|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
mrmarog
|
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 1:24 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:13 pm Posts: 3801 Images: 1 Location: Florida Been Liked: 1612 times
|
I posted this in another thread but I think it fits here too:
I went to a VFW last night and the host had quite an elaborate set-up with lights, props, projector & screen, huge 18" floor monitor, AND every song imaginable. He used 2 laptops, 1 for karaoke, 1 for filler. His main draw was probably that he played "customer CD's"......lots of them, and he did it very effeciently. There was an ocassional pause in the singing to wait for a cd to load, but considering the number of singers with their own cd's, it was very acceptable. I don't think he played any ones thumb drives, but I bet if asked he would give a try.
The place was packed with 41 singers and he got all through in 2 hrs 25 min. A lot of people left after singing their first song because they knew there was no chance of singing a second. This was an older crowd, and drinks were real cheap ($1.75 for pint of beer, $2.50 for a good mixed drink, $1.50 bottle of water). He told me his pay was $150 for 3 hours and he did get some tips, and the more tips he recieved the later he stayed.
All apperared good but his mixing skills lacked. Regardless of all the other attributes he had, that was a killer for me. His 18" floor monitor could not be heard and the mics were mud for everyone all night.
PS. Do I think he owns his 100K songs......without a doubt he does not.......did anyone in the room care.....absolutely not, except for me. Is he my "unfair competition", YES, but does he affect me, NO. I do all of things he does (including thumb drives), and I own over 60,000 songs on cd's (90,000 including dupe cd's).
Last edited by mrmarog on Mon Apr 08, 2013 7:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 1:51 pm |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
mrmarog wrote: I posted this in another thread but I think it fits here too:
I went to a VFW last night and the host had quite an elaborate set-up with lights, props, projector & screen, huge 18" floor monitor, AND every song imaginable. He used 2 laptops, 1 for karaoke, 1 for filler. His main draw was probably that he played "customer CD's"......lots of them, and he did it very effeciently. There was an ocassional pause in the singing to wait for a cd to load, but considering the number of singers with their own cd's, it was very acceptable. I don't think he played any ones thumb drives, but I bet if asked he would give a try.
The place was packed with 41 singers and he got all through in 2 hrs 25 min. A lot of people left after singing their first song because they knew there was no chance of singing a second. This was an older crowd, and drinks were real cheap ($1.75 for pint of beer, $2.50 for a good mixed drink, $1.50 bottle of water). He told me his pay was $150 for 3 hours and he did get some tips, and the more tips he recieved the later he staye
All apperared good but his mixing skills lacked. Regardless of all the other attributes he had, that was a killer for me. His 18" floor monitor could not be heard and the mics were mud for everyone all night.
PS. Do I think he owns his 100K songs......without a doubt he does not.......did anyone in the room care.....absolutely not, except for me. Is he my "unfair competition", YES, but does he affect me, NO. I do all of things he does (including thumb drives), and I own over 60,000 songs on cd's (90,000 including dupe cd's). Sounds very similar to the local American Legion, have a blessed day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Sat Apr 06, 2013 2:33 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
rickgood wrote: But what is the hesitation by SC to publish that list? When someone doesn't do something that seems like common sense, it makes me wonder' Are there only 4 or 5? This seems like something they'd be shouting out. like the ODB's, if they want the benefits of being listed on the site, they can pay. SH is a free thing so why list it?
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
mrmarog
|
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 4:23 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:13 pm Posts: 3801 Images: 1 Location: Florida Been Liked: 1612 times
|
So far Leaping Lizard is the only one that has any actual knowledge that Safe venues exist. Surely there must be others, or is this like a secret society that walks among us and you don't even know. Has anyone tried to get a gig and was informed by the venue that they had to be certified, or get certified, to play SC tracks at that venue?
|
|
Top |
|
|
BruceFan4Life
|
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 5:04 pm |
|
|
Super Duper Poster |
|
Joined: Wed May 18, 2005 10:03 pm Posts: 2674 Location: Jersey Been Liked: 160 times
|
I have a list of things that I look for when I go looking for a karaoke show to sing at. SAFE HARBOR is not one of them. I wouldn't avoid a SAFE HARBOR show but I wouldn't put them at the top of any list either. If it happened to be near by; I'd give it a shot.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 9:56 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
Insane KJ wrote: Does ASCAP/BMI have a listing of venues so we can pick and choose which dance clubs or honkytonks we attend to dance to a DJ or line dance to a cover song country band? Those organizations to not attempt any sort of "certification" nor allege their worth, despite the fact the the states listed in Doo's post say they have none. Part of the alleged worth is supposed to be about being eligible for hire at a Safe Harbor venue. Therefore, a listing of those venues should be made available. A nice long list would also add incentive for non-"certified" KJs to buy into the program, wouldn't it? Something on the order of "CUSTOMER service".
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
Last edited by JoeChartreuse on Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:07 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Sun Apr 07, 2013 10:01 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
mrmarog wrote: So far Leaping Lizard is the only one that has any actual knowledge that Safe venues exist. Surely there must be others, or is this like a secret society that walks among us and you don't even know. Has anyone tried to get a gig and was informed by the venue that they had to be certified, or get certified, to play SC tracks at that venue? After reading this thread, and a few other posts, I'm starting to get the idea that Safe Harbor is another SC phantom, like the KIAA. Just a name and a concept- no substance. Again, this is only based on what I've read here, and having no information available to balance it the other way.
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 3:41 am |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
mrmarog wrote: So far Leaping Lizard is the only one that has any actual knowledge that Safe venues exist. Where did she say that? All I saw was that Leaping Lizard knows of Safe Harbor, and she registered herself. leopard lizard wrote: If a person wanted to visit a "safe" show then they could look at the list of certified/gem hosts and go from there. A lot of them list websites on their listings as far as finding their shows. leopard lizard wrote: I took the step to register our company knowing that most venues would ignore the whole thing and trying to keep them out of trouble would mainly be my problem.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 3:54 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
JoeChartreuse wrote: Part of the alleged worth is supposed to be about being eligible for hire at a Safe Harbor venue. Incorrect. A certified operator can be hired at ANY venue without fear of him or the venue being sued. There is nothing special about Safe Harbor venues in that regard. Safe Harbor venues are not required to hire certified operators.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:06 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
mrmarog wrote: So far Leaping Lizard is the only one that has any actual knowledge that Safe venues exist. Surely there must be others, or is this like a secret society that walks among us and you don't even know. Has anyone tried to get a gig and was informed by the venue that they had to be certified, or get certified, to play SC tracks at that venue? I have worked over 18 years in the industry, and I work currently 6 days a week, and I have never had a venue or person who hired me ask if I was certified. I think they are more concerned with the type of show I do. Have a blessed day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 4:12 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: JoeChartreuse wrote: Part of the alleged worth is supposed to be about being eligible for hire at a Safe Harbor venue. Incorrect. A certified operator can be hired at ANY venue without fear of him or the venue being sued. There is nothing special about Safe Harbor venues in that regard. Safe Harbor venues are not required to hire certified operators. That would be a hard requirement to meet since currently there are only a little over 400 certified hosts nation wide. That is less than 1% of the total estimated number of hosts depending on the total possible hosts of 30,000 or more. Even if all hosts wanted to become certified there is not currently the means to certify everyone. Of course with 95% of the industry illegal James by your own figures, you could only certify 5% at most, hardly enough to meet demand, if every venue wanted a certified host. Have a legal day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 8:21 am |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: JoeChartreuse wrote: Part of the alleged worth is supposed to be about being eligible for hire at a Safe Harbor venue. Incorrect. A certified operator can be hired at ANY venue without fear of him or the venue being sued. There is nothing special about Safe Harbor venues in that regard. Safe Harbor venues are not required to hire certified operators. I think what we're trying to say here is, part of the worth in seeing which venues are registered with Safe Harbor, is that a Certified KJ or an ODB KJ who is looking to be hired, can go directly to those places listed and say, "Hey!.. I'm the exact person you are looking for." Then they can discuss availability and price and go from there. And, on a side note, you're still doing it... omitting the mention of ODB KJs.... HarringtonLaw wrote: Safe Harbor venues are not required to hire certified operators. You should have added that they can hire ODB KJs or KJs that do not use SC material as well, without the fear of possibly being sued by SC if they hire someone other than this.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 5:26 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
cueball wrote: I think what we're trying to say here is, part of the worth in seeing which venues are registered with Safe Harbor, is that a Certified KJ or an ODB KJ who is looking to be hired, can go directly to those places listed and say, "Hey!.. I'm the exact person you are looking for." Then they can discuss availability and price and go from there.
