Babs @ Sat Nov 07, 2009 4:28 pm wrote:
Hmm both have there challenges. I'd say the perfect scenario would be to take over for someone who is retiring and ran a similar show to what I do. It would be a plus if the leaving KJ supported my show.
If it was your circumstances I probably would choose the existing gig because it sounds like that is working out well.
If it was a show that a KJ was fired from who had loyal followers it would probably feel like I was starting all over any way. The loyal followers would go to where he/she was or be a pain in the butt because they'd want me to be like him. It would take time to win over the old regulars and build a new crowd for the ones who left.
Starting from scratch is tough. Hopefully the owners realize it will take time to build a following. I'd say 6 months to a yr without ample advertising.
The new owners are terrific, they even participate when they are there. I like both places a lot. But, yep, they know it will take time, and i'm trying to be patient as well. I think in the end, this place will be the best show I have. Right at this moment I have 5 different venues that I host on 4 different nights of the week. Two of them I split my saturdays between them. The one I inherited, I have been there now for about 6 months, and they want me to be able to do more weekends, but it's just not possible. I really don't have to choose between anything, I was just wondering some of everyones insights into starting one from scratch vs. an inheriting an old show. From my perspective, the inherited one has less frustration and challenges, but I actually like the challenge of building a new crowd. Most of my shows are far from each other, some as much as 80 miles, but even still, I get some of my "fans" to several of my shows. That really makes me feel good about what I do.