|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
TommyA
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 5:20 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:34 am Posts: 193 Images: 1 Location: Austin, TX Been Liked: 24 times
|
Cold and free? (my favorite)
|
|
Top |
|
|
timberlea
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 5:25 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm Posts: 4094 Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada Been Liked: 309 times
|
It's not Yankee horse p1$$.
_________________ You can be strange but not a stranger
|
|
Top |
|
|
Wall Of Sound
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 5:27 pm |
|
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:35 am Posts: 691 Location: Carson City, NV Been Liked: 0 time
|
O'Keef's Extra Old Stock has quite a punch if I remember nearly 30 years ago when I was up over the border last.
_________________ "Just Say NO, To Justin Bieber & His Beatle Haircut"
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 5:49 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
timberlea wrote: It's not Yankee horse p1$$. It's Canadian Moose P1$$
|
|
Top |
|
|
timberlea
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 6:07 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm Posts: 4094 Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada Been Liked: 309 times
|
Which still beats the heck out of Yankee soda pop that you try calling beer.
_________________ You can be strange but not a stranger
|
|
Top |
|
|
Thunder
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 7:58 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:36 am Posts: 1066 Location: Madison VA Been Liked: 0 time
|
earthling12357 wrote: What's a good Canadian beer? There isn't any it all taste like it was drawn from a hog wallow! Good beer comes from Germany!
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:22 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:28 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
Lone Wolf wrote: I'm gonna have to side with Chip on this one.
I look at it this way if SC had said that Western Digital External Hard Drives were illegal because they had SC content on them then WD could do the same that CAVS is doing now. It all depends on how exactly that statement was phrased. If SC had said that if Western Digital External Hard Drives contained any SC material on them, then THOSE units would be illegal, then you have a completely different statement. It's all semantics. You can speculate all you want, but until you know the EXACT way it was phrased, then that's all it is... SPECULATION! Like Chip said.... c. staley wrote: Cue, We will find out what that content is as this case progresses.
Last edited by Cueball on Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:34 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
|
birdofsong
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:34 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:25 am Posts: 965 Been Liked: 118 times
|
cueball wrote: Lone Wolf wrote: I'm gonna have to side with Chip on this one.
I look at it this way if SC had said that Western Digital External Hard Drives were illegal because they had SC content on them then WD could do the same that CAVS is doing now. It all depends on how exactly that statement was phrased. If SC had said that if Western Digital External Hard Drives contained any SC material on them, then THOSE units would be illegal, then you have a completely different statement. It's all semantics. You can speculate all you want, but until you know the EXACT way it was phrased, then that's all it is... SPECULATION! It may be speculation, but if they had phrased it exactly that way with CAVS, then they probably wouldn't be suing Sound Choice right now. Birdofsong
_________________ Birdofsong
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:41 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
birdofsong wrote: It may be speculation, but if they had phrased it exactly that way with CAVS, then they probably wouldn't be suing Sound Choice right now.
Birdofsong
Emphasis on the word IF It's all in the way it was worded, and you do NOT have that information. All you are doing is ASSUME-ing (purposely misspelled) just because CAVs is suing SC. Like George Carlin said in his "Class Clown" routine... "It's OK if it happens to your finger. Yes, you can prick your finger, but don't finger your..." See how the the statement changes when you keep the same words, but switch the order?
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 8:44 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
CAVS claims that those misleading statements ruined their reputation, what about the premise that their system plain sucks?
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
toqer
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 10:18 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 08, 2004 11:15 am Posts: 905 Location: San Jose CA Been Liked: 33 times
|
I applaud CAVS efforts.
I've met the owner of CAVS 4 times, 4 NAMM shows. Korean guy, can't remember his name off the top of my head, but a decent fellow. His machines have a great following there.
It pains him a lot to see folks misuse his technology. Many of you remember that we even took autokdj down for a while when we found local pirating KJ's using our stuff. Nothing is more painful to a creator than to see their creation used for evil than good.
But I ask you... Is it the fault of the creation, or the individual using it?
I remember either on a manu website, forums, that they called out every karaoke software (except us! yay!) citing they were illegal. The list included S&Ds, compuhost, MTU, and a few others. Can't remember them all. If CAVS wins this I bet we're going to see a few follow suit.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Thunder
|
Posted: Sun Jul 10, 2011 10:19 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Dec 23, 2010 9:36 am Posts: 1066 Location: Madison VA Been Liked: 0 time
|
Yes that would probably be much more the cause for any finacial damage that has impacted them.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Wall Of Sound
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 12:34 am |
|
Joined: Thu May 06, 2010 10:35 am Posts: 691 Location: Carson City, NV Been Liked: 0 time
|
karaoke newbie wrote: earthling12357 wrote: What's a good Canadian beer? I love Sub Zero .... but that's not why I'm posting. A question I have is, if you own the SC's discs and you also own a CAVS player, can you rip the SC disc and load it on to the CAVS player thereby maintaining the 1:1 requirement that SC has instituted? I guess I'm just naive about these requirements so don't shoot me Contact SC for an audit & get permission.
_________________ "Just Say NO, To Justin Bieber & His Beatle Haircut"
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 3:13 am |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
Clinton set this all up for us years ago. it all depends on what the definition of the word "is" is.
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 4:17 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
cueball wrote: It all depends on how exactly that statement was phrased. If SC had said that if Western Digital External Hard Drives contained any SC material on them, then THOSE units would be illegal, then you have a completely different statement.
It's all semantics. You can speculate all you want, but until you know the EXACT way it was phrased, then that's all it is... SPECULATION!
So.... why not request a copy of the letter directly from Sound Choice? If they are truly innocent and this is all simply a misunderstanding, then this shouldn't be a problem. I would be suspicious (they would be hiding something) if they refused because it will come out eventually - either from them or as an exhibit in the case. For public relations alone, which looks better to you? Cheerleaders, where are you? You're usually quick to defend SC but I've noticed a very uncharacteristic silence here.....
|
|
Top |
|
|
Bazza
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:03 am |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
timberlea wrote: Which still beats the heck out of Yankee soda pop that you try calling beer. All mass marketed yellow lagers are horse piss. Bud, Molson, Miller, LaBatts, Coors, Heineken, Coronoa, etc. All variations of the same crap. Its a race to see who can get the most colorless, flavorless beer! Country of origin has nothing to do with it. Go with something that has actual taste! When in Canada I go for a Alexander Keith's IPA. Ricards & Sleemans aren't bad either. When home, I drink my own Bazza brew.
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:10 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
Bazza wrote: When home, I drink my own Bazza brew. That's just sounds wrong...
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Mon Jul 11, 2011 6:34 am |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
c. staley wrote: cueball wrote: It all depends on how exactly that statement was phrased. If SC had said that if Western Digital External Hard Drives contained any SC material on them, then THOSE units would be illegal, then you have a completely different statement.
It's all semantics. You can speculate all you want, but until you know the EXACT way it was phrased, then that's all it is... SPECULATION!
So.... why not request a copy of the letter directly from Sound Choice? If they are truly innocent and this is all simply a misunderstanding, then this shouldn't be a problem. I would be suspicious (they would be hiding something) if they refused because it will come out eventually - either from them or as an exhibit in the case. For public relations alone, which looks better to you? Cheerleaders, where are you? You're usually quick to defend SC but I've noticed a very uncharacteristic silence here..... we're still here, just no point in getting riled up over this. either they did say libelous statements or they did not. no major corporation would give out information pertaining to a pending law suit, so why bother? gotta wait it out.
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 105 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|