KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - 1200 New GEM Series Songs Coming Out In MARCH??? Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Legalities & Piracy, etc... Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


premium-member

Offsite Links


It is currently Fri Jan 10, 2025 6:28 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 101 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 3:20 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
cueball wrote:
As for the situation regarding a need to replace discs due to damage, well, I don't need to worry about that anymore. With the exception of about 6 discs in my entire library that I can't make a back-up copy of (CDVs or VCDs), I finished burning a copy of each of my discs (about 1 year ago) to have for just that sort of thing. And, with any new discs or downloads which I purchase, I immediately make a back-up copy of it (to keep in storage with my other back-up copies). If my original becomes damaged to the point of being unplayable, I will just make another copy from my good back-up copy, and use one of those copies I burned in its place. I would then keep the original and the new back-up copy in storage with my other back-up copies.


Why in the world would you burn copies of discs and then use the originals? The originals are exactly that.....original. The backups can be reproduced over and over but once the original is "broken" then there is no original left.

There is also the question of whether or not a backup is even valid if the original becomes unusable. This is something that was touched on in another thread recently as well. I personally believe that in the case of original discs, all copies of it become invalid if the original is lost, stolen, or otherwise is rendered unusable. I think a manufacturer could make a pretty good case in court for this as well.

For those that wish to disagree, consider this.

1000 Original Discs and 1000 Identical Copies. The Originals get stolen. You may have receipts showing you bought the Originals. But you don't actually possess them. The backups themselves have little to no value on the resale market and can't be used by anyone at all without them also having the matching Original Discs.

1000 Original Discs and 1000 Identical Copies. The Copies get stolen. Simply reproduce new Copies. No one can ever question you under any circumstances about the validity of the copies because you possess the originals.

Another scenario....

Should I be using my originals discs and instead be putting my hard drive where all my MP3+G's are in storage? Would I be allowed to continue using my MP3+G's if my original discs were stolen? They are in fact Backups of the Original Discs and I also have all my receipts. Functionally it is no different.

With all due respect Cue, using the originals and storing the copies is just plain silly. You should be using the copies and storing the originals to truly safeguard your investment.

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:05 am 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:41 am
Posts: 652
Images: 0
Been Liked: 48 times
chrisavis wrote:
cueball wrote:
As for the situation regarding a need to replace discs due to damage, well, I don't need to worry about that anymore. With the exception of about 6 discs in my entire library that I can't make a back-up copy of (CDVs or VCDs), I finished burning a copy of each of my discs (about 1 year ago) to have for just that sort of thing. And, with any new discs or downloads which I purchase, I immediately make a back-up copy of it (to keep in storage with my other back-up copies). If my original becomes damaged to the point of being unplayable, I will just make another copy from my good back-up copy, and use one of those copies I burned in its place. I would then keep the original and the new back-up copy in storage with my other back-up copies.


Why in the world would you burn copies of discs and then use the originals? The originals are exactly that.....original. The backups can be reproduced over and over but once the original is "broken" then there is no original left.

There is also the question of whether or not a backup is even valid if the original becomes unusable. So, if your set of your Gem Series Discs got damaged and deemed unusable, would you have to pull them from your hard drive? Not the same as LOST or STOLEN because that would not qualify.... you would still be in possession of the original manufacturer's discs, even if they were in pieces. Over the last several years, certain manufacturers didn't care what condition the original was in, as long as you had the original/s to match the drive. This is something that was touched on in another thread recently as well. I personally believe that in the case of original discs, all copies of it become invalid if the original is lost, stolen, or otherwise is rendered unusable. I think a manufacturer could make a pretty good case in court for this as well.

For those that wish to disagree, consider this.

1000 Original Discs and 1000 Identical Copies. The Originals get stolen. You may have receipts showing you bought the Originals. But you don't actually possess them. The backups themselves have little to no value on the resale market and can't be used by anyone at all without them also having the matching Original Discs.

1000 Original Discs and 1000 Identical Copies. The Copies get stolen. Simply reproduce new Copies. No one can ever question you under any circumstances about the validity of the copies because you possess the originals.

Another scenario....

Should I be using my originals discs and instead be putting my hard drive where all my MP3+G's are in storage? Would I be allowed to continue using my MP3+G's if my original discs were stolen? They are in fact Backups of the Original Discs and I also have all my receipts. Functionally it is no different.

With all due respect Cue, using the originals and storing the copies is just plain silly. You should be using the copies and storing the originals to truly safeguard your investment. IMHO, what you're saying here to Cue makes perfect sense but it exposes him just like a hard drive host, playing from back-ups.

-Chris


...From what I gather, Cue is doing his best, as an ODB Host, to abide by the laws by playing off his originals. But he's also aware that some discs in his collection are out of print or the Manufacturer is gone. Plus he's allowed to make backups but knows of the exposure to the law if he plays off of the back-ups instead of the originals, just as Joe C has mentioned. I suppose if one of his originals became unusable but still in his possession, he could play off of the copy and have the original "on site" with him as proof... still iffy at best according to the law. For a SC Disc/s, the only other options are to purchase the Gem Series. Spend thousands of dollars to replace a few songs, order custom discs or delete the damaged one/s? Of course some of the Manufacturers used to have a low cost replacement program but most of them are gone now.

...As far as the computer based DJ/KJ, according to RIAA, if you purchase any downloads from legit sites, yes you need receipts for proof of purchase. And just like Karaoke, if you're going to be playing digital files off of your ripped "original" music cds, you still need to keep the originals as proof.

...What stinks for the ODB Hosts (no matter how few of them are actually out there), that have purchased legit SC Discs before the Gem Series was offered, is they have no way to purchase new SC Music, if they chose, because no Certification Program has been put in place for them although it was suppose to have happened SEVERAL MONTHS ago. It's not like there's no machines offered for them on the market to play MP3+G music because there is. Regardless of their reason/s for not moving to Computer Based Hosting, it's their choice.

...Here's a scenario for you as a multi-rigger: Let's say that one of your hosts decides he/she wants to copy one of the Gem Series sets off of one of your hard drives without your knowledge and decides to start sharing or selling them. They get busted and now who's responsible? Just asking...


...As for me, all of my Karaoke Music CDGs have been ripped and I play from the digital files except for my SC CDGs, I still play those SC discs on my computer through my Siglos Player. No need for an additional cdg player. So in reality, I would be considered an ODB Host in the eyes of SC and not be eligible for any of their new music.


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:30 am 
Offline
Super Duper Poster
Super Duper Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Sep 04, 2008 4:18 pm
Posts: 2593
Been Liked: 294 times
Purchasing the Gem for thousands is not the only option. One could get certified although that is still in the hundreds plus cost of equipment/hosting program. While I suspect SC won't turn their backs on the disc hosts when the time finally comes, I also think that new music from all of the manufacturers is going to be more and more digital and a disc host will limit themselves just becauase the technology is moving on. And I say this as a disc host.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 11:58 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm
Posts: 4433
Location: New York City
Been Liked: 757 times
leopard lizard wrote:
... I also think that new music from all of the manufacturers is going to be more and more digital and a disc host will limit themselves just because the technology is moving on.

I can understand Manufacturers going digital. After all, I am now purchasing downloads from SBI Karaoke and All Star Karaoke. Granted, I may be ordering in CDG format, but it's still a digital download that was ordered. Plus, I have the option to just do it myself... order a download from them and just burn it to disc myself (and make a label for it). But, the bottom line is, I am making a purchase for THOSE TRACKS/THAT DISC, not just for the permission from the Manufacturer to be licensed to use it at a show (as James stated SC plans to do with their upcoming new releases).


Last edited by Cueball on Sun Feb 24, 2013 7:15 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 11:59 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm
Posts: 4433
Location: New York City
Been Liked: 757 times
chrisavis wrote:
With all due respect Cue, using the originals and storing the copies is just plain silly. You should be using the copies and storing the originals to truly safeguard your investment.


My discs, my choice.

See MadMusicOne's post (3 posts above). He expressed it better for me.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:47 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm
Posts: 5107
Location: Phoenix Az
Been Liked: 1279 times
did i miss the reason why you are not playing your backups instead?

_________________
Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:49 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
chrisavis wrote:

1) Why in the world would you burn copies of discs and then use the originals? The originals are exactly that.....original.

2) The backups can be reproduced over and over but once the original is "broken" then there is no original left.

There is also the question of whether or not a backup is even valid if the original becomes unusable..

-Chris


1) I'll tell you why I do it- simply because the originals look cooler and more professional on the work surface. Since I don't use a facade, but work in front of the work surface for better interaction, this is very important.


2) There is only a "question" in regard to SC's stupidity. Backups are perfectly legal to use in single site situations per the court decisions of the 90's- etched in stone. Anyone who says otherwise, including SC, is lying-period.

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:20 am 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:41 am
Posts: 652
Images: 0
Been Liked: 48 times
JoeChartreuse wrote:
chrisavis wrote:

1) Why in the world would you burn copies of discs and then use the originals? The originals are exactly that.....original.

2) The backups can be reproduced over and over but once the original is "broken" then there is no original left.

There is also the question of whether or not a backup is even valid if the original becomes unusable..

-Chris


1) I'll tell you why I do it- simply because the originals look cooler and more professional on the work surface. Since I don't use a facade, but work in front of the work surface for better interaction, this is very important.


2) There is only a "question" in regard to SC's stupidity. Backups are perfectly legal to use in single site situations per the court decisions of the 90's- etched in stone. Anyone who says otherwise, including SC, is lying-period.


1) My apologies for mentioning your name a few posts up. I just thought the main reasons that you played from originals cdgs was because of A) Sound Quality, B) Keeping the Karaoke Manufacturers off of your back and C) To keep from exposing yourself from the Original Copyright Holders of the Music (in the event a Karaoke Manufacturer didn't get the proper permission/license from the Copyright Holder to remake the original music as a Karaoke Version and or just to show you're playing from the Original Karaoke CDG). Guess I was wrong, my bad. Was just going on some of your previous postings that I've read or thought I had read.

2) Not trying to stir the pot but am curious. Could you possible supply any links for legal use of copyrighted back-ups in a commercial setting? Everything I've ever read states it's illegal to use back-ups. With the exception of some past postings of KJs saying that SC gave them permission at one time or another, back in the late 90's or early 2000's to use back-ups (such as CD-Rs) in a commercial setting as long as they kept the originals in their possession.


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 8:49 am 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:41 am
Posts: 652
Images: 0
Been Liked: 48 times
leopard lizard wrote:
Purchasing the Gem for thousands is not the only option. One could get certified although that is still in the hundreds plus cost of equipment/hosting program. While I suspect SC won't turn their backs on the disc hosts when the time finally comes, I also think that new music from all of the manufacturers is going to be more and more digital and a disc host will limit themselves just becauase the technology is moving on. And I say this as a disc host.


...I agree with you that it's not the only option (The SC Gem Series). But was just thinking of the ODB Hosts using CDGs only and SC not offering a Certification Program for them which would limit the ODB Hosts from purchasing any new SC Music. As crazy as this sounds, would SC let them rip their SC Discs to a Hard Drive, pay the $150.00 fee for the audit, pass the audit for certification purposes, which would allow them to purchase new SC Music on MP3+G Discs and still play all of their original discs (SC Discs both CDG & new MP3+G Discs) off of a physical player (not computer)?

...Yes, it sounds crazy, why would an ODB KJ go to the trouble of ripping CDGs to a hard drive to pass an audit and not play from a computer? Well because SC doesn't offer a certification program for ODB Hosts (which also lists Certified Hosts on their SC Site and they feel left out), some hosts don't like running their shows from computers, some don't like the sound quality of ripped files and some believe they are breaking the law by playing from anything other than the original.... just posting some thoughts here, nothing more.


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:45 am 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 3:35 am
Posts: 1945
Been Liked: 427 times
JoeChartreuse wrote:

So, if I read this correctly, SC is hoping that KJs will spend thousands on a library of GEM discs filled with music that they already have in order to buy a few new SC tracks- assuming these are ever produced?

