|
View unanswered posts | View active topics
Author |
Message |
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 1:51 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: Paradigm Karaoke wrote: your right, but look at it in the context of how the Manus are doing it. now the police will pull YOU over because you are driving a car and MAY have been speeding SOMETIME in the ast so they take you to impound and dump your cars ECM to check if you went over the limit. if you did, pay a big fine, if you did not, just pay the impound fees and go on about your life. Um, no. The "police" are beset with a rash of stolen cars. They can't tell which cars are stolen without checking the registration. They know a lot of the cars that are speeding are stolen, and that's something they can see. So they pull you over because you were seen speeding. The "police" don't care as much about the speeding as they do about making sure your car wasn't stolen. They ask to see your license and registration, and if the registration you produce matches your car, you pay your speeding ticket (which might be waived) and move along. Currently SC is the only manu even checking the registration aka the audit. WWD/PR are just mass pulling everyone over without even a means to check the registration filling the court up with what might turn out to be bogus lawsuits. Tying business's up in court and forcing the drivers aka hosts to pay thousands in legal fees. That really isn't justice either if you think about it. Have a legal day.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:04 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
Bazza wrote: The Lone Ranger wrote: Still pretty pathetic numbers for four years work. Millions of people break the law speeding or running stop lights...you see them everyday. A tiny percentage are caught nationwide. Should they just stop trying? Let everyone break the law? What exactly constitutes a good number in your eyes? The Lone Ranger wrote: You really can't use a police analogy Bazza because the police deal with criminal activity Sure I can. That's why they call it an "analogy". But I will acquiesce if that makes you happy. Should ASCAP and BMI stop going to bars and venues that pay no royalties and cease threatening them to join? After all there are thousands of "public performances" that take place every day and pay no performance rights whatsoever. I am sure the percentage of people they catch isn't very high. How about movie companies? There are torrents available for every movie that exists the minute they hit DVD. Should they just give up? Stop trying to catch the criminals that give away their product for free? They catch one in a million.... literally. Should Nike, Apple, Prada & Rolex stop going after the people making knockoffs of their products? By your logic nobody is getting hurt...hey it isn't a REAL Rolex. So we should just let these thieves make copies of everything, right? In the case of knockoffs sold as originals there is an international effort conducted by police and government agencies, at least ASCAP and BMI are organized and do their work in a somewhat more efficient manner. Movie companies again seem to have their ducks in a row. It is only in the area of karaoke where the supposed enforcement is just as unorganized and fragmented as the pirates they are going after. Let's face it these manus are not professionals when it comes to trying to deal with this theft problem. That is why they hire investigators and lawyers to handle these situations for them. In the case of SC they hired APS and that was a disaster, because they did not oversee what their regulators were doing. When the manus hire employees to represent their interests they are responsible for the actions of those employees. Just like when the manus try and hold venues responsible for the actions of the hosts they hire. Bazza if you can tell the good guys from the bad guys that is more than the manus seem able to do.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:12 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
timberlea wrote: So how many police officers out there in relation to the population, not to mention they have officers in every state and territory? Compare that to two companies going against how many? They can't do it all but they will get what they can. Something is better than nothing. So what are you saying tim the manus have set themselves a task they don't have the resources to do? I guess they are in kinda of a bind they need money from sales of their products to fund their suits, yet the suits are supposed to drive sales. If there are not enough sales then they don't have the money needed for the suits. Seems like rather a flawed business model since both cylinders need to be working to make this car run.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:52 am |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: Um, no.
The "police" are beset with a rash of stolen cars. They can't tell which cars are stolen without checking the registration. They know a lot of the cars that are speeding are stolen, and that's something they can see. So they pull you over because you were seen speeding. The "police" don't care as much about the speeding as they do about making sure your car wasn't stolen. They ask to see your license and registration, and if the registration you produce matches your car, you pay your speeding ticket (which might be waived) and move along. that would be fine if the person was speeding, but they are only in possession of a car.
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:22 am |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
Paradigm Karaoke wrote: HarringtonLaw wrote: Um, no.
The "police" are beset with a rash of stolen cars. They can't tell which cars are stolen without checking the registration. They know a lot of the cars that are speeding are stolen, and that's something they can see. So they pull you over because you were seen speeding. The "police" don't care as much about the speeding as they do about making sure your car wasn't stolen. They ask to see your license and registration, and if the registration you produce matches your car, you pay your speeding ticket (which might be waived) and move along. that would be fine if the person was speeding, but they are only in possession of a car. "Unauthorized duplication ... is a violation of applicable laws."
|
|
Top |
|
|
doowhatchulike
|
Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:30 am |
|
|
Super Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:35 am Posts: 752 Images: 1 Been Liked: 73 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: Paradigm Karaoke wrote: HarringtonLaw wrote: Um, no.
The "police" are beset with a rash of stolen cars. They can't tell which cars are stolen without checking the registration. They know a lot of the cars that are speeding are stolen, and that's something they can see. So they pull you over because you were seen speeding. The "police" don't care as much about the speeding as they do about making sure your car wasn't stolen. They ask to see your license and registration, and if the registration you produce matches your car, you pay your speeding ticket (which might be waived) and move along. that would be fine if the person was speeding, but they are only in possession of a car. "Unauthorized duplication ... is a violation of applicable laws." It has been done before, and perhaps it should be done again: A legal statute that WOULD allow backups, but in a commercial setting...
|
|
Top |
|
|
Bazza
|
Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:37 am |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
The Lone Ranger wrote: Let's face it these manus are not professionals when it comes to trying to deal with this theft problem. That is why they hire investigators and lawyers to handle these situations for them. In the case of SC they hired APS and that was a disaster, because they did not oversee what their regulators were doing. When the manus hire employees to represent their interests they are responsible for the actions of those employees. Just like when the manus try and hold venues responsible for the actions of the hosts they hire. Bazza if you can tell the good guys from the bad guys that is more than the manus seem able to do. Actually it's pretty easy. We all know who they are and can spot them from a mile away. The POINT is that you keep saying they should stop or give up because their "numbers are pathetic" or they are "not professionals". My analogies above point out that the effort is still a valid one regardless of the number caught. Are you saying that IF Sound Choice spent millions hiring a large, professional piracy fighting firm, you would back them 100%? I think not.
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 6:00 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
Bazza wrote: The Lone Ranger wrote: Let's face it these manus are not professionals when it comes to trying to deal with this theft problem. That is why they hire investigators and lawyers to handle these situations for them. In the case of SC they hired APS and that was a disaster, because they did not oversee what their regulators were doing. When the manus hire employees to represent their interests they are responsible for the actions of those employees. Just like when the manus try and hold venues responsible for the actions of the hosts they hire. Bazza if you can tell the good guys from the bad guys that is more than the manus seem able to do. Actually it's pretty easy. We all know who they are and can spot them from a mile away. The POINT is that you keep saying they should stop or give up because their "numbers are pathetic" or they are "not professionals". My analogies above point out that the effort is still a valid one regardless of the number caught. Are you saying that IF Sound Choice spent millions hiring a large, professional piracy fighting firm, you would back them 100%? I think not. If my grandmother had a beard she would be my grandfather Bazza. The facts are these the manus do not have the resources to do a proper job with this legal process. It is not cost effective to do this on a mass scale or it would already have been done. These suits do not yield the type of settlements to have them continue, except to make a few examples and try to pressure hosts into either leasing GEM or subscribing to Cloud. They will never suppress even 10% of the piracy at the rate things are going. Oh by the way SC did hire a large professional piracy fighting firm remember APS. PR is supposed to be a company dedicated to fighting piracy exclusively and they have what two mass filed lawsuits, one filed with SC and the other WWD, oh and let's not forget that one suit where the host defaulted. Not much of a track record is it? If you are that good at spotting pirates why don't you stop hosting and sell your services to the manus they seem like they need all the help they can get?
Last edited by The Lone Ranger on Fri Jul 26, 2013 3:02 am, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Bazza
|
Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 6:09 am |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
OK, I'll make this simpler for you. Try to answer the question instead of rambling off. The Lone Ranger wrote: They will never suppress even 10% of the piracy at the rate things are going. Are you saying they should just stop then? Is 10% not better than 0%? What, exactly, is wrong with a 10% or even 2% reduction? What, exactly, would constitute a GOOD "track record"?
|
|
Top |
|
|
The Lone Ranger
|
Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 6:33 am |
|
|
Extreme Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am Posts: 6103 Been Liked: 634 times
|
Bazza wrote: OK, I'll make this simpler for you. Try to answer the question instead of rambling off. The Lone Ranger wrote: They will never suppress even 10% of the piracy at the rate things are going. Are you saying they should just stop then? Is 10% not better than 0%? What, exactly, is wrong with a 10% or even 2% reduction? What, exactly, would constitute a GOOD "track record"? Why not look at history for the answer Bazza? During the time of the Roman Republic the Mediterranean Sea was invested with pirates, to the point grain shipments were not coming to Italy. The Romans looked for someone to solve the problem they turned to Pompey. He had unlimited resources and the authority to do what needed to be done. He divided the Sea into districts and purged the pirates from each district, and to make sure they didn't come back he set up navel bases in each district. In less than a year he eliminated piracy and the Mediterranean became a Roman lake. Now that is a good track record in my book. The problem is the manus neither have the resources nor the type of authority to really make a dent in piracy. Their piecemeal approach will not work, much like the piecemeal approach tried before the Romans to deal with actual piracy. There is no overall plan and the process is divided at least between two manus and one of the manus is even divided more PR/WWD. Until you have some type of universal comprehensive program that includes all the manus the problem can't be solved, because the pirates merely escape into another district. That is why the summit tried to at least create the illusion of a united front. That is also the reason to eliminate supply, get rid of custom discs, foreign imports and try and get the publishers to do something about orphan brands. In this respect the manus are attempting to reduce the choices to two. Then the pirates and legal host will only have two ways to go.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Bazza
|
Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:46 am |
|
Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am Posts: 3312 Images: 0 Been Liked: 610 times
|
Bazza wrote: OK, I'll make this simpler for you. Try to answer the question instead of rambling off. The Lone Ranger wrote: During the time of the Roman Republic the Mediterranean Sea was invested with pirates, to the point grain shipments were not coming to Italy. The Romans looked for someone to............<snip> <Sigh>
|
|
Top |
|
|
Cueball
|
Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 1:22 pm |
|
Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm Posts: 4433 Location: New York City Been Liked: 757 times
|
Bazza wrote: OK, I'll make this simpler for you. Try to answer the question instead of rambling off. The Lone Ranger wrote: Why not look at history for the answer Bazza? During the time of the Roman Republic ... Bazza wrote: <Sigh> C'mon Bazza... You didn't see that coming?
|
|
Top |
|
|
Paradigm Karaoke
|
Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:22 pm |
|
Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm Posts: 5107 Location: Phoenix Az Been Liked: 1279 times
|
HarringtonLaw wrote: "Unauthorized duplication ... is a violation of applicable laws." as is unauthorized public performance, not one karaoke host in the world has that in writing either.are we going to be now sued for doing that as well?
_________________ Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens
Last edited by Paradigm Karaoke on Thu Jul 25, 2013 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Smoothedge69
|
Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:35 pm |
|
Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am Posts: 3885 Images: 0 Been Liked: 397 times
|
Paradigm Karaoke wrote: "Unauthorized duplication ... is a violation of applicable laws."
as is unauthorized public performance, not one karaoke host in the world has that in writing either.[/quote] Oh sure, open up THAT can of worms!! . Are you TRYING to kill Athena??
_________________ I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE
|
|
Top |
|
|
JimHarrington
|
Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:00 pm |
|
|
Extreme Poster |
|
Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am Posts: 3011 Been Liked: 1003 times
|
Paradigm Karaoke wrote: HarringtonLaw wrote: "Unauthorized duplication ... is a violation of applicable laws." as is unauthorized public performance, not one karaoke host in the world has that in writing either.are we going to be now sued for doing that as well? Whether you have it in writing or not, venues that pay their ASCAP/BMI/SESAC fees render the public performances of that material "authorized." There is no corresponding activity--other than getting permission--that allows you to make otherwise unauthorized copies.
|
|
Top |
|
|
kjathena
|
Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:04 pm |
|
|
Super Plus Poster |
|
Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:51 pm Posts: 1636 Been Liked: 73 times
|
_________________ "Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain." Unknown "if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters." Lee McGuffey
|
|
Top |
|
|
Alex
|
Posted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 9:14 pm |
|
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:40 am Posts: 1094 Songs: 1 Location: West Palm Beach, FL Been Liked: 53 times
|
If you feel "threatened" by the manufacturers even though you're legal, you always have the option to be pro-active and go through with a voluntary audit and get your certificate.
I did it, just because I knew they are very active here in Florida and I just didn't want to risk to have my company name involved in a legal matter.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Alex
|
Posted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 10:43 am |
|
Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:40 am Posts: 1094 Songs: 1 Location: West Palm Beach, FL Been Liked: 53 times
|
I'm not worried about any manufacturer, as I am 100% 1:1.
|
|
Top |
|
|
Who is online |
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 107 guests |
|
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot post attachments in this forum
|
|