|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
mightywiz
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 6:49 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 07, 2011 12:35 pm Posts: 1351 Images: 1 Location: Idaho Been Liked: 180 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: Smoothedge69 wrote: As for what Harrington said about reporting the local pirates, you can do that, but don't expect much results. Others on here here have done that over and over, and are still waiting for results. I'm not trying to start anything, just telling you the facts, as have been reported by others on this site. I have a new investigator who will be heading up in his direction as soon as he's trained, probably in a couple of months., so why don't you hire karaoke hosts in area's to be your investigators. i would gladly find pirates in my area (central idaho, and southeastern washington state.) and i'm sure other hosts would help your cause also. hell i would even do it for free in my local area, just to get the ball rolling! lewiston idaho
_________________ It's all good!
|
|
Top |
|
|
timberlea
|
Posted: Sat Feb 16, 2013 11:03 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm Posts: 4094 Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada Been Liked: 309 times
|
Because he has to use professional, licenced private investigators. One cannot just conduct investigations willy nilly. Watching shows about police and PIs does not make one an investigator. There are legal ramifications including what can legally be done, along with a thousand other things. Now to cut off the next question, well if he or she is licenced, why do they have to be trained for this endeavour. Simple, because it is a specialty. Do you think police officers are trained in everything at an academy? Even a seasoned investigator who is say in robbery, if transferred to homicide has to be trained in homicide and vice versa an officer going from homicide to vice has to be trained in vice. It's all different.
_________________ You can be strange but not a stranger
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 4:53 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
Not always. Most states allow attorneys to hire unlicensed investigators to work under their direct supervision on litigation matters in which the attorney is or expects to be counsel. We do hire KJs for that purpose sometimes.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Sun Feb 17, 2013 5:27 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: Not always. Most states allow attorneys to hire unlicensed investigators to work under their direct supervision on litigation matters in which the attorney is or expects to be counsel. We do hire KJs for that purpose sometimes. Of course these KJ's your hire for investigative purposes have no conflict of interest, to get rid of the competition do they? I can see a definite conflict of interest here, and the investigating KJ would have to be exceptional not to let his interests subvert justice. I hope if you do use KJ's you don't let them do their work in their own market area. I see just too much of a possible abuse of the legal system in all of this. Have a blessed day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Bazza
|
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:16 am |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
The Lone Ranger wrote: Of course these KJ's your hire for investigative purposes have no conflict of interest, to get rid of the ILLEGAL competition do they? There. I fixed it for you.
|
|
Top |
|
|
RLC
|
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 9:35 am |
|
Joined: Thu Jan 18, 2007 6:30 pm Posts: 1806 Images: 0 Been Liked: 631 times
|
Bazza wrote: The Lone Ranger wrote: Of course these KJ's your hire for investigative purposes have no conflict of interest, to get rid of the ILLEGAL competition do they? There. I fixed it for you. Whoa Bazza, The Lone Ranger does make a valid point! KJs "investigating" their competition does represent a huge conflict of interest. The whole concept of hiring KJs for that purpose seems unethical at the least.
_________________ Music speaks to the heart in ways words cannot express.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 10:48 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
Not to mention if the other host is illegal or not, the reputation a kj would get once people (singers/bars/other kj's) started finding out that you become a known rat. I'll pass on investigating other shows.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 11:52 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
We have appropriate safeguards in place to prevent conflicts of interest from arising.
For example, we never rely on an investigator's word alone when bringing a suit.
I do not view having an operator serve as an investigator in an area as an irresolvable conflict of interest. Operators often have the best working knowledge of an area, of where shows are, where the pirates are operating, and a lot of other facts we try to gather before proceeding with a suit. We spend a lot of time training them to look for what we are looking for and how to document it. They are required to declare that the facts they submit to us are true under penalty of perjury. Often, these operators are among the few non-pirates operating in a given area, which gives them a leg up in the integrity department.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Mon Feb 18, 2013 8:22 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
Lonman wrote: Not to mention if the other host is illegal or not, the reputation a kj would get once people (singers/bars/other kj's) started finding out that you become a known rat. I'll pass on investigating other shows. i am not investigating anyone and the bars thought i was the rat becuase i had the SC Cert in my promo kit. i think you are really dead on here Lon. HarringtonLaw wrote: For example, we never rely on an investigator's word alone when bringing a suit. except when it is Kurt....we all know that case where nothing but Kurt saying "I saw the SC logo on the TV" was given. HarringtonLaw wrote: They are required to declare that the facts they submit to us are true under penalty of perjury. so what happened to the investigators in AZ that "saw" Michael Michael running two different shows at the same time? What happened to the investigator that "saw" a host in Red Onion running a show that they never had? what happened to the investigator that "saw" John Pavkovich move his equipment to a bar that competes with his wife’s bar to run shows? have the "investigators" had any consequences?
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 6:59 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
Paradigm Karaoke wrote: so what happened to the investigators in AZ that "saw" Michael Michael running two different shows at the same time? What happened to the investigator that "saw" a host in Red Onion running a show that they never had? what happened to the investigator that "saw" John Pavkovich move his equipment to a bar that competes with his wife’s bar to run shows?
have the "investigators" had any consequences? The incident to which you refer--all of which was in one case--was the result of a careless error by the filing attorney. The complaint had some errors in it. The underlying investigations did not contain those errors. Of course, the attorneys and those investigators no longer work for SC as it is.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:11 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: Paradigm Karaoke wrote: so what happened to the investigators in AZ that "saw" Michael Michael running two different shows at the same time? What happened to the investigator that "saw" a host in Red Onion running a show that they never had? what happened to the investigator that "saw" John Pavkovich move his equipment to a bar that competes with his wife’s bar to run shows?
have the "investigators" had any consequences? The incident to which you refer--all of which was in one case--was the result of a careless error by the filing attorney. The complaint had some errors in it. The underlying investigations did not contain those errors. Of course, the attorneys and those investigators no longer work for SC as it is. Are those the same attorneys and investigators you are now suing for ripping off SC?
Last edited by The Lone Ranger on Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:35 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 7:23 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: We have appropriate safeguards in place to prevent conflicts of interest from arising.
For example, we never rely on an investigator's word alone when bringing a suit.
I do not view having an operator serve as an investigator in an area as an irresolvable conflict of interest. Operators often have the best working knowledge of an area, of where shows are, where the pirates are operating, and a lot of other facts we try to gather before proceeding with a suit. We spend a lot of time training them to look for what we are looking for and how to document it. They are required to declare that the facts they submit to us are true under penalty of perjury. Often, these operators are among the few non-pirates operating in a given area, which gives them a leg up in the integrity department. You might think you have appropriate safeguards in place, there is an old saying "Love laughs at locksmiths". True your investigators would be going after the bad guys, however, it would be up to them to determine initially who is suspect. Even that determination carries with it a lot of power, and should not be taken lightly. According to you James what you are looking for is the logo displayed and the operator using a PC. If the operator happens to not be on your little certified lists, he is at least guilty of infringement without permission. A big bozo no no. Then the host or venue has to pay for an audit, or settle with you, or risk a trial. Then you wonder why many hosts and venues have dropped your product. To me it makes perfect business sense to do so, since there is tons of product out here, that doesn't carry the stigma of a legal process. One that to me potentially has the look of being a conflict of interest, on the part of local hosts. Have a blessed day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
kenpat
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 8:01 am |
|
|
Senior Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2004 5:32 am Posts: 120 Location: East texas Been Liked: 0 time
|
Lonman wrote: Start asking for the songs your singers want and buy them as you need them. I have a clipboard that singers will write down their requests & order custom discs a few times a month from selectatrack.com & allstarcustom.com Works out well, You don't need to compete with a large library if you get what your singers want. I only have a meeger 14,000 non dup'd library in comparison to some of the pirate shows around here. I have just now retired, I have the legal hard drive for you. it has approx 15,000 songs ( some are dupes) complete with discs, most all major labels..$5000.00 free shipping..
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 10:21 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
The Lone Ranger wrote: Are those the same attorneys and investigators you are now suing for ripping off SC? Same investigator. Different attorneys, but they weren't fired. They quit. The only problems we've had with investigators have been with PIs. The people who work in karaoke do a far better job for less money.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 11:34 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: The Lone Ranger wrote: Are those the same attorneys and investigators you are now suing for ripping off SC? Same investigator. Different attorneys, but they weren't fired. They quit. The only problems we've had with investigators have been with PIs. The people who work in karaoke do a far better job for less money. Oh yes I forgot your first duty is to save your client money, isn't it?
|
|
Top |
|
|
timberlea
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:13 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm Posts: 4094 Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada Been Liked: 309 times
|
And of course trying to save your client some money is such a big crime. The well seems pretty dry when you try to pull this type of garbage out.
_________________ You can be strange but not a stranger
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:17 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
The Lone Ranger wrote: Oh yes I forgot your first duty is to save your client money, isn't it? It isn't, but even if it were, so what? My first duty is to the integrity of the legal process, not to my client.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Tue Feb 19, 2013 2:54 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
kenpat wrote: Lonman wrote: Start asking for the songs your singers want and buy them as you need them. I have a clipboard that singers will write down their requests & order custom discs a few times a month from selectatrack.com & allstarcustom.com Works out well, You don't need to compete with a large library if you get what your singers want. I only have a meeger 14,000 non dup'd library in comparison to some of the pirate shows around here. I have just now retired, I have the legal hard drive for you. it has approx 15,000 songs ( some are dupes) complete with discs, most all major labels..$5000.00 free shipping.. Nothing i'm interested in.
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
ktim48
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:37 pm |
|
|
Novice Poster |
|
Joined: Mon Feb 11, 2013 5:36 pm Posts: 10 Been Liked: 0 time
|
Went to another local show this last weekend. KJ claimed he had 300,000 songs. I sang a couple and got his number and asked him how a person goes about getting that many songs. He told me for a $1,000.00 he would hook me up. I of course passed but I don't see a future in this any longer for me. With the rural areas I live in it's all about quanity. I understand I need to educate and talk to bar owners but it's just not worth it anymore. These pirates are doing it so cheap I can't compete. It was a fun ride while it lasted.....
|
|
Top |
|
|
Bazza
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:46 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
ktim48 wrote: Went to another local show this last weekend. KJ claimed he had 300,000 songs. I sang a couple and got his number and asked him how a person goes about getting that many songs. He told me for a $1,000.00 he would hook me up. I of course passed but I don't see a future in this any longer for me. With the rural areas I live in it's all about quanity. I understand I need to educate and talk to bar owners but it's just not worth it anymore. These pirates are doing it so cheap I can't compete. It was a fun ride while it lasted..... Just tell everyone you have 300,001 songs. Trust me. Nobody is counting. Really.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|