KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - do i owe chartbuster money? Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


premium-member

Offsite Links


It is currently Tue Jan 14, 2025 3:52 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours





Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Sep 06, 2012 7:46 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
kjathena wrote:

Any publisher will know exactly how many times the song they licence (for rental) is played....


For the Karaoke Cloud Pro service, I don't see how they can track plays unless 1) They force the use of a proprietary player or 2) Require that existing players link to some sort of API in their cloud service. Neither of which is a viable option in my opinion.

I still do not believe that Karaoke Cloud Pro will ever get traction based on the information that we have so far from them.

To the OP - Pay the bill. Do the right thing, and feel good that you have done your part.

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 11:01 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
darbykplace wrote:
SC and I settled recently in Ohio. My case has no confidentiality agreement and I did receive authorization for public performance as well as a covenant not to sue in the future.

K J



A clarification, please.

Reading the following from your post:

"As I just settled a karaoke lawsuit based on not having permission for public performance for my legally owned cdgs"

This gives me the impression that SC sued you for running a disc based show, not a PC based show. Is that correct?

Also, they did so for public performance, not Trademark Infringement? Is that correct?

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 11:22 am 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:35 am
Posts: 752
Images: 1
Been Liked: 73 times
JoeChartreuse wrote:
darbykplace wrote:
SC and I settled recently in Ohio. My case has no confidentiality agreement and I did receive authorization for public performance as well as a covenant not to sue in the future.

K J



A clarification, please.

Reading the following from your post:

"As I just settled a karaoke lawsuit based on not having permission for public performance for my legally owned cdgs"

This gives me the impression that SC sued you for running a disc based show, not a PC based show. Is that correct?

Also, they did so for public performance, not Trademark Infringement? Is that correct?


There are NO suits filed in Federal court by SC in regards to "public performance"...


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sat Sep 08, 2012 11:37 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm
Posts: 4433
Location: New York City
Been Liked: 757 times
I am repeating my post again, for Darbykplace to respond.


c. staley wrote:
So let's see:

...
#2. He got sued - whether or not they were "mediashifted" was not specified...

#3. He's really caused them NO damage at all if he owns the discs and mediashifted.
#4. His "penalty" for purchasing their product and using it on (apparently) a computer was a lawsuit and a settlement...



darbykplace wrote:
SC and I settled recently in Ohio. My case has no confidentiality agreement and...

Since Darbykplace has stated that he is not under any type of gag ruling, and he can freely discuss his case, I'd like to see him post the details as to what took place, what was the settlement, and how much did this settlement cost him.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Mon Sep 10, 2012 11:21 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
doowhatchulike wrote:
JoeChartreuse wrote:
darbykplace wrote:
SC and I settled recently in Ohio. My case has no confidentiality agreement and I did receive authorization for public performance as well as a covenant not to sue in the future.

K J



A clarification, please.

Reading the following from your post:

"As I just settled a karaoke lawsuit based on not having permission for public performance for my legally owned cdgs"

This gives me the impression that SC sued you for running a disc based show, not a PC based show. Is that correct?

Also, they did so for public performance, not Trademark Infringement? Is that correct?


There are NO suits filed in Federal court by SC in regards to "public performance"...



OK, but still wondering if a disc-based host was sued, and on what grounds....

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Sep 11, 2012 1:07 am 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
I'm thinking it was a matter of they owned their discs but ran off computer, didn't certify and got hit.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Sep 12, 2012 12:34 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
Lonman wrote:
I'm thinking it was a matter of they owned their discs but ran off computer, didn't certify and got hit.



Could be, but reading "... for public performance for my legally owned cdgs"
doesn't give me that impression....

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 1:17 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm
Posts: 4433
Location: New York City
Been Liked: 757 times
Lonman wrote:
I'm thinking it was a matter of they owned their discs but ran off computer, didn't certify and got hit.


JoeChartreuse wrote:
Could be, but reading "... for public performance for my legally owned cdgs"
doesn't give me that impression....


And rather than continuing to battle it out amongst ourselves over wordplay, I'm still waiting to see if Darbykplace is going to respond to my question about what happened.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 68 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 636 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech