|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 11:32 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
thewraith wrote: sorry I am not as clear spoken as yourself and chip in posting thoughts, My Invite may be on one of the 10 threads or so about SC . Oh I am just breaking stones James for the most part. Civil or criminal I think it is wrong. But Hey I just want to help Piracy end , Not to make a profit off audits. I assure you, at $125 per audit, SC is not making a profit.
|
|
Top |
|
|
jerry12x
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:10 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:40 am Posts: 2289 Location: Bolton UK Been Liked: 3 times
|
Harrington. Are you at all aware that even $125 is a serious amount of money for some people. Not like it is earning related, is it.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 12:58 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
jerry12x wrote: Harrington. Are you at all aware that even $125 is a serious amount of money for some people. Not like it is earning related, is it. I am quite aware that $125 is a serious amount of money for a lot of people, yes. There have been times in my life when writing a good check for $125 would have been impossible. It is an amount that was chosen based upon the cost of running the audit program. It has very little if anything to do with how much someone makes as a KJ, except that it was chosen to be as low as possible under the circumstances, precisely because it's hard for a lot of people to write that check.
|
|
Top |
|
|
hiteck
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:02 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:39 am Posts: 884 Location: Tx Been Liked: 17 times
|
Sorry couldn't resist HarringtonLaw wrote: ... It has very little if anything to do with how much someone makes as a KJ, except that it was chosen to be as low as possible under the circumstances, precisely because it's hard for a lot of people to write that check. A check? Hell yeah I can write you a check. I thought you wanted money! - Jeff Foxworthy
_________________ My statements, opinions and conclusions are based on my own personal experiences, observations, research and/or just my own $.02. I'm not a "cheerleader", but that doesn't make me a Pirate.
|
|
Top |
|
|
jerry12x
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 1:31 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:40 am Posts: 2289 Location: Bolton UK Been Liked: 3 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: It is an amount that was chosen based upon the cost of running the audit program. Quite frankly SoundChoice should have put some money away for a rainy day. Does the money that these people have paid for the disks count for nothing. The loyalty points are not working very well are they. By the way... Really like SC music.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 2:36 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
jerry12x wrote: Quite frankly SoundChoice should have put some money away for a rainy day. Does the money that these people have paid for the disks count for nothing. The loyalty points are not working very well are they. By the way... Really like SC music. It absolutely does count for something. Without having paid for those discs, you would not be able to play that material at all, much less make a duplicate to a hard drive.
|
|
Top |
|
|
jerry12x
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:13 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Jan 15, 2007 11:40 am Posts: 2289 Location: Bolton UK Been Liked: 3 times
|
So they still can play them. That's fine then. I thought you wanted more money off them. That's great news.
Harrington Rocks.
|
|
Top |
|
|
johnny reverb
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:30 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:05 pm Posts: 3376 Been Liked: 172 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: jerry12x wrote: Quite frankly SoundChoice should have put some money away for a rainy day. Does the money that these people have paid for the disks count for nothing. The loyalty points are not working very well are they. By the way... Really like SC music. It absolutely does count for something. Without having paid for those discs, you would not be able to play that material at all, much less make a duplicate to a hard drive. not completely true........he could have bought the Gem sets...
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:42 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
jerry12x wrote: So they still can play them. That's fine then. I thought you wanted more money off them. That's great news.
Harrington Rocks. Just to be clear, having bought the discs means you can play the discs without any further payments. If you want to copy the content over to a drive, you will need an audit. Johnny, you can't "buy" the GEM series. That's licensed, and there are specific terms in that license about moving the content over to a hard drive.
|
|
Top |
|
|
kjmann
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 3:50 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jan 05, 2012 12:06 pm Posts: 181 Location: Canby, OR Been Liked: 21 times
|
I have stayed out of these discussions for the most part, but as someone who has paid for my music Twice (once when I originally bought my hundreds of Discs from '96 to '08 and again when I Paid for the GEM Series, Chartbuster 6k, and The Stellar CAP Certification).
I understand where sound choice comes from on this. How are they supposed to know who is telling the truth when someone says "hey, I bought all My discs legit but they were destroyed because of [enter disaster here]. also, are they supposed to lose money because they have to pay someone to do an audit of whoever in whatever part of the county they are in. And how does anyone know what these private auditors are charging sound choice to do these audits. with the amount of time involved in checking disc after disc against files in a hard drive, I know I would probably be charging about $250-$350 per audit.
I lost my discs in a storage fire (Stored in my 1971 Travel trailer on a friends 2 acres). If I hadn't been so cheap and had paid for a REAL storage I might not have been in this boat today. People who don't take the proper precautions with such a LARGE investment shouldn't be blaming anyone else but themselves for their predicament.
I hold no ill will against Sound Choice For the way they have chosen to handle this. In fact I would probably Do the Same if it was my company.
Just My Two Cents.
Forgive me if i misspelled anything.
_________________ Sal "Kjmann" EsquivelKaraoke With Sal - Website
|
|
Top |
|
|
gd123
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 7:23 pm |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 4:51 am Posts: 148 Been Liked: 17 times
|
I have my SC discs in an Upright Safe that is located in my basement. No one is going to be able to carry that out.
I filled in a lot of the SC as I thought, since they were no longer making music, it would be an investment.
I had thought that, during retirement, selling the SC discs, alone, would keep me busy and provide supplemental money.
But, you know, if word gets around to all the Venues that playing SC may be cause for a Lawsuit to the Venues, I've been leaning towards selling all the SC before they become impossible to sell, as no one would want them. Timing is everything with investments.
I have an overlapping show that I use to have both SC Foundations and a few other duplicate discs for play, but I pulled all SC from that show for fear of being accused of having overlapping SC displayed nights. That show has not been hurt at all by the loss of SC.
With the loss of SC, which would decrease my disc count drastically, due to duplicates on, just about, every disc, I could go back to using discs as, with other brands, with the exception of Chartbuster, there is very little, if no, duplicates...within Brands!
I could still use my Computer to PLAY the disc's Tracks, which would still make me DIGITAL, so I could, officially, give the finger to those who think that Computers would be useless if using Discs. The actual discs would be used in the CDROM...do something about that.
Or, I may decide to get permission from Other Brands that are actively pursuing it. I wouldn't mind, so much, as they are simply getting on the Band wagon. They were NOT the instigators and I don't hold any animosity towards them.
Many other Brands have been targeting the SC Library and are quickly filling in any gaps.
So all and all, I am, seriously, thinking of dropping the SC Brand as I do NOT want to be stuck with a, quickly becoming, useless investment.
|
|
Top |
|
|
johnny reverb
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 8:06 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:05 pm Posts: 3376 Been Liked: 172 times
|
Used SC disks aren't worth that much(a few discs are worth a bit), and the other brands are worth even less. You could sell your whole collection, and probably not have enough money to by the Gem series.
|
|
Top |
|
|
gd123
|
Posted: Mon Feb 27, 2012 8:36 pm |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Mon Apr 18, 2011 4:51 am Posts: 148 Been Liked: 17 times
|
johnny reverb wrote: Used SC disks aren't worth that much(a few discs are worth a bit), and the other brands are worth even less. You could sell your whole collection, and probably not have enough money to by the Gem series. As I stated, "...quickly becoming, useless investment."
|
|
Top |
|
|
mckyj57
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 3:41 am |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:24 pm Posts: 5576 Location: Cocoa Beach Been Liked: 122 times
|
gd123 wrote: johnny reverb wrote: Used SC disks aren't worth that much(a few discs are worth a bit), and the other brands are worth even less. You could sell your whole collection, and probably not have enough money to by the Gem series. As I stated, "...quickly becoming, useless investment." I spent thousands and thousands of dollars on a legal disk inventory because 1) it's the right thing to do and 2) I wanted to walk around without fear. Now come to find out I have to fear the audit anyway. Sound Choice will catch their customer -- someone they should treasure, not intimidate -- in the same net as the baldest-faced pirate. That's what sticks in our craws. We spend a lot of money doing the right thing and we get screwed -- we still have to walk around in fear. It is no wonder the music industry is hated.
_________________ [color=#ffff55]Mickey J.[/color] Alas for those who never sing, but die with all their music in them. -- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.
|
|
Top |
|
|
leopard lizard
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 6:01 am |
|
Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:18 pm Posts: 2593 Been Liked: 294 times
|
People keep saying used SCs are going for next to nothing but when I want to buy one I don't find that to be the case. And even the major retailers who used to have them on sale all of the time have brought the prices back up.
|
|
Top |
|
|
hiteck
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 6:02 am |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:39 am Posts: 884 Location: Tx Been Liked: 17 times
|
_________________ My statements, opinions and conclusions are based on my own personal experiences, observations, research and/or just my own $.02. I'm not a "cheerleader", but that doesn't make me a Pirate.
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 6:13 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
mckyj57 wrote: I spent thousands and thousands of dollars on a legal disk inventory because 1) it's the right thing to do and 2) I wanted to walk around without fear. Now come to find out I have to fear the audit anyway. Sound Choice will catch their customer -- someone they should treasure, not intimidate -- in the same net as the baldest-faced pirate.
That's what sticks in our craws. We spend a lot of money doing the right thing and we get screwed -- we still have to walk around in fear.
It is no wonder the music industry is hated. I don't know why anyone would fear an audit. Several people, inlcuding myself have posted our audit experiences. It was painless and enlightening. I didn't enter into with any fear at all. -Chris
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
mckyj57
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 6:24 am |
|
Joined: Tue Apr 04, 2006 9:24 pm Posts: 5576 Location: Cocoa Beach Been Liked: 122 times
|
chrisavis wrote: mckyj57 wrote: I spent thousands and thousands of dollars on a legal disk inventory because 1) it's the right thing to do and 2) I wanted to walk around without fear. Now come to find out I have to fear the audit anyway. Sound Choice will catch their customer -- someone they should treasure, not intimidate -- in the same net as the baldest-faced pirate.
That's what sticks in our craws. We spend a lot of money doing the right thing and we get screwed -- we still have to walk around in fear.
It is no wonder the music industry is hated. I don't know why anyone would fear an audit. How about the time, uncertainty, and expense? Quote: Several people, inlcuding myself have posted our audit experiences. It was painless and enlightening. I didn't enter into with any fear at all.
How long have you had your tracks, and how long have you been doing this? If you have built up your collection over a decade, from many sources and manufacturers, you might find provenance a bit hard to come by. And if it is so straightforward, why won't Sound Choice publish a white paper on what you should do, what they are looking for, and a script on how it is supposed to go?
_________________ [color=#ffff55]Mickey J.[/color] Alas for those who never sing, but die with all their music in them. -- Oliver Wendell Holmes, Sr.
|
|
Top |
|
|
hiteck
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 6:40 am |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:39 am Posts: 884 Location: Tx Been Liked: 17 times
|
mckyj57 wrote: ...And if it is so straightforward, why won't Sound Choice publish a white paper on what you should do, what they are looking for, and a script on how it is supposed to go? mckyj57 I pretty much asked the same question previously in this thread. hiteck wrote: Why is so hard for manus to realize that there are KJ's (customers) who have legally purchased their discs and feel they shouldn't have to pay an annual don't sue me fee.
Why is there not more information on SC's website about the audit process and terms for use of logo/tracks by a certified KJ?
Why is the the cost of the audit and renewal fee/process not posted on the site?
Why is it that SC wants compliance for something they aren't willing to publish the terms of? SC has apparently changed their policy on being able to use backups (copies of cdg's) in a show. That's fine (I guess), but how are we to know what's ok and what isn't if it isn't published. If you make a policy and specifically if you change a policy shouldn't you let your customers know?
_________________ My statements, opinions and conclusions are based on my own personal experiences, observations, research and/or just my own $.02. I'm not a "cheerleader", but that doesn't make me a Pirate.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 263 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|