|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
PyleDriver
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 9:00 pm |
|
|
Advanced Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:35 am Posts: 361 Location: Occupied Mexico aka Rio Grand Valley, S.Texas Been Liked: 8 times
|
HarringtonLaw stated in another post that there's a 2% tolerance for SC tracks. Can someone comment on this...Does that mean you can keep them if it's less than 2%, or just that you won't prosecute and they need to be destroyed?. If they find us in the 2% complience then what would give them the right to order us to do so, were complying...
Jon
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:14 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
Funny you should bring this up. Here's a conversation I had in another thread.... chrisavis wrote: Audit Complete.
We found a handful of fakes with very high quality labels applied to them. A little embarassing since I have gone through the collection several times in the past few months to ensure I had things in order and that my digital library matched up.
cueball wrote: So, what were you told about the fakes they found in your collection? Were you told that you can not use them in your digital library, or can you continue to use them since it must be quite obvious (from the rest of your collection) that you purchased them in "Good Faith?" Were you told to destroy them? Did they destroy them? Knowing that a lot of SC discs are OOP (and the retailers can not restock on a lot of those discs), if you have to destroy them (or SC destroyed them), did they make any offer to help you obtain legit discs to replace those identified as fakes? chrisavis wrote: I wasn't told to do anything with them. However, I did pull them from my catalog. I retained posession but I did toss them out today once I re-verified I didn't have them in my library.
Also, keep in mind, the person I worked with was strictly there for an audit. Not to represent Sound Choice sales, marketing or anything else.
Last edited by Cueball on Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:21 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 10:21 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
Cueball is correct. I was not given specific instruction on what to do with the discs. I told the auditor I would delete the counterfiet tracks from my system (which I did before the upcomings weeks show) and I pulled those discs from my physical library. The discs have since been tossed out.
-Chris
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
PyleDriver
|
Posted: Tue Feb 28, 2012 11:40 pm |
|
|
Advanced Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:35 am Posts: 361 Location: Occupied Mexico aka Rio Grand Valley, S.Texas Been Liked: 8 times
|
Chris is there anything in writing that they gave you that states the 2% tolerence rules? If not, it would be nice to have one posted for our records. Seems the rules change on this alot. I remember seeing it was 5% last year, and really wish I had saved that link, or printed it.
Jon
|
|
Top |
|
|
kjathena
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 2:26 am |
|
|
Super Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:51 pm Posts: 1636 Been Liked: 73 times
|
the 2% rule allows for the occasional disc that may have been stolen or been misfiled.It allows you to pass the audit with 2% or less missing discs. We were advised those discs would need to be removed from your Hard Drive when we were in NC for the meeting. Fakes of course would need to be removed (I would advise trying to recover your $$$ from the seller if possible)
_________________ "Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain." Unknown "if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters." Lee McGuffey
|
|
Top |
|
|
birdofsong
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 4:04 am |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:25 am Posts: 965 Been Liked: 118 times
|
What brand were they, Chris? I thought Harrington just said yesterday that they only look at SC, and not other brands in their audits, so I'm assuming they were fake SC discs. If not, I'd be interested to hear why SC was looking at the rest of your library.
_________________ Birdofsong
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 5:27 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
The fakes were Sound Choice discs. The auditor only asked to look at Sound Choice product.
I voluntarily showed ALL of my discs to the auditor and asked them to take pictures of whatever they wanted. I also showed my Stellar CAP and Chartbuster Certs to the auditor. I wanted there to be no doubt that I am 1:1 across the board for all manufacturers including the "off brands".
I am going to go through every single disc I own this weekend to verify that I have pulled all fakes out.
-Chris
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 8:15 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
PyleDriver wrote: Chris is there anything in writing that they gave you that states the 2% tolerence rules? If not, it would be nice to have one posted for our records. Seems the rules change on this alot. I remember seeing it was 5% last year, and really wish I had saved that link, or printed it.
Jon Yes - This comes from the Sound Choice Pre-Suit Audit form that was sent to me when I requested my audit - Quote: SUCCESSFUL AUDIT. The target you should be shooting for is where for every audited track, you own one legitimately acquired original disc containing that track for every individual machine (CAVS machine, laptop, or other device you use for media storage for a karaoke show) that contains that track. This is known as "1:1 correspondence." We recognize that discs do get lost, stolen, damaged, or destroyed from time to time. A successful audit means that at least 98% of the tracks stored on your hard drive can be traced to a unique disc owned by you and in your possession. Of course, you will still need to delete tracks that you don’t have a disc for. -Chris
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lone Wolf
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 11:30 am |
|
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 10:11 am Posts: 1832 Location: TX Been Liked: 59 times
|
If you couldn't tell they were fakes to begin with how do you know what you get in the future won't be. What was the one MAJOR thing that pointed them out to be fakes.
Asking so the rest of us can check our discs too.
_________________ I like everyone when I first meet them. If you don't like me that's not my problem it's YOURS! A stranger is a friend you haven't met yet
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 11:44 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
Transparency - I hired a neighborhood kid to rip a bunch of discs for me and scan for fakes. He missed ~10 out of ~400 in Sound Choice.
All of the fakes had paper cover labels instead of being silk-screened. They were printed from a high-quality printer so the color matching was dead on. We found them because of the texture and noting that the "silver" portions were dull and grey. I believe a few of them said "Memorex" on the inner ring as well.
I would not have expected the neighborhood kid to have caught those. But it does make me want to personally go through all of my discs again to ensure I have no more like that.
-Chris
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lone Wolf
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 11:46 am |
|
Joined: Mon May 28, 2007 10:11 am Posts: 1832 Location: TX Been Liked: 59 times
|
Thanks for the tip
_________________ I like everyone when I first meet them. If you don't like me that's not my problem it's YOURS! A stranger is a friend you haven't met yet
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:25 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
It dawned on me that I missed taking the trash to the curb last week. So I dug the fakes out. Here is what one looks like. Attachment:
Fake2.jpg [ 97.55 KiB | Viewed 22660 times ]
Here is a pic of a real and a fake side by side. Can you tell which is which? Attachment:
fake3.jpg [ 98.46 KiB | Viewed 22660 times ]
They are super easy to tell apart when touching them. The paper texture is obvious. But a quick glance while it is still in a sleeve is easy to overlook. -Chris
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 12:39 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
chrisavis wrote: Here is a pic of a real and a fake side by side. Can you tell which is which? Attachment: fake3.jpg Very obvious, the left one. Printing is not only off kilter, the Memorex in the center is a dead giveaway.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
PyleDriver
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 1:51 pm |
|
|
Advanced Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:35 am Posts: 361 Location: Occupied Mexico aka Rio Grand Valley, S.Texas Been Liked: 8 times
|
You guys miss my point, you complied to being under 2% so obviously you spent a "great deal" of money already. Shouldn't that satisfy SC enough to use thier precious label on the bootlegged ones? Afterall this is about use of their label isn't it, or is it...
Jon
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 3:05 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
PyleDriver wrote: You guys miss my point, you complied to being under 2% so obviously you spent a "great deal" of money already. Shouldn't that satisfy SC enough to use thier precious label on the bootlegged ones? Afterall this is about use of their label isn't it, or is it...
Jon While I see it as very fair of Sound Choice to allow for a 2% variance, I am chooising to not use ANY tracks in my shows for which I don't have a valid disk or license for. I voluntarily pulled the counterfeit discs. Even if I would have been told "No worries, less than 2%, you are golden" I still would have pulled them. For me, I am choosing to never allow myself to get close to 2.1% and fall out of compliance. I am sticking to 100% to help ensure I cannot be questioned about my compliance. -Chris
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 3:21 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
chrisavis wrote: While I see it as very fair of Sound Choice to allow for a 2% variance, I am chooising to not use ANY tracks in my shows for which I don't have a valid disk or license for. I voluntarily pulled the counterfeit discs. Even if I would have been told "No worries, less than 2%, you are golden" I still would have pulled them.
For me, I am choosing to never allow myself to get close to 2.1% and fall out of compliance. I am sticking to 100% to help ensure I cannot be questioned about my compliance.
-Chris Just in case anyone is wondering, what Chris did is exactly the right thing, and what is required by the terms of the audit. You can still pass the audit with up to 2% variance, but you still have to delete the uncovered tracks in order to get to 100% compliance.
|
|
Top |
|
|
PyleDriver
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 4:03 pm |
|
|
Advanced Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2011 12:35 am Posts: 361 Location: Occupied Mexico aka Rio Grand Valley, S.Texas Been Liked: 8 times
|
Of course we would have to delete it to be 100%. But you only require 98% to comply... Here's where we are personally, I'll be honest. We have a number of songs (30 or so) that SC doesn't produce anymore. If we buy the 6000+ songs we would be way under the 2%. After all, we would be spending 350.00 more on CD's to gain songs you do make, and these are songs I can't buy anymore, or I would.
Jon
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 4:38 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
chrisavis wrote: While I see it as very fair of Sound Choice to allow for a 2% variance, I am chooising to not use ANY tracks in my shows for which I don't have a valid disk or license for. I voluntarily pulled the counterfeit discs. Even if I would have been told "No worries, less than 2%, you are golden" I still would have pulled them.
Chris, based on what Mr. Harrington just posted (see quote below), it wasn't a matter of you having a choice to use/not use those tracks that were deemed fake/counterfeit. The 2% variance is just the allowance/margin that SC is/was giving for you to pass the audit. HarringtonLaw wrote: Just in case anyone is wondering, what Chris did is exactly the right thing, and what is required by the terms of the audit. You can still pass the audit with up to 2% variance, but you still have to delete the uncovered tracks in order to get to 100% compliance. I understand what you are saying about the conditions of passing the audit, and the 2% variance allowance, and that somewhere within SC's policies, it is written that you still have to get rid of those songs and discs that fell into that 2%. Here's what I don't quite understand... After Chris passed his audit with SC, and it was pointed out that he had some fakes (unbeknownst to him prior to the audit) in his collection, why didn't the Auditor tell/instruct him that he now has to remove them from his harddrive and get rid of the counterfeit discs as versus Chris stating that he has decided to just do that on his own?
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 4:48 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
cueball wrote: I understand what you are saying about the conditions of passing the audit, and the 2% variance allowance, and that somewhere within SC's policies, it is written that you still have to get rid of those songs and discs that fell into that 2%. Here's what I don't quite understand... After Chris passed his audit with SC, and it was pointed out that he had some fakes (unbeknownst to him prior to the audit) in his collection, why didn't the Auditor tell/instruct him that he now has to remove them from his harddrive and get rid of the counterfeit discs as versus Chris stating that he has decided to just do that on his own? I think that's a fair question, and it is one that I am looking into for precisely the reason that you asked it. The audit acknowledgement does say that those tracks have to be removed. I will say that the audit rep who is on-site doing the audit isn't the one making that call; he's there to collect information and mark the discs. But if that wasn't made clear to Chris at the conclusion of his audit, that was a mistake. It should have been. I've had enough conversations with Chris to believe him when he says he wasn't told to remove the discs, so we will make certain to do so in the future.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Wed Feb 29, 2012 4:57 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
PyleDriver wrote: Of course we would have to delete it to be 100%. But you only require 98% to comply... Here's where we are personally, I'll be honest. We have a number of songs (30 or so) that SC doesn't produce anymore. If we buy the 6000+ songs we would be way under the 2%. After all, we would be spending 350.00 more on CD's to gain songs you do make, and these are songs I can't buy anymore, or I would.
Jon 98% to pass the audit, 100% to comply (either before or immediately after the audit). If you do not have discs for the 30 or so tracks that are no longer in production, it does not matter whether you buy 6000+ others or not. (We'd love for you to buy the GEM series, but doing so will not get you licensed for non-original media on tracks that are not on that series.) You will not be allowed to keep tracks you don't have discs for and remain certified. If you want to keep those tracks, you will need to acquire an original disc for each of them. I will say that there is a very vigorous market for out-of-print discs, so you may be able to pick them up on eBay or elsewhere for much less than the retail price. If you need to identify which discs the tracks are on, there are websites that have lookup tools. (musicbookdeluxe.com is one of them; I'm sure there are others, and maybe better ones). You may also be able to buy them from Clark Music in Australia as custom CD+Gs. We recognize discs purchased from them as valid originals. They are a bit pricey--AU$5 per track, which at current exchange rates is around US$5.50.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 158 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|