KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - CAVS v SC ? & CAVS is the PLAINTIFF? Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Legalities & Piracy, etc... Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


premium-member

Offsite Links


It is currently Fri Jan 10, 2025 5:23 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 88 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 5:20 pm 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:34 am
Posts: 193
Images: 1
Location: Austin, TX
Been Liked: 24 times
Cold and free? (my favorite)


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 5:25 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm
Posts: 4094
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
Been Liked: 309 times
It's not Yankee horse p1$$.

_________________
You can be strange but not a stranger


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 5:27 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:35 am
Posts: 691
Location: Carson City, NV
Been Liked: 0 time
O'Keef's Extra Old Stock has quite a punch if I remember nearly 30 years ago when I was up over the border last.

_________________
"Just Say NO, To Justin Bieber & His Beatle Haircut"


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 5:49 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
timberlea wrote:
It's not Yankee horse p1$$.

It's Canadian Moose P1$$


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:07 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm
Posts: 4094
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
Been Liked: 309 times
Which still beats the heck out of Yankee soda pop that you try calling beer.

_________________
You can be strange but not a stranger


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 7:58 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:36 am
Posts: 1066
Location: Madison VA
Been Liked: 0 time
earthling12357 wrote:
What's a good Canadian beer?


There isn't any it all taste like it was drawn from a hog wallow!

Good beer comes from Germany!


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:22 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm
Posts: 4433
Location: New York City
Been Liked: 757 times
earthling12357 wrote:
What's a good Canadian beer?



Budweiser! :angel: :angel: :angel: :angel: :angel: :angel: :angel:


OK.. I just know that Tim is gonna come down to NY and kill me.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:28 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm
Posts: 4433
Location: New York City
Been Liked: 757 times
Lone Wolf wrote:
I'm gonna have to side with Chip on this one.

I look at it this way if SC had said that Western Digital External Hard Drives were illegal because they had SC content on them then WD could do the same that CAVS is doing now.


It all depends on how exactly that statement was phrased. If SC had said that if Western Digital External Hard Drives contained any SC material on them, then THOSE units would be illegal, then you have a completely different statement.

It's all semantics. You can speculate all you want, but until you know the EXACT way it was phrased, then that's all it is... SPECULATION!


Like Chip said....

c. staley wrote:
Cue,
We will find out what that content is as this case progresses.


Last edited by Cueball on Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:34 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:25 am
Posts: 965
Been Liked: 118 times
cueball wrote:
Lone Wolf wrote:
I'm gonna have to side with Chip on this one.

I look at it this way if SC had said that Western Digital External Hard Drives were illegal because they had SC content on them then WD could do the same that CAVS is doing now.


It all depends on how exactly that statement was phrased. If SC had said that if Western Digital External Hard Drives contained any SC material on them, then THOSE units would be illegal, then you have a completely different statement.

It's all semantics. You can speculate all you want, but until you know the EXACT way it was phrased, then that's all it is... SPECULATION!


It may be speculation, but if they had phrased it exactly that way with CAVS, then they probably wouldn't be suing Sound Choice right now.

Birdofsong

_________________
Birdofsong


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:41 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm
Posts: 4433
Location: New York City
Been Liked: 757 times
birdofsong wrote:

It may be speculation, but if they had phrased it exactly that way with CAVS, then they probably wouldn't be suing Sound Choice right now.

Birdofsong


Emphasis on the word IF

It's all in the way it was worded, and you do NOT have that information. All you are doing is ASSUME-ing (purposely misspelled) just because CAVs is suing SC.

Like George Carlin said in his "Class Clown" routine... "It's OK if it happens to your finger. Yes, you can prick your finger, but don't finger your..."

See how the the statement changes when you keep the same words, but switch the order?


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:44 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
CAVS claims that those misleading statements ruined their reputation, what about the premise that their system plain sucks? lol

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 10:18 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:15 am
Posts: 905
Location: San Jose CA
Been Liked: 33 times
I applaud CAVS efforts.

I've met the owner of CAVS 4 times, 4 NAMM shows. Korean guy, can't remember his name off the top of my head, but a decent fellow. His machines have a great following there.

It pains him a lot to see folks misuse his technology. Many of you remember that we even took autokdj down for a while when we found local pirating KJ's using our stuff. Nothing is more painful to a creator than to see their creation used for evil than good.

But I ask you... Is it the fault of the creation, or the individual using it?

I remember either on a manu website, forums, that they called out every karaoke software (except us! yay!) citing they were illegal. The list included S&Ds, compuhost, MTU, and a few others. Can't remember them all. If CAVS wins this I bet we're going to see a few follow suit.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 10:19 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:36 am
Posts: 1066
Location: Madison VA
Been Liked: 0 time
Yes that would probably be much more the cause for any finacial damage that has impacted them.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 12:34 am 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:35 am
Posts: 691
Location: Carson City, NV
Been Liked: 0 time
karaoke newbie wrote:
earthling12357 wrote:
What's a good Canadian beer?


I love Sub Zero .... but that's not why I'm posting.

A question I have is, if you own the SC's discs and you also own a CAVS player, can you rip the SC disc and load it on to the CAVS player thereby maintaining the 1:1 requirement that SC has instituted? I guess I'm just naive about these requirements so don't shoot me lol


Contact SC for an audit & get permission.

_________________
"Just Say NO, To Justin Bieber & His Beatle Haircut"


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 3:13 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm
Posts: 5107
Location: Phoenix Az
Been Liked: 1279 times
Clinton set this all up for us years ago. it all depends on what the definition of the word "is" is.

_________________
Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 4:17 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
cueball wrote:
It all depends on how exactly that statement was phrased. If SC had said that if Western Digital External Hard Drives contained any SC material on them, then THOSE units would be illegal, then you have a completely different statement.

It's all semantics. You can speculate all you want, but until you know the EXACT way it was phrased, then that's all it is... SPECULATION!


So.... why not request a copy of the letter directly from Sound Choice? If they are truly innocent and this is all simply a misunderstanding, then this shouldn't be a problem. I would be suspicious (they would be hiding something) if they refused because it will come out eventually - either from them or as an exhibit in the case. For public relations alone, which looks better to you?

Cheerleaders, where are you? You're usually quick to defend SC but I've noticed a very uncharacteristic silence here.....


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 5:37 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am
Posts: 6103
Been Liked: 634 times
:D I guess it just proves what I been saying all along, the cheerleaders are looking to sound choice, like they were some sort of final word on morality. Yet they have made many mistakes over the years. Just like the pirates, they are trying to hunt down. In this type of environment it is foolish to look at things in matter of black and white, there are some many various shades of gray. Danny I hope you didn't throw away your Super CDG's you might be able to use them after all.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:03 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am
Posts: 3312
Images: 0
Been Liked: 610 times
timberlea wrote:
Which still beats the heck out of Yankee soda pop that you try calling beer.


All mass marketed yellow lagers are horse piss. Bud, Molson, Miller, LaBatts, Coors, Heineken, Coronoa, etc. All variations of the same crap. Its a race to see who can get the most colorless, flavorless beer! Country of origin has nothing to do with it. Go with something that has actual taste!

When in Canada I go for a Alexander Keith's IPA. Ricards & Sleemans aren't bad either.

When home, I drink my own Bazza brew. :D


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:10 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
Bazza wrote:
When home, I drink my own Bazza brew. :D

That's just sounds wrong... :vomit:


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:34 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm
Posts: 5107
Location: Phoenix Az
Been Liked: 1279 times
c. staley wrote:
cueball wrote:
It all depends on how exactly that statement was phrased. If SC had said that if Western Digital External Hard Drives contained any SC material on them, then THOSE units would be illegal, then you have a completely different statement.

It's all semantics. You can speculate all you want, but until you know the EXACT way it was phrased, then that's all it is... SPECULATION!


So.... why not request a copy of the letter directly from Sound Choice? If they are truly innocent and this is all simply a misunderstanding, then this shouldn't be a problem. I would be suspicious (they would be hiding something) if they refused because it will come out eventually - either from them or as an exhibit in the case. For public relations alone, which looks better to you?

Cheerleaders, where are you? You're usually quick to defend SC but I've noticed a very uncharacteristic silence here.....


we're still here, just no point in getting riled up over this. either they did say libelous statements or they did not. no major corporation would give out information pertaining to a pending law suit, so why bother? gotta wait it out.

_________________
Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 88 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 115 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech