting any real return from ASCAP/BMI is pretty slim it does happen sometimes.

If I want to make a CD of some cover songs written by other folks, whether I am playing everything or hiring other folks to do or using a licensed backing track I have to pay the Harry Fox Agency to get a license for each cover.  It might come to $300 to $500 for a cd if I make less than 2500 copies.  Not doing it is kind of poor economics as the fines can be horribly punitive.  

Typically the bar getting sued will have to pay the back charges for a number of years they haven't been paying plus some legal fees and they will have to agree to keep paying from now on, shouldn't be enough to run them out of business, a parasite doesn't want to kill the host.  Their lawyers will probably advise them to settle up and we won't hear anything more about it ever.  It happens all the time really.  

A buddy of mine has a mini-golf place he just built and they came in on him because someone recognized a song being played on the speakers along the course as being registered somehow.  He paid up because to fight it is useless and way expensive.  I don't think they folks were right because I have been there and it's basically a random midi track that plays something like video game backing track sounds but the accusation was enough to get him to pay.

BSR


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 1:06 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
Karen K @ Sat Jan 05, 2008 5:22 pm wrote:
Okay, I think I'll just remove those 5 songs from my collection - or not allow them to be sung...Seems odd that the owners of the copyright will suffer such IRREPARABLE damage by having these songs sung at karaoke. Can you say EXAGGERATE?  Oh man, what's this biz coming to. I should think they'd be looking harder for the people who have freely downloaded thousands of copies of those songs pre-Napster lawsuit.

Lon, I'm thinking about calling this guy - I may contact Ty at the rag and see if I can include an article in Feb's edition about this very subject. Be interesting to know the gritty details. Thanks for linking to the complaint.

K


Yeah if you read the complaint it states down the line that the bar did not pay publisher compensation - ie ascap/bmi/sesac.  And those 5 songs were played the night the investigator (or whatever) was in which is some of the songs they represent, they didn't go after the whole library since those songs weren't performed.  I talked to a lawyer on another forum & he stated the same thing, it's basically a non-payment of publishing fees and most likely will be settled out of court with fines & purchasing the licesnes.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:42 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:43 pm
Posts: 6784
Location: Fort Collins Colorado USA
Been Liked: 5 times
Quote:
Yeah if you read the complaint it states down the line that the bar did not pay publisher compensation - ie ascap/bmi/sesac.  And those 5 songs were played the night the investigator (or whatever) was in which is some of the songs they represent, they didn't go after the whole library since those songs weren't performed.  I talked to a lawyer on another forum & he stated the same thing, it's basically a non-payment of publishing fees and most likely will be settled out of court with fines & purchasing the licesnes.
_________________


Could you provide a link to the complaint? (What is a complaint in legal terms?) Here is what I get from the original link.

Am I missing something? I never could load the video.. I check the public court records for facts I see nothing about ascap bmi etc

Code:




News Feeds/RSS  
TV Schedule
KREM 2 News Team
Email Newsletters
Desktop News
Sign up for Special Offers
wvec logo
      
KREM Top Stories
        
Search New & Used Cars
Make:
 
Model:
 
UsedNewAll    

Dentistry

Chiropractic Care

Spokane Occup. Therapy

Move It/Weight Loss
   
        
Cars | Pets | Stuff | More

Spokane karaoke bar accused of copyright infringment

07:49 PM PST on Thursday, January 3, 2008

By LEE STOLL / KREM 2 News

Click links below for more details

      SLIDESHOW > Studio K Bar & Grill accused of illegally playing songs

      VIDEO > Britney Spears' 'Toxic' named one of songs illegally played

SPOKANE -- Several music companies are suing a South Hill karaoke bar for allegedly stealing their music.

Al Lozano, KREM.com

The federal lawsuit was filed against Studio K Bar and Grill, located at 29th Avenue and Regal.

The lawsuit accuses Studio K of copyright infringement for allowing people to perform five particular songs on a karaoke machine.

One of the songs Studio K is accused of playing illegall is "Toxic" by Britney Spears.

Manager of Studio K, Dale Van Zandt, spoke to KREM 2 News off camera Thursday. Van Zandt said he received notices about the accusations, but never responded because he claims he's done nothing wrong.

Van Zandt said all of his music was purchased legally, and he plans to hire an attorney to fight the lawsuit.

Van Zandt did not have a copy of the lawsuit until KREM 2 News gave him one.

The music companies who are suing Studio K are seeking between $750 to $30,000.

_________________
Join The Karaokle Singers Social Network. Upload Your Music!!


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:07 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:43 pm
Posts: 6784
Location: Fort Collins Colorado USA
Been Liked: 5 times
Hello.. Is there anybody here that is articulate with the english language? Is there anybody here that that thinks this BS helps the KJ or our business in general? There are corporate plants and lobbyists on the internet and forums now..


Am I the only one here that is cognizant of the facts?  I F^%^&give up...

_________________
Join The Karaokle Singers Social Network. Upload Your Music!!


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 3:59 pm 
Offline
Novice Poster
Novice Poster

Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:30 pm
Posts: 40
Been Liked: 0 time
karyoker @ Sun Jan 06, 2008 6:07 pm wrote:
Hello.. Is there anybody here that is articulate with the english language? Is there anybody here that that thinks this BS helps the KJ or our business in general? There are corporate plants and lobbyists on the internet and forums now..


Am I the only one here that is cognizant of the facts?  I F^%^&give up...


Actually Bro, this is not a problem for folks in the Karaoke Business at all.  If you purchase your music leaglly YOU have nothing to worry about at all!  The owner of the venue, the bar or club or nursing home, is the one with troubles.  They HAVE to pay ASCAP/BMI to have these tunes playing in their place of business, it is just the way it is.

As a performer you have the right to play whatever you want, the karaoke producers pay a fee to the Harry Fox Agency for using making covers of these tunes we use and they are also legal.  If you are playing the piano you still don;t have to pay anyone, it's all free for you, the performer.

If you want to record covers you must pay.  

If you have cover music playing in your place of business you must pay.

If you want to share copies of written or transcribed music you must pay.

Playing it still isn't regulated, singing still isn't regulated. listening still isn't regulated.

As far as it goes I think this DOES help folks in the legit Karaoke Business, some of you guys have THOUSANDS of dollars in your libraries!  This is a real capitol investment IMHO.  It would stink if your competitiors could just grab up all the stuff you have for a $25 download from a guy on Craigslist that says "Bring your own hard drive!"...

BSR


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 4:05 pm 
Offline
Novice Poster
Novice Poster

Joined: Sun Dec 23, 2007 9:30 pm
Posts: 40
Been Liked: 0 time
Karen K @ Sat Jan 05, 2008 8:22 pm wrote:
Okay, I think I'll just remove those 5 songs from my collection - or not allow them to be sung...Seems odd that the owners of the copyright will suffer such IRREPARABLE damage by having these songs sung at karaoke. Can you say EXAGGERATE?  Oh man, what's this biz coming to. I should think they'd be looking harder for the people who have freely downloaded thousands of copies of those songs pre-Napster lawsuit.

Lon, I'm thinking about calling this guy - I may contact Ty at the rag and see if I can include an article in Feb's edition about this very subject. Be interesting to know the gritty details. Thanks for linking to the complaint.

K


No need to remove anything you have legally purchased Karen.  This is about performing cover songs in a VENUE that does not have a licence to have cover songs playing in any form.  They could be sued in the same way for having the radio playing, the TV on "MTV unplugged" or a guy playing the Saxaphone in the corner.  The KJ cannot be sued for this unless he/she is using illegally ripped tracks.  Only the place of business.

It's really not our problem...

Lonman posted the link to the actual complaint, the press apparently got it pretty much wrong and it has stirred up some trouble here....

http://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?a ... 8F0EAB78DC



BSR


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:10 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster

Joined: Wed Mar 17, 2004 6:46 pm
Posts: 1264
Been Liked: 0 time
Lonman @ Sat Jan 05, 2008 12:53 pm wrote:
Here is the copy of the complaint filed.

http://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?a ... 8F0EAB78DC

It's in a pdf format.



Here you go Ollie  Lonman posted the above pdf file link

_________________
FlipSide Karaoke
Scott


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:25 pm 
Offline
Non-Member

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:49 pm
Posts: 1250
Been Liked: 0 time
All these years i was mistaken about ASCAP/BMI.

After reading the law suit and sleeping on it, it all became clear.

ASCAP/BMI doesn't charge the bars a fee because they played the music.

ASCAP/BMI sells permission to play the songs.  

If you look on any karaoke disc it says;

ALL UNAUTHORIZED COPYING, PUBLIC PERFORMANCE AND BROADCASTING  PROHIBITED

You must obtain permission/authorization to play the disc publically.

Whenever you pay ASCAP/BMI and fill out the paper work, you have written authorization to play the music.  ASCAP/BMI has just issued you a "license" to do so.  

You need a hunting license to hunt.  A Driver's license to drive.  A license to play the music.

This is how they win in court everytime.  You can not produce the required license so you are found guilty of copyright infringement.    UNAUTHORIZED USE WITHOUT PERMISSION.   You agreed to it, whenever you bought the disc.   It's full meaning may be hidden, but it's implied.



Taking out individual songs will not save you.  It covers every song ever written that isn't in public domain.

He can lose his business if he gets fined $30,000.  Can you couch up that much dough in a month?   If he can't, he will have to get a loan, mortgage his house or sell the business.  When he becomes poor his old lady will leave him for somebody with money.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:59 am 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
karyoker @ Sun Jan 06, 2008 2:42 pm wrote:
Quote:
Yeah if you read the complaint it states down the line that the bar did not pay publisher compensation - ie ascap/bmi/sesac.  And those 5 songs were played the night the investigator (or whatever) was in which is some of the songs they represent, they didn't go after the whole library since those songs weren't performed.  I talked to a lawyer on another forum & he stated the same thing, it's basically a non-payment of publishing fees and most likely will be settled out of court with fines & purchasing the licesnes.
_________________


Could you provide a link to the complaint? (What is a complaint in legal terms?) Here is what I get from the original link.

Am I missing something? I never could load the video.. I check the public court records for facts I see nothing about ascap bmi etc


I provided the link to the actual court case earlier int his thread.....Flipper verified it.  Here it is again.
http://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?a ... 8F0EAB78DC

It's in a pdf file so you'd need to download to view.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:05 am 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
sidewinder @ Sun Jan 06, 2008 11:25 pm wrote:
All these years i was mistaken about ASCAP/BMI.

After reading the law suit and sleeping on it, it all became clear.

ASCAP/BMI doesn't charge the bars a fee because they played the music.

ASCAP/BMI sells permission to play the songs.  

If you look on any karaoke disc it says;

ALL UNAUTHORIZED COPYING, PUBLIC PERFORMANCE AND BROADCASTING  PROHIBITED

You must obtain permission/authorization to play the disc publically.

Whenever you pay ASCAP/BMI and fill out the paper work, you have written authorization to play the music.  ASCAP/BMI has just issued you a "license" to do so.  

You need a hunting license to hunt.  A Driver's license to drive.  A license to play the music.

This is how they win in court everytime.  You can not produce the required license so you are found guilty of copyright infringement.    UNAUTHORIZED USE WITHOUT PERMISSION.   You agreed to it, whenever you bought the disc.   It's full meaning may be hidden, but it's implied.



Taking out individual songs will not save you.  It covers every song ever written that isn't in public domain.

He can lose his business if he gets fined $30,000.  Can you couch up that much dough in a month?   If he can't, he will have to get a loan, mortgage his house or sell the business.  When he becomes poor his old lady will leave him for somebody with money.


Exactly.  But more than likely he'lkl be fined & have to purchase the license through the company suing them.  THey need 3, ascap/bmi & sesac (international) to be covered.  I know our bar pays them - they even asked me about sesac if they should or not, I told them it's up to them, sesac is generally an international license & rarely goes after bars in the states, but technically they are supposed to - they now pay all 3.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 9:35 am 
Offline
Super Duper Poster
Super Duper Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 2621
Location: Canuck, eh.
Been Liked: 0 time
Was kidding about taking out those songs...The places I work at all pay for licenses, thank goodness.

If it's simply a matter of the guy not having his ASCAP/BMI licensing up to date, he's a foo.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 1:29 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster

Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:39 am
Posts: 1238
Location: Tampa Bay Area
Been Liked: 15 times
Just curious, how much are these licenses? Are there specific or broad licenses? In other words are there multiple different kinds of licenses? Just looking for some basic info to save me from reading a bunch of legal stuff and tracking all over the internet for hours trying to research it. I'm thinking about opening a small beer and wine bar with live entertainment and Karoke and I don't know anything about this ASCAP, BMI stuff.
Thanks


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:08 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:43 pm
Posts: 6784
Location: Fort Collins Colorado USA
Been Liked: 5 times
Quote:
I provided the link to the actual court case earlier int his thread.....Flipper verified it.  Here it is again.
http://www.yousendit.com/transfer.php?a ... 8F0EAB78DC

It's in a pdf file so you'd need to download to view.


I still see nothing about ASACP... I got a bridge I will sell you.  Dont you know corruption  and lies when you see it?

_________________
Join The Karaokle Singers Social Network. Upload Your Music!!


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:21 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:43 pm
Posts: 6784
Location: Fort Collins Colorado USA
Been Liked: 5 times
In many jobs I have paid ASACP fees such as manager for the VFW  I have installed over 100 jukeboxes in which we paid the fees and we put a sticker in the window. I have nothing against ASCAP other than their latest methods such as the Bull & Bear lawsuit. This reeks  of mafia greed.

With all the lawsuits we are on the bottom of the totem pole.. Please dont misinterpret my posts. I am merely trying to be a voice for the KJ'S trying to make an honest living .. THANK YOU

_________________
Join The Karaokle Singers Social Network. Upload Your Music!!


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:06 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
karyoker @ Mon Jan 07, 2008 2:08 pm wrote:
I still see nothing about ASACP...


Paragraph 13 on page 4.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:08 pm 
Offline
Non-Member

Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:49 pm
Posts: 1250
Been Liked: 0 time
Google ASCAP

You can find the form to estimate the cost for each bar.


You pay for a JUKEBOX, KJ, DJ and bands.  Bands are the most expensive.  Karaoke was the cheapest.  About $3-400 a year for karaoke.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:11 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
sidewinder @ Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:08 pm wrote:
Google ASCAP

You can find the form to estimate the cost for each bar.


You pay for a JUKEBOX, KJ, DJ and bands.  Bands are the most expensive.  Karaoke was the cheapest.  About $3-400 a year for karaoke.


Actually karaoke is an add on expense.  If they are already paying for pre-recorded or cover bands, then karaoke is like an extra $.25-50 per night depending on the amount of times per month.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 4:32 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:22 pm
Posts: 1128
Location: Athens, GA
Been Liked: 4 times
Quote:
I still see nothing about ASACP... I got a bridge I will sell you.


Page 4, point 13 pt A, B, C.

Legal junk but at least that part is clear.



