|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
Author |
Message |
roe
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 7:37 pm |
|
|
Novice Poster |
|
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 1:35 pm Posts: 15 Been Liked: 0 time
|
convert your CDG to MP3+G (192K rate) should maintain a very close to CD quality
and save you 7-8 times the space.
|
|
Top |
|
|
darway
|
Posted: Mon Dec 22, 2008 7:40 pm |
|
|
Novice Poster |
|
Joined: Mon Sep 01, 2008 6:14 am Posts: 38 Location: Charlotte Been Liked: 0 time
|
This is an old topic. Rip it higher. You CAN tell the difference of 192 versus CD. Heck, I can tell with my cheap DELL speakers at home. It will definately make a difference on a real rig.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Jian
|
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 12:11 am |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 10:18 pm Posts: 4080 Location: Serian Been Liked: 0 time
|
convert your CDG to MP3+G (192K rate) should maintain a very close to CD quality
and save you 7-8 times the space.
Why ripping at 192 and not at 320K, or better still .wav. Hard disc space is cheap nowadays.
I rip my karaoke dvd video to .vob; I could save space if I convert those .vob files to .avi, but I rather not.
_________________ I can neither confirm nor deny ever having or knowing anything about nothing.... mrscott
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:37 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
Agree with hard drives as cheap as they are rip the best you can. 192 was good a couple years ago, but hard drives were also much more expensive!!!!
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
knightshow
|
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:43 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Nov 07, 2002 2:40 am Posts: 7468 Location: Kansas City, MO Been Liked: 1 time
|
not true.
For the past few years, 192 is the standard. 128 is the lazy man's way*. Sure it works... but anybody that plays first the 128 track and then the .wav version can EASILY tell the difference.
And yes, I've had customers in a noisy bar find fault with a couple of my older 128 tracks that were noticably affected by the compression.
* by lazy man's way, I mean... My software I use installed and defaulted to 128. You have to go in and change the settings!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 2:51 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
There is a noticeable difference between 128 & 192. Most of the mp3's i've been buying have been 192 or higher lately.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
ggardein
|
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 4:51 pm |
|
|
Advanced Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Mar 22, 2007 6:12 pm Posts: 339 Location: D.C. Been Liked: 3 times
|
I rest my case......lmfao
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 5:07 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
nobodyhome @ Tue Dec 23, 2008 5:51 pm wrote: I rest my case......lmfao
No, no case has been rested. You CAN tell the difference between a 128 rip and a 192 rip. Eq'ing can help, but it isn't going to hide the compressed sounds of the high end where is most noticeable. There is even a slight difference between 192 & 320, but this I give you isn't as noticeable. Like I said the downloads I have been buying lately have all been 192 or better. Haven't received a 128 mp3 download in quite a while.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Micky
|
Posted: Tue Dec 23, 2008 9:17 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 6:13 pm Posts: 1625 Location: Montreal, Canada Been Liked: 34 times
|
nobodyhome @ Tue Dec 23, 2008 5:17 pm wrote: 128k has been the usual default, and referred to as CD quality, plus you can tweek the sound with the simplest of EQs, and even more with the proper tools or toys....vast majority of customers don't notice anyway, only other Kjs, and prissy people looking to find fault with your stuff......
Can't believe people are still encoding at 128k Hope you're using a Lame encoder at least, if not, the file is damage and can't be burn on a cd, it will always sound bad
|
|
Top |
|
|
|
Page 1 of 1
|
[ 10 posts ] |
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 695 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|