|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
kjathena
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:11 am |
|
|
Super Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:51 pm Posts: 1636 Been Liked: 73 times
|
what would leave you to come to that conclusion ? One person is either honest or not basically a 50/50 chance ....but gather together 1000 people and you have 500 honest ones able to police 500 questionable ones. Often times a honest person can get those that are not honest to question themselves and make changes. Just a observation that has proven to be true many times in my life.
Blessings Athena
_________________ "Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain." Unknown "if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters." Lee McGuffey
|
|
Top |
|
|
Smoothedge69
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:28 am |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am Posts: 3885 Images: 0 Been Liked: 397 times
|
kjathena wrote: what would leave you to come to that conclusion ? One person is either honest or not basically a 50/50 chance ....but gather together 1000 people and you have 500 honest ones able to police 500 questionable ones. Often times a honest person can get those that are not honest to question themselves and make changes. Just a observation that has proven to be true many times in my life.
Blessings Athena But you are talking about a difference between a multi BILLION dollar company and people who make, mostly, some money on the side. Huge companies are FULL of thieves. I think Wall Street has proven that. Small businessmen are, for the most part, honest. Large companies not only need to be watched they need to be regulated. Athena, you will NEVER get me to agree with Sound Choice on this. Sorry, but I don't want to be watched. I think it's ridiculous. If companies like SC want to watch me, they will be quite disappointed, because there will be nothing to see. Those who sacrifice Liberty for security deserve neither. That is EXACTLY what your side is doing. You are taking away our freedom to run our businesses so YOU can have some security.
_________________ I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE
|
|
Top |
|
|
Bazza
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 5:36 am |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
c. staley wrote: The difference is of course, that earthling has showed you a prime example of it in the quote from Chris Avis. Your statement above is nothing more than your game. It's all a game. That WAS the point. c. staley wrote: Besides, just as you have proactively purchased the gems series, why do you automatically paint those who proactively choose to avoid any prosecution as "Pirates?" I don't. It was comedic analogy to point out the folly of the original post. But you knew that. "Nice try" though! You are the undisputed master of spin. The reality is that "In the future" the only thing patrons will know when they see a blue logo is that they have the best base library of songs in a high quality format.
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 7:12 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
I still don't understand why karaoke hosts feel they should be completely exempt from certification/monitoring when there are other service related industries that have to do exactly that.
The most cloesly related one to ours are the bars and venues themselves. They pay their BMI/ASCAP fees and you would think they should be left alone completely until renewal time. In fact, the BMI/ASCAP folks may just drop in unnanounced to see if additional seating has been added which warrants an increase in fees paid.
If Sound Choice shows up to check on me, I would not feel as if I were being spied on or that I was a criminal. SC is protecting their interests. In fact, I encourage it, particularly with those that settled after a suit was filed. I want them keeping tabs on those that have already demonstrated they were willing to cheat the system. If they stop by my show, no big deal.
The only request I have is that they send folks that can entertain, sing up beat songs, and aren't water drinkers. Support the show :)
-Chris
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
c. staley
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 8:34 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am Posts: 4839 Location: In your head rent-free Been Liked: 582 times
|
chrisavis wrote: I still don't understand why karaoke hosts feel they should be completely exempt from certification/monitoring when there are other service related industries that have to do exactly that.
The most cloesly related one to ours are the bars and venues themselves. They pay their BMI/ASCAP fees and you would think they should be left alone completely until renewal time. In fact, the BMI/ASCAP folks may just drop in unnanounced to see if additional seating has been added which warrants an increase in fees paid. Really? You don't understand the difference? Try this: Performing rights societies (ASCAP/BMI/SESAC) are written into copyright LAW. And as such, they have much more leverage and tools at their disposal. Sound Choice Karaoke is not. When ASCAP sends an investigator to a club (because a club hasn't paid their license fees) that investigator can tell you every single song you played -- including the bumper music you play in between -- and that investigative report is not hidden, privileged information or guarded in any way. It's made available as part of their "evidence." Right down to a copy of the receipt for drinks and food and a physical description of you and the system you use. It's all out in the open. When SC supposedly sends an investigator, it's a big, "james bond secret" even afterward. What a crock. Yeah, there no difference right? Face it Chris, your heroes aren't the government but they'd like you to believe they should be.
|
|
Top |
|
|
timberlea
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 10:53 am |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm Posts: 4094 Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada Been Liked: 309 times
|
Just ask your local BBB or police how many scam artists and fly by night operators are out there offering renovations, clothing, and just about anything else under the sun. BTW if you go to Times Square you can find individuals selling Rolex watches for $10-20.
_________________ You can be strange but not a stranger
|
|
Top |
|
|
karaokegod73
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:03 pm |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:53 pm Posts: 187 Been Liked: 5 times
|
If it comes down to being constantly watched it better be after all the pirates and undercutters are gone so I can get $200-300 a show. Then maybe it would be worth it.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:24 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
karaokegod73 wrote: If it comes down to being constantly watched it better be after all the pirates and undercutters are gone so I can get $200-300 a show. Then maybe it would be worth it. Hey I thought Phil added a like button!
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
kjathena
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:28 pm |
|
|
Super Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:51 pm Posts: 1636 Been Liked: 73 times
|
well there is a "been liked XX times" space in the sidebar but I don't see a button. Would really LOVE one however.
Blessings Athena
_________________ "Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain." Unknown "if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters." Lee McGuffey
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:55 pm |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
c. staley wrote: chrisavis wrote: I still don't understand why karaoke hosts feel they should be completely exempt from certification/monitoring when there are other service related industries that have to do exactly that.
The most cloesly related one to ours are the bars and venues themselves. They pay their BMI/ASCAP fees and you would think they should be left alone completely until renewal time. In fact, the BMI/ASCAP folks may just drop in unnanounced to see if additional seating has been added which warrants an increase in fees paid. Really? You don't understand the difference? Try this: Performing rights societies (ASCAP/BMI/SESAC) are written into copyright LAW. And as such, they have much more leverage and tools at their disposal. Sound Choice Karaoke is not. When ASCAP sends an investigator to a club (because a club hasn't paid their license fees) that investigator can tell you every single song you played -- including the bumper music you play in between -- and that investigative report is not hidden, privileged information or guarded in any way. It's made available as part of their "evidence." Right down to a copy of the receipt for drinks and food and a physical description of you and the system you use. It's all out in the open. When SC supposedly sends an investigator, it's a big, "james bond secret" even afterward. What a crock. Yeah, there no difference right? Face it Chris, your heroes aren't the government but they'd like you to believe they should be. I understand the difference just fine. I was also speaking in general terms and not specifically toward SC. I don't understand the resistance to being certified to be able to work. Plenty of other fields of work absolutely require it. -Chris
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 1:28 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
i don't think the issue is weather there should be a central governing entity like ASCAP etc. the issue comes up that SC is a company, nothing more. it would be the equivelent of Def Jam Records doing the policing of ASCAP instead. they have no right to do so, that is part of why the PRS agencies exist. if ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC came out and wanted to do what SC and CB are doing, i think the response would be very different than it is now.
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
johnreynolds
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 1:58 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:06 am Posts: 844 Been Liked: 226 times
|
I just don't get why ANYONE would want their privacy trampled on...no less by defunct karaoke companies trying to recoup losses by their own illegal activities that contributed to their own demise. BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING!! I am a legal host so i don't mind if i'm visited and/or audited, but i certainly DON'T want to feel like i'm being watched or scoped by anyone, even other hosts! Come talk to me and i'll welcome you. No need to SPY on me unfriendly-like, as if i'm guilty of doing something wrong, or that i'm your enemy for some reason.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Smoothedge69
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 2:16 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am Posts: 3885 Images: 0 Been Liked: 397 times
|
chrisavis wrote: c. staley wrote: chrisavis wrote: I still don't understand why karaoke hosts feel they should be completely exempt from certification/monitoring when there are other service related industries that have to do exactly that.
The most cloesly related one to ours are the bars and venues themselves. They pay their BMI/ASCAP fees and you would think they should be left alone completely until renewal time. In fact, the BMI/ASCAP folks may just drop in unnanounced to see if additional seating has been added which warrants an increase in fees paid. Really? You don't understand the difference? Try this: Performing rights societies (ASCAP/BMI/SESAC) are written into copyright LAW. And as such, they have much more leverage and tools at their disposal. Sound Choice Karaoke is not. When ASCAP sends an investigator to a club (because a club hasn't paid their license fees) that investigator can tell you every single song you played -- including the bumper music you play in between -- and that investigative report is not hidden, privileged information or guarded in any way. It's made available as part of their "evidence." Right down to a copy of the receipt for drinks and food and a physical description of you and the system you use. It's all out in the open. When SC supposedly sends an investigator, it's a big, "james bond secret" even afterward. What a crock. Yeah, there no difference right? Face it Chris, your heroes aren't the government but they'd like you to believe they should be. I understand the difference just fine. I was also speaking in general terms and not specifically toward SC. I don't understand the resistance to being certified to be able to work. Plenty of other fields of work absolutely require it. -Chris Because these are private businesses. Some of us don't want VENDOR intervention in our business. We provide a service of playing music. It's not like we have massive safety concerns like construction companies. It's not like we have health concerns like food service and healthcare. We play music. You are putting WAY too much importance into what we do. We play music for drunk people to sing. Certification may be useful if it were a centralized agency that took care of certification. But being certified by one or two mfrs isn't even fair business practice. Asking people to get certified by Sound Choice at a criteria for getting work is ridiculous, and gives advantage ONLY to Sound Choice, since we don't know what is ahead for CB, and no other company cares about certification. I think it's time you wake up and truly look around. Sound Choice is just looking out for their own interests with these certifications. And you people are falling for it.
_________________ I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 10:29 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
timberlea wrote: Just ask your local BBB or police how many scam artists and fly by night operators are out there offering renovations, clothing, and just about anything else under the sun. BTW if you go to Times Square you can find individuals selling Rolex watches for $10-20. That's Ronex watches.
|
|
Top |
|
|
hiteck
|
Posted: Sat May 05, 2012 6:34 am |
|
Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:39 am Posts: 884 Location: Tx Been Liked: 17 times
|
cueball wrote: timberlea wrote: Just ask your local BBB or police how many scam artists and fly by night operators are out there offering renovations, clothing, and just about anything else under the sun. BTW if you go to Times Square you can find individuals selling Rolex watches for $10-20. That's Ronex watches. Mine said Ro1ex
_________________ My statements, opinions and conclusions are based on my own personal experiences, observations, research and/or just my own $.02. I'm not a "cheerleader", but that doesn't make me a Pirate.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Sun May 06, 2012 1:38 am |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
Bazza wrote: c. staley wrote: The difference is of course, that earthling has showed you a prime example of it in the quote from Chris Avis. Your statement above is nothing more than your game. It's all a game. That WAS the point. Don't mean to scare you, Bazza, but you and I agree here 100%. It IS and HAS BEEN a game all along. All about how one plays it. Thank you for the post.
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
TommyA
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 12:51 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:34 am Posts: 193 Images: 1 Location: Austin, TX Been Liked: 24 times
|
The last thing anyone in business in this country needs is more oversight and regulation. The US government is doing far more for me than I can afford now. We sure as hell don't need to be reporting to a private company on top of it. Wanna audit me? Pay me for my time. You aint the government.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 12:56 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
TommyA wrote: The last thing anyone in business in this country needs is more oversight and regulation. The US government is doing far more for me than I can afford now. We sure as hell don't need to be reporting to a private company on top of it. Wanna audit me? Pay me for my time. You aint the government. There is a really simple solution to that problem. If you don't want to be audited, don't media-shift your SC content.
|
|
Top |
|
|
TommyA
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 1:01 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:34 am Posts: 193 Images: 1 Location: Austin, TX Been Liked: 24 times
|
Nah. I'll just wait for a threatening letter.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Smoothedge69
|
Posted: Mon May 07, 2012 1:03 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am Posts: 3885 Images: 0 Been Liked: 397 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: TommyA wrote: The last thing anyone in business in this country needs is more oversight and regulation. The US government is doing far more for me than I can afford now. We sure as hell don't need to be reporting to a private company on top of it. Wanna audit me? Pay me for my time. You aint the government. There is a really simple solution to that problem. If you don't want to be audited, don't media-shift your SC content. There is a better idea. Cut the auditing crap and just allow shifting like everyone else.
_________________ I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 140 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|