|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
karyoker
|
Posted: Wed Apr 22, 2009 6:17 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:43 pm Posts: 6784 Location: Fort Collins Colorado USA Been Liked: 5 times
|
now do you understand proper gain structure? Sheesh!!
_________________ Join The Karaokle Singers Social Network. Upload Your Music!!
|
|
Top |
|
|
gunghouk
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 1:05 am |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 30, 2005 6:30 am Posts: 140 Been Liked: 0 time
|
Most pro mixer manufacturer's advice for gain structrure setup requires 0db average signal level on the meters with PFL engaged. Then adjust channel faders to mix.
THE END.
I subsequently run my vocal channel faders at or around 0db, music channel at or just above -10dB and my master faders around -5dB (to suit my speaker processor, & amp settings). I would suggest using mp3gain to ensure the music tracks all play back at approximately the same level so that faders can be easily reset to a known position between singers etc.
My 2 cents (pence)
_________________ Gadget's Karaoke : Boldly singing what no one has dared sing before.
|
|
Top |
|
|
LondonLive
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:46 am |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 6:07 am Posts: 789 Location: Michigan Been Liked: 2 times
|
jamkaraoke @ Wed Apr 22, 2009 10:54 am wrote: OK now you guys got my head spinning I'll take the MIXER and set it up in my basment and play with it a little and see what I come up with as far as the gain and other settings to see if I can get something better before going to another effects unit. Thanks for your help and I'll let you know my results ASAP ( day or two ) THANKS
Well, I guess that's what happens when you get all kinds of people trying to explain a simple thing like "gain structure". They end up making it sound like it's rocket science, which it isn't. I would love to help you but I'm not going to get into the "answer by Committee thing", it just gets to confusing for the person that asked the question. Do yourself a favor and pick up a copy of "Sound Reinforcement Handbook" by Yamaha. It's written so even the beginner can understand, and has enough information to satisfy most sound technicians up to the intermediate level. It will answer pretty much any question you might have without all the drama and conjecture. The setting up your gear in the basement is a great idea, experiment, learn your system. You will learn why the proper input level (gain) is crucial to a good mix. Good luck.
http://www.amazon.com/Sound-Reinforceme ... 0881889008
_________________ Quickness of mind will deceive the eye
|
|
Top |
|
|
karyoker
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 5:37 am |
|
Joined: Wed Jun 30, 2004 3:43 pm Posts: 6784 Location: Fort Collins Colorado USA Been Liked: 5 times
|
Quote: I subsequently run my vocal channel faders at or around 0db, music channel at or just above -10dB and my master faders around -5dB (to suit my speaker processor, & amp settings). I would suggest using mp3gain to ensure the music tracks all play back at approximately the same level so that faders can be easily reset to a known position between singers etc.
Thats basically where I run mine, the mic compressor needs unity input. I run music about -6DB. The main fader level is determined by where the amp or powered speaker level is set at. That depends upon the venue. Outdoors I run pretty much wide open.
_________________ Join The Karaokle Singers Social Network. Upload Your Music!!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Gryf
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 11:03 am |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:09 pm Posts: 493 Location: Garland, Tx Been Liked: 3 times
|
London's got the right idea. Look up Gain Structure, understand it and get some techniques that work for you.
|
|
Top |
|
|
letitrip
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 12:06 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:53 am Posts: 1462 Location: West Bend, WI Been Liked: 3 times
|
karyoker @ Wed Apr 22, 2009 2:09 pm wrote: Quote: And how do you fix it when 100MHz comes in at 0 dbu but 1.6K is at +4? You don't go to the input attenuation nor do you go to the fader. You go to the EQ and you take out 4db at 1.6K. The only affect that has on gain structure is that adjusting the EQ decreases the overall level of the signal, so you'd have to adjust the input attenuation again. This is beyond gain structure. A clip at 1.6K will show up on the meters the same as a clip at 250Mhz, so the spectrum analysis is irrelavent at this point.
Now you are talking about an RF amp. Any amp should be flat line (.5 DB or lower for solid state across the bandwidth. -3DB at the low and -3 DB at the high high end.If youhave a 4 DB variance in that frequency range you have a problem. OK Obviously (or it should be obvious) I was talking about 100Hz, not 100Mhz. The amp should have the same sensitivity at all frequency (although reality is that there is some discrepency as you mentioned). What I'm talking about is where you would use a spectrum analyzer in a live sound scenario (after all Karaoke is a live sound application) which would be to EQ the room. It is not uncommon in a room to have even as high as 6db variance amongst various frequencies. karyoker @ Wed Apr 22, 2009 2:09 pm wrote: Quote: And how do you fix it when 100MHz comes in at 0 dbu but 1.6K is at +4? You don't go to the input attenuation nor do you go to the fader. You go to the EQ and you take out 4db at 1.6K. The only affect that has on gain structure is that adjusting the EQ decreases the overall level of the signal, so you'd have to adjust the input attenuation again. This is beyond gain structure. A clip at 1.6K will show up on the meters the same as a clip at 250Mhz, so the spectrum analysis is irrelavent at this point.
Again, not talking about broadcast, sorry don't know why I kept tossing MHz in there, should read 100Hz. And again, when you have an issue where the room shows one frequency being reproduced at higher levels than all others, you cut the frequency with the EQ, not a trim adjustment. karyoker @ Wed Apr 22, 2009 2:09 pm wrote: Quote: Gain structure is about headroom and signal-noise ratio maximization. If you cut your signals too harshly at the input stage, everything else following it has to make up for that and will introduce noise. Additionally, you've lost head room in those stages. Set your input stage so that your peaks are at 0 db, then move on to the next step in the signal path and make sure that input and output of each step are at 0. Now when you finally get to the faders you can worry about the mix and the output stage.
A mixer whether audio or video is about mixing all inputs at the proper level and feeding the power amp with proper levels. It does not need to be 0 DB The level control on the amp or powered speaker is an attenuator an just determines the amount of input needed for the desired power or SPL out. If you are feeding it 0DB then you are running the mixer at max and close to the headroom level. If you are running the computer or pre at low levels then you are introducing floor noise. A video mixer has to be closer to 0 DB and timing is critical. OK This is just plain wrong. The "attenuator" on the amplifier is not a level control it is an input sensitivity adjustment. There is a significant and very important difference. I also never said you want the signal going to the amp to be at 0db, what I said is you want your amp pushing maximum power when the output from the console is 0db. Did you even read what you quoted? karyoker @ Wed Apr 22, 2009 2:09 pm wrote: Quote: Gain structure is only the first foundation you lay for the rest of your reinforcement rig. Once it's in place you have Equalization, Mix, Effects and a whole host of other issues to deal with. So let's not confuse the issue by bringing in more topics that in the end likely do not relate to the OP's issue.
You are the one that initiated the discussion proper gain structure. I am an engineer and suggested some simple techniques on checking it other than golden ears. Then you as much said I didnt know what the hell I was talking about!!! Lets go get a beer!! We have turned this thread into an informative one to say the least..
I never said you didn't know what you were talking about, I corrected some mis-statements in what you said. And you didn't offer a simple technique, you offered a complex one of using a spectrum analyzer when simply using the meters on the board (not a golden ear) will do the job. Equalization requires either spectrum analysis or a good ear or both, but not gain structure.
_________________ DJ Tony
Let It Rip Karaoke
|
|
Top |
|
|
mckyj57
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 1:08 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:24 pm Posts: 5576 Location: Cocoa Beach Been Liked: 122 times
|
I don't think gain structure is very important to the original question.
On a powered mixer like that, simply setting the FX send on the microphone channel at about 1pm, setting the FX Program to 10 (vocal echo), setting FX parameter midrange, and FX ON should yield an audible result. If it does not, then there is something wrong with the mixer. Pretty simple.
_________________ [color=#ffff55]Mickey J.[/color] Alas for those who never sing, but die with all their music in them. -- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.
|
|
Top |
|
|
LondonLive
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 2:05 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Sat Jul 28, 2007 6:07 am Posts: 789 Location: Michigan Been Liked: 2 times
|
mckyj57 @ Thu Apr 23, 2009 4:08 pm wrote: I don't think gain structure is very important to the original question.
On a powered mixer like that, simply setting the FX send on the microphone channel at about 1pm, setting the FX Program to 10 (vocal echo), setting FX parameter midrange, and FX ON should yield an audible result. If it does not, then there is something wrong with the mixer. Pretty simple.
You are absolutely right MJ, I got so caught reading all the back and forth banter that I forgot the OP was inquiring about an EMX512SC, no wonder Jamkaraoke's head is spinning. It is pretty cut and dry with that mixer head. I would think that starting somewhere around mid level with the individual channels and adjusting your your overall volume with the Master would be a good starting point to insure a good signal path for the FX.
_________________ Quickness of mind will deceive the eye
|
|
Top |
|
|
letitrip
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 6:41 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:53 am Posts: 1462 Location: West Bend, WI Been Liked: 3 times
|
I apologize that this turned into a crazy technical discussion that obviously disinterested most of the forum. I'll make this my last post on the subject. I agree that setting that mixer's effects should be pretty straightforward which is why if the OP is having problems getting significant levels out of the EFX unit I would suspect an issue with gain structure. I would agree with LondonLive, do some research on your own and you'll find the answers you need. Too much contradictory information has been given in this thread to make it useful to anyone (except maybe the insomniacs )
My apologies JamKaraoke, I hope you get it figured out.
_________________ DJ Tony
Let It Rip Karaoke
|
|
Top |
|
|
Micky
|
Posted: Thu Apr 23, 2009 7:58 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 6:13 pm Posts: 1625 Location: Montreal, Canada Been Liked: 34 times
|
|
Top |
|
|
Gryf
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 7:44 am |
|
Joined: Sat Jun 21, 2008 9:09 pm Posts: 493 Location: Garland, Tx Been Liked: 3 times
|
|
Top |
|
|
Micky
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:16 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 6:13 pm Posts: 1625 Location: Montreal, Canada Been Liked: 34 times
|
Gryf @ Fri Apr 24, 2009 10:44 am wrote: Micky @ Thu Apr 23, 2009 9:58 pm wrote: Yorkville also offers a friendly Professional audio guide in pdf, it's FREE!! http://www.yorkville.com/default.asp?p1=6&p2=0&p_id=17Have fun! Hey great link! Thanks!
You welcome, it's my little bible
|
|
Top |
|
|
MorganLeFey
|
Posted: Fri Apr 24, 2009 5:33 pm |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Jul 12, 2006 3:26 am Posts: 7441 Location: New Zealand Been Liked: 8 times
|
folks London Live doesnt only know his stuff, he has been a wonderful help in one on one sessions helping this closet blonde understand it and get her own system working right.
He's a busy man...his band is awesome and they work pretty damned hard...but if you can wait till he has some down time, then you wont get a better teacher
_________________ "Be who you are and say what you feel... Because those that matter... Don't mind...And those that mind... Don't matter."
|
|
Top |
|
|
jamkaraoke
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 5:48 am |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2002 10:54 am Posts: 3485 Location: New Jersey , USA Been Liked: 0 time
|
1ST I want to thank everyone for their responses!!
I didn't get a chance to experiment in my basement, but I did read AGAIN the manual to the mixer again and paid close attention to the instructions on setting up the system. At this Saturdays show I reset all the settings on the Powered Mixer. ( Channel EQ / Master EQ / GAIN / EFX and Compressore etc etc. )
Using the unity setting on the MASTER volume and working from there I was able to get a much cleaner sound and suprisingly the EFX came thru a little clearer.
It seems the past few weeks I may have had the Master set to LOW and compensating for the power by over EQ etc etc etc. ROOKIE mistake that I should have seen myself. But thanks to YOU and actually paying attention to the manual I was able to get a better sound .....
Thanks
|
|
Top |
|
|
Bazza
|
Posted: Mon Apr 27, 2009 6:04 am |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
karyoker @ Wed Apr 22, 2009 3:09 pm wrote: As a former broadcast CE I know this.
What stations were you CE at? I have been in the broadcast biz for 27 years...we probably have mutual friends.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 583 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|