Not sure that depending on an unintelligent ( I would use another word, but don't want to be harsh) customer base is the key to successful sales, but good luck with that.....It does seem to fit with other schemes that SC has come up with.....


SC is the only game in town producing new, quality stuff so those who don't re-buy, yet again will really be missing out! oh, wait...

They can have all their new material. I wouldn't buy it if they WERE the only game in town. Let me rephrase, you couldn't GIVE it to me for free if they were the only game in town.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 9:46 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am
Posts: 3011
Been Liked: 1003 times
MadMusicOne wrote:
leopard lizard wrote:
Purchasing the Gem for thousands is not the only option. One could get certified although that is still in the hundreds plus cost of equipment/hosting program. While I suspect SC won't turn their backs on the disc hosts when the time finally comes, I also think that new music from all of the manufacturers is going to be more and more digital and a disc host will limit themselves just becauase the technology is moving on. And I say this as a disc host.


...I agree with you that it's not the only option (The SC Gem Series). But was just thinking of the ODB Hosts using CDGs only and SC not offering a Certification Program for them which would limit the ODB Hosts from purchasing any new SC Music. As crazy as this sounds, would SC let them rip their SC Discs to a Hard Drive, pay the $150.00 fee for the audit, pass the audit for certification purposes, which would allow them to purchase new SC Music on MP3+G Discs and still play all of their original discs (SC Discs both CDG & new MP3+G Discs) off of a physical player (not computer)?

...Yes, it sounds crazy, why would an ODB KJ go to the trouble of ripping CDGs to a hard drive to pass an audit and not play from a computer? Well because SC doesn't offer a certification program for ODB Hosts (which also lists Certified Hosts on their SC Site and they feel left out), some hosts don't like running their shows from computers, some don't like the sound quality of ripped files and some believe they are breaking the law by playing from anything other than the original.... just posting some thoughts here, nothing more.


As I have stated several times, including recently, SC does offer certification to ODB KJs. In fact, we have one large ODB operator in Arizona who is certified. Certification of an ODB KJ requires that we inspect the KJ's disc holdings and equipment to make certain (a) that there are no non-original discs in use and (b) that the KJ has the necessary equipment to play an ODB show, among other steps. There is a cost associated with that.

What we were trying to implement was a technological solution that would allow that inspection to be done virtually, so that a free certification could be offered to ODB hosts. We ran into some technical problems that we could not easily surmount, so we were unable to proceed any further.

I am certain that once the new material becomes available we will be able to work out a solution that allows that product to be acquired by ODB hosts, but I cannot guarantee that it will be available to ODB hosts immediately.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 10:04 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am
Posts: 3011
Been Liked: 1003 times
JoeChartreuse wrote:
The point is, they are seriously hoping that non-users will invest thousands in a GEM set of songs they probably already have ( maybe even on SC CD+Gs) just to be able to get whatever new music SC might produce in the future. In other words, invest thousands, then sit and wait patiently in hopes of an actual quantity of new production in the future. I can't imagine a sillier way to run a business, and I don't think I will be in the minority. Not a great sales plan.


If that were the only target market, then you might have a point. As usual, you focus on one aspect of it that you deem to be stupid, and ignore the major part that isn't stupid.

For operators who have SC material on CD+Gs, restriction of new material to certified operators will encourage those operators to get certified, if they are otherwise 1:1, or to get 1:1 and certified, if they are not. That has benefits to SC beyond sales.

For operators who have illicitly used SC material, the availability of material that they cannot steal, plus attractive financing options for legit material, plus the opportunity to get legal at the lowest cost (i.e., before being sued) may prompt them to get legal.


JoeChartreuse wrote:
On the other hand, assuming that the majority of GEM users have them due to "settlements" ( and I do assume that), I guess they have to try something.....


To the contrary, the majority of GEM users purchased their licenses in a non-lawsuit-related transaction. You "assume" that to be true because you want it to be true, not because you have any actual information. To put it another way, which is less charitable but more accurate, you made it up.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 12:11 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:41 am
Posts: 652
Images: 0
Been Liked: 48 times
HarringtonLaw wrote:
MadMusicOne wrote:
leopard lizard wrote:
Purchasing the Gem for thousands is not the only option. One could get certified although that is still in the hundreds plus cost of equipment/hosting program. While I suspect SC won't turn their backs on the disc hosts when the time finally comes, I also think that new music from all of the manufacturers is going to be more and more digital and a disc host will limit themselves just becauase the technology is moving on. And I say this as a disc host.


...I agree with you that it's not the only option (The SC Gem Series). But was just thinking of the ODB Hosts using CDGs only and SC not offering a Certification Program for them which would limit the ODB Hosts from purchasing any new SC Music. As crazy as this sounds, would SC let them rip their SC Discs to a Hard Drive, pay the $150.00 fee for the audit, pass the audit for certification purposes, which would allow them to purchase new SC Music on MP3+G Discs and still play all of their original discs (SC Discs both CDG & new MP3+G Discs) off of a physical player (not computer)?

...Yes, it sounds crazy, why would an ODB KJ go to the trouble of ripping CDGs to a hard drive to pass an audit and not play from a computer? Well because SC doesn't offer a certification program for ODB Hosts (which also lists Certified Hosts on their SC Site and they feel left out), some hosts don't like running their shows from computers, some don't like the sound quality of ripped files and some believe they are breaking the law by playing from anything other than the original.... just posting some thoughts here, nothing more.


As I have stated several times, including recently, SC does offer certification to ODB KJs. In fact, we have one large ODB operator in Arizona who is certified. Certification of an ODB KJ requires that we inspect the KJ's disc holdings and equipment to make certain (a) that there are no non-original discs in use and (b) that the KJ has the necessary equipment to play an ODB show, among other steps. There is a cost associated with that.

What we were trying to implement was a technological solution that would allow that inspection to be done virtually, so that a free certification could be offered to ODB hosts. We ran into some technical problems that we could not easily surmount, so we were unable to proceed any further.

I am certain that once the new material becomes available we will be able to work out a solution that allows that product to be acquired by ODB hosts, but I cannot guarantee that it will be available to ODB hosts immediately.


...I highlighted some of your post in red mainly because I was unaware that you had mentioned this several times as of recent. Mainly because I haven't been on this site very often in recent months. My fault, I will take a few thousand ours out of my time to do some research on your recent postings. However, as of a few months ago, one particular poster (an ODB Host) was attempting to ask for Certification (this was before the rumors of new music and he just wanted to be listed on the site as a Certified Host in the event that a Commercial Venue demanded or requested it) and you responded that you would be working with Kurt on it. To the best of my knowledge you guys were still working on it at the time.

...After your current posting, I guess you now offer a Certification Program for the ODB Host with a fee? As for the ODB Host that wants a Free Audit, they can wait because you're still working on it?

...Again, for me, I consider myself a Hybrid KJ Host. I play all of my Karaoke Music (that was ripped from Original CDGs along with some Pop Hits Monthly MP3+G Discs, Chartbuster SD Cards & Drive) on a laptop with the exception of Sound Choice CDGs. I do still play those SC CDGs off of a computer but from the discs thanks to the software player that allows cdgs to be played.

...Just did a quick search at the SC Site and didn't see anything there such as a Certified ODB Host Section or an application for that particular program. Oh well, guess I'm wrong again?

...By the way, I've never had ANY issues with audits (been there and done that with a couple of other brands). Have no problem with Karaoke Companies wanting to be compensated for their stolen music or showing/proving my legally obtained library. Has SC made some very good tracks? Yes of course. Could I run a show without them? Yes, I could and it's always been an option because of the other brands that I carry. Would I have a problem passing a SC Audit? Absolutely not! Do I think the $150.00 Certification Fee for shifting SC Tracks from CDG to a Hard Drive is unreasonable? Nope. Do I or did I completely agree with every stipulation in the contract that WAS being offered for 1:1 compliance? Not exactly. Just not a huge fan of the new American Law Practice of Guilty until Proven Innocent. Even a Person of Interest? Come on, just say it, "Suspect."

...One final note here, do I now see a lot more recent frustration building up from KJs and rumors of Commercial Venues not allowing SC Karaoke Tracks to be played at their venues (from postings by some KJs) about these Lawsuit being filed? Yes, I think it's fairly obvious and it does concern me as a KJ/DJ. Although you have no way of knowing it, I'm not the enemy here, I WAS a very GOOD paying SC Customer that's having second thoughts now about including the brand in my library and that's the SAD part of the story!


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:36 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
MadMusicOne wrote:
JoeChartreuse wrote:
chrisavis wrote:

1) Why in the world would you burn copies of discs and then use the originals? The originals are exactly that.....original.

2) The backups can be reproduced over and over but once the original is "broken" then there is no original left.

There is also the question of whether or not a backup is even valid if the original becomes unusable..

-Chris


1) I'll tell you why I do it- simply because the originals look cooler and more professional on the work surface. Since I don't use a facade, but work in front of the work surface for better interaction, this is very important.


2) There is only a "question" in regard to SC's stupidity. Backups are perfectly legal to use in single site situations per the court decisions of the 90's- etched in stone. Anyone who says otherwise, including SC, is lying-period.


2) Not trying to stir the pot but am curious. Could you possible supply any links for legal use of copyrighted back-ups in a commercial setting? Everything I've ever read states it's illegal to use back-ups. With the exception of some past postings of KJs saying that SC gave them permission at one time or another, back in the late 90's or early 2000's to use back-ups (such as CD-Rs) in a commercial setting as long as they kept the originals in their possession.[/color]


First, no need to apologise for anything- your assumptions are also valid, as being ODB does limit my liability. My backups are made with a standalone dedicated duplicator ( Microboards Quik-Disc), so sound is not an issue. I also own a pro-style resurfacing machine (JFJ EasyPro) so disc maintainance is much easier.

As for posting a link, you are not pot-stirring, and this request is also valid.
However, I have observed what happens here when one does post such things (like Chip): The link's source is renounced or impugned, or misinterpretation is claimed, or I shouldn't post it just because I'm ugly....

Besides,I would have to do exactly what you should do and use a search engine to find it. If you did it yourself, you would know, without any questions or debates.

I learned originally because my older brother owns a rather large institutional software company, and he was not pleased when the decision came down. Like SC, he would have preferred a new purchase for a backup.

...and before anyone mentions it, this applies to software, music, movies, or any other hard media purchase, as long as it's for single site use ( Obviously, using copies at multiple sites is a definite no-no.).

However, when searching, please keep in mind that I am referring to backups that are media to exact same media only.
I can't find anything definitive one way or another in regard to shifted media. Everyone has an opinion and something to quote.

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 1:46 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:41 am
Posts: 652
Images: 0
Been Liked: 48 times
...Glad to hear that, Joe. I never try to intentionally offend anyone....most of the time :D

...Although I am slightly confused. When you say media back-ups, do you mean copying the Original CDG to a Blank CD-R by using a bin format or something different? I know with the software that I have, I can copy an original in bin format to a hard drive or disc. Just curious... Please explain if it doesn't take up to much of your time. Thanks!


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:19 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
HarringtonLaw wrote:
JoeChartreuse wrote:
The point is, they are seriously hoping that non-users will invest thousands in a GEM set of songs they probably already have ( maybe even on SC CD+Gs) just to be able to get whatever new music SC might produce in the future. In other words, invest thousands, then sit and wait patiently in hopes of an actual quantity of new production in the future. I can't imagine a sillier way to run a business, and I don't think I will be in the minority. Not a great sales plan.


1) If that were the only target market, then you might have a point. As usual, you focus on one aspect of it that you deem to be stupid, and ignore the major part that isn't stupid.

For operators who have SC material on CD+Gs, restriction of new material to certified operators will encourage those operators to get certified, if they are otherwise 1:1, or to get 1:1 and certified, if they are not. That has benefits to SC beyond sales.

For operators who have illicitly used SC material, the availability of material that they cannot steal, plus attractive financing options for legit material, plus the opportunity to get legal at the lowest cost (i.e., before being sued) may prompt them to get legal.


JoeChartreuse wrote:
On the other hand, assuming that the majority of GEM users have them due to "settlements" ( and I do assume that), I guess they have to try something.....


2) To the contrary, the majority of GEM users purchased their licenses in a non-lawsuit-related transaction. You "assume" that to be true because you want it to be true, not because you have any actual information. To put it another way, which is less charitable but more accurate, you made it up.


I find absolutely no fault with your statements above.

1) I never claimed that SC would derive NO benefits from their plan. What I said was that the plan was not a good one for promoting SALES, and maintain that position. No business owner in their right mind intentionally limits their potential customer base ( especially to one so small) except certain luxury producers that hope to get incredibly high prices in return for the perception of "exclusivity".


2) As I stated, and you re-iterated, I was making an assumption, not stating a proven fact. My only basis for this was a lack of experience with many hosts that use GEMS that haven't been put through the mill by SC. My assumption may well be incorrect, but I can't be sure it is simply because you say so.

The way to know for sure is to find out how many GEM sets were made and sold (numbers for either that you will never divulge and up to date listing on the SC website.

On this entire forum there are what..6 or 7 ( if that many) owners who haven't been part of settlements?

For the sake ove accuracy, I will start a new thread and request input from the above.

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:32 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
MadMusicOne wrote:
...Glad to hear that, Joe. I never try to intentionally offend anyone....most of the time :D

...Although I am slightly confused. When you say media back-ups, do you mean copying the Original CDG to a Blank CD-R by using a bin format or something different? I know with the software that I have, I can copy an original in bin format to a hard drive or disc. Just curious... Please explain if it doesn't take up to much of your time. Thanks!


No problem- ever. As amatter of fact, if you PM me I will do what I would for anyone- on either side of the debates- and supply my phone number and e-mail.

Yes, by media to exact same media, I mean original CDG to blank disc without a format change.

That's the only thing that was covered. Please keep in mind that I am NOT saying that there is anything wrong OR right with media shifting, only that arguments in either direction seem inconclusive, leaving it a "gray" area.

I never bothered to delve to deeply into media shifting anyway, simply because I am ODB and have no need.

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 2:48 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:41 am
Posts: 652
Images: 0
Been Liked: 48 times
JoeChartreuse wrote:
MadMusicOne wrote:
...Glad to hear that, Joe. I never try to intentionally offend anyone....most of the time :D

...Although I am slightly confused. When you say media back-ups, do you mean copying the Original CDG to a Blank CD-R by using a bin format or something different? I know with the software that I have, I can copy an original in bin format to a hard drive or disc. Just curious... Please explain if it doesn't take up to much of your time. Thanks!


No problem- ever. As amatter of fact, if you PM me I will do what I would for anyone- on either side of the debates- and supply my phone number and e-mail.

Yes, by media to exact same media, I mean original CDG to blank disc without a format change.

That's the only thing that was covered. Please keep in mind that I am NOT saying that there is anything wrong OR right with media shifting, only that arguments in either direction seem inconclusive, leaving it a "gray" area.

I never bothered to delve to deeply into media shifting anyway, simply because I am ODB and have no need.


...Cool, thanks for the info. By the way, have a buddy of mine that's wanting to drive up to New York to visit his mother. His wife can't go with him and he's asked me. Am thinking about it. Might try to slide by to one of your shows.


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:16 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:35 am
Posts: 752
Images: 1
Been Liked: 73 times
I want to make sure I understand: I am gathering that ODB means Original Disc Based, or something close to that. If that is the case, is it really accurate, or is it a bit misleading, if one calls themselves ODB if they have, even one time, used a backup disc in a show, since technically it is not an "original" disc?


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:19 pm 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
doowhatchulike wrote:
I want to make sure I understand: I am gathering that ODB means Original Disc Based, or something close to that. If that is the case, is it really accurate, or is it a bit misleading, if one calls themselves ODB if they have, even one time, used a backup disc in a show, since technically it is not an "original" disc?

Exactly. Backing up an original disc & using the backup is technically no different than dropping it to hard drive. The originals stay at home. An investigator wouldn't be able to tell if original discs were owned no better than they could from a computer. If a disc user is using backups, they should IMO be nailed no differently than a computer user. Unless they are TRULY using the original discs only.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 101 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 183 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

cron
Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech