|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
Alan B
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 5:44 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 7:24 pm Posts: 4466 Been Liked: 1052 times
|
Hi Everyone. This time I wonder if anyone can recommend wireless mikes in the 2 to 3 hundred dollar range. Can't really spend a lot of $$ at this time so I'm looking for the best bang for the buck that's not going to sound like crap.
Thanks
Alan
|
|
Top |
|
|
mckyj57
|
Posted: Sun Jan 27, 2008 7:37 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:24 pm Posts: 5576 Location: Cocoa Beach Been Liked: 122 times
|
AKG WMS-40 is pretty good. $200 for one, $350 for two. I own one, and while I would rather have the SM-58, it costs twice as much or more.
The WMS-40 also has the advantage of getting 20 or more hours from a singler AA battery.
|
|
Top |
|
|
ranger
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 2:10 pm |
|
|
Novice Poster |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 21, 2008 3:31 pm Posts: 47 Location: texas Been Liked: 0 time
|
one thing to remember is that the freq range may be enter feared with from other wire-less devices and set your reciever for your mic at least four foot from your pa system ,so you dont get any un-wanted hum thru your pa speakers,
hope this is of some help
as far as brand off wire-less mics i have used cheep one and exsp. ones ,results about the same, some times your going to be paying for the name, not the product
|
|
Top |
|
|
Jian
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 4:06 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 10:18 pm Posts: 4080 Location: Serian Been Liked: 0 time
|
ranger @ 29th January 2008, 6:10 am wrote: one thing to remember is that the freq range may be enter feared with from other wire-less devices and set your reciever for your mic at least four foot from your pa system ,so you dont get any un-wanted hum thru your pa speakers, hope this is of some help as far as brand off wire-less mics i have used cheep one and exsp. ones ,results about the same, some times your going to be paying for the name, not the product
Really? can you give us an example or two.
_________________ I can neither confirm nor deny ever having or knowing anything about nothing.... mrscott
|
|
Top |
|
|
MagicMike
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 6:17 pm |
|
|
Novice Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 6:37 pm Posts: 26 Location: Dutch Harbor Alaska Been Liked: 0 time
|
Just got a Samson Stage 5 mic in the mail today. I'm going to give it a try at my show tonight. Ill let you know how it goes.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Alan B
|
Posted: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:37 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 7:24 pm Posts: 4466 Been Liked: 1052 times
|
|
Top |
|
|
lyquiddye
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 7:38 am |
|
Joined: Wed Apr 20, 2005 12:26 pm Posts: 1252 Location: Pittsburgh, PA Been Liked: 3 times
|
|
Top |
|
|
mckyj57
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:00 am |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:24 pm Posts: 5576 Location: Cocoa Beach Been Liked: 122 times
|
lyquiddye @ Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:38 am wrote: Keep in mind that any wireless microphone you purchase that operates above 698mhz will be totally useless come Feburary 2009. When the new Digital tv system goes live.
No, you are wrong. They have *the potential* of being useless in some locations and under some conditions at that time.
It is not like all of a sudden huge jamming stations are going to start operating in those freq bands. The spectra are being sold, and in most cases it is unclear what will happen on each band.
|
|
Top |
|
|
MagicMike
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 1:16 pm |
|
|
Novice Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Jan 23, 2008 6:37 pm Posts: 26 Location: Dutch Harbor Alaska Been Liked: 0 time
|
I couldn't get the Samson mike to work last night! rrrrggg. Next week Ill spend a little more time with it. I was told it didn't have a plastic 'body' either but it does. I have always stayed away from mics that have plastic bodies. Is this a mistake? Are there good sounding mics with the body being plastic?
|
|
Top |
|
|
Jian
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:51 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 10:18 pm Posts: 4080 Location: Serian Been Liked: 0 time
|
mckyj57 @ 30th January 2008, 2:00 am wrote: lyquiddye @ Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:38 am wrote: Keep in mind that any wireless microphone you purchase that operates above 698mhz will be totally useless come Feburary 2009. When the new Digital tv system goes live.
No, you are wrong. They have *the potential* of being useless in some locations and under some conditions at that time. It is not like all of a sudden huge jamming stations are going to start operating in those freq bands. The spectra are being sold, and in most cases it is unclear what will happen on each band.
But you would not want to buy a mic that have 'the potential' to be useless.
_________________ I can neither confirm nor deny ever having or knowing anything about nothing.... mrscott
|
|
Top |
|
|
dawnpgeo
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 3:52 pm |
|
|
Novice Poster |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 1:44 pm Posts: 24 Been Liked: 0 time
|
The set from Gem Sound has plastic bodies and I've used them for several months now. The first set I had was the first model to come out. Someone placed it on one of my speakers and it rolled off. It didn't work after that. I contacted the company and they gave me a brand new set under the warranty. They have upgraded them now and they seem to be a bit more rugged. I keep them wrapped in an old, thick sock when packed up.