I think that the problem with karaoke is that to legally run a show one needs to be paying royalties to ASCAP, BMI and SESAC to Publicly PERFORM the songs. They also need to pay Hary Fox (indirectly) for the rights to make a cover version of the song (and the karaoke making companyies should be paying that, and most do). Finally they have to pay the rights for the lyrics. THe karaoke maker also has to pay for the sycnronizing the lyrics from the music publishers. The first four are at least standardized fees, but the last is whatever the publisher wants to charge. The last one is the expensive one and difficult one to obtain for the karaoke makers. Apparently it is also the one most often abused by them. Part of the problem is that in many cases there may be dispute as to who owns the rights to songs and finding that out may be difficult.

The annoyance is that in theory all of this money from 5 different mechanisms is supposed to be going back to the same person/people who wrote the song. With 5 different mechanisms it is not odd that some bars may think "well I already paid for that song/music" they are incorrect in the eyes of the law.

If it was a more fair system, then only a single mechanism or two would exist NOT 5 different ones, but then the lawyers would not be getting as rich.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:37 pm 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2005 6:04 pm
Posts: 1688
Location: wishing i was at wrigley
Been Liked: 0 time
Lonman @ Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:01 pm wrote:
DJMojo @ Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:53 am wrote:
A couple things I find interesting-

How would the labels know if the bar was using bogus music ? It legal to make backup copies, right? Maybe the labels sent some sort of spy to the bar that went up and starting BSing with the KJ and got him to admit something without the KJ knowing who he was talking to.

And why would the TV station have a copy of the lawsuit before the bar?

Hey Lonman, since this is in your neck of the woods, keep us posted on any updates.

Mojo


Technically no it's not legal to use backups or format shifted music in commercial environments, but this isn't even stated.  It's more than likely a publishing issue where they didn't pay their ascap/bmi fees.  But if it is a case of true copyright WITH original discs, this will be interesting.


lonman, forgive my ignorance, but it seems like you're intimating that a venue must pay a fee to ascap, bmi or who ever to use legitimately purchased discs for karaoke.  i wasn't aware that the venue needed to pay dues.  i thought the dues/fees etc. were paid by the disc manufacturers and that purchaaseing legitimate discs was the only real problem.  i can't think of a single venue in which i've played that has ever paid any dues to those entities.

_________________
All work and no play make Homer something something

Image


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:43 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
xx @ Mon Jan 07, 2008 5:37 pm wrote:
Lonman @ Fri Jan 04, 2008 12:01 pm wrote:
DJMojo @ Fri Jan 04, 2008 9:53 am wrote:
A couple things I find interesting-

How would the labels know if the bar was using bogus music ? It legal to make backup copies, right? Maybe the labels sent some sort of spy to the bar that went up and starting BSing with the KJ and got him to admit something without the KJ knowing who he was talking to.

And why would the TV station have a copy of the lawsuit before the bar?

Hey Lonman, since this is in your neck of the woods, keep us posted on any updates.

Mojo


Technically no it's not legal to use backups or format shifted music in commercial environments, but this isn't even stated.  It's more than likely a publishing issue where they didn't pay their ascap/bmi fees.  But if it is a case of true copyright WITH original discs, this will be interesting.


lonman, forgive my ignorance, but it seems like you're intimating that a venue must pay a fee to ascap, bmi or who ever to use legitimately purchased discs for karaoke.  i wasn't aware that the venue needed to pay dues.  i thought the dues/fees etc. were paid by the disc manufacturers and that purchaaseing legitimate discs was the only real problem.  i can't think of a single venue in which i've played that has ever paid any dues to those entities.


They are supposed to pay these fees if they run tv, radio, background music, live music, karaoke, dj - anything that is played or shown in their club.  Even if there is a dance floor or not will factor into the fee.  Maybe you didn't know that they were paying, or maybe they just weren't paying, but yes they are supposed to and obviously can be busted for not.  None of that is covered in the purchase of the disc, these fees are the clubs responsibility.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 62 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 834 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech