Karaoke Forums

No Chip not a "childish bullying tactic"....just way too much info to post here and I have grown weary of having the info I post twisted by some here. There are many legal sites and it is my opinion that everybody should educate themselves

_________________
"Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain."
Unknown
"if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters."
Lee McGuffey

Here we go again...... like you're some kind of victim.... right... sure, whatever you say.

Giddyup!

another good try Chip....MAO

_________________
"Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain."
Unknown
"if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters."
Lee McGuffey

I feel like I've stepped into an alternative universe where you hadn't spent the last three years playing the victim.

To quote from one of last night's speeches, it takes some brass to attack a guy for doing what you did.

HaHaHa...I wish I could find an alternative universe where you would have a clue. I have been far from playing victim and anyone reading the posts here is smart enough to see where the victim mentality comes from "Mr I want approval to convert my discs without an audit or I pay me every penny I spent"

_________________
"Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain."
Unknown
"if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters."
Lee McGuffey

You mean like suing people for infringement for the same product(s) that you've been sued for infringement on?

Boy, I'll say!

(kinda stepped in that one didn't 'ya?)

Here's a good example of lying--and I will use that term, because you know better, and you've done it anyway.

SC doesn't sue anyone for copyright infringement.

SC has never been sued for trademark infringement.

So it's not the same.

If you used the modifiers, your statement wouldn't make any sense. So you omit the modifiers to try to make a point dishonestly that you couldn't make honestly.

I don't know what to call that other than a lie.

After reading your post i have found that your post is really amazing interesting and informative also keep posting that kind of posts.

Watching armchair lawyers attempt to go head to head with the real deal is always highly amusing to me.

[quote]
Watching armchair lawyers attempt to go head to head with the real deal is always highly amusing to me.

now look whos child like
was your comment above really necessary

watching armchair cheerleaders makes me sad

The only difference between an intelligent mans argument and a lawyers arguments is jargon and semantics. The intelligent mans interpretation may fall short only because of lack of the use of legal jargon to describe his/hers argument. That is what I see here.

A lawyer likes to point out that lack (of the proper term) out quickly, so as to seem more correct in his (the lawyer's) approach to winning the argument. It is a sad world when only the lawyer's words (jargon) is considered legal.

Or maybe from some other childish bully?

Your "modifiers" were not omitted.
They were added by you!
Using veiled dishonest tactics in an effort to mislead and fool others, I do know what to call that.

_________________
KNOW THYSELF

If your aunt had cajones, she'd be your uncle right? But she doesn't. (and Timberlea accuses me of "twisting facts?")

Let me explain this to you in a little more detail since you either seem to be confused, or simply want to create confusion which is more likely the case;


When a karaoke host is sued by a karaoke manufacturer for "trademark infringement" it means that the karaoke host is using an "unlicensed" reproduction of the manufacturer's trademark. Isn't that correct? Isn't that also what you call "piracy?" or are you softening that by simply using the phrase "technical infringer?"

When a karaoke manufacturer is sued by a publisher for "copyright infringement" it means that the karaoke manufacturer produced a product that was not "licensed" by them to produce in the first place. You can add to that the charge of "willful infringement" when you look at the credit screen of a product which was produced without license, and it happens to have something similar to the following tagline; "used by permission" when in fact, no permission was ever granted. Now that tagline is not only a lie, but because it is not only unauthorized and "unlicensed," I believe that also fits nicely under the same definition of "piracy" that you so often remind karaoke host of. Or would you prefer to use the term "technical infringer?"


Sure you do, but that does nothing to support your argument – or lack thereof.



I would call that a Kool-Aid dispenser.

This thread is a perfect example of why I have gone from checking these forums a couple of times a day to maybe a couple of times a week.

-Chris

_________________
-Chris

Then perhaps you should refrain from reading these threads only and stick to the ones that you like and make you happy. No one here is stopping you from reading those, only you are.

How many? If the reasoning is correct, and since SC has defaulted several times as well- against defendants that show- what would be the conclusion in regard to SC? In other words, does the reasoning go both ways?

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."

I dunno. I'm thinking that the timing of said defunctitude ( yup, my word and I'm keeping it ) probably had a lot to do with that CAVS suit. ...

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."

Chip posted PROOF that his statements in regard to Big Mama, Tennessee Productions, Chartbuster, etc.. were correct, and that yours weren't. The little piece on the end was the only thing to which you replied?

I know the question sounds hostile Jim, but I swear it is not meant that way- I'm just surprised and completely taken aback. Call it shock if you want, but don't you want to reply to the rest???!!!!!

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."

Chip, you really have to stop confusing the issues by posting PROOF.

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."