|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
Marble
|
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:08 am |
|
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:12 pm Posts: 619 Images: 3 Location: Devon Been Liked: 25 times
|
jamkaraoke @ Thu Feb 25, 2010 2:24 pm wrote: Rosario You should know better than to try and do something like this You've been around long enough, all you will get is NEGATIVE information from some willing members The "best" or "closest to the original" track is very subjective --you might as well ask what is the best SPEAKER to use --Everyone has a favorite. Moving forward it may be helpful to just target the tracks that SUCK versus the ones that are good. BUt even then you will have some arguments that one version is better than another.
Could you not just list what the different versions offer and state your favourite if there is one ?? Also mention if you are a "die hard fan" of that artist. I would have little clue about if the SGB versions of Cream songs are any good, since neither I or my customers sing them.
Eg. suspicious minds
SC: About five minutes long, the track starts to fade out just before the end before coming back in with a definate ending. Clear swipes.
ZM: My personal favourite. Clear swipes, runs slightly longer about 3:40 for a definate ending
SPC: Clear swipes, pan flute in background, slightly slower than some versions, great for the novice singer and fade out ending.
PS: I have ZM version of I'm gonna be (solo singer) and found it an excellent replacement to the SAVP version I owned before.
ZM: Clear swipes, definate ending
SAVP: can be difficult to read swipes (light text on light background) and pan flute throughout.
|
|
Top |
|
|
srnitynow
|
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:17 am |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:00 pm Posts: 1096 Been Liked: 20 times
|
Marble, THAT is the idea I was thinking of, just a general opinion, and the reason for, and against. I guess you make it look too easy!! Even if people had differing opinions, the original poster could sort it out, from maybe a concensus of all opinions. That's WAY too easy though.
Rosario
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 11:41 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
BigJer @ Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:28 am wrote: While we're sort of on the topic, anybody know a good version of I'm Gonna Be (500 miles) by the Proclaimers? The version I have is terrible.
The version I have is from SBI. Sounds pretty decent to me.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
jamkaraoke
|
Posted: Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:01 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 26, 2002 10:54 am Posts: 3485 Location: New Jersey , USA Been Liked: 0 time
|
I think most on-line retailers now have the ability to sample and listen to MOST tracks for sale. I think SBI does ?
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 9:35 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
BigJer @ Thu Feb 25, 2010 2:28 pm wrote: While we're sort of on the topic, anybody know a good version of I'm Gonna Be (500 miles) by the Proclaimers? The version I have is terrible.
I like the JVC version... have had it for years and never a single complaint.
I THINK.... the best way to determine whether or not a karaoke track is good is to synchronize it with the original.
here's another test for you: Listen to the versions of "Carry On Wayward Son" on the following brands: DK, Dangerous, SC, Priddis. You'll find that each one is different from all the rest depending on whether you want the "rock version" or studio version, or want an introduction or don't want background singers.
SC's "Wasted On The Way" (Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young) has so many prominent parts in it you don't know what part to sing where the Priddis version has NO background harmony singers (bring friends to sing with you).
So how do you determine which is "closest" to the original?
I think the real question here is which version is the most "usable."
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Tue Mar 02, 2010 10:54 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
BigJer @ Thu Feb 25, 2010 11:28 am wrote: While we're sort of on the topic, anybody know a good version of I'm Gonna Be (500 miles) by the Proclaimers? The version I have is terrible.
I've got it on Pioneer, and I've been satisfied with it.
|
|
Top |
|
|
leopard lizard
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 7:15 am |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:18 pm Posts: 2593 Been Liked: 294 times
|
[
here's another test for you: Listen to the versions of "Carry On Wayward Son" on the following brands: DK, Dangerous, SC, Priddis. You'll find that each one is different from all the rest depending on whether you want the "rock version" or studio version, or want an introduction or don't want background singers.
SC's "Wasted On The Way" (Crosby, Stills, Nash & Young) has so many prominent parts in it you don't know what part to sing where the Priddis version has NO background harmony singers (bring friends to sing with you).
So how do you determine which is "closest" to the original?
I think the real question here is which version is the most "usable."[/quote]
____________________________________________________________________
above a quote from C. Staley post
This is one of the exceptions to taking out duplicates in our books. For some we will offer the same song "With Background Singers" or "Without Background Singers."
Another thing SC does is turn duets into solos by providing one of the parts. "The Letter That Johnny Walker Read" provides the female part so it is just a male solo song. "Games People Play" adds a lot of extra singers so it isn't a group song. Sort of bugs me but on the other hand I waited years for someone to do "Hips Don't Lie" with me and no one would learn the male part. So I was happy to find an SBI version that provides the male part. It is really lame to have that much singing provided on the song but sometimes I do it for a joke bedcause it makes me happy. But let that be a warning to anyone who buys that version of the song. I know, you wouldn't anyway but I like it.
|
|
Top |
|
|
srnitynow
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:22 am |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:00 pm Posts: 1096 Been Liked: 20 times
|
Seems this topic MIGHT work after-all!!
Rosario
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:56 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
Lonman @ Thu Feb 25, 2010 12:41 pm wrote: BigJer @ Thu Feb 25, 2010 9:28 am wrote: While we're sort of on the topic, anybody know a good version of I'm Gonna Be (500 miles) by the Proclaimers? The version I have is terrible. The version I have is from SBI. Sounds pretty decent to me.
I suppose the question should have been which version are you referring to?
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
tovmod
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 12:13 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Sun May 31, 2009 9:36 pm Posts: 613 Been Liked: 0 time
|
Marble @ Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:01 am wrote: .....I've also picked brains before on "Paradise..." because none of my versions had both parts on the screen at the same time. In a couple of days I brought the DK version, perfect for drunks (it's down a key) and those who do not know the parts.
I'm not sure what "drunks" have to do with your evaluation. I like the DK version of Paradise for being complete and for having timely swipes.
Musically (instrumentally and background singers) .... the AH's version is the "closest to the original"
And I think that Leopard Lizard has nailed what some of us have been trying to say about rating various versions against one another of any track.
|
|
Top |
|
|
leopard lizard
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 2:25 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:18 pm Posts: 2593 Been Liked: 294 times
|
I think it is C. Staley that nailed it and I did a bad job of using the quote function--the first part of my post is a quote from one of his.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Marble
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 3:54 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Aug 03, 2008 1:12 pm Posts: 619 Images: 3 Location: Devon Been Liked: 25 times
|
tovmod @ Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:13 pm wrote: Marble @ Wed Feb 24, 2010 10:01 am wrote: .....I've also picked brains before on "Paradise..." because none of my versions had both parts on the screen at the same time. In a couple of days I brought the DK version, perfect for drunks (it's down a key) and those who do not know the parts. I'm not sure what "drunks" have to do with your evaluation. I like the DK version of Paradise for being complete and for having timely swipes. .
In my area most people are familiar with the sunfly version which cuts out the commentary completely. However not all of the sunfly versions have both parts, so a lot of people just learn the song, so they don't have to trust the screen as much.
"drunks" tend not to care too much about versions and just want to sing... because DK lowers the song a key, it's easier for most people to sing (rather than scream) and like you said has all the parts and timely swipes, plus it has the pan flute helping them stay on track, which in turn makes it easier for the listener. Strangely quite a few people in my area don't know there is a commentary due to hearing the SF version so often. Perfect for drunks wasn't a criticism of DK's version... more of a nod to how good it was.
|
|
Top |
|
|
jerry12x
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 4:01 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:40 am Posts: 2289 Location: Bolton UK Been Liked: 3 times
|
srnitynow @ Wed Mar 03, 2010 4:22 pm wrote: Seems this topic MIGHT work after-all!! Rosario
Possibly...
Then we can get together and decide who should be the next president.
Maybe it's just living in the YUK.
Sometimes when I play a soundChoice version of a track I get
WHAT THE £$*&^% IS THAT.
People simply as Lon stated, prefer the version they are used to.
What ever I like it seems I am doomed to Sunfly.
Sucks dunit.
|
|
Top |
|
|
vtrod
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 4:44 pm |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Jan 09, 2008 3:19 pm Posts: 245 Location: Sydney, Australia Been Liked: 1 time
|
Rosario
I think this is a great idea.
Maybe an easier way to go about would be to list the songs in rows, and more popular manus in columns. And we vote for which version we think is the best.
If someone can write the code etc., it should be possible to tally up the count and display total votes. (N.B: My IT skills are non existent, so I could be wrong)
This will make sure scores are averaging out at 'best value' (decent lyrics, instrumentation, etc) as opposed to closest to the original. Most people will vote for the version they have, the one they use regularly - because this is the one they are happy with. If they aren't they would have got another version.
This should give us a good average to work with.
I know this will lead to a hundred new questions about which manus to include, but I know you guys have been in the business long enough to know what is more readily available and what is not.
I love the idea, as I am buying disks left and right lately and it is starting to hurt my pockets.
WHILE I'VE GOT YOU - WHO MAKES THE BEST "DEAN MARTIN" and "FRANK SINATRA" discs? Someone's 75th Birthday coming up, and I want to make sure I am prepared.
Cheers all
Vic in Sydney, 'Straaya
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Wed Mar 03, 2010 8:00 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
I would probably go with Pocket Songs and Just Tracks (they're Pocket Songs) for Frankie. I don't recall seeing a whole lot of stuff on Dean.
|
|
Top |
|
|
srnitynow
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 3:28 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:00 pm Posts: 1096 Been Liked: 20 times
|
Vtrod, just saw "best of the Rat Pack". Frank, Sammy, and Dean. Ps2031. Three disc set, looks pretty good to me, it does have a couple dupes, but still seems worth getting. I may even get it myself.
Rosario
|
|
Top |
|
|
ripman8
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:35 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:34 pm Posts: 3616 Location: Toronto Canada Been Liked: 146 times
|
mckyj57 @ Wed Feb 24, 2010 1:52 pm wrote: srnitynow @ Wed Feb 24, 2010 2:07 pm wrote: PLEASE, let's not "pick this apart". You guys are WAYYYY over-thinking this. I'm not saying that this is re-inventing the WHEEL. Just an idea, that MIGHT be helpful. I'm not worried if the singer can sing the song or not, that's THEIR problem. But what I am worried about is a singer saying that the version I have is crap. Sometimes you don't even know what the song is SUPPOSED to sound like, so you could come on the forum for ADVICE. I didn't say that ANYONE'S opinion would be etched in stone, but if the versions got narrowed down to maybe 2 the person asking the question could take it from there. ALSO, when the kj's on the forum gave opinions, they could state "I think this is the closest to ORIGINAL, (but) would recommend this different version because: (state the reason) Also, in closest to ORIGINAL, I'm speaking of correct lyrics also, I thought that would be automatically understood. Any other opinions? Just thought this could be something that could help us to help each other. Then don't put out BEST == CLOSEST TO ORIGINAL as if that is a karaoke axiom. I would love to see such a database. I would even provide the server to host it and some programming if someone wanted to flesh out the concept.
I have to agree with mcky on this. Maybe the best way is to know each song that is in your data base? Or at least the main stays.
_________________ KingBing Entertainment C'mon Up! I have a song for you!!! [font=MS Sans Serif][/font]
|
|
Top |
|
|
srnitynow
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 4:59 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:00 pm Posts: 1096 Been Liked: 20 times
|
Well, in a perfect world, we would ALL have minds that could remember EVERYTHING we see and hear, but to think that ANYONE could possible know EVERY song in their database, in my opinion is RIDICULOUS. Unless you have a very small database, it's IMPOSSIBLE to not only know ALL the songs in EVERY genre, but to know what the whole song sounds like. I won't argue the point, because I already know that there's just NO WAY. So I'll stick to asking questions, and asking for input, instead of thinking that I KNOW IT ALL. For anyone that thinks this topic is worthless, DON'T POST ON IT. For the rest, I hope it works.
Rosario
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Thu Mar 04, 2010 11:51 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
The way I see it, the "best" version is the one most popular with the singers.... Theirs is the only opinion that counts.
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Fri Mar 05, 2010 1:52 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
JoeChartreuse @ Fri Mar 05, 2010 12:51 am wrote: The way I see it, the "best" version is the one most popular with the singers.... Theirs is the only opinion that counts.
But it also varies from singer to singer. I'm not going to spend money to purposely get duplicates from other manus, unless the version I have is unanimously inferior, then I will work on a replacement - which I have done & actually just did a month ago on a song that I had numerous complaints about. Replacement version has garnered all praises.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 389 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|