|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
doowhatchulike
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 3:49 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:35 am Posts: 752 Images: 1 Been Liked: 73 times
|
I have not seen it worded quite this way, but it would almost stand to reason that this could be the crux of the whole situation: If it WERE to be deemed within fair use rights to make AND use a backup in a 1:1 ratio on one's media of choice, and it is the position of your ASCAP, BMI, et. al. to give authorization for public performance, then isn't it safe to conclude that not only can any manufacturer not "authorize" for commercial performance, then they cannot "de-authorize" it either???
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:50 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
doowhatchulike wrote: I want to make sure I understand: I am gathering that ODB means Original Disc Based, or something close to that. If that is the case, is it really accurate, or is it a bit misleading, if one calls themselves ODB if they have, even one time, used a backup disc in a show, since technically it is not an "original" disc? The term is meant to be ONLY Disc Based. Whether it be an Original disc or a Back-up copy of that disc, the KJ is only operating with the use of Discs and no other format. There have been no legal issues made against KJs who have purchased Original Manufacturer issued discs, and made 1 back-up copy of them onto a blank disc. There also has been no legal issues made against a KJ who chooses to use those back-up discs at a show instead of the originals (as long as the originals are not being used at another show at the same time (in other words, multi-rigging with just 1 set of owned discs)). As for me personally, I have a back-up copy for almost all of my original CDGs (there were about 6 that I could not copy due to how they were originally formatted on the disc). I choose to use my originals at a show and keep the back-up copies at home. When I have an original that looks like it can't be used anymore, I switch it with my back-up copy, and I make a new back-up copy to have in case anything happens to that one. I choose to use my originals, because my discs are displayed out in the open. People walking by can see them, and one can tell (especially a fellow KJ) the difference (for the most part) between an original store-bought disc, and one that has a label slapped on it (even one that is scanned from the original label). If you look down at my discs and (maybe) see 1 disc with a home-made label on it, and all the others nice and shiny and metallic-like, you aren't going to assume anything; however, if you see a whole slew of discs with labels slapped on, you might assume that the KJ is using copies of everything (and maybe obtained them illegally). Call it paranoia, but it's my choice to work off of my originals unless I have to use a back-up disc.
Last edited by Cueball on Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:17 pm, edited 2 times in total.
|
|
Top |
|
|
MadMusicOne
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 4:56 pm |
|
Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:41 am Posts: 652 Images: 0 Been Liked: 48 times
|
cueball wrote: doowhatchulike wrote: I want to make sure I understand: I am gathering that ODB means Original Disc Based, or something close to that. If that is the case, is it really accurate, or is it a bit misleading, if one calls themselves ODB if they have, even one time, used a backup disc in a show, since technically it is not an "original" disc? The term ODB here means ONLY Disc Based. You don't have much choice, otherwise you couldn't play your downloads, right? Well, I guess you could if you wanted to bring in a laptop and get a software player.
|
|
Top |
|
|
doowhatchulike
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:04 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:35 am Posts: 752 Images: 1 Been Liked: 73 times
|
cueball wrote: doowhatchulike wrote: I want to make sure I understand: I am gathering that ODB means Original Disc Based, or something close to that. If that is the case, is it really accurate, or is it a bit misleading, if one calls themselves ODB if they have, even one time, used a backup disc in a show, since technically it is not an "original" disc? The term ODB here means ONLY Disc Based. Again, is this definition of the acronym, assuming it is the "accepted" use of it, technically correct and/or misleading? This generalized definition can include EVERY disc one might get into their posession. I truly am not intending to pick at this, but if an acronym is going to be used to represent a certain sect of people, those who view it from the outside looking in have the right to understand just what that entails. cueball wrote: When I have an original that looks like it can't be used anymore, I switch it with my back-up copy, and I make a new back-up copy to have in case anything happens to that one. BTW, did you just admit that, at least one time in the past, you have had an original, a back-up, AND an additional back-up??? Be careful.....
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:39 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
doowhatchulike wrote: cueball wrote: The term ODB here means ONLY Disc Based. Again, is this definition of the acronym, assuming it is the "accepted" use of it, technically correct and/or misleading? This generalized definition can include EVERY disc one might get into their posession. I truly am not intending to pick at this, but if an acronym is going to be used to represent a certain sect of people, those who view it from the outside looking in have the right to understand just what that entails. cueball wrote: There have been no legal issues made against KJs who have purchased Original Manufacturer issued discs, and made 1 back-up copy of them onto a blank disc. There also has been no legal issues made against a KJ who chooses to use those back-up discs at a show instead of the originals (as long as the originals are not being used at another show at the same time (in other words, multi-rigging with just 1 set of owned discs)). Also, it was already established years ago that even Sound Choice was OK with a KJ making a back-up copy of an original disc, and using that disc in place of the original as long as it was the only copy being used. doowhatchulike wrote: cueball wrote: When I have an original that looks like it can't be used anymore, I switch it with my back-up copy, and I make a new back-up copy to have in case anything happens to that one. BTW, did you just admit that, at least one time in the past, you have had an original, a back-up, AND an additional back-up??? Be careful..... I think that might be a "grey area." I'm still only using 1 copy of a disc (whether it be an original or a back-up copy). The back-up of the back-up copy is to have in case something happens where the 1st back-up is no longer playable. It's no different than all of the Legit KJs who have copied their original discs to a HD, and have made a copy of the HD as a back-up. As long as only 1 copy is in use (whether it be original discs or copies on a HD), it should be OK. Now, as for the use of different media... ie an original disc copied to a HD, that is what Sound Choice has issue with. As far as I have known, Sound Choice didn't/doesn't have issue with the use of a back-up disc (since it is the same media as the original disc).
|
|
Top |
|
|
doowhatchulike
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 5:49 pm |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:35 am Posts: 752 Images: 1 Been Liked: 73 times
|
Mr. Cueball, I am sure someone in here might appreciate the detailed, yet much-repeated, thoughts you have on this subject, which you have worded as if to respond to my posts. My intention, however, has been to invoke different directions of thought, not encourage repititious restatement of a singular inflexible position. A different direction such as this: It might be prudent for concerned individuals to look beyond what is "OK" to any one manufacturer. There are more than likely other determining factors at play. Sorry for any confusion...
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Tue Feb 26, 2013 11:27 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
cueball wrote: Now, as for the use of different media... ie an original disc copied to a HD, that is what Sound Choice has issue with. As far as I have known, Sound Choice didn't/doesn't have issue with the use of a back-up disc (since it is the same media as the original disc). HarringtonLaw wrote: That looks like permission was given to someone named Lonnie back in 1998. Of course, we don't know precisely what Lonnie was asking for; looks like Kurt was responding to an inquiry from a specific poster. Also, if permission can be given, it can certainly be taken away, particularly if there isn't consideration to support a contract on the point. Or did you think that those words were effective to be a permanent, irrevocable grant to every person, everywhere, in every medium?
Over the last few years, it has been made very clear that whatever permission might have been given in the past has been revoked, and that new permission is subject to some very specific conditions.
sorry Cue, your permission has been revoked. better ditch those backups or pay your $150.00 audit fee.
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:18 am |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
doowhatchulike wrote: I want to make sure I understand: I am gathering that ODB means Original Disc Based, or something close to that. If that is the case, is it really accurate, or is it a bit misleading, if one calls themselves ODB if they have, even one time, used a backup disc in a show, since technically it is not an "original" disc? That's a fair question, Do. In my case, I guess I'm 99.62% ODB. I had about 7 Party Tyme discs - an open page of my binder- melt up due to a mishap with acetone,( I still have the originals) and those discs have been replaced by backups. However, since virtually every other disc of about 1800 that I carry ( I actually own about 2500) is original, the 7 equal about 0.38% of the total, and I feel comfortable calling myself an ODB host.
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 1:57 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
Paradigm Karaoke wrote: HarringtonLaw wrote: That looks like permission was given to someone named Lonnie back in 1998. Of course, we don't know precisely what Lonnie was asking for; looks like Kurt was responding to an inquiry from a specific poster. Also, if permission can be given, it can certainly be taken away, particularly if there isn't consideration to support a contract on the point. Or did you think that those words were effective to be a permanent, irrevocable grant to every person, everywhere, in every medium?
Over the last few years, it has been made very clear that whatever permission might have been given in the past has been revoked, and that new permission is subject to some very specific conditions.
sorry Cue, your permission has been revoked. better ditch those backups or pay your $150.00 audit fee. Not sure where this quote came from but I remember the exact context that that quote was made back on JOLT in 98. Kurt had made a statement something to the fact that if he walked into a club and saw an entire binder of burns - he'd assume piracy, if he walked into a club & saw a couple burns here & there among all the orignal discs, he'd assume backup and probably wouldn't have an issue of it. However as i've always thought, policies change over the years with ANY company, why should SC be any different in the way they view backups? This was WAY before the advent of computer piracy killing all the industry on both the manus AND kj side!
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 7:38 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
cueball wrote: If you look down at my discs and (maybe) see 1 disc with a home-made label on it, and all the others nice and shiny and metallic-like, you aren't going to assume anything; however, if you see a whole slew of discs with labels slapped on, you might assume that the KJ is using copies of everything (and maybe obtained them illegally). Call it paranoia, but it's my choice to work off of my originals unless I have to use a back-up disc. When I see a KJ using discs of any kind I just think.....dinosaur. Welcome to 1997! -Chris
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Wed Feb 27, 2013 11:38 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
chrisavis wrote: cueball wrote: If you look down at my discs and (maybe) see 1 disc with a home-made label on it, and all the others nice and shiny and metallic-like, you aren't going to assume anything; however, if you see a whole slew of discs with labels slapped on, you might assume that the KJ is using copies of everything (and maybe obtained them illegally). Call it paranoia, but it's my choice to work off of my originals unless I have to use a back-up disc. When I see a KJ using discs of any kind I just think.....dinosaur. Welcome to 1997! -Chris When I see a PC based host I think: Here's one of the folks that used a PC (found in most households) in public, along with MP3s- causing everyone's uncle Lou to think they could be a Karaoke Host just by buying 2 speakers and a mic, and downloading music from pirate sites- causing a virtual explosion in both piracy and unskilled krappy-oke shows. List under: How A Karaoke Host Can Shoot Themselves In The Foot, And The Industry As Well. Welcome To 2013!
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 12:29 am |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: [ JoeChartreuse wrote: On the other hand, assuming that the majority of GEM users have them due to "settlements" ( and I do assume that), I guess they have to try something..... To the contrary, the majority of GEM users purchased their licenses in a non-lawsuit-related transaction. You "assume" that to be true because you want it to be true, not because you have any actual information. To put it another way, which is less charitable but more accurate, you made it up. Well, since my poll indicates (so far) that a grand total of three GEM users here on a forum of 16,000 ( approx. 0.0188%) have been uncoerced, it would seem that YOUR statement is false- once again making kind of a goof of your "100% true" statements. YOU made it up.
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 12:35 am |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
cueball wrote: doowhatchulike wrote: cueball wrote: The term ODB here means ONLY Disc Based. Again, is this definition of the acronym, assuming it is the "accepted" use of it, technically correct and/or misleading? This generalized definition can include EVERY disc one might get into their posession. I truly am not intending to pick at this, but if an acronym is going to be used to represent a certain sect of people, those who view it from the outside looking in have the right to understand just what that entails. I'm not a credit-grabber, but in this case I will make an exception, since- unless someone can find a previous user, I was the one who originated "ODB"- and MY definition was ORIGINAL disc based. I also used OMD, as in Original Manufacturers' disc.
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
Lonman
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 2:19 am |
|
Joined: Mon Dec 10, 2001 3:57 pm Posts: 22978 Songs: 35 Images: 3 Location: Tacoma, WA Been Liked: 2126 times
|
JoeChartreuse wrote: on a forum of 16,000. You have to remember about 80% of our users are spam (too much to count, but even when removed, they still count as member total unfortuantely) & 1 time shots that NEVER come back or just plain no longer active!!!! Take that into consideration!!
_________________ LIKE Lonman on Facebook - Lonman Productions Karaoke & my main site via my profile!
|
|
Top |
|
|
MrBoo
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 4:15 am |
|
Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 3:35 am Posts: 1945 Been Liked: 427 times
|
Lonman wrote: JoeChartreuse wrote: on a forum of 16,000. You have to remember about 80% of our users are spam & 1 time shots that NEVER come back!!!! Take that into consideration!! There are probably also a ton of guests that probably are KJs who never signed up to post but read every day. Something like that poll could be enough to draw them into signing up and posting, given they did buy the GEM on their own and without being pushed to do so. People who bought the GEM on their own seem to be very defensive of the GEM, and I don't blame them. It would be a great deal if not for (what I perceive to be) all the strings.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 5:04 am |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 6:37 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
JoeChartreuse wrote: Well, since my poll indicates (so far) that a grand total of three GEM users here on a forum of 16,000 ( approx. 0.0188%) have been uncoerced, it would seem that YOUR statement is false- once again making kind of a goof of your "100% true" statements. YOU made it up. I'm having a hard time believing that you think this is actually a logical conclusion, but if you do, it explains a lot about who you are and what your intelligence level is.
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 7:28 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
JoeChartreuse wrote: HarringtonLaw wrote: [ JoeChartreuse wrote: On the other hand, assuming that the majority of GEM users have them due to "settlements" ( and I do assume that), I guess they have to try something..... To the contrary, the majority of GEM users purchased their licenses in a non-lawsuit-related transaction. You "assume" that to be true because you want it to be true, not because you have any actual information. To put it another way, which is less charitable but more accurate, you made it up. Well, since my poll indicates (so far) that a grand total of three GEM users here on a forum of 16,000 ( approx. 0.0188%) have been uncoerced, it would seem that YOUR statement is false- once again making kind of a goof of your "100% true" statements. YOU made it up. Joe - I believe all of the GEM licensees are listed on the SC page. I do not believe all of them frequent these forums though. You have proven nothing. -Chris
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
chrisavis
|
Posted: Thu Feb 28, 2013 7:32 am |
|
Joined: Fri Dec 02, 2011 12:38 pm Posts: 6086 Images: 1 Location: Redmond, WA Been Liked: 1665 times
|
JoeChartreuse wrote: chrisavis wrote: cueball wrote: If you look down at my discs and (maybe) see 1 disc with a home-made label on it, and all the others nice and shiny and metallic-like, you aren't going to assume anything; however, if you see a whole slew of discs with labels slapped on, you might assume that the KJ is using copies of everything (and maybe obtained them illegally). Call it paranoia, but it's my choice to work off of my originals unless I have to use a back-up disc. When I see a KJ using discs of any kind I just think.....dinosaur. Welcome to 1997! -Chris When I see a PC based host I think: Here's one of the folks that used a PC (found in most households) in public, along with MP3s- causing everyone's uncle Lou to think they could be a Karaoke Host just by buying 2 speakers and a mic, and downloading music from pirate sites- causing a virtual explosion in both piracy and unskilled krappy-oke shows. List under: How A Karaoke Host Can Shoot Themselves In The Foot, And The Industry As Well. Welcome To 2013! Well.... since I started hosting well after the piracy issue was firmly established and since I spent about $4000 on my initial equipment purchase, and then immediately purchased a CAP agreement from Stellar, and immediately started buying legitimate discs on the free market and hosted shows with other KJ's prior to hosting my own solo shows, you can't dump me in that category. -Chris
_________________ -Chris
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 190 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|