They have worked great for me. I've had absolutely NO interference with them. They have a great distance range, too. For $50 for two mics there is no way you can go wrong.
They have a 1/4" plug (low impedance) instead of the larger high impedance. The volume level is relatively low but I have a Peavy XR-600 head so I crank the main up to get the volume I need.
MDP
|
|
Top |
|
|
Jian
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:01 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 10:18 pm Posts: 4080 Location: Serian Been Liked: 0 time
|
dawnpgeo @ 30th January 2008, 7:52 am wrote: The set from Gem Sound has plastic bodies and I've used them for several months now. The first set I had was the first model to come out. Someone placed it on one of my speakers and it rolled off. It didn't work after that. I contacted the company and they gave me a brand new set under the warranty. They have upgraded them now and they seem to be a bit more rugged. I keep them wrapped in an old, thick sock when packed up.
They have worked great for me. I've had absolutely NO interference with them. They have a great distance range, too. For $50 for two mics there is no way you can go wrong.
They have a 1/4" plug (low impedance) instead of the larger high impedance. The volume level is relatively low but I have a Peavy XR-600 head so I crank the main up to get the volume I need.
MDP
You should never give your singer a chance to put a mic at the top of the speaker. Never, never ever.
_________________ I can neither confirm nor deny ever having or knowing anything about nothing.... mrscott
|
|
Top |
|
|
dawnpgeo
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:03 pm |
|
|
Novice Poster |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 1:44 pm Posts: 24 Been Liked: 0 time
|
It was a kid's birthday party and a 6 year-old did it. Her Mom offered to pay for it but I had a warranty. Just an accident.
I've guarded them with my life since.
MDP
|
|
Top |
|
|
sidewinder
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:26 pm |
|
|
Non-Member |
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:49 pm Posts: 1250 Been Liked: 0 time
|
Plastic on the outside doesn't mean plastic on the inside.
It's the guts that makes the sound difference. They are not like speakers. Wood sounds better than plastic. Because the sound needs the box to react with. Microphones just need good guts.
I have never had a kid drop a microphone. Just stupid drunk adults. LMAO
|
|
Top |
|
|
Jian
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 4:33 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 10:18 pm Posts: 4080 Location: Serian Been Liked: 0 time
|
dawnpgeo @ 30th January 2008, 8:03 am wrote: It was a kid's birthday party and a 6 year-old did it. Her Mom offered to pay for it but I had a warranty. Just an accident. I've guarded them with my life since. MDP
The point I want to make is that it is a good recipe for feedback. A bad feedback can kill your speaker.
_________________ I can neither confirm nor deny ever having or knowing anything about nothing.... mrscott
|
|
Top |
|
|
mckyj57
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 8:26 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:24 pm Posts: 5576 Location: Cocoa Beach Been Liked: 122 times
|
Jian @ Tue Jan 29, 2008 6:51 pm wrote: mckyj57 @ 30th January 2008, 2:00 am wrote: lyquiddye @ Tue Jan 29, 2008 10:38 am wrote: Keep in mind that any wireless microphone you purchase that operates above 698mhz will be totally useless come Feburary 2009. When the new Digital tv system goes live.
No, you are wrong. They have *the potential* of being useless in some locations and under some conditions at that time. It is not like all of a sudden huge jamming stations are going to start operating in those freq bands. The spectra are being sold, and in most cases it is unclear what will happen on each band. But you would not want to buy a mic that have 'the potential' to be useless.
Shure I would.
And I mean that -- if Shure SM58 wireless go down to $200.00, I will probably buy one even though it might become useless in a few years.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Murray C
|
Posted: Tue Jan 29, 2008 9:05 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 23, 2004 3:50 pm Posts: 1047 Been Liked: 1 time
|
Myth no. 11 in this article addresses the issue of February 2009.
http://www.shurenotes.com/issue27/article.html
Certainly if you can get a frequency agile system that is going to be the best way to go. The system I have is way out of the price range you mention, but I love the auto-scanning feature which scans for available frequencies.... that make set-up a lot easier, especially if moving around different venues.
The plastic body of the Shure Beta87C mic transmitter doesn't seem to affect it's performance at all... makes it a bit lighter to handle!
|
|
Top |
|
|
sidewinder
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:36 am |
|
|
Non-Member |
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:49 pm Posts: 1250 Been Liked: 0 time
|
IMO, with the changes that are coming that could effect the performance of wireless microphones. One should consider programable microphones and ones that are true diversity, so you have less chance of a signal drop out. If you are upgrading your microphones now, don't waste your money on anything less, or you may be buying them again.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Jian
|
Posted: Wed Jan 30, 2008 12:41 am |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 10:18 pm Posts: 4080 Location: Serian Been Liked: 0 time
|
The answer to your 2009 problem is wired/cable mic. SIMPLE.
_________________ I can neither confirm nor deny ever having or knowing anything about nothing.... mrscott
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 891 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|