Karaoke Forums

So Joe, you harp about SC investigations and go on about errors as if the investigators have to be perfect. As in all walks of life there are good ones and a few terrible ones. In fact I can easily say there are "investigational errors" in every law enforcement agency. How can I say that? Because I doubt there is one agency with a perfect conviction rate. So why are you putting SC investigators to a higher standard than the FBI, DEA, LAPD, NYPD, or in my country the RCMP? They have all made investigational errors.

_________________
You can be strange but not a stranger

They are NOT "law enforcement" Timberlea.... and therefore, yes - they SHOULD be held to a "higher standard."

They're not trying to rescue hostages,
They're not saving a shopkeeper from robbers,
They're not protecting the public from rogue Moose,
They're not doing ANYTHING that would "endanger" anyone and,
They HAVE ALL THE TIME IN THE WORLD TO "GET IT RIGHT."

Instead of making excuses for them, why shouldn't they be held to a higher standard?

I DO think you AND SC are acting in an unethical way. You go after everyone, regardless of situation, and, in essence, sue your paying customers. You charge for audits that very few even want, or need, AFTER people have paid for their discs. That is unethical. Your client has talked about revenue through enforcement. So, instead of making a product and selling it, like other businesses, your client would rather bully people and sue them and force them into paying fees for audits. It is not only unethical but it is shameful. You don't treat customers like that.

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE

because the FBI, DEA, LAPD, NYPD
are not going after you for what you have paid for in the past
they are not looking for the gray area to sue you