KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - Things are getting interesting Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Legalities & Piracy, etc... Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


wordpress-hosting

Offsite Links


It is currently Fri Jan 10, 2025 8:10 am

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 9:35 am 
Offline
Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster

Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 12:04 pm
Posts: 336
Been Liked: 33 times
http://ia600206.us.archive.org/0/items/ ... .128.0.pdf

what do you find most interesting about these rulings ?


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:00 pm 
Offline
Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster

Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 12:04 pm
Posts: 336
Been Liked: 33 times
Crickets chirping over 20 views and not one response


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:08 pm 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 3:35 am
Posts: 1945
Been Liked: 427 times
Someone was stupid enough to not show up at a civil trial? What's interesting about that? Of course the judge will enter a default ruling. He certainly isn't going to defend it himself so a default ruling is the answer.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:17 pm 
Offline
Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster

Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 12:04 pm
Posts: 336
Been Liked: 33 times
I find it interesting that:

1. This is the first case to be ordered closed. Legally that is a very big deal as the company/person (in this case "karaoke chicks") can no longer petition on the case to ask for reconsideration from the court.

2. Forfeiture of Sound Choice DISCS was ordered.

3. The higher judgement amount of $44,000 per system.

4. The ruling that 'karaoke chicks" was in violation of FUDTPA. (FLORIDA DECEPTIVE AND
UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES ACT)


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:21 pm 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 3:35 am
Posts: 1945
Been Liked: 427 times
I don't know about the closed part, but I believe it is standard procedure to award what was asked for in the case. Again, no one argued against it so the judge rules for what was asked for. That isn't big news..


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:41 pm 
Offline
Senior Poster
Senior Poster

Joined: Tue Oct 11, 2011 3:00 am
Posts: 192
Location: Illinois
Been Liked: 16 times
MrBoo wrote:
Someone was stupid enough to not show up at a civil trial? What's interesting about that?


What is interesting is that the defendant at first was fighting the lawsuit, then didn't show up?

Very strange.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 12:44 pm 
Offline
Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster

Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 12:04 pm
Posts: 336
Been Liked: 33 times
I bet the defendant thought there would only be a small judgement ordered and realized they were going to lose.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 1:07 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm
Posts: 4094
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
Been Liked: 309 times
Some people think that if they don't show, it will be forgotten about. If the Defendant has a legal excuse (in the hospital or some sort of emergency, with proof), they may be able to appeal. Being on vacation, the alarm didn't go off, or no babysitter are not legal excuses.

Mr Boo, I guess you didn't read the sections of laws cited by the Plaintiff to make their case. Whether or not the Defendant shows up, the Plaintiff still has to prove its case.

_________________
You can be strange but not a stranger


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:24 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
I think Slep-Tone has been allowed to go too far and has overstepped their boundaries as a vendor. That is ALL they are. They are Karaoke peddlers and they have gotten way too powerful. Were I in government I would go after them and work to get some laws changed.

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:26 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm
Posts: 4094
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
Been Liked: 309 times
So go into government and make your changes but to get there will require work.

_________________
You can be strange but not a stranger


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:28 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
timberlea wrote:
So go into government and make your changes but to get there will require work.
Unfortunately, to get there requires MONEY, even more than work.

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:29 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm
Posts: 4094
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
Been Liked: 309 times
So do what every other politician does and raise it, make contacts, etc.

_________________
You can be strange but not a stranger


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 2:49 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:41 am
Posts: 652
Images: 0
Been Liked: 48 times
...So, are these the same chicks that are from Naples, Florida? The ones that are on this Social Network:
https://www.facebook.com/Karaoke.in.Naples

...or some different ones? I don't know? Not from around that area.


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 3:35 pm 
Offline
Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster

Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 12:04 pm
Posts: 336
Been Liked: 33 times
The legal documents say ...Deana Jennings DBA "the Karaoke Chicks" so it would appear that you found the correct FB page


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 3:47 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Oct 24, 2011 12:41 am
Posts: 652
Images: 0
Been Liked: 48 times
kjflorida wrote:
The legal documents say ...Deana Jennings DBA "the Karaoke Chicks" so it would appear that you found the correct FB page


...Wow! Well, looks like they were still posting as of a couple of days ago. Wonder if they're still running shows since they didn't show up in court? Noticed they were showing the Chartbuster Certified Seal or at least it was on their website.


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 4:00 pm 
Offline
Super Duper Poster
Super Duper Poster

Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:03 pm
Posts: 2674
Location: Jersey
Been Liked: 160 times
Very Surprised by this. They wouldn't even let me sing a particular song at their show because they didn't have multiple discs with that song and the other rig was being used somewhere else. I had sung the song at one of their other shows on a previous visit but at the second location, that song wasn't part of the library and they wouldn't or couldn't play the song from my disc either. It seemed to me that they were trying to dot every I and cross every T but I guess that wasn't good enough for the top notch invetigating teams of Sound Choice....or one of their competitors ratted them out with no evidence just for spite or to screw the competition?


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 4:09 pm 
Offline
Advanced Poster
Advanced Poster

Joined: Wed Jun 29, 2011 12:04 pm
Posts: 336
Been Liked: 33 times
well the original suit was filed over 2 years ago and I guess "the top notch investigating teams of Sound Choice" had enough legal proof for a judgement to be filed. What I wonder about is why they failed to show up for the trial ? to fight for 2 years and then not show up the day of the trial seems weird to me. Wish the paperwork from legal discovery was available.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 4:30 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
It would suck if it turned out they were dead. Though, I guess it would solve all their problems. LOL

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Mar 01, 2013 7:37 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Wed Sep 04, 2002 12:41 pm
Posts: 4094
Location: Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada
Been Liked: 309 times
Not necessarily, the suit could be amended to the estates of the parties. Just because one dies, it doesn't mean the end to a case in civil court. No more than your debts go away if you die without the debts being insured.

_________________
You can be strange but not a stranger


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Sat Mar 02, 2013 6:00 am 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jul 31, 2012 3:35 am
Posts: 1945
Been Liked: 427 times
timberlea wrote:
Some people think that if they don't show, it will be forgotten about. If the Defendant has a legal excuse (in the hospital or some sort of emergency, with proof), they may be able to appeal. Being on vacation, the alarm didn't go off, or no babysitter are not legal excuses.

Mr Boo, I guess you didn't read the sections of laws cited by the Plaintiff to make their case. Whether or not the Defendant shows up, the Plaintiff still has to prove its case.


They stated a possible case. They "proved" nothing. Hey, maybe they had a solid case. But without access to the evidence and without the evidence being defended, nothing was proved.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 43 posts ]  Go to page 1, 2, 3  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 109 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech