|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
toqer
|
Posted: Wed Nov 03, 2010 3:45 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:15 am Posts: 907 Location: San Jose CA Been Liked: 33 times
|
Just thought I'd throw this out here in case anyone is interested. The two biggest changes are:
Stand alone app.
Ported to java (cross platform)
Same great rotation
Wider naming convention support
still free
It's not even safe for public consumption yet, so don't ask for an alpha.
There's a ton new features we're going to roll out too, but it's kind of a secret at this point. I just want to play my hands close to my chest. Let's just say any of the bragging rights the other softwares had, will be gone.
If there was any nagging bugs you ever had with autokdj, or features you wanted added go ahead and post them here and I'll share them with the rest of the dev team.
|
|
Top |
|
|
letitrip
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 5:50 am |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:53 am Posts: 1462 Location: West Bend, WI Been Liked: 3 times
|
I'm definitely interested, so keep us up to date. I'll admit, the move to Java makes me nervous, but I'm anxious to see what you come up with.
_________________ DJ Tony
Let It Rip Karaoke
|
|
Top |
|
|
stogie
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 9:31 am |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Nov 29, 2007 9:39 am Posts: 1238 Location: Tampa Bay Area Been Liked: 15 times
|
Will it still be winamp based? Will it still use Pacemaker?
|
|
Top |
|
|
DannyG2006
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 10:16 am |
|
Joined: Sun Nov 27, 2005 11:31 am Posts: 5404 Location: Watebrury, CT Been Liked: 407 times
|
stogie @ Thu Nov 04, 2010 12:31 pm wrote: Will it still be winamp based? Will it still use Pacemaker?
He said it is a standalone so I would assume that it wouldn't be using pacemaker.
_________________ The Line Array Experiment is over. Nothing to see here. Move along.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Moonrider
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 11:18 am |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Sun Jul 05, 2009 6:13 pm Posts: 551 Been Liked: 0 time
|
toqer @ Wed Nov 03, 2010 6:45 pm wrote: Just thought I'd throw this out here in case anyone is interested. The two biggest changes are:
Stand alone app. Ported to java (cross platform) Same great rotation Wider naming convention support still free
This means it will run on linux!?
The ONLY reason I run Windows on my karaoke laptops is because there are no linux based karaoke hosters, and none that I can get to perform reliably under WINE. If I can be freed from using this satanic abomination of an operating system I'll nominate you for sainthood!
_________________ Dave's not here.
|
|
Top |
|
|
diafel
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 11:38 am |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:27 am Posts: 2444 Been Liked: 46 times
|
Excellent news! I was getting tired of Winamp crashing all the time... (and I know it was winamp..)
As for any new features we'd like to see, the only thing I can think of is to have the ability to change a singer's name when they are already in the rotation.
The reason for this is that sometimes, with the chicken scratch that I get handed, I will spell a name wrong, or it turns out that it's altogether completely wrong. Of course I often don't find this out until I've called the singer up and by then, their place in the rotation would be lost if I were to correct it by deleting them and redoing their name.
The other scenario I've come across is two singers will do a few duets together and of course, in my show, I allow 1 singer 1 song per round. Both singers use up their turn with the duet (I'm often too busy to allow any other way). In such a case, I pick ONE of the names to enter into the rotation. Then, one singer drops out, and wouldn't you know it? It's the singer whose name I used to enter the duets. This is problematic because I run a straight rotation and they get used to following so-and-so. Now I must either keep them under their former partner's name (and try and remember not to call the former partner), or I must enter them anew. If I enter them anew, they wonder why they now must wait much longer to sing than they did before.
An alternative (or additional feature!) would be to allow the ability to move the singers around in rotation(not just in the play list). This comes in handy when you have a twitchy finger, like I do and accidentally delete them from the rotation. Oops!
Good luck with the software!
|
|
Top |
|
|
exweedfarmer
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 12:59 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:34 pm Posts: 1227 Location: Completely Lost Been Liked: 15 times
|
Congratulations on the new software. Since it's freeware and no chance of someone under cutting you, how about a sneak peek at the feature list? Are you still using FFT for the key changer?
_________________ Okay, who took my pants?
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 3:59 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
did someone say Linux? hot damn!
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
letitrip
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 4:20 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 14, 2009 8:53 am Posts: 1462 Location: West Bend, WI Been Liked: 3 times
|
If I can run it on FreeBSD, I'm ready to roll!!
_________________ DJ Tony
Let It Rip Karaoke
|
|
Top |
|
|
toqer
|
Posted: Thu Nov 04, 2010 7:07 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:15 am Posts: 907 Location: San Jose CA Been Liked: 33 times
|
We're about 50% there.
Yes, it'll run on Linux, Mac, Windows, BSD, anything with a java VM. Java backend with lwjgl doing most of the screen drawing (light weight java gaming library/gl)
Maybe checkout http://lwjgl.org for more info on it. Try out the demo's there.
Also checkout minecraft, it's a java game that does things the way the new autokdj is doing it. Don't forget, the 2nd FE was completely written in Java using lwgl (for those that have tried it)
Maybe in the pre-ghz days java would have been unacceptable, but these days it's fast enough to pass things off to external decoders (lame mp3, open GL, assorted audio API's) So really the only intensive processing its going to be doing is just shuffling small bits of data around, which really isn't that intensive.
Even without using external decoders, java is fast enough to decode mp3's and apply software EQ's. on a GHZ + machine.
|
|
Top |
|
|
paulmo101
|
Posted: Fri Nov 05, 2010 11:29 am |
|
|
Major Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Apr 02, 2009 10:25 am Posts: 54 Been Liked: 0 time
|
Sounds great - please keep us up to date.
Thanks
Paul
|
|
Top |
|
|
mckyj57
|
Posted: Sat Nov 06, 2010 6:48 am |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:24 pm Posts: 5576 Location: Cocoa Beach Been Liked: 122 times
|
What are you planning on using for key changer?
_________________ [color=#ffff55]Mickey J.[/color] Alas for those who never sing, but die with all their music in them. -- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.
|
|
Top |
|
|
toqer
|
Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:24 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:15 am Posts: 907 Location: San Jose CA Been Liked: 33 times
|
|
Top |
|
|
diafel
|
Posted: Sun Nov 07, 2010 8:41 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:27 am Posts: 2444 Been Liked: 46 times
|
toqer @ Sun Nov 07, 2010 9:24 pm wrote:
<3
Awesome!!!!!!!
|
|
Top |
|
|
toqer
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 9:10 am |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:15 am Posts: 907 Location: San Jose CA Been Liked: 33 times
|
mckyj57 @ Sat Nov 06, 2010 6:48 am wrote: What are you planning on using for key changer?
Initial support is in for the soundtouch library (which is what pacemaker is built on)
http://www.surina.net/soundtouch/index.html
There are other pitch changers. I won't say which one, but the quality is leaps and bounds better. Problem is this..
Since most of these other pitch changers are closed source and windows only, we're really limited on what we can bundle with the new player.
|
|
Top |
|
|
exweedfarmer
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:05 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Jan 24, 2006 7:34 pm Posts: 1227 Location: Completely Lost Been Liked: 15 times
|
Have you considered not including a key changer? I have yet to hear one that actually sounded good. I think that there is too much information lost in the original digitization process to make it viable.
_________________ Okay, who took my pants?
|
|
Top |
|
|
jerry12x
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:25 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:40 am Posts: 2289 Location: Bolton UK Been Liked: 3 times
|
Weedy, you are the guy to do this.
Key change is after all simply playing the music back at a faster or slower speed.
This is not a tempo change.
I did it electronicly back in the 80's.
Is it more difficult to do the software side?
|
|
Top |
|
|
Kevin That 70s Guy
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:27 pm |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Fri May 23, 2003 7:19 am Posts: 119 Been Liked: 5 times
|
May I request an on-screen singer and message display that is easy to select?
I currently use your software but most of the features I don't use because they don't seem to work right (like Next Singer up name display). I've read your forum posts and watched the videos, and I still was confused. Thanks and I look forward to your next big update toqer.
Kevin
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Mon Nov 08, 2010 2:33 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
jerry12x @ Mon Nov 08, 2010 3:25 pm wrote: Key change is after all simply playing the music back at a faster or slower speed.
A digital key changer does nothing to the speed. I had an old Pioneer player with Aux input and was able to change the key of outside sources that the audio was just plugged into the player.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 226 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|