|
|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
| Author |
Message |
|
JoeChartreuse
|
 Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:32 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
|
I'll wait for 3 things: 1) .WAV format 2) WAAAAAY lower pricing 3) Confirmed licensing Til then I remain Luddite  
_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
| Top |
|
 |
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:38 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
|
Bazza wrote: simpmech wrote: They are also working on a drive similar to the chartbuster drive (potentially out in 6-8 mths). NOW your talking! I would be all over this if it gives me ala-carte "KJPro" type delivery of SC songs not already on the GEM set. This would be the only way i'd get on board. Don't need the cloud - if becomes the absolute only way to get new music for the show, then I might have to reconsider, but at this time absolutely not. .wav doesn't matter as long as they are ripped in 320, over a good system/sound card, you wouldn't be able to tell the difference anyway. I have been running my laptop with Alpha along side with my discs - no audible difference when comparing the same songs, same levels, same eq settings - and that was with a 192 kma/wma file. _________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 3:48 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
|
Lonman wrote: .wav doesn't matter as long as they are ripped in 320, over a good system/sound card, you wouldn't be able to tell the difference anyway. I have been running my laptop with Alpha along side with my discs - no audible difference when comparing the same songs, same levels, same eq settings - and that was with a 192 kma/wma file. To avoid another round of slop, how about we agree that a host should feel free to run their business the way they see fit, and let it go at that....
_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Micky
|
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 5:57 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jun 10, 2004 6:13 pm
Posts: 1625
Location: Montreal, Canada
Been Liked: 34 times
|
JoeChartreuse wrote: Lonman wrote: .wav doesn't matter as long as they are ripped in 320, over a good system/sound card, you wouldn't be able to tell the difference anyway. I have been running my laptop with Alpha along side with my discs - no audible difference when comparing the same songs, same levels, same eq settings - and that was with a 192 kma/wma file. To avoid another round of slop, how about we agree that a host should feel free to run their business the way they see fit, and let it go at that.... Agree... but keep in mind that an mp3 file can be converted to wave Personally, I can clearly hear the difference between a wma file at 192k versus a wave file, and I'm surprised Lonman can't hear it 
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 6:21 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
|
Micky wrote: JoeChartreuse wrote: Lonman wrote: .wav doesn't matter as long as they are ripped in 320, over a good system/sound card, you wouldn't be able to tell the difference anyway. I have been running my laptop with Alpha along side with my discs - no audible difference when comparing the same songs, same levels, same eq settings - and that was with a 192 kma/wma file. To avoid another round of slop, how about we agree that a host should feel free to run their business the way they see fit, and let it go at that.... Agree... but keep in mind that an mp3 file can be converted to wave Personally, I can clearly hear the difference between a wma file at 192k versus a wave file, and I'm surprised Lonman can't hear it The difference is so minute that I would challenge anyone to tell over a good PA system in a noisy bar. _________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
KaraokeIan
|
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 8:17 pm |
|
 |
| Advanced Poster |
 |
Joined: Sun Nov 20, 2011 3:04 pm
Posts: 486
Been Liked: 99 times
|
Lonman wrote: Micky wrote: JoeChartreuse wrote: Lonman wrote: .wav doesn't matter as long as they are ripped in 320, over a good system/sound card, you wouldn't be able to tell the difference anyway. I have been running my laptop with Alpha along side with my discs - no audible difference when comparing the same songs, same levels, same eq settings - and that was with a 192 kma/wma file. To avoid another round of slop, how about we agree that a host should feel free to run their business the way they see fit, and let it go at that.... Agree... but keep in mind that an mp3 file can be converted to wave Personally, I can clearly hear the difference between a wma file at 192k versus a wave file, and I'm surprised Lonman can't hear it The difference is so minute that I would challenge anyone to tell over a good PA system in a noisy bar. Agree, plus not to mention that a WAV file can take up to 12 times the hard drive space. It's why the MP3 was invented.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Thu Sep 13, 2012 11:19 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
|
Micky wrote: [ Agree... but keep in mind that an mp3 file can be converted to wave Not exactly. Yes, one can convert an MP3 to .WAV, but one cannot replace the information lost in the original MP3 conversion. Changing to .WAV doesn't put it back. .WAVs are only "lossless" files if the conversion is made to them in the first place. That being said, it's all about personal choice. Let it lay.....
_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Bazza
|
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 6:14 am |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am
Posts: 3312
Images: 0
Been Liked: 610 times
|
JoeChartreuse wrote: ...one cannot replace the information lost in the original MP3 conversion. Changing to .WAV doesn't put it back. .WAVs are only "lossless" files if the conversion is made to them in the first place. Correct...and a clarification. You can't hear the "lost pieces" as they are obfuscated by other frequencies. Google "Psychoacoustics". Simply because it is a "lossy" format, does not mean anyone can actually hear the loss so whether they are there or not is moot.
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 12:47 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
|
Lonman wrote: Micky wrote: JoeChartreuse wrote: Lonman wrote: .wav doesn't matter as long as they are ripped in 320, over a good system/sound card, you wouldn't be able to tell the difference anyway. I have been running my laptop with Alpha along side with my discs - no audible difference when comparing the same songs, same levels, same eq settings - and that was with a 192 kma/wma file. To avoid another round of slop, how about we agree that a host should feel free to run their business the way they see fit, and let it go at that.... Agree... but keep in mind that an mp3 file can be converted to wave Personally, I can clearly hear the difference between a wma file at 192k versus a wave file, and I'm surprised Lonman can't hear it The difference is so minute that I would challenge anyone to tell over a good PA system in a noisy bar. I should point out that most of my venues are upscale restaurant lounges, and that I usually work at a lower volume than in these more quiet places....Just an observation. Why continue a discussion that always ends with subjective points of view remaining unchanged? To each host his/her own....
_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:24 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
|
|
It was brought up - by you with the wav statement!
And even in a quiet restaurant setting, over a good PA at LOWER volumes the difference is even going to be less. PA speakers are not exactly the best for accurate reproduction like a studio monitor or audiophile speaker.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 1:25 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
|
doowhatchulike wrote: Since I was not in on the sound format discussion, maybe I can be the one to get the last word in, since I don't care about such trivial things...  It's just one of those things, kind of like certain words. _________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
johnny reverb
|
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:11 pm |
|
|
| Extreme Poster |
 |
Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:05 pm
Posts: 3376
Been Liked: 172 times
|
JoeChartreuse wrote: [ To avoid another round of slop, how about we agree that a host should feel free to run their business the way they see fit, and let it go at that.... [/quote] And what fun would that be.....are you trying to shut down the forum?...  last word, so far
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Smoothedge69
|
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 2:18 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
|
|
In wav format the cloud would have to be a Cumulonimbus cloud. It certainly couldn't be a nice fluffy cumulus cloud.
_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 3:05 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
|
Smoothedge69 wrote: In wav format the cloud would have to be a Cumulonimbus cloud. It certainly couldn't be a nice fluffy cumulus cloud. That's a fact. Be one of towering thunder clouds. _________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 3:47 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm
Posts: 4433
Location: New York City
Been Liked: 757 times
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 4:52 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm
Posts: 5107
Location: Phoenix Az
Been Liked: 1279 times
|
mine 
_________________
Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 5:14 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm
Posts: 4433
Location: New York City
Been Liked: 757 times
|
cueball wrote: Paradigm Karaoke wrote: Whose turn is it for the last word? mine  ... OOPS
|
|
| Top |
|
|
|
earthling12357
|
Posted: Fri Sep 14, 2012 9:29 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Jan 08, 2011 11:21 pm
Posts: 1609
Location: Earth
Been Liked: 307 times
|
|
zyz·zy·va [ziz-uh-vuh]
noun
Any of various South American weevils of the genus Zyzzyva, often destructive to plants.
_________________
KNOW THYSELF
|
|
| Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 636 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|
Login
Register
FAQ
Search