I understand what you're saying, but a legal operator should be able to go to ANY venue and do that. cueball wrote: And, on a side note, you're still doing it... omitting the mention of ODB KJs.... HarringtonLaw wrote: Safe Harbor venues are not required to hire certified operators. You should have added that they can hire ODB KJs or KJs that do not use SC material as well, without the fear of possibly being sued by SC if they hire someone other than this. Venues aren't required to hire redheads, either. If I didn't mention redheads in my explanation, does that mean I'm anti-ginger? As I said before, venues aren't required to hire certified KJs.
|
|
Top |
|
|
birdofsong
|
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 6:16 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 9:25 am Posts: 965 Been Liked: 118 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote:
Venues aren't required to hire redheads, either. If I didn't mention redheads in my explanation, does that mean I'm anti-ginger?
Speaking on behalf of us redheads....I think you should definitely include us.
_________________ Birdofsong
|
|
Top |
|
|
mrmarog
|
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 6:46 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Jul 10, 2008 5:13 pm Posts: 3801 Images: 1 Location: Florida Been Liked: 1612 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: Incorrect. A certified operator can be hired at ANY venue without fear of him or the venue being sued. There is nothing special about Safe Harbor venues in that regard. Safe Harbor venues are not required to hire certified operators. HarringtonLaw wrote: Here is how the safe harbor program works: 1. The venue signs up. 2. The venue has its host register by filling out a questionnaire. 3. SC analyzes the questionnaire and follows up with the host. For example, if the host is running SC from a computer, we would ask the host to get audited and certified. If the host isn't running legally and won't get legal, we notify the venue about the ongoing infringement. 4. If the venue keeps the host on, the safe harbor doesn't apply, and the venue gets sued with the host. But, now that the safe venue knows the "rules", they HAVE to hire a certified KJ or be included in the lawsuit if they hire a pirate (even if the pirate claimed he was legal). The safe venue is required to have the KJ vetted or face the consequences.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 7:14 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: cueball wrote: I think what we're trying to say here is, part of the worth in seeing which venues are registered with Safe Harbor, is that a Certified KJ or an ODB KJ who is looking to be hired, can go directly to those places listed and say, "Hey!.. I'm the exact person you are looking for." Then they can discuss availability and price and go from there.
I understand what you're saying, but a legal operator should be able to go to ANY venue and do that. But it would make it that much easier for a legit KJ (Certified, ODB, or KJs who don't use SC material) to be able to walk into places that have registered with SH, knowing ahead of time that these places are specifically looking for people like them. It's not the same thing as walking up and down Bleecker Street (in Manhattan), where there are at least 20 bars going from the East side to the West Side, and asking if they are interested in hiring me for Karaoke. There might only be 1 of those 20 bars that had registered with SH, and the others could care less about legalities. Granted, I would probably leave my card at all 20 places, but my best odds of getting a gig would probably be with the 1 bar who did register with SH. HarringtonLaw wrote: cueball wrote: And, on a side note, you're still doing it... omitting the mention of ODB KJs.... HarringtonLaw wrote: Safe Harbor venues are not required to hire certified operators. You should have added that they can hire ODB KJs or KJs that do not use SC material as well, without the fear of possibly being sued by SC if they hire someone other than this. Venues aren't required to hire redheads, either. If I didn't mention redheads in my explanation, does that mean I'm anti-ginger? As I said before, venues aren't required to hire certified KJs. That's not the point, and I believe you know it. The point is, SH (Safe Harbor) registered Venues have been informed by SC that if they hire a KJ, it should be a Certified KJ, or else they risk being sued if the KJ is operating with an illegal hard drive which has SC music on it. You yourself have admitted that SC has made very little mention about the ODB KJs, because there are so few of us around, and SC's focus has been mainly towards the Computerized KJs. If you really want to get technical about it, then maybe you should have SC tell all the Venues that they aren't required to hire ANYONE... PERIOD! Then there's no discrimination in your statement.
|
|
Top |
|
|
JoeChartreuse
|
Posted: Mon Apr 08, 2013 10:02 pm |
|
Joined: Wed Feb 07, 2007 1:12 pm Posts: 5046 Been Liked: 334 times
|
The Lone Ranger wrote: That would be a hard requirement to meet since currently there are only a little over 400 certified hosts nation wide. . With all due respect to you, Lone Ranger, I'm wondering about that "400" number. Jim Harrington has stated that the "certified" KJ site is reasonably up to date. That being the case, I note a grand total of 66 names (some dupe company/KJ) on the list. Even if we wanted to add the listed GEM users NOT on the certified list- hence, "UN-CERTIFIED", the total would only come to less than 150.. Looks like 66 is the number to me. Not that it matters. Due to a lack of any evidence to the contrary, I've come to believe that "Safe Harbor" is, like the KIAA, just another SC boogyman- a concept only- and any current list of venues would be VERY short indeed..... Teeny, even... I wouldn't waste too much time worrying about it...
_________________ "No Contests, No Divas, Just A Good Time!"
" Disc based and loving it..."
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 1:56 am |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
cueball wrote: But it would make it that much easier for a legit KJ (Certified, ODB, or KJs who don't use SC material) to be able to walk into places that have registered with SH, knowing ahead of time that these places are specifically looking for people like them. i do have to say though Cue, i doubt there is a venue in safe harbor without a certified host already there who pushed them to sign up. no room for us at these places, Athena is already there cueball wrote: Venues aren't required to hire redheads, either. If I didn't mention redheads in my explanation, does that mean I'm anti-ginger? i will eat your soul for this comment , especially as i am a certified ginger
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:36 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
JoeChartreuse wrote: The Lone Ranger wrote: That would be a hard requirement to meet since currently there are only a little over 400 certified hosts nation wide. . With all due respect to you, Lone Ranger, I'm wondering about that "400" number. Jim Harrington has stated that the "certified" KJ site is reasonably up to date. That being the case, I note a grand total of 66 names (some dupe company/KJ) on the list. Even if we wanted to add the listed GEM users NOT on the certified list- hence, "UN-CERTIFIED", the total would only come to less than 150.. Looks like 66 is the number to me. Not that it matters. Due to a lack of any evidence to the contrary, I've come to believe that "Safe Harbor" is, like the KIAA, just another SC boogyman- a concept only- and any current list of venues would be VERY short indeed..... Teeny, even... I wouldn't waste too much time worrying about it... I was being kind Joe and giving the certified hosts the fiat power of debate. Thunder said their are 410 certified hosts and counting on Free Forum Karaoke, I'm taking his number since to me how many certified hosts means little. Even allowing for their inflated number, still the overwhelming number of hosts in the industry are non certified. There is no way even this larger number could possibly meet the industry demand for hosts. Have a blessed day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Tue Apr 09, 2013 4:45 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: JoeChartreuse wrote: Part of the alleged worth is supposed to be about being eligible for hire at a Safe Harbor venue. Incorrect. A certified operator can be hired at ANY venue without fear of him or the venue being sued. There is nothing special about Safe Harbor venues in that regard. Safe Harbor venues are not required to hire certified operators. That's great news James, since the total number of certified hosts currently could never meet demand, of the venues. One thing these Safe Harbor's could also do is require the host they hire not to use the SC product, that would be another way to avoid a lawsuit, right? Have a legal day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 169 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|