|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Karen K
|
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 2:28 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 08, 2007 10:56 am Posts: 2621 Location: Canuck, eh. Been Liked: 0 time
|
nobodyhome @ Thu Jul 08, 2010 2:03 pm wrote: :lol: .....you're asking the wrong people......it could put us out of business, and make our karaoke song investment a non-factor in the business.
like
|
|
Top |
|
|
mickaraoke
|
Posted: Thu Jul 08, 2010 8:15 pm |
|
|
newbie |
|
Joined: Thu Oct 08, 2009 9:59 pm Posts: 6 Been Liked: 0 time
|
Hmmm....Touch Tunes, Ecast & other jukebox manus rely on connection. Maybe follow similar utilization. Library would be available, however once cued is downloaded locally as purchase. So charge for the availability & nominal fee for possession. I as well as others have thousands of songs that may never be sung. Also believe this could reduce the amount of piracy making it affordable. Karaoke laws will never be established until there is a uniform delivery mechanism. A karaoke lounge streams to individual rooms. With todays technology you could stream to various venues. Look forward to future discussion
|
|
Top |
|
|
jclaydon
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 10:54 am |
|
|
Super Duper Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 11:16 pm Posts: 2027 Location: HIgh River, AB Been Liked: 268 times
|
I just found the link i was looking for. This is EXACTLY what I would like to see for karaoke.
http://www.discjockeymusicsupply.com/faq.php#owndrive
You buy the drive with an initial amount of music, then you pay a monthly subcription fee to cover licensing and for the ability to download any updates from a secure server.
I would pay any reasonable sum for that priviledge.
The interesting thing is if you could find the technology to sync the graphics on the fly then you could do this with just regular mp3s and the licensing already exists both in Canada and the US.
|
|
Top |
|
|
DigiTrax Karaoke
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 12:29 pm |
|
Joined: Fri May 21, 2010 12:05 pm Posts: 141 Been Liked: 7 times
|
Outstanding feedback, folks, keep 'em coming.
I realize I was light on details in my initial question - that was intentional so that I could get everyone's impressions up front. I'll have some more details on our thoughts about this type of product coming later.
|
|
Top |
|
|
classickaraoke
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 12:45 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 10, 2008 2:12 pm Posts: 299 Been Liked: 0 time
|
Apologies for the off-topic here....
mickaraoke @ Thu Jul 08, 2010 10:15 pm wrote: Hmmm....Touch Tunes, Ecast & other jukebox manus rely on connection.
TouchTunes has a number of songs available locally. The also have the 'vast library' available to download there and then at a premium. But... once downloaded it is not necessarily available in the local library. Also (and this is the fun part) if the internet connection goes down you can still search the 'vast library' and although many songs are unavailable, some songs are yet still magically downloadable. Why? These songs ARE actually on the local jukebox HD but being sold as premium download tracks for 2 credits instead of 1!
And now back to our scheduled discussion...
So, from a karaoke point of view you would want offline access to the 'Essential 4500' and online access to additional songs. By offering only CB tracks in your show the ASCAP BMI et al could be covered at the subscription point rather than the venue (just the the jukebox companies do). I still see issues with songbooks unless these go all digital too.
Basically the subscription idea could eventually lead to the elimination of local hosting companies and their profits and centralize them with the provider of the subscription service. This would make KJs more like running a Chartbuster Karaoke franchise than running their own show.
- Jonn
|
|
Top |
|
|
Alan B
|
Posted: Fri Jul 09, 2010 9:06 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jul 30, 2006 7:24 pm Posts: 4466 Been Liked: 1052 times
|
It's bad enough that the pirates are putting us out of business, now the manufacturers want to put us out of business, too.
|
|
Top |
|
|
twansenne
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:48 am |
|
Joined: Fri Jan 13, 2006 4:03 pm Posts: 1921 Images: 1 Location: N. Central Iowa Been Liked: 53 times
|
Alan B @ Fri Jul 09, 2010 11:06 pm wrote: It's bad enough that the pirates are putting us out of business, now the manufacturers want to put us out of business, too.
DITTO THAT!!!!!!
And speaking for those of us KJ's that host out in the BOONIES, where I have 2 bars that I host at the only internet connection is DIAL-UP.
One of the other bars I host at has high-speed internet available in the town, but they have no use for internet at the bar. How am I as a KJ host going to be able to talk them paying $70+/month for internet access just so they can have karaoke, and pay me more $$$ that I currently charge because I stream my karaoke.
How about a better business idea......
Offer all new songs that CB puts out as HIGH QUALITY (320kbps) mp3+G downloads for a decent price (1$-2$ per song). And if I want the song I can download it on the fly at a show that has a internet connection.
BTW....My GIG computer NEVER EVER NEVER NEVER NEVER goes on the internet!!!!!!!!
To sum up.....No, I would never subscribe to a streaming karaoke service. But for home use, good idea.
|
|
Top |
|
|
birdofsong
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 12:39 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:25 am Posts: 965 Been Liked: 118 times
|
Certainly an interesting idea, but if you walk into the wrong brick building or venue and have no connection, you're pretty much screwed. I pondered just this thing last night as I sat in a restaurant where I could not get a connection.
Birdofsong
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 1:26 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
jerry12x @ Thu Jul 08, 2010 11:10 am wrote: Bazza @ Thu Jul 08, 2010 4:01 pm wrote: Absolutely. As much as I hate to admit it, if I were a bar wanting to host my own Karaoke I would be all over it. I strongly agree with that. This is not really aimed at the KJ is it. You see venues feeling the pinch.
I agree with both of the above. However, I'd also like to point out something for Chartbuster's benefit: You think piracy exploded after public use of PCs and MP3s? This would make that look like a walk in the park. Nothing is easier to pirate than a signal, scrambled, coded, or otherwise.
Not only that, but what if the output quality at a particular venue is bad. It's your product, as well as the KJ that looks bad.
Also, if I were PC based, I wouldn't want to be limited to a single mfr. You mentioned that being able to use other tracks would negate legality of the use of your product.
One other thing, and this is a biggie: Unless something about streaming circumvents the current U.S. laws regarding downloads ( and it may, I just don't know), no karaoke producer can make using these tracks in a show LEGAL- but can only claim that the use of the product is ok with THAT mfr..
Either way, I agree with the above that this product seems to be aimed at the venues, as were those big red CAVS coin operated karaoke jukeboxes. They didn't go over well in my area....A good host does.
Still, all in all, a cool idea, and shows creative thinking. For that you get kudos!
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
ripman8
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 1:44 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 6:34 pm Posts: 3616 Location: Toronto Canada Been Liked: 146 times
|
Oh baby! Gotta use the P word. Any of them that are sweating now, have a chance to get back on equal terms with those of us who have built our libaries the old fashinoed way. Sounds like if all KJs went this method, all would have the same libary. Taking out the "personlized" library.
I see no benefit in this for myself or others like me. Owners, yep. Pirates, yet. Newbies, yep. Established KJs with established libraries, nope.
I only use the 'net on my laptops for upgrading my software and THAT is all! Chances of my show going bad due to a virus or a slow connection are non existence now.
Looking forward I would almost PAY you NOT to have this type of system!
_________________ KingBing Entertainment C'mon Up! I have a song for you!!! [font=MS Sans Serif][/font]
|
|
Top |
|
|
leopard lizard
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:00 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:18 pm Posts: 2593 Been Liked: 294 times
|
There was a member of the forum who came up with this idea last year (?) and it was discussed for a page or two. I just can't seem to find the thread. I THINK the member had the avatar that was a blue backgbround with "Peace" written on it, if anyone remembers.
|
|
Top |
|
|
DannyG2006
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:13 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 11:31 am Posts: 5405 Location: Watebrury, CT Been Liked: 407 times
|
We non streaming hosts might have yet an edge since the only stuff Chartbuster knows how to make right is country. I'll pit my Sound Choice library against chartbusters anyday once I get the gem series.
_________________ The Line Array Experiment is over. Nothing to see here. Move along.
|
|
Top |
|
|
srnitynow
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:15 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 17, 2008 8:00 pm Posts: 1096 Been Liked: 20 times
|
Leopard, was it ANGEL ?
Rosario
|
|
Top |
|
|
jclaydon
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:24 pm |
|
|
Super Duper Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 18, 2010 11:16 pm Posts: 2027 Location: HIgh River, AB Been Liked: 268 times
|
Just to play devil's advocate here. How many people have heard the arguement "Digital Jukeboxes are going to put DJs out of work. Why would anyone pay the expense of live entertainment when a person can just press a button and get the song they want"
I heard that quite a bit when the jukeboxes first came out. The only thing digital jukeboxes did was put BAD djs out of work. Anyone still worth hiring doesn't seem to have any problems finding work. At least where I live
-James
|
|
Top |
|
|
Moonrider
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 4:51 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:13 pm Posts: 551 Been Liked: 0 time
|
jclaydon @ Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:24 pm wrote: The only thing digital jukeboxes did was put BAD djs out of work. Anyone still worth hiring doesn't seem to have any problems finding work. At least where I live
-James
Bingo. Why hire a cheap pirate with no people skills, ONLY 100,000 songs that are mostly dupes and increased risk of annoying lawsuits , when you can put in a cheap sound system better than the pirates, hire minimum wage flunkies to run it, and make more profit?
The only ones worth hiring will be the ones that can actually entertain. I think this is the wave of the future, whether ya like it or not.
_________________ Dave's not here.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Jian
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:32 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 06, 2004 10:18 pm Posts: 4080 Location: Serian Been Liked: 0 time
|
The only valid argument against this idea is the lack of stable bandwidth.
Quote: Just to play devil's advocate here. How many people have heard the arguement "Digital Jukeboxes are going to put DJs out of work. Why would anyone pay the expense of live entertainment when a person can just press a button and get the song they want" Very true..... did they not said that radio is going to die when TV arrived? Quote: We non streaming hosts might have yet an edge since the only stuff Chartbuster knows how to make right is country. I'll pit my Sound Choice library against chartbusters anyday once I get the gem series. you can still play your customers' disc (if you want to)when you you go the HD way, what is there to prevent you from using what you already have in your HD to compliment the streamed files? Quote: I think this is the wave of the future, whether ya like it or not.
just get use to it and be prepared when it comes...
_________________ I can neither confirm nor deny ever having or knowing anything about nothing.... mrscott
|
|
Top |
|
|
DannyG2006
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 7:59 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 11:31 am Posts: 5405 Location: Watebrury, CT Been Liked: 407 times
|
Chartbuster Karaoke @ Wed Jul 07, 2010 6:39 pm wrote: Hypothetical product:
Hosting software that streams karaoke directly to the computer. No discs, no purchases - subscription model. Access to (most of) the manufacturer's library, instantly. Fully licensed and completely legal (for the streamed tracks - if the software allowed use of other tracks not included in the streaming license as an option, legality can't be guaranteed).
1) Would you use it? (if not, say so and ignore the following questions) 2) How much would it be worth (per month or year) to you? 3) What feature set must it have? (feel free to include an example of existing software) 4) Any conditions you'd insist on?
You may also direct answers to me at dgrimes[at]bigmama.tv
If there's sufficient interest, we are thinking of developing this product. Licensing is starting to shape up that would allow us to, but it makes no sense to build something there's no market for.
1)I don't think I would but:
2)$50 a month
3)Must be backwards compatable since you don't have every song made on karaoke be able to play outside karaoke (DISC, MP3+G) without having to go outside of the program to play it.
4) yes only available to professional Mobile Karaoke hosting companies so that bars can't go behind our backs and cut us out of the loop.
_________________ The Line Array Experiment is over. Nothing to see here. Move along.
|
|
Top |
|
|
BigJer
|
Posted: Sat Jul 10, 2010 10:52 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Aug 28, 2009 10:42 pm Posts: 1064 Been Liked: 92 times
|
You know in a perfect world wherever that might be, maybe bar owners do notice the difference between a good host and a bad one. I'm sure there are a few out there even in this reality, but at least when I was back on the old Jolt forum I recall hearing sad stories from several KJs who seemed very professional discussing losing shows to an under-cutter who came along and dangled a lower price.
These KJS had come to a dead bar, taken less money to build the shows up, spent hours of their time marketing and promoting the shows and finally built it up to where they started to make a little money and then what happens?
Did all that sweat really mean anything to the owner? Nope, along comes the under-cutter dangling a lower price and the original host was sent packing. How many of their singers followed them? Well sometimes they did if the move was close enough and that was always a delight to read about, especially when the first show died and the owner had to approach them with their hats in their hands, but how often does that really happen? It's sad, but geography has an amazing impact on who people choose to spend their time with.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 650 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|