KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - Taylor Swift's Copyright Infingement Suit Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


premium-member

Offsite Links


It is currently Tue Jan 21, 2025 10:39 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:01 am 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:36 pm
Posts: 613
Been Liked: 0 time
Taylor Swift just never ceases to amaze me. Not only did she produce a karaoke version of her latest album, but she is aggressively participating in a copyright infringement lawsuit strictly to enforce the law

http://www.tmz.com/2009/11/19/taylor-sw ... operation/


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:38 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2002 10:54 am
Posts: 3485
Location: New Jersey , USA
Been Liked: 0 time
So are you AMAZED for her or against her LOL


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 7:43 am 
Offline
Super Extreme
Super Extreme
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 4:12 pm
Posts: 7708
Songs: 1
Location: Hollyweird, Ca.
Been Liked: 1090 times
Reading between the lines. it seems she sent an "Agent" to run a "Sting".

Now I'm sure she started the whole deal.. since she has nothing else to do.. :angel:

I'm not saying she has no claim.. Pirates need to be hung from the yardarm..


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:06 am 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:36 pm
Posts: 613
Been Liked: 0 time
clarification:

I am totally amazed by her:

composing skills

singing skills

business acumen

maturity

composure under fire (i.e. Kanye)

shall I go on?

EDIT: actually, i think that i should. I am amazed at how much thought she has given to karaoke and where it fits into her career and that she wants to "protect" her karaoke endeavors


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:49 am 
Offline
Super Duper Poster
Super Duper Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:56 am
Posts: 2621
Location: Canuck, eh.
Been Liked: 0 time
The girl's management has principles for sure - she may not even know about it. Nevertheless, good to have an artist on our side of this law, I'd say.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:50 am 
Offline
Super Duper Poster
Super Duper Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:18 pm
Posts: 2593
Been Liked: 294 times
Couldn't tell if this was a BMI fee thing or a copied karaoke thing. Sounds like a BMI fee thing.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:02 am 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:36 pm
Posts: 613
Been Liked: 0 time
leopard lizard @ Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:50 am wrote:
Couldn't tell if this was a BMI fee thing or a copied karaoke thing. Sounds like a BMI fee thing.


BMI collects fees for public performances of an artist's material and does not need Taylor Swift's involvement, as her representative, to strive to collect said fees. And BMI or ASCAP or the like do not get involved, to my understanding, with copyright infringement of a composer's material!

As to copyright suits for music, no copyright suit can be initiated without the composer being a plaintiff. And in many cases the karaoke manufacturer's have been restrained in bringing copyright suits against pirates because of a lack of enthusiasm on the part of composers' to pursue such matters (not enough financial incentive to do so for the composers)


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:33 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:24 pm
Posts: 5576
Location: Cocoa Beach
Been Liked: 122 times
tovmod @ Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:02 pm wrote:
leopard lizard @ Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:50 am wrote:
Couldn't tell if this was a BMI fee thing or a copied karaoke thing. Sounds like a BMI fee thing.


BMI collects fees for public performances of an artist's material and does not need Taylor Swift's involvement, as her representative, to strive to collect said fees. And BMI or ASCAP or the like do not get involved, to my understanding, with copyright infringement of a composer's material!

Actually, you sort of have it backwards. BMI/ASCAP originally had nothing to do with the artist performing the song. They have always represented the songwriters. That's why the name is American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP).

They now collect royalties for both performers and composers, and a true singer-songwriter like Taylor Swift collects it all. I have a friend in the industry who bought rights for all of his songs from the composers years ago. It cost quite a bit then but turned out to be a goldmine when two of the songs got picked up for large TV commercial ad campaigns.

_________________
[color=#ffff55]Mickey J.[/color]
Alas for those who never sing, but die with all their music in them.
-- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:58 am 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:36 pm
Posts: 613
Been Liked: 0 time
mckyj57 @ Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:33 am wrote:
BMI/ASCAP originally had nothing to do with the artist performing the song. They have always represented the songwriters. That's why the name is American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP).

They now collect royalties for both performers and composers, and a true singer-songwriter like Taylor Swift collects it all. I have a friend in the industry who bought rights for all of his songs from the composers years ago. It cost quite a bit then but turned out to be a goldmine when two of the songs got picked up for large TV commercial ad campaigns.


thanks for the update and correction. bottom line, though, is that for a copyright suit to proceed Taylor Swift must be a plaintiff (assuming she kept the rights to her songs). Correct?


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 10:41 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:24 pm
Posts: 5576
Location: Cocoa Beach
Been Liked: 122 times
tovmod @ Thu Nov 19, 2009 12:58 pm wrote:
mckyj57 @ Thu Nov 19, 2009 9:33 am wrote:
BMI/ASCAP originally had nothing to do with the artist performing the song. They have always represented the songwriters. That's why the name is American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP).

They now collect royalties for both performers and composers, and a true singer-songwriter like Taylor Swift collects it all. I have a friend in the industry who bought rights for all of his songs from the composers years ago. It cost quite a bit then but turned out to be a goldmine when two of the songs got picked up for large TV commercial ad campaigns.


thanks for the update and correction. bottom line, though, is that for a copyright suit to proceed Taylor Swift must be a plaintiff (assuming she kept the rights to her songs). Correct?

It's actually ASCAP bringing suit on her behalf, but essentially correct.

_________________
[color=#ffff55]Mickey J.[/color]
Alas for those who never sing, but die with all their music in them.
-- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Nov 19, 2009 8:34 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster

Joined: Wed Aug 22, 2007 5:22 pm
Posts: 1128
Location: Athens, GA
Been Liked: 4 times
Isn't she one of the few out there who has a disk with her origional tracks used for karaoke. If so she could be suing simultaneously for performing rights and also for pirated music.

So it could be a simultaneous BMI style (failure to pay performing rights) and Soundchoice type (pirated copy) case.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:19 am 
Offline
Super Extreme
Super Extreme
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 4:12 pm
Posts: 7708
Songs: 1
Location: Hollyweird, Ca.
Been Liked: 1090 times
Here in Los Angeles, the codes enforcement group checks on all performance rights payments prior to issuing the business license..

This includes TV, Music, Karaoke, dancing, bands, etc..

And they check as the license is renewed..

A sports bar here, (Boardwalk11) installed 20 DirecTV receivers when they started up, and no TV until the code guy signed the permit papers.

The club had a stage, so these permits were required too..

Mileage in your city may vary..


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:23 am 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster

Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:36 pm
Posts: 613
Been Liked: 0 time
jdmeister @ Fri Nov 20, 2009 7:19 am wrote:
Here in Los Angeles, the codes enforcement group checks on all performance rights payments prior to issuing the business license..

This includes TV, Music, Karaoke, dancing, bands, etc..

And they check as the license is renewed..

A sports bar here, (Boardwalk11) installed 20 DirecTV receivers when they started up, and no TV until the code guy signed the permit papers.

The club had a stage, so these permits were required too..

Mileage in your city may vary..



That may help BMI, ASCAP and the like but it does nothing to prevent Copyright Infringement!


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 8:54 am 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
It looks like strictly a BMI - club not paying - type of suit, and they just happened to see that the karaoke they had is probably all downloaded/pre-loaded hard drive.
Since it's all speculation as the article really doesn't state, but that's how it looks to me.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 5:19 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme
Super Extreme
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 24, 2002 4:12 pm
Posts: 7708
Songs: 1
Location: Hollyweird, Ca.
Been Liked: 1090 times
Due process.. Where is it when we need it?


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Nov 20, 2009 9:32 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun May 30, 2004 6:38 pm
Posts: 804
Location: Knoxville, Tennessee
Been Liked: 56 times
jdmeister @ Fri Nov 20, 2009 10:19 am wrote:
Here in Los Angeles, the codes enforcement group checks on all performance rights payments prior to issuing the business license..

This includes TV, Music, Karaoke, dancing, bands, etc..

And they check as the license is renewed..

A sports bar here, (Boardwalk11) installed 20 DirecTV receivers when they started up, and no TV until the code guy signed the permit papers.

The club had a stage, so these permits were required too..

Mileage in your city may vary..


If they did that here, it sure would solve a lot of problems. So in LA code enforcement does recognize that BMI and ASCAP are legit operations!

_________________
No venue to big or too small. From your den to the local club or event, we have the music most requested. Great sounding system!


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 16 posts ] 

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 338 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech