|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
awildnkrazykj
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 5:44 am |
|
|
Major Poster |
|
Joined: Mon May 26, 2003 3:16 am Posts: 71 Location: Orange County Been Liked: 0 time
|
I can see mr insane kj has been reading my posts as fast as I put them up in here... . At first glance it seems that this InsaneKj dude, is trying to goat me but at least he has mentioned in his posting little tidbits referring to the fact I have CDG's booklets in the background and cdg's in all the pics...good or bad? Yes I have all cdg's and If you noticed from previous posts, I have been doing it for over 21 years thus obtaining a vast collection of Cdg's.. In fact a close personal friend of mine had his own karaoke business and when he died, his wife gave me his remaining cdg collection, 90% of which I haven't even opened...R.I.P. "Dave K." Remember appearances aren't what they always appear to be... If you're anywhere's in the Orange County area, stop by check out my shows, I'll be glad to let you see my cdg's....or if you're into DJ dance clubs, I do them for a living too... Hopefully you can at least post up my cdg collection of pics for me too on your site?.... You know me well enough now... .. Oh yeah for the record when SC had one of their studios down here in Southern California, the crew used to visit my shows all the time, why, cause I had an extensive sc library, their craft was admired by them... Also you mentioned several things in your other site: 1) you asked why in the world would you ver get a lawyer when you have the CDG's? answer: I was served a summons last week. Also, I was never given an opportunity to do an audit. Plus when the APS people called, they asked for someone totally different other than me and to be noted they called very early in the morning as you can see from most of my posts, I don't go to sleep til well after 6:00am so I am not of fair judgement at that time, another oversight from APS. 2) You mentioned you saw a spool of Cd's at my table during the fest? answer: Those are dance cd's I use when I took breaks, The Karaoke fest was from an ALL DAY event, I left them out for my helpers to play while I was gone on breaks.... 3) You asked why in world do I listen to Chip? answer: like I have stated before, I listen to everyone...even those who's views are not well received but time is running out, I have to answer soon... 4) You asked why in the "F" would I get an attorney? answer: isn't it apparent? My name is being drudged in the mud and in public, a lawyer will clear this all up in a hurry. Also for everyone that has contacted the SC lawyer in this case has been treated with disrespect and told that their price has just gone up. 5) You asked why did I say 2 million, that is exactly what it says on the summons...2 million each !!!! Yes, I am here publically until I actually pay the retainer fees, i hope that anyone who can help before it goes that far....I will prove to anyone that I am totally legit and run a cdg based karaoke show... After all I am proud of my Library and the 21 years it took to buy them..... Hope this at least calms the LIONS out here?
_________________ Karaoke is supposed to be fun, if it isn't, then it's NOT KARAOKE.......
|
|
Top |
|
|
diafel
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 9:36 am |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:27 am Posts: 2444 Been Liked: 46 times
|
awildnkrazykj wrote: After all I am proud of my Library and the 21 years it took to buy them..... Hope this at least calms the LIONS out here? Don't count on it. They're like pit bulls. Once they latch on, they won't let go. And if I were you, I'd immediately change my Facebook settings to ensure privacy, not only for yourself, but for your friends and family as well. You should set it up so that only actual friends of yours can see anything, including your pictures, general information and especially your friends list, because they will start going through your friends photos and information as well, if they haven't done so already. As you can see, they like to internet stalk you and even make things up, like saying the spool of discs are blank and that you are recording the singers. Seriously, where do they get this stuff from? There is no possible way to tell from just a photo what, exactly, that spool contains, yet they feel free to make it up as they go along. It's only a matter of time before they start stalking you in real life too. My advice is to change your settings immediately! There's a reason he goes by the moniker InsaneKJ.
|
|
Top |
|
|
diafel
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 9:43 am |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 16, 2007 8:27 am Posts: 2444 Been Liked: 46 times
|
cueball wrote: Personally, I feel that your comments about Rodney are extremely insulting and belittling.
I'm sorry KJAthena, but I have to say this... STAY OUT OF THIS!!!! . Your comments about Rodney are making you look extremely shallow!!!
True colors always show themselves, given enough time. Just let someone keep talking and it all comes out in the wash eventually.... (PS: I'm still waiting for you to "put up", Athena.)
|
|
Top |
|
|
earthling12357
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:33 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:21 pm Posts: 1609 Location: Earth Been Liked: 307 times
|
Ease up on kjathena, she's only judging us all based on her own personal experience....We're all pirates until we've been audited by the controling authority and made the required additional purchases. However, as nutty as some of those posts sound, I'm starting to wonder if that's really her posting. Perhaps through further investigation it will all become clear.
_________________ KNOW THYSELF
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 12:45 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
Don't even bother here Rodney. Athena and insanekj will do nothing but discredit you. Talk to your attorney and find out what your recourse is. It appears to me like sc is doing nothing just to worry you more.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 4:59 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
c. staley wrote: Be advised that the second Rodney hands one dime to his attorney, that it is improper for Harrington or slep or the attorney of record to contact Rodney directly. Harrington knows this. Let's see if he plays by the same rules he wants the rest of us to play by. Harrington or the attorney of record, yes. Slep, no. Kurt can talk to him directly. I would encourage everyone to tamp down the speculation.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 5:05 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
awildnkrazykj wrote: 6) I got my official summons barely last week and it was dated on October 6th,2011 with a demand to file withing 21 days ....uuuhh, way past that date when I even got served, 12/15/11 at 12:35am in the morning !!!!
It's 21 days from the date of service. The deadline can be extended by agreement of the parties or by motion, also.
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 5:19 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: c. staley wrote: Be advised that the second Rodney hands one dime to his attorney, that it is improper for Harrington or slep or the attorney of record to contact Rodney directly. Harrington knows this. Let's see if he plays by the same rules he wants the rest of us to play by. Harrington or the attorney of record, yes. Slep, no. Kurt can talk to him directly. I would encourage everyone to tamp down the speculation. once Rodney retains his attorney. It is NOT proper for Harrington to talk to him directly or the attorney of record. I am surprised that You would have readers here believe otherwise. You are fully aware that the PROPER method is through his attorney only.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Second City Song
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 5:24 pm |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 3:00 am Posts: 192 Location: Illinois Been Liked: 16 times
|
c. staley wrote: HarringtonLaw wrote: c. staley wrote: Be advised that the second Rodney hands one dime to his attorney, that it is improper for Harrington or slep or the attorney of record to contact Rodney directly. Harrington knows this. Let's see if he plays by the same rules he wants the rest of us to play by. Harrington or the attorney of record, yes. Slep, no. Kurt can talk to him directly. I would encourage everyone to tamp down the speculation. once Rodney retains his attorney. It is NOT proper for Harrington to talk to him directly or the attorney of record. I am surprised that You would have readers here believe otherwise. You are fully aware that the PROPER method is through his attorney only. But YOU also mentioned that Slep couldn't talk to him and Mr. Harrington just corrected you, that's all. Just have to have the last word, huh?
|
|
Top |
|
|
leopard lizard
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 5:24 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:18 pm Posts: 2593 Been Liked: 294 times
|
I read that as yes, you are correct, the attorneys can't contact him but no, you are incorrect, Kurt Slep can.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 5:28 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
leopard lizard wrote: I read that as yes, you are correct, the attorneys can't contact him but no, you are incorrect, Kurt Slep can. You read it correctly.
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 5:36 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
Let me make this clearer for those that might be confused :
Once Rodney retains his attorney, the attorney of record, and Harrington are NOT supposed to talk to him directly. PERIOD.
Capish?
They are supposed to talk to his attorney ONLY.
I don't know why Harrington thinks that Rodney would be interested in talking to slep.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 5:52 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
c. staley wrote: Let me make this clearer for those that might be confused :
Once Rodney retains his attorney, the attorney of record, and Harrington are NOT supposed to talk to him directly. PERIOD.
Capish?
They are supposed to talk to his attorney ONLY.
I don't know why Harrington thinks that Rodney would be interested in talking to slep. So, when you said it was improper for Kurt to talk to him, were you intentionally lying or just making something up that you hoped might be true?
|
|
Top |
|
|
Second City Song
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 5:53 pm |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 3:00 am Posts: 192 Location: Illinois Been Liked: 16 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: c. staley wrote: Let me make this clearer for those that might be confused :
Once Rodney retains his attorney, the attorney of record, and Harrington are NOT supposed to talk to him directly. PERIOD.
Capish?
They are supposed to talk to his attorney ONLY.
I don't know why Harrington thinks that Rodney would be interested in talking to slep. So, when you said it was improper for Kurt to talk to him, were you intentionally lying or just making something up that you hoped might be true? OMG! You better confiscate something because he lied! !
|
|
Top |
|
|
birdofsong
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 6:13 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:25 am Posts: 965 Been Liked: 118 times
|
How old are you people?
_________________ Birdofsong
|
|
Top |
|
|
kjflorida
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 6:19 pm |
|
|
Advanced Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 12:04 pm Posts: 336 Been Liked: 33 times
|
all of you have my head spinning Harrington isn't even the attorney handling the case APS is....this is reminding me why I seldom visit the forums
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Wed Dec 28, 2011 9:07 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: So, when you said it was improper for Kurt to talk to him, were you intentionally lying or just making something up that you hoped might be true? Ho hum.... here you go again... Not lying... it IS "improper" for him to do so when he has representation. It's not "illegal." Do you advise your clients to pay you a retainer then settle the case directly themselves?.... (I can always tell which attorneys I would not hire.) Why don't you fill us in on how this wonderful "investigation" conducted by one of your crack-investigators got somehow "confused" or "misinterpreted" what a compact disc looks like.... THIS TIME?....
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 5:41 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
c. staley wrote: HarringtonLaw wrote: So, when you said it was improper for Kurt to talk to him, were you intentionally lying or just making something up that you hoped might be true? Ho hum.... here you go again... Not lying... it IS "improper" for him to do so when he has representation. It's not "illegal." Do you advise your clients to pay you a retainer then settle the case directly themselves?.... (I can always tell which attorneys I would not hire.) Why don't you fill us in on how this wonderful "investigation" conducted by one of your crack-investigators got somehow "confused" or "misinterpreted" what a compact disc looks like.... THIS TIME?.... I often recommend that my clients discuss the subject matter of the lawsuit with the other party, especially in the early stages of the litigation, because it promotes settlement. It's not MY investigator, but I am waiting until I see the report to make a judgment. I don't have it yet. If it were MY investigator, there would be an affidavit, at least an audiotape, and a videotape in some cases. This is under a different manager, so they may do things currently.
|
|
Top |
|
|
rickgood
|
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:14 am |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Tue May 31, 2011 7:09 pm Posts: 839 Location: Myrtle Beach, SC Been Liked: 224 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: I often recommend that my clients discuss the subject matter of the lawsuit with the other party, especially in the early stages of the litigation, because it promotes settlement.
It's not MY investigator, but I am waiting until I see the report to make a judgment. I don't have it yet. If it were MY investigator, there would be an affidavit, at least an audiotape, and a videotape in some cases. This is under a different manager, so they may do things currently. An audiotape of a logo being displayed? What kind of evidence is that?
|
|
Top |
|
|
Bazza
|
Posted: Thu Dec 29, 2011 7:59 am |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
birdofsong wrote: How old are you people? I would think you would know your husbands age, seeing as he is in the dead center of the playground about now.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 252 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|