KARAOKE SCENE MAGAZINE ONLINE! - Tightening The Noose? Public Forums Karaoke Discussions Karaoke Legalities & Piracy, etc... Karaoke Scene's Karaoke Forums Home | Contact Us | Site Map  

Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene Karaoke Forums

Karaoke Scene

   
  * Login
  * Register

  * FAQ
  * Search

Custom Search

Social Networks


premium-member

Offsite Links


It is currently Fri Jan 10, 2025 3:00 pm

All times are UTC - 8 hours




Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 155 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next
Author Message
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 1:51 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am
Posts: 6103
Been Liked: 634 times
HarringtonLaw wrote:
Paradigm Karaoke wrote:
your right, but look at it in the context of how the Manus are doing it.
now the police will pull YOU over because you are driving a car and MAY have been speeding SOMETIME in the ast so they take you to impound and dump your cars ECM to check if you went over the limit. if you did, pay a big fine, if you did not, just pay the impound fees and go on about your life.


Um, no.

The "police" are beset with a rash of stolen cars. They can't tell which cars are stolen without checking the registration. They know a lot of the cars that are speeding are stolen, and that's something they can see. So they pull you over because you were seen speeding. The "police" don't care as much about the speeding as they do about making sure your car wasn't stolen. They ask to see your license and registration, and if the registration you produce matches your car, you pay your speeding ticket (which might be waived) and move along.



8) Currently SC is the only manu even checking the registration aka the audit. WWD/PR are just mass pulling everyone over without even a means to check the registration filling the court up with what might turn out to be bogus lawsuits. Tying business's up in court and forcing the drivers aka hosts to pay thousands in legal fees. That really isn't justice either if you think about it. Have a legal day.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:04 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am
Posts: 6103
Been Liked: 634 times
Bazza wrote:
The Lone Ranger wrote:
Still pretty pathetic numbers for four years work.


Millions of people break the law speeding or running stop lights...you see them everyday. A tiny percentage are caught nationwide. Should they just stop trying? Let everyone break the law? What exactly constitutes a good number in your eyes?

The Lone Ranger wrote:
You really can't use a police analogy Bazza because the police deal with criminal activity


Sure I can. That's why they call it an "analogy". But I will acquiesce if that makes you happy.

Should ASCAP and BMI stop going to bars and venues that pay no royalties and cease threatening them to join? After all there are thousands of "public performances" that take place every day and pay no performance rights whatsoever. I am sure the percentage of people they catch isn't very high.

How about movie companies? There are torrents available for every movie that exists the minute they hit DVD. Should they just give up? Stop trying to catch the criminals that give away their product for free? They catch one in a million....literally.

Should Nike, Apple, Prada & Rolex stop going after the people making knockoffs of their products? By your logic nobody is getting hurt...hey it isn't a REAL Rolex. So we should just let these thieves make copies of everything, right? :roll:


8) In the case of knockoffs sold as originals there is an international effort conducted by police and government agencies, at least ASCAP and BMI are organized and do their work in a somewhat more efficient manner. Movie companies again seem to have their ducks in a row. It is only in the area of karaoke where the supposed enforcement is just as unorganized and fragmented as the pirates they are going after. Let's face it these manus are not professionals when it comes to trying to deal with this theft problem. That is why they hire investigators and lawyers to handle these situations for them. In the case of SC they hired APS and that was a disaster, because they did not oversee what their regulators were doing. When the manus hire employees to represent their interests they are responsible for the actions of those employees. Just like when the manus try and hold venues responsible for the actions of the hosts they hire. Bazza if you can tell the good guys from the bad guys that is more than the manus seem able to do.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:12 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am
Posts: 6103
Been Liked: 634 times
timberlea wrote:
So how many police officers out there in relation to the population, not to mention they have officers in every state and territory? Compare that to two companies going against how many? They can't do it all but they will get what they can. Something is better than nothing.


8) So what are you saying tim the manus have set themselves a task they don't have the resources to do? I guess they are in kinda of a bind they need money from sales of their products to fund their suits, yet the suits are supposed to drive sales. If there are not enough sales then they don't have the money needed for the suits. Seems like rather a flawed business model since both cylinders need to be working to make this car run.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 2:52 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm
Posts: 5107
Location: Phoenix Az
Been Liked: 1279 times
HarringtonLaw wrote:
Um, no.

The "police" are beset with a rash of stolen cars. They can't tell which cars are stolen without checking the registration. They know a lot of the cars that are speeding are stolen, and that's something they can see. So they pull you over because you were seen speeding. The "police" don't care as much about the speeding as they do about making sure your car wasn't stolen. They ask to see your license and registration, and if the registration you produce matches your car, you pay your speeding ticket (which might be waived) and move along.

that would be fine if the person was speeding, but they are only in possession of a car.

_________________
Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:22 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am
Posts: 3011
Been Liked: 1003 times
Paradigm Karaoke wrote:
HarringtonLaw wrote:
Um, no.

The "police" are beset with a rash of stolen cars. They can't tell which cars are stolen without checking the registration. They know a lot of the cars that are speeding are stolen, and that's something they can see. So they pull you over because you were seen speeding. The "police" don't care as much about the speeding as they do about making sure your car wasn't stolen. They ask to see your license and registration, and if the registration you produce matches your car, you pay your speeding ticket (which might be waived) and move along.

that would be fine if the person was speeding, but they are only in possession of a car.


"Unauthorized duplication ... is a violation of applicable laws."


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:30 am 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster

Joined: Wed Sep 21, 2011 8:35 am
Posts: 752
Images: 1
Been Liked: 73 times
HarringtonLaw wrote:
Paradigm Karaoke wrote:
HarringtonLaw wrote:
Um, no.

The "police" are beset with a rash of stolen cars. They can't tell which cars are stolen without checking the registration. They know a lot of the cars that are speeding are stolen, and that's something they can see. So they pull you over because you were seen speeding. The "police" don't care as much about the speeding as they do about making sure your car wasn't stolen. They ask to see your license and registration, and if the registration you produce matches your car, you pay your speeding ticket (which might be waived) and move along.

that would be fine if the person was speeding, but they are only in possession of a car.


"Unauthorized duplication ... is a violation of applicable laws."


It has been done before, and perhaps it should be done again: A legal statute that WOULD allow backups, but in a commercial setting...


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:37 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am
Posts: 3312
Images: 0
Been Liked: 610 times
The Lone Ranger wrote:
Let's face it these manus are not professionals when it comes to trying to deal with this theft problem. That is why they hire investigators and lawyers to handle these situations for them. In the case of SC they hired APS and that was a disaster, because they did not oversee what their regulators were doing. When the manus hire employees to represent their interests they are responsible for the actions of those employees. Just like when the manus try and hold venues responsible for the actions of the hosts they hire. Bazza if you can tell the good guys from the bad guys that is more than the manus seem able to do.


Actually it's pretty easy. We all know who they are and can spot them from a mile away.

The POINT is that you keep saying they should stop or give up because their "numbers are pathetic" or they are "not professionals". My analogies above point out that the effort is still a valid one regardless of the number caught.

Are you saying that IF Sound Choice spent millions hiring a large, professional piracy fighting firm, you would back them 100%? I think not.


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 6:00 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am
Posts: 6103
Been Liked: 634 times
Bazza wrote:
The Lone Ranger wrote:
Let's face it these manus are not professionals when it comes to trying to deal with this theft problem. That is why they hire investigators and lawyers to handle these situations for them. In the case of SC they hired APS and that was a disaster, because they did not oversee what their regulators were doing. When the manus hire employees to represent their interests they are responsible for the actions of those employees. Just like when the manus try and hold venues responsible for the actions of the hosts they hire. Bazza if you can tell the good guys from the bad guys that is more than the manus seem able to do.


Actually it's pretty easy. We all know who they are and can spot them from a mile away.

The POINT is that you keep saying they should stop or give up because their "numbers are pathetic" or they are "not professionals". My analogies above point out that the effort is still a valid one regardless of the number caught.

Are you saying that IF Sound Choice spent millions hiring a large, professional piracy fighting firm, you would back them 100%? I think not.


8) If my grandmother had a beard she would be my grandfather Bazza. The facts are these the manus do not have the resources to do a proper job with this legal process. It is not cost effective to do this on a mass scale or it would already have been done. These suits do not yield the type of settlements to have them continue, except to make a few examples and try to pressure hosts into either leasing GEM or subscribing to Cloud. They will never suppress even 10% of the piracy at the rate things are going. Oh by the way SC did hire a large professional piracy fighting firm remember APS. PR is supposed to be a company dedicated to fighting piracy exclusively and they have what two mass filed lawsuits, one filed with SC and the other WWD, oh and let's not forget that one suit where the host defaulted. Not much of a track record is it? If you are that good at spotting pirates why don't you stop hosting and sell your services to the manus they seem like they need all the help they can get?


Last edited by The Lone Ranger on Fri Jul 26, 2013 3:02 am, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 6:09 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am
Posts: 3312
Images: 0
Been Liked: 610 times
OK, I'll make this simpler for you. Try to answer the question instead of rambling off.

The Lone Ranger wrote:
They will never suppress even 10% of the piracy at the rate things are going.


Are you saying they should just stop then? Is 10% not better than 0%?

What, exactly, is wrong with a 10% or even 2% reduction?

What, exactly, would constitute a GOOD "track record"?


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 6:33 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am
Posts: 6103
Been Liked: 634 times
Bazza wrote:
OK, I'll make this simpler for you. Try to answer the question instead of rambling off.

The Lone Ranger wrote:
They will never suppress even 10% of the piracy at the rate things are going.


Are you saying they should just stop then? Is 10% not better than 0%?

What, exactly, is wrong with a 10% or even 2% reduction?

What, exactly, would constitute a GOOD "track record"?


8) Why not look at history for the answer Bazza? During the time of the Roman Republic the Mediterranean Sea was invested with pirates, to the point grain shipments were not coming to Italy. The Romans looked for someone to solve the problem they turned to Pompey. He had unlimited resources and the authority to do what needed to be done. He divided the Sea into districts and purged the pirates from each district, and to make sure they didn't come back he set up navel bases in each district. In less than a year he eliminated piracy and the Mediterranean became a Roman lake. Now that is a good track record in my book. The problem is the manus neither have the resources nor the type of authority to really make a dent in piracy. Their piecemeal approach will not work, much like the piecemeal approach tried before the Romans to deal with actual piracy. There is no overall plan and the process is divided at least between two manus and one of the manus is even divided more PR/WWD. Until you have some type of universal comprehensive program that includes all the manus the problem can't be solved, because the pirates merely escape into another district. That is why the summit tried to at least create the illusion of a united front. That is also the reason to eliminate supply, get rid of custom discs, foreign imports and try and get the publishers to do something about orphan brands. In this respect the manus are attempting to reduce the choices to two. Then the pirates and legal host will only have two ways to go.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 8:46 am 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Mon Nov 24, 2008 8:00 am
Posts: 3312
Images: 0
Been Liked: 610 times
Bazza wrote:
OK, I'll make this simpler for you. Try to answer the question instead of rambling off.


The Lone Ranger wrote:
During the time of the Roman Republic the Mediterranean Sea was invested with pirates, to the point grain shipments were not coming to Italy. The Romans looked for someone to............<snip>


<Sigh>



Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 9:47 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am
Posts: 6103
Been Liked: 634 times
8) Sorry if you don't like the answer Bazza but that is what it would take to make the karaoke legal process effective. Minus an overall plan, the resources to carry it out and the authority needed to make it work, there is little chance the current solution will succeed. That is just the cold hard truth. This current process does more harm than good to the industry as a whole, and is only designed to help the current sales of two floundering manus. You really have a short attention span don't you?


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 1:22 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sat Oct 20, 2001 6:55 pm
Posts: 4433
Location: New York City
Been Liked: 757 times
Bazza wrote:
OK, I'll make this simpler for you. Try to answer the question instead of rambling off.
The Lone Ranger wrote:
Why not look at history for the answer Bazza? During the time of the Roman Republic ...
Bazza wrote:
<Sigh>

C'mon Bazza... You didn't see that coming? :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao: :rotflmao:


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:22 pm 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster
User avatar

Joined: Thu Aug 12, 2010 6:24 pm
Posts: 5107
Location: Phoenix Az
Been Liked: 1279 times
HarringtonLaw wrote:
"Unauthorized duplication ... is a violation of applicable laws."

as is unauthorized public performance, not one karaoke host in the world has that in writing either.are we going to be now sued for doing that as well?

_________________
Paradigm Karaoke, The New Standard.......Shift Happens


Last edited by Paradigm Karaoke on Thu Jul 25, 2013 6:12 pm, edited 1 time in total.

Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 5:35 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster
User avatar

Joined: Sun Dec 19, 2004 2:55 am
Posts: 3885
Images: 0
Been Liked: 397 times
Paradigm Karaoke wrote:

"Unauthorized duplication ... is a violation of applicable laws."

as is unauthorized public performance, not one karaoke host in the world has that in writing either.[/quote]
Oh sure, open up THAT can of worms!! LOL. Are you TRYING to kill Athena?? :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen: :mrgreen:

_________________
I am the ONLY SANE 1 HERE


Top
 Profile Personal album Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:00 pm 
Offline
Extreme Poster
Extreme Poster

Joined: Wed Aug 03, 2011 8:59 am
Posts: 3011
Been Liked: 1003 times
Paradigm Karaoke wrote:
HarringtonLaw wrote:
"Unauthorized duplication ... is a violation of applicable laws."

as is unauthorized public performance, not one karaoke host in the world has that in writing either.are we going to be now sued for doing that as well?


Whether you have it in writing or not, venues that pay their ASCAP/BMI/SESAC fees render the public performances of that material "authorized."

There is no corresponding activity--other than getting permission--that allows you to make otherwise unauthorized copies.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 7:04 pm 
Offline
Super Plus Poster
Super Plus Poster

Joined: Tue Jun 15, 2010 3:51 pm
Posts: 1636
Been Liked: 73 times
:wave: :wave: Yes please try not to kill Athena or make her head explode. She needs it :wave: :wave:

_________________
"Integrity is choosing your thoughts, words and actions based on your principles and values rather than for your personal gain."
Unknown
"if a man has integrity, nothing else matters, If a man has no integrity, nothing else matters."
Lee McGuffey


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Thu Jul 25, 2013 9:14 pm 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:40 am
Posts: 1094
Songs: 1
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Been Liked: 53 times
If you feel "threatened" by the manufacturers even though you're legal, you always have the option to be pro-active and go through with a voluntary audit and get your certificate.

I did it, just because I knew they are very active here in Florida and I just didn't want to risk to have my company name involved in a legal matter.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 2:59 am 
Offline
Extreme Plus Poster
Extreme Plus Poster

Joined: Fri Jun 17, 2011 8:22 am
Posts: 6103
Been Liked: 634 times
8) Seems that the manus for some reason really like Florida, there are other states as well, oh that's right they have tried other states and things have not gone so well. You were proactive but really only one manu currently has an auditing system in place SC. If you have CB certification it has expired and needs to be renewed, oh that's right CB has no system in place since CB no longer exists. Well we are told that CB certification will be coming to a city near you some day.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
PostPosted: Fri Jul 26, 2013 10:43 am 
Offline
Super Poster
Super Poster
User avatar

Joined: Tue Jan 22, 2008 10:40 am
Posts: 1094
Songs: 1
Location: West Palm Beach, FL
Been Liked: 53 times
I'm not worried about any manufacturer, as I am 100% 1:1.


Top
 Profile Singer's Showcase Profile 
 
Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 155 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5 ... 8  Next

All times are UTC - 8 hours


Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 121 guests


You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group

Privacy Policy | Anti-Spam Policy | Acceptable Use Policy Copyright © Karaoke Scene Magazine
design & hosting by Cross Web Tech