KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - GEM User Purely By Choice- How Many? Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Legalities & Piracy, etc... Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


premium-member

Offsite Links


It is currently Fri Jan 10, 2025 6:25 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 6:27 am 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Jul 15, 2011 2:55 pm
Posts: 185
Location: saylorsburg Pa
Been Liked: 54 times
yes, added sc to rig 2

(originally just typed yes but system said
Your message contains 3 characters. The minimum number of characters you need to enter is 10)


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 6:31 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm
Posts: 4094
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
Been Liked: 309 times
No, because we have almost 28,000 titles and do not need it.

_________________
You can be strange but not a stranger


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:29 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
Yes.

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 8:10 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:05 pm
Posts: 3376
Been Liked: 172 times
JoeChartreuse wrote:
johnny reverb wrote:
Now let me get this straight....you put the lime in the co......I mean....you're actually asking.... :shock:
Who on here was a pirate, that Sound Choice forced to by their Gem series?........lmfao.......


You are the fourth person to ignore the OP:

It's like the N-Word.....it's implied........
save you the trouble
I am the second person to ignore your request twice.....it's part of the sequestor....they're comming to get you Joe.... :lol:


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:30 am 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Jan 16, 2008 10:01 am
Posts: 780
Images: 0
Location: Champaign IL
Been Liked: 180 times
No...but if I was just starting I would.


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 9:53 pm 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster

Joined: Mon Jul 02, 2012 5:35 pm
Posts: 130
Been Liked: 10 times
No--because
Foundation 1 and 2 plus 5 bricks--1200 .00
Dk library--freeware
All Hits--freeware
Pioneer--freeware
Heelavadisk--freeware
Doctor Music--freeware
Georgia Brown--freeware
Chartbuster 12000 song library--2000.00


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 9:58 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
dave wrote:
No--because
Foundation 1 and 2 plus 5 bricks--1200 .00
Dk library--freeware
All Hits--freeware
Pioneer--freeware
Heelavadisk--freeware
Doctor Music--freeware
Georgia Brown--freeware
Chartbuster 12000 song library--2000.00


At risk of derailing this thread.....

Are you saying that you would pay money for the Foundation and Chartbuster content, but would freely download the remaining brands simply because they are not being policed by anyone?

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 12:05 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
OK, so far a grand total of 2 non-SC shoved GEM users. Also, out of 26 replies, 5 read and comprehended the OP. So far, a very teeney percentage of non-coerced GEM users. Though he hasn't replied, I will add DannyG as a Yes, making three, or 0.0188% of over 16,000. Anyone else?

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 2:20 am 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
dave wrote:
No--because
Foundation 1 and 2 plus 5 bricks--1200 .00
Dk library--freeware
All Hits--freeware
Pioneer--freeware
Heelavadisk--freeware
Doctor Music--freeware
Georgia Brown--freeware
Chartbuster 12000 song library--2000.00

Freeware = Piracy!! No such thing! If you didn't pay for it - it's illegal!!! Sorry, you lose!!!

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:06 am 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 3:35 am
Posts: 1945
Been Liked: 427 times
I don't have GEM. Don't want GEM.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:23 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
Lonman wrote:
dave wrote:
No--because
Foundation 1 and 2 plus 5 bricks--1200 .00
Dk library--freeware
All Hits--freeware
Pioneer--freeware
Heelavadisk--freeware
Doctor Music--freeware
Georgia Brown--freeware
Chartbuster 12000 song library--2000.00

Freeware = Piracy!! No such thing! If you didn't pay for it - it's illegal!!! Sorry, you lose!!!

LMAO!! You sound like a bad McRuff commercial. "Help take a bite outta crime!!!".

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:26 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am
Posts: 3011
Been Liked: 1003 times
JoeChartreuse wrote:
OK, so far a grand total of 2 non-SC shoved GEM users. Also, out of 26 replies, 5 read and comprehended the OP. So far, a very teeney percentage of non-coerced GEM users. Though he hasn't replied, I will add DannyG as a Yes, making three, or 0.0188% of over 16,000. Anyone else?


Do I really need to explain to you why this methodology is flawed?

You can see a fairly up-to-date list on the SC website. Very few of those listed were defendants in lawsuits (also a public record). What is your point?


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:30 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
HarringtonLaw wrote:
JoeChartreuse wrote:
OK, so far a grand total of 2 non-SC shoved GEM users. Also, out of 26 replies, 5 read and comprehended the OP. So far, a very teeney percentage of non-coerced GEM users. Though he hasn't replied, I will add DannyG as a Yes, making three, or 0.0188% of over 16,000. Anyone else?


Do I really need to explain to you why this methodology is flawed?

You can see a fairly up-to-date list on the SC website. Very few of those listed were defendants in lawsuits (also a public record). What is your point?

I think he is trying to find out the percentage of SC shakedowns and the percentage of voluntary buyers. You already have one judge calling your efforts "shakedown suits". I am sure in time to come more judges will start to agree with that assessment.

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 7:44 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:05 pm
Posts: 3376
Been Liked: 172 times
HarringtonLaw wrote:
JoeChartreuse wrote:
OK, so far a grand total of 2 non-SC shoved GEM users. Also, out of 26 replies, 5 read and comprehended the OP. So far, a very teeney percentage of non-coerced GEM users. Though he hasn't replied, I will add DannyG as a Yes, making three, or 0.0188% of over 16,000. Anyone else?


Do I really need to explain to you why this methodology is flawed?



:lol: I don't know Jim, it sounds pretty scientific to me. Try putting on an aluminum foil hat, and go back and re-read what he said.
........like the Doc(Bones) would always say to Captain Kirk......he's dead, Jim.......


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 7:51 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm
Posts: 6086
Images: 1
Location: Redmond, WA
Been Liked: 1665 times
Smoothedge69 wrote:
HarringtonLaw wrote:
JoeChartreuse wrote:
OK, so far a grand total of 2 non-SC shoved GEM users. Also, out of 26 replies, 5 read and comprehended the OP. So far, a very teeney percentage of non-coerced GEM users. Though he hasn't replied, I will add DannyG as a Yes, making three, or 0.0188% of over 16,000. Anyone else?


Do I really need to explain to you why this methodology is flawed?

You can see a fairly up-to-date list on the SC website. Very few of those listed were defendants in lawsuits (also a public record). What is your point?

I think he is trying to find out the percentage of SC shakedowns and the percentage of voluntary buyers. You already have one judge calling your efforts "shakedown suits". I am sure in time to come more judges will start to agree with that assessment.


Which will be IMPOSSIBLE to calculate from responses on these forums.

-Chris

_________________
-Chris


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 8:06 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Sun Apr 29, 2007 1:05 pm
Posts: 3376
Been Liked: 172 times
chrisavis wrote:
Smoothedge69 wrote:
HarringtonLaw wrote:
JoeChartreuse wrote:
OK, so far a grand total of 2 non-SC shoved GEM users. Also, out of 26 replies, 5 read and comprehended the OP. So far, a very teeney percentage of non-coerced GEM users. Though he hasn't replied, I will add DannyG as a Yes, making three, or 0.0188% of over 16,000. Anyone else?


Do I really need to explain to you why this methodology is flawed?

You can see a fairly up-to-date list on the SC website. Very few of those listed were defendants in lawsuits (also a public record). What is your point?

I think he is trying to find out the percentage of SC shakedowns and the percentage of voluntary buyers. You already have one judge calling your efforts "shakedown suits". I am sure in time to come more judges will start to agree with that assessment.


Which will be IMPOSSIBLE to calculate from responses on these forums.

-Chris


No (@$%&#!)?....... :lol:


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 8:27 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am
Posts: 3312
Images: 0
Been Liked: 610 times
chrisavis wrote:
Smoothedge69 wrote:
I think he is trying to find out the percentage of SC shakedowns and the percentage of voluntary buyers. You already have one judge calling your efforts "shakedown suits". I am sure in time to come more judges will start to agree with that assessment.


Which will be IMPOSSIBLE to calculate from responses on these forums.

-Chris


Exactly. Statistically, what you will end up with is a very small sample base with a very LARGE margin of error...which in the ends means you have actually discovered nothing.


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:23 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm
Posts: 5046
Been Liked: 334 times
HarringtonLaw wrote:
Do I really need to explain to you why this methodology is flawed?

You can see a fairly up-to-date list on the SC website. Very few of those listed were defendants in lawsuits (also a public record). What is your point?


Nope, it's flawed- but just good enough to make my point.

I was using this forum- because of the sheer size of a membership devoted to karaoke- strictly as a sampler.


1) Gem users by pure choice are a miniscule minority here.

2) The majority of the folks here have the perception ( the truth of which is not germain to the result) that Using Gems doesn't deem to be a sound business decision.

The margin for error can be absolutely HUGE, but the majority/minority are clearly defined nonetheless.

Of the current sampling, this tells me that- in my own opinion, of course- these sets would probably not sell all that well without some pushing from SC that didn't involve selling the sets qualities.

What is on the website does not reflect how many people use the set- not because of quality or even song needs- but rather as a pre-emptive defense against SC's actions. I say that because of the following:

The site shows 113 sets out there. It also shows states shown the most SC "attention" seem to have the most users. For instance, out of the 113 sets, California shows 24, Florida 25, North Carolina 9.

That means 51% of total "sales" are concentrated in the 3 states most bothered by SC.

Less hit states like Connecticut (2), NY ( 1 ), NJ (4- one's a double listing) seem to have very few sales. Now, consider the population density of NY, NJ, & CT- offering HUGE sales opportunities. Where are the sales?

Now add the GEM deals made through "settlements" on top of that, and we see how the majority have been spread out there.

I guess the fear tactic works for you, but call it what it is...

_________________
"No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"

" Disc based and loving it..."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:04 am 
Offline
Super Extreme Poster
Super Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm
Posts: 22978
Songs: 35
Images: 3
Location: Tacoma, WA
Been Liked: 2126 times
JoeChartreuse wrote:
I was using this forum- because of the sheer size of a membership devoted to karaoke- strictly as a sampler.
I thought I explained that, the membership number does not represent the 'actual' number of true users. The majority are spam members, then members that have not posted in years, then members that have done a 1 on hit & run post never to return. The actual regular users probably represent MAYBE 20% of this forums member count.

_________________
LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
Image


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 3:52 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm
Posts: 4094
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
Been Liked: 309 times
"Of the current sampling, this tells me that- in my own opinion, of course- these sets would probably not sell all that well without some pushing from SC that didn't involve selling the sets qualities."

And in the opinion of Ancient Astronaut Theorists, the Egyptian pyramids were electrical power generation stations or was it spacecraft landing stations. Maybe it was both.

_________________
You can be strange but not a stranger


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 69 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 182 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech