KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - SC audits question Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Legalities & Piracy, etc... Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


premium-member

Offsite Links


It is currently Fri Jan 10, 2025 1:47 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 183 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next
Author Message
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:11 am 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster

Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:51 pm
Posts: 1636
Been Liked: 73 times
what would leave you to come to that conclusion ? One person is either honest or not basically a 50/50 chance ....but gather together 1000 people and you have 500 honest ones able to police 500 questionable ones. Often times a honest person can get those that are not honest to question themselves and make changes. Just a observation that has proven to be true many times in my life.

Blessings
Athena

_________________
"Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain."
Unknown
"if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters."
Lee McGuffey


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:28 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
kjathena wrote:
what would leave you to come to that conclusion ? One person is either honest or not basically a 50/50 chance ....but gather together 1000 people and you have 500 honest ones able to police 500 questionable ones. Often times a honest person can get those that are not honest to question themselves and make changes. Just a observation that has proven to be true many times in my life.

Blessings
Athena

But you are talking about a difference between a multi BILLION dollar company and people who make, mostly, some money on the side. Huge companies are FULL of thieves. I think Wall Street has proven that. Small businessmen are, for the most part, honest. Large companies not only need to be watched they need to be regulated. Athena, you will NEVER get me to agree with Sound Choice on this.

Sorry, but I don't want to be watched. I think it's ridiculous. If companies like SC want to watch me, they will be quite disappointed, because there will be nothing to see. Those who sacrifice Liberty for security deserve neither. That is EXACTLY what your side is doing. You are taking away our freedom to run our businesses so YOU can have some security.

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 5:36 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am
Posts: 3312
Images: 0
Been Liked: 610 times
c. staley wrote:
The difference is of course, that earthling has showed you a prime example of it in the quote from Chris Avis. Your statement above is nothing more than your game.


It's all a game. That WAS the point.

c. staley wrote:
Besides, just as you have proactively purchased the gems series, why do you automatically paint those who proactively choose to avoid any prosecution as "Pirates?"


I don't. It was comedic analogy to point out the folly of the original post.

But you knew that. "Nice try" though! You are the undisputed master of spin.

The reality is that "In the future" the only thing patrons will know when they see a blue logo is that they have the best base library of songs in a high quality format.


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 7:12 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
I still don't understand why karaoke hosts feel they should be completely exempt from certification/monitoring when there are other service related industries that have to do exactly that.

The most cloesly related one to ours are the bars and venues themselves. They pay their BMI/ASCAP fees and you would think they should be left alone completely until renewal time. In fact, the BMI/ASCAP folks may just drop in unnanounced to see if additional seating has been added which warrants an increase in fees paid.

If Sound Choice shows up to check on me, I would not feel as if I were being spied on or that I was a criminal. SC is protecting their interests. In fact, I encourage it, particularly with those that settled after a suit was filed. I want them keeping tabs on those that have already demonstrated they were willing to cheat the system. If they stop by my show, no big deal.

The only request I have is that they send folks that can entertain, sing up beat songs, and aren't water drinkers. Support the show :)

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 8:34 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Thu Jun 06, 2002 7:26 am
Posts: 4839
Location: In your head rent-free
Been Liked: 582 times
chrisavis wrote:
I still don't understand why karaoke hosts feel they should be completely exempt from certification/monitoring when there are other service related industries that have to do exactly that.

The most cloesly related one to ours are the bars and venues themselves. They pay their BMI/ASCAP fees and you would think they should be left alone completely until renewal time. In fact, the BMI/ASCAP folks may just drop in unnanounced to see if additional seating has been added which warrants an increase in fees paid.


Really? You don't understand the difference?

Try this:

Performing rights societies (ASCAP/BMI/SESAC) are written into copyright LAW. And as such, they have much more leverage and tools at their disposal.

Sound Choice Karaoke is not.

When ASCAP sends an investigator to a club (because a club hasn't paid their license fees) that investigator can tell you every single song you played -- including the bumper music you play in between -- and that investigative report is not hidden, privileged information or guarded in any way. It's made available as part of their "evidence." Right down to a copy of the receipt for drinks and food and a physical description of you and the system you use. It's all out in the open.

When SC supposedly sends an investigator, it's a big, "james bond secret" even afterward. What a crock.

Yeah, there no difference right?

Face it Chris, your heroes aren't the government but they'd like you to believe they should be.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 10:53 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm
Posts: 4094
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
Been Liked: 309 times
Just ask your local BBB or police how many scam artists and fly by night operators are out there offering renovations, clothing, and just about anything else under the sun. BTW if you go to Times Square you can find individuals selling Rolex watches for $10-20.

_________________
You can be strange but not a stranger


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:03 pm 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster

Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 8:53 pm
Posts: 187
Been Liked: 5 times
If it comes down to being constantly watched it better be after all the pirates and undercutters are gone so I can get $200-300 a show. Then maybe it would be worth it.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:24 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
karaokegod73 wrote:
If it comes down to being constantly watched it better be after all the pirates and undercutters are gone so I can get $200-300 a show. Then maybe it would be worth it.

Hey I thought Phil added a like button!

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:28 pm 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster

Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:51 pm
Posts: 1636
Been Liked: 73 times
well there is a "been liked XX times" space in the sidebar but I don't see a button. Would really LOVE one however.

Blessings
Athena

_________________
"Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain."
Unknown
"if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters."
Lee McGuffey


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:55 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
c. staley wrote:
chrisavis wrote:
I still don't understand why karaoke hosts feel they should be completely exempt from certification/monitoring when there are other service related industries that have to do exactly that.

The most cloesly related one to ours are the bars and venues themselves. They pay their BMI/ASCAP fees and you would think they should be left alone completely until renewal time. In fact, the BMI/ASCAP folks may just drop in unnanounced to see if additional seating has been added which warrants an increase in fees paid.


Really? You don't understand the difference?

Try this:

Performing rights societies (ASCAP/BMI/SESAC) are written into copyright LAW. And as such, they have much more leverage and tools at their disposal.

Sound Choice Karaoke is not.

When ASCAP sends an investigator to a club (because a club hasn't paid their license fees) that investigator can tell you every single song you played -- including the bumper music you play in between -- and that investigative report is not hidden, privileged information or guarded in any way. It's made available as part of their "evidence." Right down to a copy of the receipt for drinks and food and a physical description of you and the system you use. It's all out in the open.

When SC supposedly sends an investigator, it's a big, "james bond secret" even afterward. What a crock.

Yeah, there no difference right?

Face it Chris, your heroes aren't the government but they'd like you to believe they should be.


I understand the difference just fine. I was also speaking in general terms and not specifically toward SC.

I don't understand the resistance to being certified to be able to work. Plenty of other fields of work absolutely require it.

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 1:28 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm
Posts: 5107
Location: Phoenix Az
Been Liked: 1279 times
i don't think the issue is weather there should be a central governing entity like ASCAP etc. the issue comes up that SC is a company, nothing more. it would be the equivelent of Def Jam Records doing the policing of ASCAP instead. they have no right to do so, that is part of why the PRS agencies exist. if ASCAP, BMI, and SESAC came out and wanted to do what SC and CB are doing, i think the response would be very different than it is now.

_________________
Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 1:58 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster

Joined: Tue Sep 01, 2009 11:06 am
Posts: 844
Been Liked: 226 times
I just don't get why ANYONE would want their privacy trampled on...no less by defunct karaoke companies trying to recoup losses by their own illegal activities that contributed to their own demise. :o

BIG BROTHER IS WATCHING!!

I am a legal host so i don't mind if i'm visited and/or audited, but i certainly DON'T want to feel like i'm being watched or scoped by anyone, even other hosts!

Come talk to me and i'll welcome you. No need to SPY on me unfriendly-like, as if i'm guilty of doing something wrong, or that i'm your enemy for some reason. :o


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 2:16 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
chrisavis wrote:
c. staley wrote:
chrisavis wrote:
I still don't understand why karaoke hosts feel they should be completely exempt from certification/monitoring when there are other service related industries that have to do exactly that.

The most cloesly related one to ours are the bars and venues themselves. They pay their BMI/ASCAP fees and you would think they should be left alone completely until renewal time. In fact, the BMI/ASCAP folks may just drop in unnanounced to see if additional seating has been added which warrants an increase in fees paid.


Really? You don't understand the difference?

Try this:

Performing rights societies (ASCAP/BMI/SESAC) are written into copyright LAW. And as such, they have much more leverage and tools at their disposal.

Sound Choice Karaoke is not.

When ASCAP sends an investigator to a club (because a club hasn't paid their license fees) that investigator can tell you every single song you played -- including the bumper music you play in between -- and that investigative report is not hidden, privileged information or guarded in any way. It's made available as part of their "evidence." Right down to a copy of the receipt for drinks and food and a physical description of you and the system you use. It's all out in the open.

When SC supposedly sends an investigator, it's a big, "james bond secret" even afterward. What a crock.

Yeah, there no difference right?

Face it Chris, your heroes aren't the government but they'd like you to believe they should be.


I understand the difference just fine. I was also speaking in general terms and not specifically toward SC.

I don't understand the resistance to being certified to be able to work. Plenty of other fields of work absolutely require it.

-Chris

Because these are private businesses. Some of us don't want VENDOR intervention in our business. We provide a service of playing music. It's not like we have massive safety concerns like construction companies. It's not like we have health concerns like food service and healthcare. We play music. You are putting WAY too much importance into what we do. We play music for drunk people to sing. Certification may be useful if it were a centralized agency that took care of certification. But being certified by one or two mfrs isn't even fair business practice. Asking people to get certified by Sound Choice at a criteria for getting work is ridiculous, and gives advantage ONLY to Sound Choice, since we don't know what is ahead for CB, and no other company cares about certification. I think it's time you wake up and truly look around. Sound Choice is just looking out for their own interests with these certifications. And you people are falling for it.

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Fri May 04, 2012 10:29 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm
Posts: 4433
Location: New York City
Been Liked: 757 times
timberlea wrote:
Just ask your local BBB or police how many scam artists and fly by night operators are out there offering renovations, clothing, and just about anything else under the sun. BTW if you go to Times Square you can find individuals selling Rolex watches for $10-20.


That's Ronex watches.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Sat May 05, 2012 6:34 am 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Jun 06, 2010 10:39 am
Posts: 884
Location: Tx
Been Liked: 17 times
cueball wrote:
timberlea wrote:
Just ask your local BBB or police how many scam artists and fly by night operators are out there offering renovations, clothing, and just about anything else under the sun. BTW if you go to Times Square you can find individuals selling Rolex watches for $10-20.


That's Ronex watches.


Mine said Ro1ex

_________________
My statements, opinions and conclusions are based on my own personal experiences, observations, research and/or just my own $.02. I'm not a "cheerleader", but that doesn't make me a Pirate.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Sun May 06, 2012 1:38 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
Bazza wrote:
c. staley wrote:
The difference is of course, that earthling has showed you a prime example of it in the quote from Chris Avis. Your statement above is nothing more than your game.


It's all a game. That WAS the point.



Don't mean to scare you, Bazza, but you and I agree here 100%. It IS and HAS BEEN a game all along. All about how one plays it.

Thank you for the post.

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2012 12:51 pm 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:34 am
Posts: 193
Images: 1
Location: Austin, TX
Been Liked: 24 times
The last thing anyone in business in this country needs is more oversight and regulation. The US government is doing far more for me than I can afford now. We sure as hell don't need to be reporting to a private company on top of it. Wanna audit me? Pay me for my time. You aint the government.


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2012 12:56 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am
Posts: 3011
Been Liked: 1003 times
TommyA wrote:
The last thing anyone in business in this country needs is more oversight and regulation. The US government is doing far more for me than I can afford now. We sure as hell don't need to be reporting to a private company on top of it. Wanna audit me? Pay me for my time. You aint the government.


There is a really simple solution to that problem.

If you don't want to be audited, don't media-shift your SC content.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2012 1:01 pm 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jun 07, 2011 5:34 am
Posts: 193
Images: 1
Location: Austin, TX
Been Liked: 24 times
Nah. I'll just wait for a threatening letter.


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
 Post subject: Re: SC audits question
PostPosted: Mon May 07, 2012 1:03 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
HarringtonLaw wrote:
TommyA wrote:
The last thing anyone in business in this country needs is more oversight and regulation. The US government is doing far more for me than I can afford now. We sure as hell don't need to be reporting to a private company on top of it. Wanna audit me? Pay me for my time. You aint the government.


There is a really simple solution to that problem.

If you don't want to be audited, don't media-shift your SC content.

There is a better idea. Cut the auditing crap and just allow shifting like everyone else.

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 183 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 10  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 162 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech